What's with the weird wallet files types? I can see a way to import a regular wallet.dat but what about exporting?
The client does not use BerkeleyDB library. The Import made on tiny BDB-parser. I'd love to switch over to your wallet program because of the interface. Not all of us know everything about database software so unfortunately this answer means nothing to me. A google search for "tiny BDB-parser" returns this thread as the first result so... my question remains. My concern is being able to back up my wallet in the same format as the default client. If this can be done, please let us know. I don't care if I have to use third party software to export as long as I can export it in the same format.
|
|
|
Looking forward to some competition. Have you considered accepting payment in bitcoin? Or have you not gotten to the business model yet?
|
|
|
Bitcoin is the perfect currency with which to donate to causes due to the ease of sending the currency. I have never donated anything with paypal, creditcard etc. but I have donated via bitcoin before. It is my assumption that most Anime sub groups are versed in computer technology. Therefore, my assumption is that bitcoin adoption would be relatively easy for them. However, none of them currently accept bitcoin. I would like to see this changed. This could be very attractive to groups. For example, one group even currently requests donations of no less than $5 to reduce paypal fees, which is something bitcoin avoids entirely... at least until the USD conversion. ( http://static-subs.com/donations/) I would like to propose sending several friendly messages to sub groups asking if they accept bitcoin as donates and where to send them if so. I've already started. Problems: The following are reasons a group might choose not to which might be something we could consider addressing in such emails 1. Conversion to USD 2. How much of a hassle is this to implement? Emphasis: The following are ways groups use donated money and therefore, if bitcoin can help with any specifically, it would be more attractive. Especially if, for example, they could use the funds directly without USD conversion and save money in the process. 1. server costs 2. hosting costs 3. domain name costs 4. computer hardware costs 5. purchase of anime DVDs and Blu-rays Below is a list of all the sub groups or anime related groups I know that accept donations in paypal or credit card but not bitcoin. I will add to the list if anyone more knowledgeable can mention some groups. There are hundreds out there. http://haruhichan.comhttp://www.arigatouhell.comhttp://doki.co/http://www.elysiumsubs.comhttp://anime.is-delicio.us/http://hadena-subs.com/http://coalguys.com/http://ggkthx.org/http://static-subs.com/
|
|
|
That's using pooler's JMiner. It was a mistake I made when I coded my first Android LTC Miner. It's too slow and worthless, and was the reason I removed it from the Google Play Store. Now that I compiled the C version CPU Miner, It's a lot faster and more efficient rather than using Android's JVM. And yes, the miner already has a UI So 0.1 is JMiner-based? I get 18 H/s on an atrix (tegra 2, dual core (1 thread), 1GHz, A9, neutrino rom (android 2.3.7)) 35 H/s on an atrix (tegra 2, dual core (2 threads), 1GHz, A9, neutrino rom (android 2.3.7)) 16 H/s on a Galaxy S (hummingbird, single core, 1GHz, A8, cyanogenmod 9) Both at normal priority. So the nexus 7 should get > 80 H/s on Jminer.
|
|
|
Is this a laptop with switchable graphics?
|
|
|
The above comments confuse me. Did I miss something? Anyway, you obviously know a lot from work and I'd probably learn something from a debate with you.
|
|
|
I just cross compiled pooler's cpuminer for my Kindle Fire. It's dual core! I'm getting 0.7 khash/s per core as opposed to 0.02 khash/s on the old Java miner I had coded awhile back! I'm gonna put this back on the Google PlayStore! I'll post pictures in a couple of minutes! Cool. If you want to compile a list of devices and performance for your reference or others, I'd love to test it on my android devices so I'll follow this thread.
|
|
|
Press the link that says "27 Retweets" and you'll see him listed there. It's also on his Twitter timeline. You wanted him to take a picture of him jumping and saying "yupiee, bitcoin"?
If he decides to use Bitcoin he better keep it for himself. You'll know when he launches his site. If he really thinks Bitcoin is an option I'm sure Twitter won't be the place where he'll do his reasearch.
Resuming, you're just talking out of your ass.
No need to insult me. I'm not talking out of my ass. I am talking as someone who doesn't use twitter. I sincerely apologize if I have offended or annoyed you or somehow seemed argumentative. My only intention was to convey my own understanding and ask for clarification. Can we please be civilized here? Anyway, I don't see a link that says "27 retweets" (even ctrl+f on the page). I assume it's because I don't have a twitter account so probably getting a different kind of page. It's good news he's retweeting then NAT is the answer to limited IPv4 addresses in a similar way to buses being an answer to not enough automobiles. Buses work fairly well, reduce the pain of lack of transportation, and have some advantageous side effects, but at the end of the day there are some significant annoyances, complications, and lack of flexibility. In network-land these are particularly noticeable today's (hopefully more) p2p-centric environments. Ah well...after several decades IPv6 seems to be gaining some traction.
I'd love a debate but probably don't want to change the topic of this forum. If you want to continue, feel free to pm me. Metaphors are unnecessary (as I am a network engineering student) and I usually find them confusing and distracting. Not to mention the holes in your metaphor.
|
|
|
So anyway, I've read through this and the articles online and it seems he is completely ignoring the bitcoin suggestions and everyone is ignoring that he is ignoring them. I don't use twitter though. Thoughts on this?
How can he be ignoring those suggestons if he is retweeting them? Have you seen him retweet any other payment provider suggestion besides Bitcoin? He also retweeted Matonis article on Forbes. https://twitter.com/ForbesTech/status/223409880755740672I thought that was forbes, some business news site, not him. Are you saying he owns forbes? I don't see the part from your link where it is him retweeting it. As I said, I don't use twitter so I haven't seen any tweets. But I have seen the forbes article that was tweeted there. My basis for what I am saying comes mainly from this thread, where I have seen no one say anything like: "he's tweeted his interest in bitcoin" "he's tweeted that bitcoin could be an option and has asked for more suggestions" "he's decided to use bitcoin" stuff like that.
|
|
|
single 5830 won't get you much.
Honestly, 300Mhashes/sec is decent. It's good enough for me considering I have FREE electricity. I think I did exactly what you are looking at except I used a different case. I get 321 with a 1GHz overclocking using CGminer inside BAMT from a USB stick on my sapphire 5830. The specs are an Athlon 64 3200+ with an older ASUS AM2+ motherboard with an Nvidia chipset (avoid Nvidia chipsets... not that they make them anymore) and 2GB DDR2. The power supply is an antec VP450 and I would be more than comfortable to add a second card into the PCI-e 1x slot with an adapter and power it with additional molex to PCI-e power connectors. It has now been moved to my metal server rack and sits nicely with the power supply behind it. I built with a used 5830, a new VP450 and the rest spare parts. I wanted to keep my ROI under 3 months at what was $5.50/BTC. So my advice:Here's my current list: OS: Ubuntu BAMT is a lighter-weight linux designed for mining off a 4GB $7 USB stick. Save you $$$ on a hard drive. But if you already have a hard drive, then all the power to you.RAM: 1GB of DDR* If this is the case, you will be looking in the used market for older motherboards that support DDR. DDR3 ram is cheap these days.CPU: Some sort of single-core AMD chip My recommendation is to build an AMD APU based system. You will get some extra megahashes from the GPU part of the APU and they are decently cheap. Something like: http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130641 http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819106013 http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148147Mobo: PSU: CORSAIR 450W 80+ >> just got one for my serverCard: 1x Radeon 5830 (Overclocking and Underclocking memory) >>> I've gotten 1000/300 stableCase: A slice of wood from Home Depot -Slapping on a HDD, mobo, and PSU won't do the job -Gotta find out how to secure parts onto wood...use pen to mark holes and power drill into wood? HDD: Sata2 120GB (Only $10 so...)
|
|
|
It will reach $100 when the demand is sufficient. So the better question is "When will bitcoin become mainstream?"
|
|
|
This sort of reminds me of the guy who said that the worldwide demand for computers would be four or five, and they guy who decided that 4x10^6 IPv4 addresses should be plenty. The chief difference is that the guys who made these two mistakes give every indication of having been clever people who understood the technology and the market space.
There are enough. More than enough, even with rich companies hogging entire address ranges with their class A networks. It's called NAT. So anyway, I've read through this and the articles online and it seems he is completely ignoring the bitcoin suggestions and everyone is ignoring that he is ignoring them. I don't use twitter though. Thoughts on this?
|
|
|
Probably best to close both threads, start a new one in dev and link to it from both. One official thread now that the idea has come to this stage.
|
|
|
At the onset, the process could easily be accomplished manually, but as time passes, I envision that taking way too much effort. That said, I'm open to suggestions.
My answer to most things like this is: Decentralize. My suggestion: Each member can promote any other member to his or her own level, but no higher. Decentralize eh? Seems a good match for bitcoin. How about a new blockchain/"coin" whose sole P2P purpose is to keep track of members? Hmm. I didn't think that through though... the nature of it seems to allow anyone with the software to... invite themselves...
|
|
|
4) Seasonic is the best. Period.
Thank you. Do you have any reasons? Higher efficiency? Lower cost? Cleaner output? Anything? Seasonic has extremely good test results on various sites (see also the well-known corsair brand... seasonic makes their >500W PSUs) A lot of manufacturing places (like the company I used to work for that manufactured electronics test equipment) only use Seasonic power supplies. So, not lower cost, not necessarily higher efficiency (they are as efficient as the rating on the label) but they are the most reliable in everything I have read over the past 3-4 years. That said, I have never owned one.
|
|
|
Anyone feel like officially inviting me?
Consider yourself invited, mokahless. For anybody else still in queue for an invite, please don't fret it or become disappointed. There's plenty of time before Freecoiner comes online. ~Bruno~ Cool thanks. Do you have ideas on how you plan to keep track of members yet?
|
|
|
Anyone feel like officially inviting me?
|
|
|
I intend to keep GPU mining in addition to a BFL J ASIC. My goal is 1GH/s for GPUs. Currently at 0.8GH/s.
Are you going to heat your house, or water? Because otherwise it will be just a waste of electricity. Basically everyone who's planning to continue with either GPUs or FPGAs can be placed in "quit mining" section. That's your opinion. I usually do the math before I spell out numbers here. I'm >85% confident that GPUs will be useless within 1,5-2 month time after the first ASICs are out. FPGA will stay profitable, but ROI will be like 20+ years, or around 10 years if you got free electricity ). The only way for GPU to be still profitable, is for btc to be $10+, and if you want to have same revenue as today, then it should be at $65+. So you were able to take into account all factors of my personal situation in your calculations? Impressive. But yeah, thanks for elaborating. The unpredictability of the future is what makes me hesitant to invest much. I'm currently only purchasing equipment that has an ROI of <3 months at current exchange rate. That limits me to some used video cards and using only the motherboards I currently have on hand. There's no way I could build a new system or even source a full system of spare parts on kijiji with that kind of ROI currently. I can't disagree that what you are saying is a possibility but... BFL always seemed to have long wait times and slow production and shipping. I think your ideas won't come to pass for a while. Unless perhaps they were only doing low-volume before to test the market? Then there is the unpredictability of the bitcoin value.
|
|
|
You should be able to make just over 0.5BTC per day per GH/s at the current difficulty. I get 800MH/s and make ~0.45BTC/24hours at BTCGuild. Hashrate is approximate.
|
|
|
|