You're repeatedly told me things that have no basis in reality. I debunked literally every statement that you made. And you just keep repeating them. Now you're questioning my motivation. What's next? You want to know how old I am? Or what I like to eat?

Everyone that has installed the wallet app has keys an numbers attached. Everyone that has downloaded blockchain can see numbers and addresses. Anyone that would pay $1.2 trillion today to have the sum of all the numbers in the Satoshi's system attached to their address, would have a number attached, the same as any person that holds an address in the system. It's just that the number would be different. But nobody would own something. A guy with 18,000,000 attached to his address, and a guy with 0.00000001 attached, can both show only keys and math symbols. Nothing else. There's no difference between them. So, what is your point? On what did the first guy spend 1.2 trillion dollars?

You couldn't have proved that my arguments are flawed because I made no arguments. I was simply stating facts. Saying that the Sun is bigger than the Moon is not an argument. Saying that bitcoin doesn't exist in Satoshi's system is not an argument. It's a statement of fact. I am simply observing the system. When people say that they bought bitcoin, all I can see is the change of a number next to their address. So, I observe a couple of math symbols, and not some revolutionary digital product that is capable of making people free. Then, I check the network. And I see nodes that are keeping the numbers and addresses stored in a database. Again, no revolutionary digital product there. Than I check the wallet app. I see only keys that everyone got for free. And numbers attached to address. And letters B, T, and C. But again, I see no revolutionary digital product there. So, I have empirically confirmed that no revolutionary digital product exists in the Satoshi's system. Not a single bitcoin holder has ever demonstrated to own such a product when joining the system. What we all observe is a simple system that attaches numbers to addresses and keeps that stored in a distributed database. People then simply read that numbers via wallet applications. That's literally everything. A revolutionary digital product, a new form of money, an advanced electronic cash, ... exist only in human imagination.  
I would never say that Elon Musk is stupid. Nor anyone here. You are just ignorant or driven by greed, so you shut down your brains when discussing bitcoin issues.
I can prove that a digital book exists by reading text or watching pictures after opening a file. In the same way you can prove that a number is attached to your address when opening your wallet. But you cannot prove that there's a digital product called bitcoin.

I deny nothing. I am simply stating the fact that Bitcoin doesn't exist.
And I am saying that it is stupid to pay money just because a number will be attached to your name. Paying for communication via internet is reasonable. That's why we pay our internet providers. Paying for swapping numbers between addresses is not reasonable. So, it's pretty simple.
My point is what I have wrote: if you say that 5 digital(intangible) books or movies exist, you are not supposed to show number "5". But books and movies.

In the same way, if you say that a specific number of digital (intangible) bitcois exists, you're not supposed to show number, but digital products. However, all you can show is a number. Essentially, you are proving that bitcoin doesn't exist.

WOW, really? Bitcoin is a ledger of transactions? Nice. Now everyone can just download the ledger and have bitcoins. For free. Hahaha. I am really having fun. It's so amusing to read your rationalizations that try to justify Satoshi's sacred text. Keep up the good work.

Yes, bitcoin doesn't exist. Numbers do, if you attach them to someone's name. So, you cannot show a digital asset called bitcoin. You can show numbers. If you say that 5 digital books or movies exist you are not supposed to show number 5. But books and movies. Can you comprehend something so simple?

So, how much do you pay for using DNS protocols? And how much do you pay for attaching the number "10" to your crypto address in Satoshi's system? Do you now understand the true meaning of the phrase: "Your level of your ignorance is astounding."?
When I go to a web site or install the wallet app to get a cryptographic key, and "0" is attached to my address, suggesting I own 0 coins, how that differs from a guy that has 1,000,000 attached? We both have zero property to show. There's no difference in ownership between us. If you were to ask that guy to prove that he actually owns million coins he wouldn't be able to show something that I am not able to show. We both have numbers attached, but own no bitcoins. No coins. No money. No property. Nothing. It's like if a system would write down that I have 0 Porsches and that guy have 10 Porsches. None of us would be able to show Porsches. So, one can attach whatever number to whatever name. That literally means nothing.

A randomly generated number is still a number. It's not a cat. A randomly generated Ferrari would still be a Ferrari. It doesn't matter how you generate something. If I work 10 hours a day for a year and get the same amount of money as someone who win a lottery that doesn't mean my money is more valuable.

Well, I don't have a problem if you and others agree that you are a bird and able to fly. I am simply debunking your nonsense. You are not a bird. You are not able to fly. You are not transferring value. There's no bitcoin. Do we now understand each other?

Internet is computers and communication protocols. Those exist. Bitcoin is not "used" given it doesn't exist. Numbers are attached to address by Satoshi's system. Attaching numbers is a proof that numbers are attached. Attaching letters is proof that letters are attached. Attaching a picture to a email message is proof that a picture is attached. No bitcoins magically emerge by attaching one thing to another. You believe in some sort of alchemy. Try to use your brains for a second instead of repeating the same nonsense over and over again.

You're again talking nonsense. People don't agree that the ladger is satisfactory, whatever that means, but to have numbers stored to their address. And they do that because they falsely believe these numbers quantify a digital asset called bitcoin. They believe so, because thay accepted Satoshi's paper at face value. Or because they fall for false narrative and misleading information spread throughout social media.

Internet is used by nodes to store fake numbers. Without the internet there wouldn't be bitcoin fraud.

We don't see things differently. You are imagining things that don't exist in reality. You create fictions because you lack basic knowledge of economy and finance.

People use a medium of exchange that is not credit all the time. However, this medium of exchange exists. That's the whole point. A thing must exist to be able to be exchanged. Bitcoin doesn't exist so there's nothing to exchange. People in bitcoin community blindly believe Satoshi like he is some kind of God. He wrote in his paper that his system creates coins and the community accepted that without a question. But all that his system does is attaching numbers to addresses. Then the wallet is lying that this number is quantifying "BTC" - a digital thing called Bitcoin. But this thing is non-existent. A guy with "0" attached to his address is not able to show a digital thing in his possession, the same as a guy that has 1,000 attached to his address. The last guy simply creates fictions in his imagination and believes that he owns a valuable digital product, without being able to show it. It's like a mythology. Just like people believed Zeus exists without being able to show it, bitcoin community believes bitcoin exists without being able to show it. They are blind believes in the sacred text that Satoshi wrote. It is literally unbelievable that people believe blindly an anonymous guy ever when they see with their own eyes that no digital product exist in their possession.  

It is not nice when you project your own ignorance and a lack of knowledge on others. Every paper bill handed to individuals and companies came from deposit accounts. Loans are granted on deposit accounts, and then withdrawn as cash. Numbers that represented debt on deposit accounts, in the same amount represent that debt on paper. If 1000 is withdrawn those same numbers are now on paper bills. Literally every bill, except of course counterfeit ones, represent debt that was created by issuing loans. When borrowers are paying back loans, paper bills are deposited, and from their deposit accounts are transferred for loan liquidation. In that way debt is settled. Paper bills that the central banks took out of circulation or just printed represent of course nothing. But those are not in the hands of individuals and companies. So I don't know what was the point of your last sentence. How can a central bank grant loans to commercial banks in paper bills without first printing bills? You have some bizarre way of looking at things.

This is literally crazy. How do you know that bitcoin is "a thing" and that it is "new" if you're unable to prove its existence? Where're 5 things that the person bought after number 5 was attached to their address? What is that mega expensive product that the person paid $40.000 a piece? All you do is repeating "Bitcoin is this", Bitcoin is that" like a broken record, without proving anything.

Commodity is something that exists. Be it digital or not. Digital things are existing things. Books, documents, sounds, pictures...are digital. Applications are digital. Non of them can you touch. But they exist. Saying bitcoin is a digital commodity is as nonsensical as saying Zeus is a digital commodity. You can say whatever you want for a thing whose existence you are not able to prove. You can write down in a database that you own 5 shares in Zeus. If you are not able to show Zeus, that what you've written down is nonsense. That's what Satoshi's software is doing. Writing down nonsense. Fake numbers. Quantities of a thing that no one is able to show. You can as well say that bitcoin is an ice cream. Or a car. Or a diamond. It's all equally stupid as saying that bitcoin is a digital commodity.

You're repeating nonsense that I already debunked. Gold is a thing that exists. Bitcoin doesn't. Saying or writing down that you own 5 ounces of gold, means you're able to show an actual metal in your possession. Otherwise you're lying. Whan you say that you own 5 bitcoins, or this is written down in your wallet, but you're not able to show a digital product in the quantity of 5, that means you're lying and that the wallet has fake numbers.
Scarcity is a concept of existing things. For something to be scarce it must exist. Bitcoin doesn't exist so it cannot be scarce.

You are not storing or moving value, but numbers. A number is a concept on quantity of things. A thing is value, not a number. If there's a number "10", next to your name or address, this is suggesting that there are 10 pieces of a thing in your possession. But if the thing is not in your possession, the number is fake. And that's exactly the case with bitcoin. There's no such thing as bitcoin in the possession of an address holder which has a specific number attached to their address. So, blockchain is just a giant collection of fake numbers. And bitcoin cannot be value by definition, given it doesn't exist.

You talk nonsense and stupidity.  Cash is paper with numbers and these are put in circulation with loans. Loan is debt. Cash prove the existence of debt. No debt no cash. First the debt is created and only then numbers are used to quantity it. The same is with deposit accounts. Positive numbers on deposit accounts mean debt was created. Numbers are the consequence of debt. No debt no numbers.

The same is with everything else. A company produces cars and then they put numbers in accounting books to express quantity of cars. No cars no numbers.

Debt and cars are things that exist. Numbers are means to inform about the quantity of those EXISTING things.

Numbers are also attached to bitcoin addresses. But there's no thing which is quantified with them. This is called fake numbers. It's like invoice that lists the products or services that were never sold to a costumer. Bitcoin wallet has quantities of a product that was never sold to a wallet holder. That's a fraud. And you are one of the online promotors of that fraud. You are constantly spreading misinformation that people are buying bitcoin but such digital product was never sold to people.

The level of your ignorance is stunning. I just proved to you the existence of debt. I proved that the debt is an existing thing and that the numbers that quantity that thing are therefore genuine.

And your response is: "bitcoin the same". Hahaha. In a rational discussion, what you are supposed to do, is to show a thing called bitcoin. Only in that way you can prove that the numbers attached to the addresses are genuine. You are not supposed to make nonsensical claims of equivalence between an existing thing and a thing whose existence you must demonstrate.

So, can you demonstrate the existence of bitcoin? Can you show where's that revolutionary digital commodity? No, you can't. You already demonstrated that you can't. All you can do is talk nonsense and play semantics.

Debt is the liability evidenced with loan contracts and accounting books in the banking system. Go talk to a person that was granted a loan to show you the contact and you will see the evidence of debt. Check the accounting books of the banks and you will see the evidence of debt. Go to a bank to see how loans are paid and how the debt is settled in the accounting books. It's a process that happens every day. Debt management is practically all that the banks are doing.

The whole banking system exists to manage loans. Loans are debt.  Every loan granted is evidence of debt. Every loan repayment is evidence of debt settlement. Numbers on bank accounts or banknotes just quantity the shares in that debt. What you can show me is a pic of fake number attached to your address. Nothing else.