I am not fun of webcam sties but i am bitcoin fun so i am think that any new site that will support bitcoin is good. It will help to make it popular and it's good for bitcoin.
Try to like them more. Then you can use your bitcoin better. |
|
|
|
I said to my girlfriend to go to amazon shop and buy something with Bitcoin and then she trying to buy some nice shoes.
Girls like to waste money no matter bitcoin or dollars/cash. The main motivation is amount of money. It's not only about womens, everybody loves money and also everybody loves waste money. Not me. I want to save money. Especially bitcoin |
|
|
|
true technically
I should know, I declared bankruptcy 4 times.
. . . is that you, Donald? . . . Hey everyone, The Donald just showed up in the forum !! trump? the Donald? |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is the best pay for all sites  yep |
|
|
|
The cam sites need to get their cut. If the girls start throwing up their bitcoin address on a cam site, The cam site is gonna get pissed cause they need to get their piece of the action.
Not really, there are other ways to build out a cam site where money flows to the models directly and still make money (can't give out all my secrets), but my issues with that is a lot of cam girls don't understand bitcoin yet and I hate for them to lose their hard earn bitcoins. That will just make them frustrated and not use bitcoin again. That is why I talk to every girl on the site to make sure they know I am willing to help them before turning them lose with their coins. So in reality these girls are paying me to use the platform, advise, and secure their coins before they get their dollars (Both in the sense of securing them but also detecting zero confirmed payments and double spends). I personality have helped over a 100 cam girls get into bitcoin and not everyone of them are on my site. I enjoy that the most to be honest, not the profits  . Cause the more cam girls that use bitcoins will make it go up and I can enjoy those profits without taking advantaging of other people. Blue's profile if anyone wants to subscribe or tip her... https://goseemybits.com/profile/BlueYozakura. Don't tip me if I'm not there. I seem to only be able to log in 25% of the time before I have to contact gweedo to reboot the site and attempt to log in. It's odd because my passwords work on all sites consistently but this one locks me out 75-80% of the time. NO OFFLINE TIPPING EVER! IF anyone wants to tip me Offline I'm pretty sure you can find one of the three wallets I have posted around from twitter to my profile here. Did anyone figure out why she doesn't want to be tipped offline? |
|
|
|
I don't think a regular joe can change something about bitcoin
Nearly everyone who changes something about bitcoin is a regular joe. |
|
|
|
Advantage is being able to spend your bitcoins where they're not yet accepted, disadvantage is, you're trusting a company of which you know nothing about with your money.
This is not exactly true. A better way to say it is: Advantage is being able to spend your bitcoins where they're not yet accepted, disadvantage is, you're trusting a company of which you know nothing about with your spending money.
If you have 1000 bitcoins, keep 998 on a paper wallet. Then put 2BTC into a debit card. From time to time when you'd like to spend some BTC pull out the debit card and spend your BTC at 100 million convenient merchants everywhere in the world. Bitcoin debit cards are awesome. Get one today. I'd use Coinbase(safety) / Shift (convenient). Go here and sign up now. https://www.shiftpayments.com/ |
|
|
|
 HI KEEP YOU ARE VERY INTEGRITY AND MUCH WISDOM WHY THANK YOU MIKE IT'S SO NICE TO MEET YOU HERE, YOU ARE HIGHLY INTELLIGENCE You're not even trying anymore which makes me wonder if you've become desperate? You're just working against Core and in favor of Classic. Usually most of the stuff that you've written is false. Moronic memes won't make your case any better. Blockstream is trying to own Bitcoin by calling everything else an 'Alt'. Large blocks are needed, necessary and prudent. Blockstream is a private company trying to cripple blockchain so people will buy their solution. They've got to be stopped! |
|
|
|
You're not even trying anymore which makes me wonder if you've become desperate? You're just working against Core and in favor of Classic. Usually most of the stuff that you've written is false.
Lauda, you are such a lying, misdirecting shill. I am hardly desperate.... I moved most of my bitcoins into Ethereum. I'm up 30%. If you and the rest of the idiots sitting around in denial about Core's demise continue to make it clear you are willing to kill Bitcoin if you can't have your way.... then I'll move the rest of my coins into Ethereum. And I WILL make money. Now, after you guys are gone, and Classic Devs back in charge.... I will come back into bitcoin. But the FUD, misdirection, lies, and sabotage that is being played by Core/Blockstream supporters is getting dangerous, and I thnk this Fork may turn out very badly for people not careful. What bothers me is that while MOST people may not step on any financial disater mines during hte Fork..... I think Core Supporters will stop at nothing, including spreading lies that may drive some hapless uninformed people to exchange coins that render them useless on the Core chain. Innocents will lose money.... because of people like you. Core/Blockstream is crazy to think bitcoiners are just going to sit around while they bend the direction of the network into their own little private project. No way. Bitcoiners do not like privatization. Core devs are conflicted. It is a conflict of interest that they impose a 1MB blocksize which clearly serves no purpose other than to drive need for their bullshit sidechain solutions which are going to generate money for their company. Core = Blockstream. We need Classic today and 8MB blocks to render Core/Blockstream irrelevant. How did Maxwell get so much power to stop the masses anyway? This 'Veto' power is dangerous. |
|
|
|
What a beautiful post. Couldn't have said it better myself. I wonder how the Crypto world will remember Blockstream? After the Fork.... will they be punished? .... or forgiven? I know how I will be voting in that one...... assuming of course they do not IMMEDIATELY turn from their destructive ways. Although, it is sort of ironic.... that the harder they fight against Classic, and the inevitable change that the OVERWHELMING majority has made clear it wants.... the more evil they look, and that is actually helping solidify resolve in the comunity against them, and for Classic. Yep. It has now become the case that Classic is the will of the people, large block size is what the majority wants, and SegWit and sidechains is the Alt. Core has benefitted mightily by calling everything the 'alt'. Now, they are the alt. Core Devs need to be replaced. You can't work for Blockstream and impose unnecessary restrictions on bitcoin just because your cool new technology needs the capacity failure to drive demand. 100% bullshit. Those Core Devs can't be trusted. Blockstream is 100% bullshit. Time to stop this crap now. Remove the 1MB cap. |
|
|
|
which got basicaly monopolized by BlockStream and Bitcoin
Can you explain this for me? Bitcoin Core is a project with dozens of people. One of the main developers of Bitcoin Core is a founder of Blockstream. And this is "monopolized"? Please, help me understand what you're thinking here. Meanwhile, the developers of other implementations just don't bother to tell you about their business partnerships at all. Makes me sick. It is now useful for Blockstream to block expansion to 2MB so there is greater need for Lightning. They monopolized Core because their de facto 'veto' vote has stopped Mike Hearn and others from going down a road that permits scalability without the Blockstream privately owned solution. Look, you guys got found out. The community isn't that stupid. Knock off the bullshit. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin can't scale efficiently without solutions such as the Lightning Network. The Lightning Network which is privately owned by Blockstream. They want you to believe Bitcoin can't scale without you having to buy access to their system. But, I believe lots of solutions for scaling can be devised without any overlord owner. Core programmers have a conflict of interest - they say things like: "Bitcoin can't scale efficiently..." Because convincing others of this allows them to burden the system with a limit that drives need for their solution. Fuck that. And fuck those guys who were trusted to control the software while they got on Blockstreams payroll. |
|
|
|
That's not what I meant. I was comparing the current two groups, people contributing to Core and people who are/will contribute to Classic according to their website. I don't think that everyone would stop working on Bitcoin but I'm sure that we would lose some very important names due to this.
But if those very important names are taking money from private interests, where those private interests want them to impose artificial limitations that force bitcoin users to adopt fixes like those known as Lightning, then it is good to see those 'important names'. This is called 'conflict of interest'. Bitcoin Core is controlled by those having a private interest aligned with limited the blocksize. Therefore, fuck them. Good riddance. |
|
|
|
... The Lightning Network is going to be part of Bitcoin and it is free to use.
Like bitcoin is free to use! 8.5 Fees
Lightning Network fees, which differ from blockchain fees, are paid directly between participants within the channel. The fees pay for the time-value of money for consuming the channel for a determined maximum period of time, and for counterparty risk of non-communication.
Do you know why the paragraph is titled: '8.5 Fees'? Because in the future they will just make the amendment '8.51 Additional Fees' and lay down a fair use price to be paid to Blockstream. Blockstream is privatizing Bitcoin via a sneaky run around. Their make excuses all day why 2MB is dangerous - when in fact 8GB probably isn't. They are merely creating a need for their Lighting Network. Core is the now the fucking Alt. |
|
|
|
Looks like those assholes at Blockstream Now we just need to take their commit keys away from them for getting sucked into acting on the code for the benefit of a private concern. A clear conflict of interest. Can't someone fire these guys? |
|
|
|
Have to agree though... i really hate the conflict of interest
going on where the core devs are the same dudes at
blockstream. Yep. This is pure garbage. Smelly garbage. Wouldn't be so bad - if they didn't try to bend the argument to favor their solution. But that is exactly what they are doing. They are intentionally trying to cripple the transaction capacity - so they can offer their solution. I call BS. |
|
|
|
|
I hate Blockstream for blocking with DDOS and censorship the possibility of > 1 MB blocks just so their system can become more valuable and make them lots of money as they tax the onramps (via sidechains) to the blockchain. Fuck them. Hope they die soon.
But, I do think there is one good argument for small blocks. A blockchain cancer is Satoshi Dice. Other schemes which pump the chain full of meaningless transactions are equally harmful. If we have 1MB limits, transaction might soon cost $.30 - or more. This would eliminate Satoshi Dice and other bullshit. If your transaction is worth something, welcome to the blockchain, if not, gut fucked buddy - spam not welcome here. So, maybe 1MB limit is better. Maybe paying $.50/transaction is a good idea.
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I'm not going to make any promises because of my schedule, but we'll see what happens.
Let me tell you already 'what happens' - NOTHING. You wrote to long bullshit post - and that is the end of it. You are all done. 'because of my schedule...' just means you don't have time because you spend all day jerking off on the Internet. So, we are all stuck with this forum. Bummer. Hmmm. Maybe we do need a friendlier professional forum. Where do these assholes come from? |
|
|
|
He clearly asked who and not what address. Can you people read?
This is who: 1m4CXFKcAqhLjKULqZeDDFCV8exBTiKxb. In the Bitcoin world, 'who' is labeled in this way. Who is not 'Fred Perez'. 'who' is a long alphanumeric. btw 'Fred Perez' is just a label of a different format. It isn't really any more/less of a 'who' than the a Bitcoin who. |
|
|
|
So what does this have, that other bitcoin debit cards don't have?
Shift bitcoin debit card can be shiped to the USA, has no monthly/annual fee and 0% BTC to USD conversion fee for domestic transactions (for a limited time). It also ins't a prepaid card, which most Bitcoin debit cards are. Instead of funding the card by converting some BTC to USD at one point in time, the card withdraws BTC from your account balance and converts it to USD on the spot when you use it. This means that different amounts of BTC will be used for same amount USD transactions due to Bitcoin's price volatility. Yep. This is a big difference. Prepaid cards just suck. This card allows you to hold bitcoin - and at the moment you decide to buy something, a trade - only for the amount of the purchase - not a new prepaid event to buy another large block of fiat, but rather a trade is done to cover the purchase. Not a bad system. Those prepaid schemes are not so interesting. But shift and coinbase nailed it as it allows a very convenient exit from bitcoin holdings which was not previously available. Excellent system. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
