Limited additional stock is now up at http://fpga.land ! - Get'm while they're hot! Wait 3,600USD for 14Kh/s on CNV1? That's not that great. You can hit 13.5Kh/s using dual EPYC 7401s for around 2500USD @ ~300W. Am I missing something here? Performance is pretty decent, but nothing to write home about imo.. Edit: Ohhh CNV1.. I thought it was CN-LiteV1 (most places write it as CNV7). Even so, doesn't seems all that amazing considering resale value won't be that great. To each their own, pretty interesting seeing all this new info coming out. I'd like to see more performance numbers. I'm a little skeptical seeing how AMD is planning to launch 7nm CPUs on 2019 (which do amazing on CN-LiteV1). I'll keep an eye on these xilinx however, I'll let others test them out first xD. Also I see no numbers on CN-Heavy. I wonder if it takes a hit hashrate wise like some CPU and GPUs? I recently got a hold of some Phi 7220s really cheap and they do ~3200 on CN-heavy. Been testing a few new things lately, but so far I'm not too convinced on these xilinx but I'll wait for people to get their hands on em. |
|
|
|
|
Seems interesting but I think I'll stay with my Xeon Phis. Still slaying CN-LiteV7 for a fraction of the price.
|
|
|
|
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
You read it all after registering 2 minutes ago   |
|
|
|
I downloaded the newest claymore v11.3 for windows and have been trying to mine Worktips on a couple different pools but I keep getting this error message, can anyone help me out with what is causing this ?
Share rejected (281 ms)!
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"lowdifficultyshare"}}
and on some pools I get the "rejectedshare:invalidresult" error message
Claymore doesn't work on worktips. Try SRBMiner or XMR-STAK 2.4.3 |
|
|
|
Omg, people!.. After all, try the SRBminer.
Supported cryptonight type normal, normalv7, lite, litev7, heavy, ipbc, artocash, alloy, marketcash, b2n, stellitev4.
For my Asus RX 560 2Gb for normalv7 with Claymore - 495 h/s, with SRBMiner 515 h/s.
Thats about a 4% increase over Claymores miner, but Claymores miner is free, SRBminer has a 0.85% fee on top of the time your lose mining (and money) while the Rig shuts down restart to mine for dev fee, then shutsdown again and restarts mining for you, would that take about another 3% ? ORRRR you can do a little research and use SRB 1.3.1/1.3.2 (supports CNV7, CN, CN-LiteV7, CN-Heavy [both XHV & Regular CN-Heavy) and remove the dev fee.  ORRRRRRRR you can compile XMR-STAK 2.4.4 (supports all the algos + CPU) and get SRB performance with 0 fee aswell. Claymore is not the only one with no fee, it is however the one that hashes the lowest. |
|
|
|
How lame and un-professional. Where's the link to the (one single) miner that wouldn't crash immediately on 1060? Windows 8.1, driver version 22.21.13.8554
Trying to mine CryptoNight on an Nvidia? What a meme. |
|
|
|
Doktor is working on a coin switcher (YAY!), but until then, you can try out this one,
Coin switchers are overrated. None of them are giving you an edge. There's always going to be somebody who's faster or more powerful than you and will "steal" your blocks from all those useless Yiimp pools. Add to that the fact that you don't get proper market data (you usually only get "last paid price" from the exchanges as opposed to "bids"), and massive latency (hours!) between the moment the switcher decides a given coin is most profitable and the effective time your mined (and matured) coin finally gets exchanged, and the whole exercise is completely ludicrous. The good trading/switching algos out there are already flattening the market. Look at the various profitability calculators online and check with your hashrate. On average, the profitability difference between the 5 top coins will be within a negligible 5%. Coin switching has been very necessary for me, I do manual switching though. I may switch based on just difficulty alone without looking at price so I mine more of a coin, or I may switch to a valuable coin that I convert to BTC. I use this proxy so I'm able to switch coins using my mobile and it's quite inefficient when switching through a remote desktop solution and pressing "p" button to reach the coin you want, only to have your hashrate drop and wait for a few blocks to get it back up. The automated one I'll try to do will let you decide based on difficulty (do not mine when difficulty is so high), or a combination of difficulty and price, and maybe something in between. I hope Doktor's version also takes account this, sometimes I don't care about the value of the coin, because as you say the price is very hard to determine (Solace, anyone? It switches between 2 or 3 satoshis massively deceiving the profit calculators, however, I just switch to it if I can mine enough of those, not looking at the price) And low hashrate coins are very vulnerable to pile-up's due to coin switching of mass hash-rate sources (nicehash etc.) so you may be getting very little half of the day until powers that be pile up on another coin. The (difficulty) / (weighted exchange rate) approach could be a nice compromise for switching (esp. for low hashrate / per block or small gap difficulty adjusted coins) Coin switchers are a meme. Very difficult to properly monitor accurate market data + nethash spikes with low latency. |
|
|
|
Don't know about it's price on Stocks.Exchange but on TradeOgre is was pumped to 2 sat last weekend.
So if you're patient enough you can buy some at 1 sat and wait until it's pumped again to sell at 2 sat.
But I won't waste my electricity to mine more of that coin.
This isn't even listed on TradeOgre... |
|
|
|
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin? What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out. Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork. So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm? It's the same reason XTL is also forking away from nicehash. Nicehash is pure cancer thanks to a few toxic A-holes with large sums of BTC who use the massive hashrate to attack smaller projects. It's the same reason more projects are moving to CN-Heavy aswell. I mean look at all the 51% attacks that have been happening recently. Bitcoin Gold, Litecoin Cash, Verge, ZenCash ect.. Where do you think those tards got the massive multi algorithm (SHA-256, Equihash, Blake2s, Lyra2c2..) hashrate from? Yup, nicehash. Nicehash is pure aids, I'm glad we're making this move. It was awesome when they got hacked, pitty they didn't close down for good. |
|
|
|
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin? What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out. Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork. |
|
|
|
Masari has developed CN-Fast and will roll it out as the PoW algo @ block height 204,000. Testing shows a hashrate increase of 30-50% for both CPU & GPU against CNv7.
Sadly after this change we will loose ability to use free Claymore version. I hope that Masari devs will release custom xmr-stack without built in fees. Or you can compile XMR stak via github and remove the fee yourself. It's not rocket science. |
|
|
|
 UI 'SNEAK-PEEK' PREVIEWFirst and fundamental step towards building an efficient Worktips ecosystem is the Worktips web wallet, which is set to be released in the upcoming weeks. First 'sneak peek' previews of the gateway to our ecosystem can be found below in the post, or by following the link https://invis.io/GWJX7G9SBZM Should you follow the link - please use the 'grid button' in the bottom right corner of your browser window to reveal all previews. As we move closer to each individual release, we will be adding additional UI 'sneak peek' previews as well as full blown UX demos of particular ecosystem integrations. Thank you! SIGN IN (UI) PREVIEW MY WALLET (UI) PREVIEW Great news for Worktips community. With webwallet, Worktips users can retrieve there coins easier. In addition, in the last few weeks, Worktips has stayed almost stable around 5-7 litoshi, which is good signals for future movements in LTC trading pair. https://altex.exchange/markets&pair=LTC_WTIPCoin has been doing great. Solid volume on altex. |
|
|
|
My wallet is slowly updating, what is the problem?
Your computer or Internet speed? |
|
|
|
If they change to ASIC and bitmain can use their recently launched cryptonight ASIC to secure the network, i guess its not a bad idea at all.
PS: I dont hold any SUMO.
The point is ASICs are not intended to secure netowrks, and furthermore tend to centralize. Not to mention the impairment to small miners. PS. I mine SUMO, now, not sure I should hold them Im glad u mining it, but ASICs cryptocurrency miners are high-efficiency, so i can consider them 1000x better to secure a network. Also sorry to dissapoint you, but decentralization is a hoax, no ones give a single f888 for this, as long as the network are working 100% perfectly. You have no idea what you're talking about if you think having a high network hash means a coin is secure. ASIC coins are much more prone to 51% attacking than GPU coins are. ASICs literally split Bitcoin into 2 coins because the ASIC concentration was so strong by a few entities (This is what centralization gives you). You can rent 100Mh/s of CN power for 24hours for only 1 BTC. Look at the fucking marketplace ffs. There are people ordering multiple 100Mh/s+ orders already. There is some guy trying to buy a 300Mh/s order. Fuck this shit sumokoin will be another dead coin just like Bipcoin lol Yes ASICs are inevitable, but it's far too soon with Bitmain having most of the control. |
|
|
|
|
Complete garbage shit coin. Fuck your stupid ass excuses.. You should see telegram. Banning people like crazy for posting concerns. Go burn your shitcoin to the ground with your ASIC friendly bullshit.
OoOoo let's fix 51% attack issues with ASICs... ASICs are literally KNOWN for being notorious at 51% attacking.
Fucking incompetence is real..
You morons did this to your self for bending over for Fireice.
Pardon my french.
|
|
|
|
Network hashrate dropped from 62Mh/s on nanopool to 2Mh/s. What a joke. The devs better start spending some BTC to get the chain rolling again. Over 24 hours and only 1 single block pff... We have a fraction of the hashrate we had during the fork as well. 3Mh/s trying to solve a 1.5Gh/s pre fork diff, what a meme... The chain has been completely stopped for over 20 hours  |
|
|
|
With 62000 khs at 180 million difficulty. Nano pool should at least get 1 block every 1-2 hours why no block at all It's at 25,000kh/s which is nothing for 180,000,000 difficulty (1.5Gh/s Net Hash). That's 1/60 of the old network hash. Mining this coin like this is a meme. You guys go ahead and burn your electricity I'll hop in when it's all sorted out. Someone is losing big $$ burning away electricity/BTC trying to find a block to fix the developers incompetence waiting this long to fork lmao. |
|
|
|
A super whale buys ITNS with price up to 69 sats in tradeOgre. Prepare to see crazy price up. Some of the big players are starting to buy it up. Price is wayyy to low to sit like that much longer, it's too good of an opportunity. |
|
|
|
@doktor83. Is there a virtual memory requirement or free ssd/hdd space requirement when compiling the kernels and copying over the device?
Virtual mem is same as for every other Cryptonight miner(the more, better  ) , kernel compile happens on GPU, after that it's written to the hdd, miner directory, and it takes up approx 2.1-2.3mb / binary. Or what was your question ? Cause this is weird behavior I observed today. Same I/W/T settings 59/8/1 on 4gb RX 570 which was working fine. Restarting the miner it gave the error related to below error message,  sometimes drivers or windows behaves strange, i bet if you delete the .srb files and reboot it will all be good. Nope deleting the .srb file didn't solve it. Rebooting did. it seems more like a driver/miner didn't clean up memory properly? probably. these kind of 'errors' happen a lot after driver crash/recovery. Invalid buffer size usually means you're trying to use an intesity that is too high for the card. Happens often on CN-Heavy coins. That's probably the case since you're using 4GB cards. |
|
|
|
wallet not working... scam coin.. or???
haha not scam it’s now 69 BTC Volume in Tradeogre End process from task manger and open your wallet again, if stuck again End process again Hahahaha now price 0 sat.... Scam coin .... This is coin Giant Bullshit ... altex and tradeogre very low=SHIT exchange... Lmao you prob bought in and are crying now that the buy orders are gone. This coin was at 2Mh/s for months kid. Somebody just banked like 40 BTC by selling at 1 sat. The emission factor of this coin is insane, it has like a 600k reward per block (not 100% sure since it's nowhere to be found [should be clear as day in the main page]) and a emission rate of 120. All that translate to most of the supply being mined in around a year. I wouldn't call it a scam coin at all. You won't see major price jumps since like ~430million coins are being mined daily (which is why it's so easy to build up sell walls). Even if the entire supply was mined tomorrow (all 184B coins) @ 1 sat it would have a market cap of 15 million USD which is extremly low. This coin has much room for growth but it will be slow initially. who said i want the price raise to 20 or 30 sat kid ? think about it the volume for all coins at tradeogre before yesterday less than 40 btc, and yesterday some people bought worktips at 1 sat for 70 btc, are you thinking all this people are mad or just kids ? I’m not talking about 100 sat or 20 sat right now but what about for 2-6 sat short or mid term Haha child, when did I ever mention 20 or 30? You pulled those numbers out of your own ass. I never mentioned anything in regards to a specific price. Yes the coin can very easily move a couple sats, what's your point? About 85 BTC worth of Worktips was bought at 1 sat (taken out of circulation) in the last day. There's clear interest, but with the high emission rate it will take some time to grow. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
