I was looking at starting a new thread instead of re-activating the old one |
|
|
|
i saw slight increase in the prices of blocknet
is this coin added to azure or not yet
any progress
thanks
Its not on azure yet but it will be shortly. Then I will be building out the templates for a full-stack "blocknet dx node" push-button deployment for XC/BTC. |
|
|
|
|
Excellent Idea and would be great to get on-board, how does one get an invite?
Thanks
Dan
|
|
|
|
Your clearly missing the fact the ITO was never a security or presented as one, no shares were issued during the ITO, it was crowd funding for the software You might forget that I was one of the concerned individuals which suggested you reconsider your terminology to it's current version. Your words and figures have changed over time to fit your perceived needs of the moment. No, now your just lying.... but since you think that LTC or BTC or XC is a financial security or financial instrument , I really don't care |
|
|
|
2/1/2011
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 4813
$14,039.46
1/2/2013
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 5922
$4,485.43
2/4/2014
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (federal) serial #981157214
$67,531.52
5/8/2014
XCurrency launched
10/15/2014
BlockNet announced
Virtual tokens are not securities, your NOT AN INVESTOR IN A COMPANY, you don't receive shares, voting rights or dividends YOUR NOT BUYING SHARES OF A COMPANY, it is not a security You understand that BlockNet Inc is US C-CORPORATION, you understand how corporate law works? |
|
|
|
Your clearly missing the fact the ITO was never a security or presented as one, no shares were issued during the ITO, it was crowd funding for the software |
|
|
|
Submit a complaint about Dan Metcalf, atcsecure, ATC Solutions LLC (ID # 001068271) Consider referencing lien BK:44055 Pg. 97 Although this site appears to only cover complaints on IRS agents or people impersonating IRS agents, I have been assured that this is the correct place to file a complaint thru the online form. http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/contact_report.shtmlThis "superpriority" protects the purchaser or the holder of a security interest in a "security" who at the time of purchase or at the time the security interest came into existence did not have actual notice or knowledge of the existence of the federal tax lien. IRC § 6323(b)(1). The Code defines securities to include money, stock, bonds, debentures, notes, negotiable instruments, and various other types of interests. IRC § 6323(h)(4) . A subsequent holder of a security interest is also protected if the prior holder did not have actual notice or knowledge at the time the security interest came into existence. An illustration of the intent of this paragraph is the case where "P" , without actual notice or knowledge of the existence of a tax lien, purchases a security from "T" , the taxpayer, after a notice of lien has been filed. "P" is protected under the provisions of this paragraph. If "P" thereafter sells the security to "C" , who at the time of such sale has actual knowledge of the existence of the lien, "C" is also protected against the tax lien. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6323(b)-1(a)(2), Examples (1) and (2). 1st - Blocknet Inc is it own US Corporation which does not have any liens on it 2nd - the ITO was not a security |
|
|
|
So then whats your deal? I like how your implying I've done something wrong or illegal when I haven't....
Dan, you've already said that you do not want to discuss open information. Feel free to continue with your "development" and I will do the same. what the tax lien? you don't know anything about it or what ever arrangements I've made to deal with that, your acting like you found a body buried in my back yard |
|
|
|
PRETENDING?? Seriously? You have used xchat, I was using it with you...you helped me identify one of the bugs....
what because there was a bug its not a real product? Have you ever developed software before? Software requires testing to work out the bugs, that doesn't make it any less legit
keep spreading your lies....
Yes, I've worked for software companies Dan. I understand how it works. I'd like to thank you for getting me more deeply involved in understanding finance, government, and legal. So then whats your deal? I like how your implying I've done something wrong or illegal when I haven't.... |
|
|
|
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha. You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility. Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting. I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted. Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least. Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp. You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel. By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof. And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands. Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit. I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team. Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD" But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life. Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc" So stupid. If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers) Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth".. As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes? These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments. I haven't created any financial instruments, the IRS has ruled that virtual currencies are property not financial instruments. As for the tax lien, its none of your business No problem Dan. You keep pretending you make legit software products and I'll keep relaying the important info. PRETENDING?? Seriously? You have used xchat, I was using it with you...you helped me identify one of the bugs.... what because there was a bug its not a real product? Have you ever developed software before? Software requires testing to work out the bugs, that doesn't make it any less legit keep spreading your lies.... |
|
|
|
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha. You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility. Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting. I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted. Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least. Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp. You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel. By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof. And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands. Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit. I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team. Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD" But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life. Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc" So stupid. If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers) Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth".. As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes? These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments. I haven't created any financial instruments, the IRS has ruled that virtual currencies are property not financial instruments. As for the tax lien, its none of your business |
|
|
|
And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.
It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha. You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility. Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting. I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted. Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least. Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp. You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel. By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof. And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands. Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit. I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team. Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD" But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life. Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc" So stupid. If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers) Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth".. As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it |
|
|
|
so nothing is open sourced for xbridge? Doesn't looks like much has bene done in 2 months. its all open sourced, that piece of xbridge is completed for now We are working on the next phase currently - which is at https://github.com/atcsecure/xhubv2/AFAIK, xhub != xbridge? XHub is the P2P client for the XBridge. right ok... that's what I thought. and the xbridge repo is where? XHub is part of the XBridge. It's the core. We'll start on other aspects of the XBridge after the core is done. Everything - including wallets, Xhub/XBridge, etc. will be in here: https://github.com/atcsecure?tab=repositoriesBut, "XBridge is the foundation of Blocknet" ... Yet Xhub is the core but is the client to Xbridge. How can you build something without a foundation? How long will you guys chase your tail? Lol, I really needed that laugh XHUB is just that ---- the HUB that connects nodes we have both XHUB and XBRIDGE So we have the foundation and the network and we have working clients with cross-chain messaging available for testing and the foundation is closed sourced. Got it now, thanks. NOTHING IS CLOSED SOURCE its all on GITHUB PUT DOWN WHATEVER YOUR SMOKING XHUB - https://github.com/atcsecure/xhub & https://github.com/atcsecure/xhubv2XBridge Wallet Code - https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknet/tree/xbridge-qt5 |
|
|
|
so nothing is open sourced for xbridge? Doesn't looks like much has bene done in 2 months. its all open sourced, that piece of xbridge is completed for now We are working on the next phase currently - which is at https://github.com/atcsecure/xhubv2/AFAIK, xhub != xbridge? XHub is the P2P client for the XBridge. right ok... that's what I thought. and the xbridge repo is where? XHub is part of the XBridge. It's the core. We'll start on other aspects of the XBridge after the core is done. Everything - including wallets, Xhub/XBridge, etc. will be in here: https://github.com/atcsecure?tab=repositoriesBut, "XBridge is the foundation of Blocknet" ... Yet Xhub is the core but is the client to Xbridge. How can you build something without a foundation? How long will you guys chase your tail? Lol, I really needed that laugh XHUB is just that ---- the HUB that connects nodes we have both XHUB and XBRIDGE So we have the foundation and the network and we have working clients with cross-chain messaging available for testing |
|
|
|
so nothing is open sourced for xbridge? Doesn't looks like much has bene done in 2 months. its all open sourced, that piece of xbridge is completed for now We are working on the next phase currently - which is at https://github.com/atcsecure/xhubv2/ |
|
|
|
Can you feel the walls closing in bobby  yeah.. them glass windows in my penthouse 30+ stories up really feels tight! Dont you get it??? I could care less... You guys think you know me... but none of you really do!  I can say with confidence. I do. This will be my last post. The world now knows what you did and have done. I ask the crypto community to either side with a scamming looser or with developers who CARE about the future of crypto-currency. I choose Crypto. Bye everyone, hope what I have said helps clear the air re:zimebeck. None of you guys care about crypto.. you all just care about making money... Its ok.. blocknet chats... they coming... bitswift chats.. they coming.... Blocknet chats? Blocknet has nothing to hide,and is not a scam. The funds are held in secured escrow'd accounts and the address's public. The alpha prototype client can be compiled from github... so don't bring blocknet in this shit storm and Bitswift was saved by Paul and he's actively developing the features some of which are ALREADY available in the v2 wallet Dan |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
