About ads - I don't know, who is going to pay for it.

I mean there need to be some consensus, because it can't be just one person, it would be unfair for this person to pay all expenses.
@gavarillo already helped us immense for example, with giving some donation to @barry, for his pool work.

If it's like 100USD, it's not a problem, but I think such "campaign" wouldn't do anything - it would need to be thousands of dollars to get the system going probably.

About exchanges - I thought about crypto-bridge - it's a decentralized exchange (but they charge a fee...) - it was 1BTC till recently. Now it's 2BTC - lol.
Fees are going higher, even tho crypto won't probably pump for whole year, so it's really amusing situation.

I would just like to have a better liquidity in the market - price doesn't matter so much, if liquidity is good enough, and there are daily trades.
For now we are one of the most unliquid assets, as I have seen, even on freiexchange.

There are sometimes some peak vols - but then later it flattens out.

Besides - about signature campaign - we can't really fight with those shitcoins, that are being creatted out of thin air, and airdropped to people, and have "value" on exchanges.
Sorry, but such coins as Semux, are killing whole purpose - and it's not even this (cause project I consider quite interesting).

But a lot of coins and tokens that are created within one click (ETH/Waves tokens), or genesis block (own blockchain), is hard to "compete".

I can make an address, where I will put everything that I have mined - but this still won't be enough.

It's really saddening, that centralized craps, and centralized distribution is the way to go here, and it became full of scams, and useless crap.

I just wanted to access ACME (http://tessier.bel-epa.com:5064) to know if I could find keliokan's problem, but it didn't work, is it currently offline? (minkiz.co works again).

Too little info and therefore confusing. Which explorer and which wallets?
Cheers

Graham

Yes, if there is failure in tx, they won't be sent.

So nothing to worry about, only preserve your wallet, and priv keys to coins.
Tho, it's very hard to make it break (I couldn't do it with numerous restarts of my PC), and I make numerous backups.


Besides I'm thinking about sig campaign - I have 50K SLM which was given to me for promotion, and some campaigns.

Maybe someone could think about right proportions of it ? And good design of it - more advanced, then my current sig .

Hi guys

I am a bit worried

I just made a big transaction to one of my other wallet.
I got a warning message saying that my transaction was rejected (something about coins already spent).
And i lost my coins, they disappeared from my wallet....

I do not understand ...

K.

Well no. He was contacing with me 2 days ago.

When the pool submits what it thinks is a valid block, the daemon gives the nod because preliminary checks pass - then has an Exception error; while giving a stack dump (while continuing to run).
Basically the same thing that was happening years ago - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=613213.3995;wap.

Anyway; i've started writing a pool from scratch that gets around this by using some getwork trickery; stay tuned.

james

@barrysty1e - why you didn't respond to me?
I have sent you a few messages here and on discord.
Please respond to me about a pool and to a community.

We have done what you've asked (sent BTC & SLM), it wasn't much, but you must know, that we do our job for free normally. It's not the way you should treat us.

Barry didn't respond to me for over the week, and over 2 weeks ago, pool should be running (it's not his resposibility to be running on his server/vpn, but he should give us at least code of it, which we didn't receive). Sorry Barry, but it's more than 2 weeks now, without anything.

I recently came across the GPU solo-mining code (not the stratum gpu miner @ https://github.com/JonnyLatte/slimminerGPU); this will not work against the pool due to differences in getwork/stratum work format and byteswapping of the nonces (and several other fields).

Even when the daemon had died, while the stratum was still up; it will still return valid hashes as it keeps the last blocktemplate in memory.
More than happy to do some testing if you like.

anyway

I'm writing a small patch to allow the block to be submitted using getwork; will post back on my results in an hour.

james

Seems pool it is not finding blocks?

I think they were probably testing or something 

Yes it's open-source.
It can still have errors, pool is still being debugged, will be up in several hours, so treat it as testnet.

minerd.exe -o stratum+tcp://206.189.86.177:3032 -u (slimcoin address) -p pass —hashtable 5 -s 20 -t (threads number)

Getting started is wrong.

We have pool!
http://206.189.86.177