Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
Okay I've thought of a way to bypass the one address limitation. The tickets will be priced at .01 BTC and your payment must be sent in increments of that. I will divide your sent amount by .01 and for each time that increment occurs I will do some sort of operation to randomize the numbers. I should be able to get about 100 different combinations of numbers using this method, but I will know for sure once testing begins.
|
|
|
I've decided that the numbers are going to be generated by the address that sends them, so no database is necessary, just a list of Bitcoin addresses entered in the lottery. The one setback using this would be that you could only bet once per address for unique addresses, but I will try and think of a workaround for this.
In other news I think I'm going to name this Powercoin.
|
|
|
In the coming weeks I will be developing a Bitcoin lottery designed to be similar to the Powerball. I hope to have the following features:
- Cummulative jackpot - Random numbers - Anonymous winners: Will be sent to address that made bet - Use an escrow until I gain more trust. - Consolation prizes: eg 4 or 5 correct numbers - A power number that must be present to win jackpot - A livefeed of the numbers being generated to prove fairness
Any suggestions, HELPFUL criticism, and comments are welcome.
Oh and I also need a name for this, and what you guys think each ticket should be priced at
|
|
|
You're obviously just running a script. Do you have any experience in ethical hacking? Is your report even worth anything, or does it miss the more advanced hacks?
I'd say I experience in ethical hacking. Just yesterday I found a directory traversal vulnerability in a Bitcoin site that allowed me to access their passwd file.
|
|
|
I vouch for him! Fast and easy!
Thanks! Still have 1 more free scan
|
|
|
Bitcoinstatus.org
Very simple website, not too much work
Checked, no errors.
|
|
|
3 free scans? So i wont have to pay?
That is correct. After you, there will be 2 free scans left, etc.
|
|
|
Hey guys, just want to offer a website scanning service, to looking for vulnerabilities that could be exploited. This service fee ranges .1 BTC to 1BTC depending on the size of your website. You only pay the fee if a problem is found! I will give away 3 free scans to first 3 who post here for vouch reasons. Free scans: 1 Left Scanshttp://countryliving.xx.xx/ ::: 303 Files Found ::: 0 Problems http://bitcoinstatus.xxx/ ::: 2 Files Found ::: 0 Problems
|
|
|
Created ASIC discussion! Come join us!
|
|
|
Come join and chat about ASIC devices Acceptable topics include questions about ASICs, credibility of a company, buying and selling ASICs, and more! http://coinchat.org/j:discussasic
|
|
|
It's less about how much money it takes, the biggest issue is gaining trust.
|
|
|
Sent in my first of (hopefully) many!
Cheers!
|
|
|
Seems like a very unique idea. I can't say it'd be of much use to me, but I would love to see how it works out.
|
|
|
The market only has 5-6 poorly implemented exchanges, developed in secret by people without financial services or security knowledge.
Let's make ANOTHER one! YAY!
Have a look at the buttercoin effort to build a scalable exchange. Or look at commercial exchange trading engines, order management engines, market data engines etc.
Please don't reinvent another square wheel, we have several already, they only serve to hurt bitcoin.
Our team is very competent consisting of all the members required to make an efficient and secure system. I am also a follower of buttercoin and many other projects alike ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=87836.0). I am looking to expand my team and anyone willing to be part of a pay-for-work scenario is welcome to bring their value to the table... hence the point of my post. The open source initiatives are great, but bounties are too low to attract dedicated programming resources in a timely fashion with a fixed path of execution. Does that explain my position better? "Please don't reinvent another square wheel, we have several already, they only serve to hurt bitcoin." - Really? Come on guy, behave. I support this. Good luck and if your looking for any sort of support team, hmu
|
|
|
oh no, i totally get it. no worries. no hard feelings at all.
Alright thanks. If I don't get enough orders expect me to order a couple with you.
|
|
|
fair nuff.
Please don't think I'm trying to compete
|
|
|
I wanted to offer a cheaper alternative to those ordering in bulk
|
|
|
I'm planning a group buy of Block Erupter USB mining devices.
Devices Pledged 0/300 needed
Once the 300 device minimum order has been reached, I will contact those who pledged with a bitcoin address, and once I receive their pledge, add their name to the order list.
Status Planning
Log 5/5/13- Created group thread
Pricing Each miner is sold at a fixed price of 1.99 BTC I will charge a flat .05 for every order. You order 1 device, you pay .05 fee You order 10 devices, you pay .05 fee
Shipping Once I receive the devices from the manufacturer, I will do estimates at the post office (or whichever shipping company gives the best rates) and provide each user with shipping fee. Once said user has paid shipping, I will ship the next business day and provide user with tracking info.
I am located in Coastal North Carolina, so if you live nearby or want to pick up in person, please specify that in your order.
Escrow If enough people request an escrow, I will find a reputable escrow to hold the funds. However, keep in mind that this will raise fees a bit.
|
|
|
You should use java, so you can better abstract the exchange, so you can easily add more power trading logic , using php for a trading bot is the worst idea ever. If you run this long enough you going to have some issues I can spot them already. Only thing you did right was set it for bitstamp. I have forgotten most of my coding capabillities, but to me it seems like Java has too many holes and exploit to handle valuables. It's not like the Java would be run on a public server, so I don't know what you mean by exploited.
|
|
|
Right! I understand its just a precautionary thing!
|
|
|
|