Once again, some words without evidence. The data of the exchange and their reputation with everyone on the hulk.
But why should developers take your word for it? Attach links with evidence of their guilt, so that your topic becomes a guiding one for the creators of projects.

1. Yes, perhaps I’m lucky to take part in several good projects
2. For me it’s like a hobby, I don’t see any reason to add a touch.
3. Not interested.
4. Already enjoy. In fact, this is the only thing that interests me in the market.

Each case is unique. However, judging by the statistics, we can conclude that people are more likely to suffer from gambling addiction than vice versa.
Socialization is certainly good, but if it leads to the creation of useful things, things that are useful to the surrounding society.

All right. Any predictions are only guesses and assumptions that do not go beyond the thinking of an individual, which means that they are completely unsound.
The market is not predictable, which means it remains only to do our job, and do it well. Keep it up.

It has always been so. Most of the truly good projects have never run a bounty campaign because they did not need it.
They, as a rule, already had their own external investors, who covered the main capitalization. Everything else fell on the classic types of marketing.

Probably because people are looking primarily for the most convenient for them methods of transferring money.
Credit cards, forwarding between bank accounts and so on are much more convenient, because these funds can be paid in all stores and medical centers.
While bitcoin and cryptocurrency are not accepted everywhere.

All people want to make money. Bounty hunters, like investors, accumulate coins for their own benefit. Everyone hopes to sell a coin at the highest possible price.
But there is one difference, the share of hunters is much smaller than the share of investors, and if the project is crap, then a small share of hunters is enough for the price to drop.
But blaming them for this makes no sense, the point is that the project is crap.

You defend Airdrops however all that you did was bring bare figures that are not backed up by any evidence.
I doubt that you are so lucky that it is you who manage to earn money on Airdrops, while the rest spend a lot of time on this while not earning anything.

In my opinion, control should be carried out before the start of the games.
Indeed, in the process itself, you will often be emotionally involved in the situation, as a result of which you can make an emotional rather than rational decision.
Therefore, you must have a clear retreat plan prescribed in advance.

In my opinion, calling such things gambling is not entirely correct. Gambling is always connected with money, I think this is the main criterion.
If you add the function of playing for money in those games that your family plays, then this could be called gambling.

Perhaps this is the only useful advice that can be taken from this joke.
It is better not to visit such crowded places, it is better to stay at home and wait for the moment when the epidemic will decline.
By the way, in many countries casinos are already quarantined.

In fact, this is just a cocktail from the pleasure of victory, and the desire to win back from losses is thereby what ties players to gambling for a long time.
Each time we promise ourselves not to continue the game, the brain can easily deceive us and convince us that it is worth continuing.

This question is not just about losing money. This is a question of how people experience personal falls, personal crises, personal failures.
Most people have experienced personal crises since childhood that they cannot cope with, they are haunted by constant nervousness, and insecurity in themselves and in their own strengths.

Therefore, the answer to your question lies deep in the depths of the human psyche. Indeed, if a billionaire loses all his capital, he will still have knowledge and skills on how to earn this capital in a new way.
It all depends on whether you believe in your strength or not, you have enough skills to make this money again or not.
If your capital came to you in an easy way, then most likely you would not have kept it anyway.

Once again, a rather strange name that does not correspond to the content of the topic. Who will sell bitcoin at half cost, for what?

After all, a project can easily give everyone $ 10 for a post on Twitter or for joining an official channel to telegrams.
The effect will be exactly the same. Spending such a huge amount of money to attract new users is simply not practical. It all sounds like some kind of trick.

The main question is what will become a project after it collects or does not raise funds.
After all, even good honest and high-quality projects are sometimes not able to cope with the task of raising funds, which ultimately leads to the closure of the project.
But you could support this good project for a year or more. In any case, you will be upset and disappointed with such an unpleasant result.

As a rule, newcomers mainly react to such news and those who do not care what actually caused the price of this coin to rise.
Most often, these are really coins without volume, as you said. However, there are exceptions.
Nevertheless, the majority do not give a damn because they will not be inclined to double-check this information, but will take it for granted because it is more convenient.

One day this is bound to happen, but the question is when. Indeed, many scam coins are able to stay afloat thanks to confident and proper marketing.
By creating a hype around such coins, simulating violent activity, or simply paying the exchange for the volume increase, the developers or creators of the project can maintain the viability of any coin scam for a long time.

I completely agree with you, when your bankroll is less than necessary, it is difficult for you to make sound decisions, especially if you start to lose.
You will often lose control of yourself and your game if you are in a needy position regarding your finances.
Because if you lose, you will lose much more than just money, your debts will increase many times, and the moment of their liquidation will also be postponed.

I doubt it very much.
The fact is that if it were a banking system exclusively in the physical world, then perhaps a reduced number of contacts from the system could somehow affect its operation.

However, now we can see that almost the entire banking system goes digital.

From this we can conclude that an epidemic of this kind will only accelerate the transition of financial systems to the digital environment.

For me, gambling is not an option for making money, so only things related to my core values can stop me.
If for some reason gambling can interfere with my life, my family or my health, then I will stop immediately.