I saw the option earlier this evening when I was about to place a bet for Liverpool's game. After building up my bet with different props but couldn't get it through as it kept toggling between the single and multi bet tabs. So I ended up not placing the bet.  Despite not placing my bet with the builder (already had a running acca). I like the feature and would love to see it on more events.

---

Anybody know if we can put more than one betbuilder bets into an acca/multibet slip or mix it up with other selections in a multibet?

He simply wants to buy Altcoins, not implement comprehensive trading strategies. So don't think that he has to prepare himself with simulators and co.

The fact alone that this question has to be asked shows for me that the exchanges are still far away from being able to be used by people who are not so technically versed. In my opinion, Bitpanda is going a very good way here. There is exactly one button in the app with "Buy" or "Sell". There are no overloaded UIs, no additional settings etc. and can therefore be used by all user groups:

I've seen a lot of negative comments (even ones based on nothing real) and they don't remove those posts. I don't mind a self-moderated topic as they can remove senseless spam in this thread as that sometimes happen.

DeFi is a tryst less community. What were you thinking think when members locked 11 billions usd worth of token on DeFi, it's an autonomous trust less ecosystem. No one can temper with the funds. Only user who met the conditions can interact with this funds when they interact with the smart contract.
The only challenge here is, computer rarely make errors as humans, sometimes Hackers temper with smart contract when they see a bug and they tend to used that as an advantage to launder funds locked on these smart contracts. Some of these contracts are well audit but still, human makes mistakes. As in the case of Yam, kimchi etc.

still can't affect my estimate for the latest system defi, because every update will always attract more attention but the results that look new are a little very vulnerable to behavior that looks for opportunities in situations like this, it's good to see developments first and can't decide in fast tempo. so as not to be affected by things that might be detrimental.

It's like your seeing the Leeds team through my eyes. There style or tactics of play is just amazing for a team that just came off the championship. They come out to play football and not being scared to hold their defence line.

Chelsea didn't impress me much today, though they managed to bag home a point with a 3-3 come back. The game was supposed to be a win for Chelsea.

It's up to you. But in my opinion, it's a good idea to bet higher on those matches that you are more confident with.
If you are already very familiar to the both of the team, then that should somehow means that you can place better predictions to the result of their match.
If so, I suggest placing higher bets.

But just like I said, it will depend on your senses that time.

Oh Yeah I think it does.  Some names just sound more appealing then others.
A good name versus a bad name can be the difference if people want to invest in your project or not to.

Watford is doing amazing right now but they haven't utilized the transfer window just yet, if they sell too many good players (specially sarr for example) that means they will drop to championship level anyway, right now they are playing like a relegation level premier league team which is better than championship teams (at least most of them) so at the end of the day they need to keep as many players as possible.

And in case they sell one player because that player wants to and can't keep him, they need to find someone at least as good or even better because new player would have to get used to the team and also the strategy along with his teammates, so it would be difficult to replace a player with same level. It is a very tricky situation and I hope they get out of it easily.

any ideas on how DeFi 2.0 will progress? 

BTC has been wrapped into ETH and into smart contracts what is the next steps?

Huobi just posted they will be launching Defi 2.0:

I also believe LINK is going to the moon again, but not anytime soon. Because LINK will at least correct up to $ 3. After that,
the pump will reach an all time high price of $ 19, in fact I believe LINK's price will be able to go up to $ 30 by the end of this year.
But this target can be achieved provided there is no bad news about LINK and the Bitcoin price does not dump below $ 10,000.

On the other hand, and I've said this before, it does make it rather difficult to chat, you can say one thing and it just gets lost in 2 seconds buried under a lot of other chatter posts. So it's very tough to have a proper conversation, but I guess you can't have it all;)

Ofcourse, not. Tell you what, no one became that good in trading without making a mistake. Besides, trading isn't a risk free venture though, it was and would always been entagled with risk, even those experienced individuals tend to commit such mistake  . So, don't expect that you'll be to avoid one. And who knows? You might achieve amazing feat here, if you'll just set your mind into it.

Random values do not guarantee fairness (given that it is proved to be totally random), you can not just use a random value generator on internet and just assume they are 100% or even 80% fair and that is because you don't know how they come up with the values and there's nothing transparent like blockchain to back it up, that's the whole idea behind gambling websites that use provably fair system and seed numbers that are being hashed and sent out to the players and even if players want they can add their own seed number to make sure that the gambling website is not tampering with the results, that way there is significantly less chance(still not zero) of any wrongdoing on the website part.

There are places that do show wrong numbers as well on the pandemic death. I saw a paper with proof online that some person put his grandpa into ICU because his grandpa had corona and he waited for 3 days for him to recover, on third day morning his grandpas results came back negative and he no longer had corona which made him happy but then they told him his grandpa passed away and on official paper it looks like he died from pneumonia so they basically faked his death as something other than corona.

If the dude didn't proved this with papers and results and dates I wouldn't believe him but it really happened. So, that means pandemic is not going away, it is still here and that means recovery may not be as quick as people imagined it would be, we could still be going down once again.