XCurrency (XC) BlockNet community thread

[slapper]

how have these dirt bags just managed to sneak off without any real fuss?

Awww so you are playing persecuted scumbag now? They managed it because of phags like you. Remember you sucking Dan and other marketing insiders scumbag's dicks for months and now suddenly you are ready to speak on behalf of society? Go back to another shitcoin.

Not really sure what your trying to say here or why your mad but your misspellings are cute.  Have another beer.   

Wasn't meant for you. I appreciate what you have done. Enjoyed the Corona and ready for some real drinks now. Enjoy.

[cryptohunter]

how have these dirt bags just managed to sneak off without any real fuss?

Awww so you are playing persecuted scumbag now? They managed it because of phags like you. Remember you sucking Dan and other marketing insiders scumbag's dicks for months and now suddenly you are ready to speak on behalf of society? Go back to another shitcoin.

Not really sure what your trying to say here or why your mad but your misspellings are cute.  Have another beer.  

Wasn't meant for you. I appreciate what you have done. Enjoyed the Corona and ready for some real drinks now. Enjoy.

hehe slapper is back, always good for some fun. This guy is obsessed with "phags" and sucking cock. I have never seen this fool even attempt to put his point across without swearing or some kind of childlike remarks.  His "real drink"  is probably ginger ale since he's obviously 12yrs old with an unhealthy/over powering fascination/obsession with other males genitals.

Yes, at one point in time you may have a valid point, however since you find  it impossible to express yourself in adult terms most will assume it is invalid before getting through half of your "phag"/ "salad tossing" remarks.

My point is how has this just been forgotten here? not if XC had at some point some seemingly good development behind it. I hold and therefore support over 200 coins in reasonable quantities of course some will go bad. The question is when the developer is known then IF it was a scam it should be fully investigated and not be forgotten about if they pull the threads from here. Having said that i see a bit of discussion coming back to their threads so i will still wait and see for now.

slapper try to read, comprehend and then reply in a half sensible manner then people may have some clue to whom you're refering to and what your point is.

[URSAY]

Do you have interesting info about Dan Metcalf, Arlyn Culwick, XC, BlockNet, or related?  Feel free to PM me.  I'll be making a few more calls today. 

[URSAY]

Just changed one word from atcsecure AKA Dan Metcalf's last post... 

NOTHING IS CLOSED SOURCE its all on plymouthdeeds.org


PUT DOWN WHATEVER YOUR SMOKING

[atcsecure]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth"..

 As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else

If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it

[URSAY]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth"..

 As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else

If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it

Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes?  These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments.

[atcsecure]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth"..

 As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else

If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it

Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes?  These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments.

I haven't created any financial instruments,  the IRS has ruled that virtual currencies are property not financial instruments.  

As for the tax lien, its none of your business

[URSAY]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth"..

 As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else

If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it

Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes?  These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments.

I haven't created any financial instruments,  the IRS has ruled that virtual currencies are property not financial instruments.  

As for the tax lien, its none of your business

No problem Dan.  You keep pretending you make legit software products and I'll keep relaying the important info.

[atcsecure]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

Whats stupid is the expectation that I need to answer to bogus FUD.....Just because somebody says something doesn't make it true and that certainly doesn't mean I need to respond, you wonder why I'm rude at times? its because of the absurd and unfounded LIES that are posted as "truth"..

 As for the scumbag who stole hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believed him at first when he said he was issuing refunds.. he was a master manipulator trying to get me to fund his exchange project, I was fooled just like everyone else

If you have a legit question go ahead ask it and I will answer it

Are you saying the tax lien docs found at plymouthdeeds.org under the name Dan Metcalf are fakes?  These liens pre-date your creation of multiple crypto financial instruments.

I haven't created any financial instruments,  the IRS has ruled that virtual currencies are property not financial instruments.  

As for the tax lien, its none of your business

No problem Dan.  You keep pretending you make legit software products and I'll keep relaying the important info.

PRETENDING?? Seriously?  You have used xchat, I was using it with you...you helped me identify one of the bugs....


what because there was a bug its not a real product?  Have you ever developed software before?  Software requires testing to work out the bugs, that doesn't make it any less legit

keep spreading your lies....

[URSAY]

PRETENDING?? Seriously?  You have used xchat, I was using it with you...you helped me identify one of the bugs....


what because there was a bug its not a real product?  Have you ever developed software before?  Software requires testing to work out the bugs, that doesn't make it any less legit

keep spreading your lies....

Yes, I've worked for software companies Dan.  I understand how it works.

I'd like to thank you for getting me more deeply involved in understanding finance, government, and legal.

[atcsecure]

PRETENDING?? Seriously?  You have used xchat, I was using it with you...you helped me identify one of the bugs....


what because there was a bug its not a real product?  Have you ever developed software before?  Software requires testing to work out the bugs, that doesn't make it any less legit

keep spreading your lies....

Yes, I've worked for software companies Dan.  I understand how it works.

I'd like to thank you for getting me more deeply involved in understanding finance, government, and legal.

So then whats your deal? I like how your implying I've done something wrong or illegal when I haven't....

[URSAY]

So then whats your deal? I like how your implying I've done something wrong or illegal when I haven't....

Dan, you've already said that you do not want to discuss open information.  Feel free to continue with your "development" and I will do the same.

[atcsecure]

So then whats your deal? I like how your implying I've done something wrong or illegal when I haven't....

Dan, you've already said that you do not want to discuss open information.  Feel free to continue with your "development" and I will do the same.

what the tax lien? you don't know anything about it or what ever arrangements I've made to deal with that, your acting like you found a body buried in my back yard

[URSAY]

Submit a complaint about Dan Metcalf, atcsecure, ATC Solutions LLC (ID # 001068271), BlockNet Inc. (ID # 001152206)

Consider referencing lien BK:44055 Pg. 97

Although this site appears to only cover complaints on IRS agents or people impersonating IRS agents, I have been assured that this is the correct place to file a complaint thru the online form.

http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/contact_report.shtml

This "superpriority" protects the purchaser or the holder of a security interest in a "security" who at the time of purchase or at the time the security interest came into existence did not have actual notice or knowledge of the existence of the federal tax lien. IRC § 6323(b)(1). The Code defines securities to include money, stock, bonds, debentures, notes, negotiable instruments, and various other types of interests. IRC § 6323(h)(4) .

A subsequent holder of a security interest is also protected if the prior holder did not have actual notice or knowledge at the time the security interest came into existence. An illustration of the intent of this paragraph is the case where "P" , without actual notice or knowledge of the existence of a tax lien, purchases a security from "T" , the taxpayer, after a notice of lien has been filed. "P" is protected under the provisions of this paragraph. If "P" thereafter sells the security to "C" , who at the time of such sale has actual knowledge of the existence of the lien, "C" is also protected against the tax lien. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6323(b)-1(a)(2), Examples (1) and (2).

[atcsecure]

Submit a complaint about Dan Metcalf, atcsecure, ATC Solutions LLC (ID # 001068271)

Consider referencing lien BK:44055 Pg. 97

Although this site appears to only cover complaints on IRS agents or people impersonating IRS agents, I have been assured that this is the correct place to file a complaint thru the online form.

http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/contact_report.shtml

This "superpriority" protects the purchaser or the holder of a security interest in a "security" who at the time of purchase or at the time the security interest came into existence did not have actual notice or knowledge of the existence of the federal tax lien. IRC § 6323(b)(1). The Code defines securities to include money, stock, bonds, debentures, notes, negotiable instruments, and various other types of interests. IRC § 6323(h)(4) .

A subsequent holder of a security interest is also protected if the prior holder did not have actual notice or knowledge at the time the security interest came into existence. An illustration of the intent of this paragraph is the case where "P" , without actual notice or knowledge of the existence of a tax lien, purchases a security from "T" , the taxpayer, after a notice of lien has been filed. "P" is protected under the provisions of this paragraph. If "P" thereafter sells the security to "C" , who at the time of such sale has actual knowledge of the existence of the lien, "C" is also protected against the tax lien. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6323(b)-1(a)(2), Examples (1) and (2).

1st - Blocknet Inc is it own US Corporation which does not have any liens on it

2nd - the ITO was not a security  

[URSAY]

Additionally you can submit information here...

http://www.sec.state.ma.us/InvestorComplaint/compidx.aspx

[atcsecure]

http://www.sec.state.ma.us/InvestorComplaint/compidx.aspx

Your clearly missing the fact the ITO was never a security or presented as one, no shares were issued during the ITO, it was crowd funding for the software

[URSAY]

http://www.sec.state.ma.us/InvestorComplaint/compidx.aspx

Your clearly missing the fact the ITO was never a security or presented as one, no shares were issued during the ITO, it was crowd funding for the software

You might forget that I was one of the concerned individuals which suggested you reconsider your terminology to it's current version.  Your words and figures have changed over time to fit your perceived needs of the moment.

[URSAY]

2/1/2011
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 4813
$14,039.46

1/2/2013
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 5922
$4,485.43

2/4/2014
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (federal) serial #981157214
$67,531.52

5/8/2014
XCurrency launched

10/15/2014
BlockNet announced

[atcsecure]

2/1/2011
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 4813
$14,039.46

1/2/2013
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (MA) #0440 9000 5922
$4,485.43

2/4/2014
Daniel R. Metcalf
Tax lien (federal) serial #981157214
$67,531.52

5/8/2014
XCurrency launched

10/15/2014
BlockNet announced

Virtual tokens are not securities, your NOT AN INVESTOR IN A COMPANY, you don't receive shares, voting rights or dividends

YOUR NOT BUYING SHARES OF A COMPANY, it is not a security



You understand that BlockNet Inc is US C-CORPORATION, you understand how corporate law works?