I don't think we will hit new ATH but probably it could go closed to the latest ATH because halving usually make bitcoin's worth increase and will affect how the miners will sell their BTC at considering it become a lot rarer and hard to get.
But what I afraid is that if the reward is not worth it anymore some miners will just give up with the mining and therefore we will lose some hash power. Hopefully the price of bitcoin could keep up with the halving so that it still profitable.

Remember that these debt will be no more when there's a war. I mean, debt is debt but if a war started to clash what does this debt could act for? as you said, It will be better to go war instead of paying all the debt because it's just too immense and you need to remember how much effort the US spent to keep the countries with different ideology in check and now it's getting out of hand and I'm pretty sure in the future we will see unexpected move from each country.

I know that well only industrial country that could process their raw material into something even more valuable could grow into a rich country take example of south korea and china they could become developed country from a poor country in short period of time and that's because they are industrial country and the chinese's growth after so much investors coming there is immense but now the turn for vietnam after the trades war. The problem with underdeveloped country is that they are always lacking common sense to process their own material and the corruption aswell. they still think about their own wealth and not for the entire country. but the weak currency that these underdeveloping countries have is also a problem for their advancement of the infrastructure.

I think we really stuck in term of adoption because I can't see crypto getting adopted by big company nowaday, most of the time crypto only accepted by small company that need users but not big company, the backlash from the government after the proposal of libra could have serious affect too regarding this.
the big company dont want to take risk into accepting bitcoin and I still wonder why stablecoin is also lacking the adoption because these stablecoin basically just a digtalized cash and to see that no one bats an eyes is really confusing.

this movement makes sense if you know that they are only want to adopt the blockchain system and not the cryptocurrency. they've always been like this and people are forgetting the fact that cryptocurrency is different with blockchain while blockchain is just a system that is beneficial and crypto is its product.

You just saw someone that doesn't represent the whole generation, yes there are some millennials that even their capability are just doing something stupid like that but there are some that really contributes to the society as the silly and foolish one usually stands out the most. You just don't need to be so pessimistic about this generation, if you don't believe just see the amount of startups that are growing everyday that definitely shows this generation is doing something and not just wasting their time as you said.

It is to be expected that some people are not really into technology and to not know cryptocurrencies or some sort is totally human and bitcoin was initially created for a currency anyway and not source of income it's the people that make it happen.
Also some people are ignorant enough to think that cryptocurrency is a scam because their government says so and some of the millenials even believe that even bbut tbh there's no such thing as passive income with bitcoin if you just trade or holding it.

The list is dominated by the stablecoins even if it qualifies to be taken into account you must include USDT aswell but in my opinion including stablecoin as top 10 ERC20 Succesfull ICO is really wrong I mean there's no ICO for all these stablecoin to begin with they just come up with the reserve fund and offering people their stablecoin and not even opening initial coin offering and some names are even I don't familiar with so maybe there's another factor that makes you decide to put those list of coin you consider most succesfull.

first, China never friendly with crypto to being with, they are just trying to implement blockchain and you must remember or know that Crypto is a product of blockchain and is not in favor of China meanwhile the blockchain system is what china deem as revolutionary.
second, China is trying to create their own crypto ofcourse to beat down other crypto to pulp they could just do this to secure the market share for their own crypto. There's no such thing as china love crypto, people are just too optimistic about this.

I really guess that the government will just lock up the account that have suspicious transaction for some period of time while also investigating and this happen only if you have solid proof or a government tells them that they found illegal money got into the exchange's wallet. Otherwise they will just dont care but fortunately nowadays they require KYC to prevent AML aswell as preventing any stolen money from being cashed out from their exchange and that ofcourse require cooperation from both sides fastly otherwise it will just gone.

I heard from some news that the hongkong riot just only increase the use of bitcoin to store their wealth a little. Quite the opposite, people there are trying to move their assets to a country with good stability and if possible to gain a permanent residence aswell since they probably worry that their assets will be in danger.
Quite different to country with fragile economy that uses bitcoin to seek profit instead of utlising its function of stroing wealth which quite honestly too volatile.

You know a good trading volume can be build up by hyping the coin and that was the case for so many project in the past. the token may be just another shit token or even just a clone of some already existing token with basically the same functionality but if there's some kind factor that could make people hyped about the project for example using popular people's name to their advisor and team of developers then it could gather the attention of the crowd. But then afterward people realize that the coin is basically a shit coin in disguise and it will lost the volume and popularity afterwards.

You know people will get tired if they are getting shoved with all these IEO down their throat every week. All these platform taking a break is the best decision as of now anyway and considering that the current market is bearish if you start an IEO right now the answer will be always obvious that the project will always fail in the listing on exchange and take massive dump at the first round. It's just they are waiting for the right time in my opinion to avoid any losses because if there's a project that become a big failure they will take the blame.

Bruh, even in 3rd world country the law enforcement to the people who avoid to pay taxes could be even worse. I've heard that lives are valueless in a 3rd world country and what the government care is just gathering the tax as much as they can and then just misuses all the tax income for stupid things. The percentage that goes for the taxes also usually just as high as 1st world country but have no infrastructure or even free healthcare whatsoever. It's literally a hellpit where you will be enslaved by the government to work and give them percentage of your earning and literally gets nothing in return while 1st world countries usually have nice infrastructure and many more.

It's always the efficiency that matters most when it comes to business and there is also the transparency to help review the overall transaction because of the fact that blockchain always write down all the transaction since it was created until the latest block. I could definitely understand that for Bank instead of waging a war against it they adopt it. Although all these thing are still experimental in my eyes and doesn't guarantee that it will bring that real value to the Bank but we will definitely see in the future.

maybe you accidentally press send button when there's a request demanding for BTC maybe in the past you want to buy something with BTC? It makes zero sense to think that you just conscious of a transaction that you haven't done sending money to someone else after 22 days. Or if possible maybe there's someone close to you that knows or have access to your wallet?


Not true. You can get a malware that replace the address everytime you copied everything and then you can accidentally losing your cryptos or even keylog that record all your seeds.

The funding clearly moved to IEO it's a clear pattern people are getting tired of dealing with someone they dont even know and letting their money in the hand of someone who might turns out as such irresponsible developer anymore. Every IEO will absolutely getting listed and that make people rest easy not worrying about if the project listed to an unknown exchanges instead. the ICO that could still hold up until now is probably the best out there because getting funding from ICO is becoming a lot harder and harder because people are more cautious.

I mean if government forcing people to sell their bitcoin to the government isn't that adding the demands and could start the rumour that bitcoin and cryptos is starting to be accepted just because the government wanted to buy it? doesn't make sense at all. You need to remember that governments aren't officialy accepting bitcoin they always observing and didnt intervene until now but I know if they want to accept crypto they will create their own just like what china proposed because government is all about taking control over everything.

Well lets be real here, if there comes the financial crisis it will make all the financials sector suffer and that includes cryptocurrencies. People at that time will need money or basic needs to survive and selling crypto if they have is one of the option because many people actually consider cryptocurrencies as digital property and not currency. People at financial crisis always consider to sell things that they consider not much of a help because that's all what they can do.

I believe it can be decentralized but the real answer is, is it effective? there are so many projects out there trying to decentralize literally everything and ended up failing because no one uses thier product. Youtube can be decentralized, but then there'll be some technical problem occur if it's p2p and a decentralized social media is already existed I believe but not that popular.
Decentralized is good indeed but not that needed in some aspect of our life, it's just like how if things become too centralized it will be bad. Youtube and facebook are alrady having a good time with their centralized nature so I guess there's no point of switching over to decentralization, they will also have a hard time to manage everything including ads if that to happen.