As a rule of thumb: if you can do something without a blockchain, you shouldn't use a blockchain.
In this case, you can just sell "hours": the user buys credit that allows him to use the scooter for a certain number of hours. A centralized database can handle this, so there's no need for a (decentralized) tokenized system.

Unless of course you want to go full-on ICO, claim you're going to disrupt the rental industry, cash a few millions, and disappear without ever completing the project. Because this cynical summary is the reality of almost every token project ever created.

As an example of a company doing something similar: Greenwheels offers subscriptions for rental cars. You can choose between several combinations of fixed fee per month, per kilometer or per hour. It allows renting a car for less than an hour, and you only pay for the time you use it. A lower fee per month means a higher fee per km, and users who use it more often can opt for a higher monthly and lower usage fee.
This works without blockchain, it's a "conventional" company which uses a "conventional" database.

One reason to use cryptographic tokens would be to allow anyone to transfer the tokens P2P in an app, but I assume you want to know who's using your scooters (for insurance purposes). That takes away the main advantage tokens could offer.

Update: If you want to pay me for this, I'll post my addy

1. People buy tokens using debit, credit and other more social payment apps, such as Venmo and PayPal. Alternatively, customers can purchase ride time or subscriptions directly with these payments options (without any discount)

2. With the tokens, customers are able to either rent scooters for a fixed period, or they can stake their tokens to reduce the circulating supply, hence driving up demand. When paying for rentals with the ICO token, customers will get a reduced fee of around 20-50%. Staking the tokens will drive up their value on the exchange, while stakers are awarded riding credit depending on the amount of tokens staked and for how long.

e.g. stake 100 tokens for 30 days, receive 1 free hour. 1,000 tokens for 30 days = 11 free hours. Further levels will be added in an attempt to lock up a good fraction of the tokens.

3. Tokens that are used to pay for rides will be burned, further decreasing the available supply, increasing their value on exchanges and giving traders a reason to hodl their tokens for the long term. This could be combined with regular buy-backs using funds from fiat paying customers, maintaining and improving the token value on exchanges.

4. Plan additional functionality for the token, for example, allowing game makers such as Pokemon Go, Parallel Kingdon etc to integrate with the app, providing an incentive for those getting around in the game using your scooters.

Address for payment: 1Jyj8t4hLzgbiVLmmbWMRhdo31QGQK415x

Maybe you can get some with the Drife model.

It all depends on the domain extension, so it would help if you can point out which extension you want to know the value of. But then again, even if people here say it's worth $100 (could be any amount) the price in reality is likely to be far lower because in +95% of the cases nothing is being done with them.

The higher valuations mostly come from businesses wanting to develop themselves around a specific domain, and in case these businesses aren't in the market for your domain, you'll be left with something that has (mostly lower) speculative value only.

That's because its a demo to get the bidders an idea of how its going to look and about the basic functionality of the gateway. Still to clear your doubts here is the link to download the source code of the gateway(password protected) so you can check the hierarchy of the code.


https://www.dropbox.com/s/lwyubup1ews7acl/gateway.rar?dl=0