I have a question. What would happen if the person who quotes my signed message happens to hack my account? Couldn't they simply change both my post and the post they used to quote my signed message?
I think it would probably be better to have a thread setup by an admin that has a specific message that needs to be signed and uses custom settings so that posts cannot be edited or deleted (similar to the auction sub forum)
Well, that is why it is to be quoted twice by two users. I also mentioned to sign the message so that someone doesn't accidentally post a bitcoin address that cannot be signed. |
|
|
|
Any spots left for full member?
Yes. You can check from the document (link is also on my signature) Ok, then I would like to join. Name: twister Posts: 1200 Activity: 238 Position: Full Member Address: 123Get818NzrAiYRs28dJkga9FdHxmWBnE Since the next payment would be on Tuesday, I would have the whole week to make at-least the minimum post count, which is 20, right? Let me know if I am enrolled. Hi ndnhc, I see my name on the 'New Enrollees' list in the spreadsheet, however it doesn't shows starting post counts? Starting post count is not required for new enrollees. Your enrollment post is in a different format altogether.  So am I enrolled? Or do I need to provide anything more. I think this was the only thing missing : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=361475;sa=showPostsAnd how will the counting of posts be done if starting post is not recorded in the spreadsheet? You are enrolled. I already added that links when you enrolled. No post count required, posts will be counted from your enrollment post. If you see your name on the Enrollment sheet, then you are enrolled. That is it.  |
|
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Signed by ndnhc on 19 March, 2015
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1At8KjNtUyAhWdUuNrZyUsCVQCFqcuY68m
G9cDOsqYCh/IAi0bS6ctbPs78Toh0OdaX+CSUsc/zT2jU2TQ7Ox/49kFwZ5hbTakEf+Sr6efPcLsdG8obl4ai+w=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
|
Please proceed to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0 to stake your address.
How: Sign a message after quoting the two persons immediately above you. (Carefully remove the quote of the third person, to avoid it going too long later.)
Why? Very useful to prove ownership of your account, for security, trust, and similar reasons.
Esp. To get your account restored in case it get hacked.
Signing the message should contain : Date, and your account name.
https://brainwallet.github.io/#verify
Standard format for this thread:
Example:Signed by ndnhc on 19 March, 2015 or This address was owned by Josef27 @bitcointalk.org
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=369756
Signed on: 19/03/2015, Thursday |
|
|
|
I am the only one who is in the list of "new enrollees" now, scared.
lol, you were added to Enrollment Sheet. Non-English posts do not count. |
|
|
|
Any spots left for full member?
Yes. You can check from the document (link is also on my signature) Ok, then I would like to join. Name: twister Posts: 1200 Activity: 238 Position: Full Member Address: 123Get818NzrAiYRs28dJkga9FdHxmWBnE Since the next payment would be on Tuesday, I would have the whole week to make at-least the minimum post count, which is 20, right? Let me know if I am enrolled. Hi ndnhc, I see my name on the 'New Enrollees' list in the spreadsheet, however it doesn't shows starting post counts? Starting post count is not required for new enrollees. Your enrollment post is in a different format altogether. |
|
|
|
I filled that form, not sure what you get out of it though. Maybe you can shed some light on it when you are back. Go to the old spreadsheet and click on 'New Enrollees' tab and you will see your entry there. (I removed your entry though. Double entry plus the post count you entered is more than the post count we are supposed to start counting from) |
|
|
|
Wagered full 1 BTC. Don 1.000 PROFIT: -0.23971309 Dang!  |
|
|
|
but how is the prize distributed between the winners? you take the whole amount played in three categories and distribute it according to the percentage you have bet in the winner category?
Yes.
Locking this thread for now.. |
|
|
|
What happened? There was 3 seconds to go, I made a 0.05 BTC bet and it went to the next game? 1. If it was in the previous round, it was over, but it went to next round. 2. If it was in th next round, it should show error Not success. I hadn't read this thread till now, and didn't know of this weird issue. You are supposed to fix it and I think even if it was made on the 0 second left (it was showing 3), it should either show error not below 0.005 or show in the previous round.Not somewhere, in the middle  with tinasun and I have point it out in this thread. when you bet on 0:00：00， it went to next round with the max of five times last bet you made. and only that special moment. not 0:00:01 we can see last round http://girlbtc.com/dashboard/rounds/?time=1426701600 Hobbastank lady 0.025 2015-03-18 17:59:55 bitmars girl 0.125 2015-03-18 17:59:58 and at last bitmars won with final bet. and Don's bet is special at 0:00:00, it was in the next round. If this is an issue, why are you not fixing it? of course it is the issue ,which made the final bet more interesting. you must catch the xx:59:59 or you will push a massive of btc to the next round, and the advantage is the fee is zero. if there is no this kind of issue ,everyone is try to catch xx:59:59 final bet ,when the result is very clear. which make the game in a bad way. If it was supposed to be like that, and you already knew it, you are supposed to mention it in the rules or somewhere. Especially if it is a weird thing no one has seen before.  |
|
|
|
What happened? There was 3 seconds to go, I made a 0.05 BTC bet and it went to the next game? 1. If it was in the previous round, it was over, but it went to next round. 2. If it was in th next round, it should show error Not success. I hadn't read this thread till now, and didn't know of this weird issue. You are supposed to fix it and I think even if it was made on the 0 second left (it was showing 3), it should either show error not below 0.005 or show in the previous round.Not somewhere, in the middle with tinasun and I have point it out in this thread. when you bet on 0:00：00， it went to next round with the max of five times last bet you made. and only that special moment. not 0:00:01 we can see last round http://girlbtc.com/dashboard/rounds/?time=1426701600 Hobbastank lady 0.025 2015-03-18 17:59:55 bitmars girl 0.125 2015-03-18 17:59:58 and at last bitmars won with final bet. and Don's bet is special at 0:00:00, it was in the next round. If this is an issue, why are you not fixing it? |
|
|
|
Well, there is a way to count it indicatively https://docs.google.com/forms/d/14mkNdaj0AYWkThqX1pbVLQUtjvOucg-Iuhr0OY6ppfc/viewform?usp=send_form (so that we can avoid variations due to human error) I will start a poll, on the weightage issue soon. But first let us be patient, and wait for the discussion to be over. Otherwise, you won't know what you are fighting against. Here are the points we have till now: Pros: 1. Effective advertising (negatives are in cons) 2. Most likely, all boards, even off-topic will have some weight. Cons: 1. Promotes spam 2. Gets people to post in where they don't really want to? etc. Let us not discuss this any further for 24 to 48 hours. |
|
|
|
Thanks Well, I want all of your opinion regarding what payout should each board get: Like we can say: (with random amounts) Gambling section gets 1.25x Other marketplace boards get 1.1x Offtopic gets 0.1x Meta gets 0.25x? etc.. Also, since we don't rely on a bot to do the counting, do you have any ideas we could implement in making this er.. weighted counting more efficient? (that is assuming we differentiate between constructive and non-constructive) I wrote something about this in the main campaign thread (whoops) but I'll reiterate here for convenience sake. I hope you do not go down this route. As you insinuate, counting will become more difficult and what's more, we begin to have an incentive to post in boards we wouldn't otherwise post in because of the weights. You have reiterated "post because you want to post" but implenting weights for subfora works against this, IMO. Well, you still post where you want to post. You don't have to post in a board just because it has more payout. It won't be a big difference. May be a small increase. Anyway, it is dadice who suggested. We are discussing on it. After that when we reach a conclusion, we can talk more about that. Yes, it is going to be a pain to count the posts like that. So, we need a method in case it is adopted. |
|
|
|
|
God exists.
Scientific proof?
First we need a spiritual proof that Science exists.
(Then only we can go for 'scientific' proof, right?)
|
|
|
|
Well, that is exactly what the discussion is about. I would rather tell you after it is over. Right now, even I don't know what we are finally going to decide. Hmm...But I hope the changes are made from next week as I would not post in the Gambling section just for the campaign. I prefer making posts that are of my interest and I want to voice my opinion No problem. That is exactly what we want you to do |
|
|
|
What happened? There was 3 seconds to go, I made a 0.05 BTC bet and it went to the next game? 1. If it was in the previous round, it was over, but it went to next round. 2. If it was in th next round, it should show error Not success. I hadn't read this thread till now, and didn't know of this weird issue. You are supposed to fix it and I think even if it was made on the 0 second left (it was showing 3), it should either show error not below 0.005 or show in the previous round.Not somewhere, in the middle |
|
|
|
Thanks Well, I want all of your opinion regarding what payout should each board get: Like we can say: (with random amounts) Gambling section gets 1.25x Other marketplace boards get 1.1x Offtopic gets 0.1x Meta gets 0.25x? etc.. Also, since we don't rely on a bot to do the counting, do you have any ideas we could implement in making this er.. weighted counting more efficient? (that is assuming we differentiate between constructive and non-constructive) |
|
|
|
There might be rules coming up (under discussion) that will giver higher pay to gambling posts.
The Games and Rounds section is excluded, since they are mostly making bets like soccer, etc. and giveaways while the other sub-board is ponzi section.
Well, we might include the constructive posts in Games and Rounds section too soon.
We are also going to implements 'varying rates' from this or next week and gambling will of course be the highest paid one. Unfortunately we don't rely on a bot, so other boards (at least most boards) will have the same rate.
So is it that you will be decreasing the pay in other sections? I don't post in Gambling section as I don't gamble neither want to do so  Well, that is exactly what the discussion is about. I would rather tell you after it is over. Right now, even I don't know what we are finally going to decide. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
