actmyname
b:19,387,420,649
Roll : 71.42

Okay.

Interesting. What does that mean, though?

Ah! Here's the critical point!

Wait... He didn't change his mind. He didn't edit it. You cannot edit posts in Auctions. Aventhe was literally just posting the fact that they did not want to get involved in account trading.

Read above.

And? Plenty of users come from a spammy beginning.
 e.g. Lauda, The Pharmacist [/quote]Enjoy your invisible response.

Caught it, did ya? I sure swindled you!

---

Giddy up, back on over to your hole of despair. [/quote]And I'll keep doing this.

God, your English really sucks, doesn't it? No wonder you got shit on.

Well, that's too bad. Just admit that you're a dumbass and move on. Okay?

[/quote]You're right, actmyname! I'm a dumb poo-poo head and now I'll move on!

---

Yes, yes. It's all true.

[/quote]Feel free to completely disregard the first part of the feedback, which is "account sales encourage [...]"

[/quote]Does that include yourself?

[/quote]Sure, you can link the feedback on my wall. But then again, if all of mine are valid then wouldn't that parallel with your feedback ratings?

[/quote]

False. I looked at your 'explanation'.

You're also sending retaliatory feedback. Hm... where is the real abuse coming from?

---

If these had any substance behind them (or if we were to believe all the feedback given by anyone) then I certainly would not want to be on the forum now, would I?

---

---

If you don't know how to write English, then don't use the goddamned forum. This half-assed explanation that you were simply 'trying to help' the account seller is re-fucking-tarded.

How about I write up a post claiming, "do go here to this site get big money$ $$ (ponzisite.com)" and then when consequences are given, I act as if my English was just poor and state that I didn't mean to write "do" but rather meant to write "don't".

---

Here, I ticked it off for you.

[√] Butthurt

I like Christmas. I like presents on Christmas. Money counts as a present to me. Therefore, I'd like a nice hundred dollar present.

---

inb4 the shilling and flattering comes

Why would you trade without knowing what you're trading?

Are you looking for trust?

---

If you simply look for threads related to the items you're seeking, or create a thread yourself, you can look through potential traders' trust scores and then evaluate them.

Technically, by the rules, scamming is also allowed.

In general, account selling is discouraged for the reasons that The Pharmacist illustrated in his feedback. Trust is given at a user's discretion, and anyone can provide trust for any reason at all. The key bit to take away from this is the fact that his trust is (currently) untrusted and has no impact on most people's perceptions of you, since most have only DefaultTrust in their trust list. I would recommend reading about how trust works in the Meta section to further clarify this.

Cheers.

That's a bit mean. And unfounded.

(as you proceed to write a wall of text)

When you yourself admit that it was a mistake, what more is there to justify the action?

Aw, heck. Did you know that trust is not dependent on rules?

Therefore, whenever there is a legal gray area, you will abuse it and lash out at anyone that questions you?

That seems unwarranted.

Right. Attempted account dealer would be more appropriate.

Screen names never meant anything. Are you a detective?

Good luck. It'll be hard.

Wait why?

Hallucinations?

It looks like this negative trust really got to you, even though it didn't do anything.

See my answer above. #1344

Have you dumped all your bitcoin?
Have you margin traded for BCH?
Have you converted all your FIAT into BCH? (save living expenses)

It's to prevent all the "my ACTIVITY IS NOT INCREASING??!" threads as activity ≠ posts.

Doesn't really fix that problem when account farmers just make newbies that ask the same questions though.

Okay. If you want to explain what I'm missing then go ahead.

If you have everyone playing to be competitive then it shifts between +ev and -ev because of the bonus & people dropping out/in. I'm not sure what's wrong with that idea.

---

I mean, you will most likely get a ton of people never cashing out but you can also consider the main issue with that strategy: a finite bankroll

Let's stop right there! If bonus hunters don't play, then is it not profitable again?

---

This may be akin to stating, "it's a terrible move to bluff on the river: you shouldn't shove with nothing," yet if we keep that ideology, then it suddenly becomes a +ev move. If it's always terrible to bluff on the river and nobody does it, then would it not be profitable to do so? Your opponents would never think that you were bluffing!

---

But in correspondence with bustabit, this will simply result in a sort of oscillation in the number of players.

(when you've run out of threads to poke at so now you shitpost in Meta)

Fuck off.

---

FTFY.

But you have to determine the difference between good traffic and bad traffic.

Traffic that results in only players abusing the bots ≠ good traffic.
Same thing with freerolls. The biggest problem is establishing a large enough player base to create an incentive to deposit & play. It's a positive feedback loop for both the recession of traffic and the increase of traffic, both of which plateau at a certain point.

Get ready to have a lot of scams pop back up again

How amusing. CryptoCopy.

Did you PM them yet?

I don't think so. There would most likely be an account-based blockage as well as an IP-based block. Perhaps the account-based one is pre-emptively assumed due to the fact that the IP must wait.