Dear Lutpin,

Inactivity is a kind of spam ?

Yahoo manages a list of inactive users and merging it into spammers list and finally you are adding them into blacklist.
He is a manager he has all the rights to have his own list.

I just want to confirm whether SMAS covers inactivity ?

You mean to say we are on right path ? Okay, lets wait and watch the survival of fittest.

I am not the right person to suggest any changes here.
But I just started this topic just to ensure whether we are traveling in a right path as per founder's wish. Please listen to consensus (especially for treating non-English speakers and non-technical people accordingly)

Seems you didn't get.

Yet to born. You argue not at all possible ?

Just to time pass ? To talk for what ?

Yes bitcoin may not. But this forum may lose.
The rise of other forums and their success may get triggered with your aggressiveness.

This must be a right solution and permanent too if I agree with you. But I wonder after that whom you are going to moderate ?

One simple example : Nokia was too successful just 5 to 8 years back. Due to their ignorance to listen to the demand of changes, they faced their fate.

Is there any history of non-bitcoiner turned a full node running volunteer ? Your read-only mode suggestion may kill the adoption rate of bitcoin. If you disagree, that may mean this forum is not contributing in convincing new people to adopt bitcoins.

What is your standard for shit-posting.
For example, I do see when a newbie asks what wallet he starts using. You simply lock that thread and move to thrash. But I prefer giving him exact answers so that he will be encouraged. I believe, for that encouragement only we are here.

See, government knows alcohol is injurious to health still they permits factories for that. Low quality posts are just part of this forum. Because worldwide people are not speaking one single language and you can not expect new people talks about higher end topics always.

If you do not agree this, you can make entire "Beginners&Help" section read-only  . Almost every doubts were covered. Just a search function will be more than enough there 

From where you got the exact user-base of bitcoin ecosystem ?
Even a newbie of this forum has more than 10 bitcoin addresses (obviously with some satohis from faucets) in their blockchain.info wallet.

Spam is different and low quality topic/post is different.

Moving a topic after 100 pages of discussion into off-topic is completely strange. Suddenly a good discussion becomes off-topic. Moderate posters become spammers.

You cannot understand the pain of non-English speakers. I came to know my local board after years.

Corrected. One good example how non-English people SPAM HERE. Still you understood what I tried to say there. 

Why Satoshi has created this forum ?

I agree with spam contents we cannot spread awareness of bitcoins to new people.
But we cannot expect non-native English speakers to participate into higher end discussions.

Just imagine a non-English 20 year old boy joins here and enter the general discussion board, if he finds a topic bitcoin is money or investment, he will try to say something but if he sees ONLY discussions like high technical subjects for example about segwit, he will probably close the tab and will open facebook.

In long run we may lose a possible bitcoin adopter.

If bitcoin is only for native English speaker then we can have higher standards for topics and posts.
(still I doubt they will be ready to talk for tech topics)

Obvious spammers/ copy pasters must deserve their ban. No second opinion on this.

I view this forum is doing similar role of block rewards. Those who got possibilities run mining farm and earn rewards. Those who got interest to write about cryptocurrency, join here and earn bitcoins. But we need to note here that both are just bitcoin adopters without adopters there will be no life for bitcoin system.

But recent changes seems a heavy deviation from motto of this forum.

I am sorry for any possible off-topic.
Still, if you fail to learn a lesson from that, definitely this forum does not need you as a manager. When you learn something, you will not find my post off-topic.

No. Certainly needs more managers (yes, obviously quality mangers) just to reduce the dominance and to get rid of the attitude of 'thinking themselves as God'.

See here: http://archive.is/xs8FD how a campaign manger runs a campaign consciously.

Supporting proof : https://archive.is/uH4ZZ#selection-605.0-605.10

sorry

You are caring about others quality and inactivity but you have forgot to do your responsibilities actively/consciously that too for two weeks ?

Archive

(Do not wonder, this is an account just created only for this post. It is a privilege supported by Theymos to protect identity.)