sMerit is Limited and it will be run out of Stack soon.
No, it is not. Read about the actual system before you shitpost. Also, it's not spelled "Stack". |
|
|
|
I run a cryptocurrency worth over a $6 million dollar market cap...
Nobody cares about your little shitcoin, neither is it relevant to the raised concern. Quite a few people do care. And I know for a fact there are larger people watching DNR right now in Silicon Valley. Is this what legendary members are doing now? Trolling coins being actively developed?  What are the odds of you being controlled by the same person/group of people and/or there being ulterior motives at play? Give me a break. DNR is a shitcoin and this project is a very good way to get scammed.  |
|
|
|
You should paint the people that are red tagged appropriately in that table using [color=red ].
I will consider adding that in the future. I don't think red trust necessarily disqualifies someone from being a merit source, and I'm sure theymos or whoever chooses takes it into account already. I might also add a note for accounts that have sent a suspiciously large amount of merit to individuals for no obvious reason. That being said, I'm pretty sure that's also already being looked at when choosing. What are you trying to say here? That someone who is a scammer is going to properly distribute merit points among the users, without abusing it in any possible way? That's just outright naivety. |
|
|
|
I run a cryptocurrency worth over a $6 million dollar market cap...
Nobody cares about your little shitcoin, neither is it relevant to the raised concern. |
|
|
|
This service, according to his signature, is no longer active. You should remove it.
You should: a) Make up an ordering for the lists (e.g. alphabetical). Right now, it seems random and in some places the latest (newest) service is being placed on top which doesn't make sense. b) Change the colors. The styling is just bad. |
|
|
|
Sr. Member, Hero and Legendary do they need a merits?
Yes. These rank should be exempted on merits systems instead they are the one who will judge the lower ranks by giving merits.
No. 1. Newbies that work as a spam will be controlled.
No. 2. It will give an opportunity those newbies that really working hard to rank up in fair time.
If you are *really working hard to rank up*, you are doing it wrong and shouldn't be allowed to rank up to begin with. 3. Merits will be distributed fairly to the lower ranks because higher ranks will not think of their merits anymore.
No. The exact opposite will happen. If I can't receive merit, I would probably not bother giving anyone any. |
|
|
|
|
This is a good way to get scammed. Read the history behind OP.
|
|
|
|
IMO I think ppl like to have a Legendary member or Hero post the thread for them because they feel it brings them more prestige. I think it does quite the opposite. Just makes it look a bit scammy.
Disagreed. Well, we might be thinking of the same thing but you missed out the *purchased posting* part. If a higher ranking member does post an ICO, it adds *somewhat more legitimacy* if he/she is: a) The founder. b) Part of the team. Paid posting like this: 1) Don't really do good. 2) Will end up a disaster for the poster if the project turns out to be a scam. Purchase the Copper member account and post your own ICO. No need to pay someone a penny to help you out
Indeed. |
|
|
|
That is NOT correct.
So one private key can generate only one public key and that one public key can generate only one address? The private key in Wallet Import Format (WIF) as most of us are used to seeing it actually has 3 important parts. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Wallet_import_format- (1 byte) A version number.
- (32 bytes) The ECDSA private key.
- (4 bytes) A checksum.
By changing the version number, you can generate different bitcoin addresses (one for an uncompressed public key, and the other for a compressed public key) with the same ECDSA private key. This will result in a different WIF (both the version number and the checksum will be affected) for that private key though, so when viewed in the typical format it will appear to be a different private key. You are correct. There are potentially nearly 2256 public keys, and there can't be more than 2160 bitcoin addresses. Therefore, there are likely to be multiple public keys (and therefore multiple private keys) that all result in the same bitcoin address. Fortunately, there is no known way to find these additional keys that result in the same address.
|
|
|
|
I didn't see the changes in spreadsheet but I am looking from my smartphone and it is much more difficult to use google spreadsheets on it than on computer.
Hero/Legendary Members when you press on one of their Payments:  |
|
|
|
|
As previously mentioned, I've re-evaluted the payment rates. Should the Bitcoin price be above $13 500, they will be returned to the old ones. They have been changed only for the current bi-week, and are as follows:
Member: 0.004 BTC -> 0.007 BTC.
Full Member: 0.008 BTC -> 0.012 BTC.
Senior Member: 0.02 BTC -> 0.028 BTC.
Hero/Legendary Member: 0.03 BTC -> 0.04 BTC.
You can view these changes in the spreadsheet for the current bi-week.
The last remaining Member, who looks like they will fail to update their address, will be kicked without payment at the end of the round. The campaign will be 100% SegWit (a forum first) after this round.
|
|
|
|
Don'ts
4. Do not use abusive words while replying to thread.
Why not? You would take away the fun from a lot of people who are, let's say, *very expressive*. They don’t study it, they just start panicking about how they could work with forum, how they could earn money and that’s what make them to create junk topics all over the forum asking this and that.
They shouldn't come here just because they want money to begin with, so everything is fine. Looks like you forgot rule 1, this thread has been made dozens of times already This section has become a mess, but if the administration isn't doing anything about it you should just go with the flow. |
|
|
|
It's not sketchy at all. Most of the software has not even reached Beta version, however a lot of people are already using it on the mainnet:  800 channels: https://lnmainnet.gaben.win. Do they have a 'timeline' or are they being the usual 'bitcoin core' coy ...about if/when/ever anything they do is 'ready'  LN developers =/= Bitcoin Core developers although some might have contributed to both. It will be ready whenever they feel it can guarantee that users won't lose any funds due to a weird bug. |
|
|
|
1) I don't run NastyFans.
So you're saying that in the hypothetical case of someone getting tagged and/or legal action being taken, regardless from who, that it should be directed towards nonnakip? No neg rep for Pirateat though...
No neg rep for Quickseller, a known investor in this *charity*. |
|
|
|
Lauda is a peace of shit abusing the trust feedback.
Am collecting some people to add her tomorrow 50 negativ feedbacks since we dont trust him/her and give back for his/her abuse.
PM me
Talk about digging your own hole. Archived for reference: https://archive.fo/CxVft. |
|
|
|
hunting for bounties a crime? or what?
Spamming and abusing anything with alts is *similar to a crime* here. actmyname is a pisshead who is abusing the trust system massivly
He is not abusing anything. |
|
|
|
|
Why did you put spammers and rule breakers into the same list? The former, we shouldn't tag, and the latter we should be tagging.
|
|
|
|
I therefore conclude that any given possible solutions to the previous problems will only create another problem.And these abusive DTs will always find their way to have a reason to give you a red...
They are most certainly not abusive. If you cared about abuse, you would have been fighting against other people being abused. You did not care about it until you got tagged yourself. Therefore, your lazy act has failed. this is how it works and I DONT GIVE A SHIT because i am only here to LEARN Then stop needlessly complaining. |
|
|
|
Looks, I just gave Lauda merit for a random post. Am I part of the cool kids club now?
To help spread the love, I gave aTriz another 10 and you 10.
Meanwhile, baboons like thaayb should really mind their own business. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
