I think Gambling section is allowed but subsections aren't, for ex. Games and rounds & Investor-based games.
Yes, exactly. I forgot that the subsection of gambling were invalid for the payment, I will do better this week  I admit I haven't followed all the changing stipulations on which sections are paid and which aren't, but it's quite a surprise to me if you're correct that "gambling" wouldn't be paid. Presumably, as a gambling site, dadice would value advertising in "gambling" quite highly. I know that in the preview of Stunna's (not yet released) sig campaign with varying rates for different sections, gambling was in the highest paid class. Why wouldn't dadice want to advertize in gambling? There might be rules coming up (under discussion) that will giver higher pay to gambling posts. The Games and Rounds section is excluded, since they are mostly making bets like soccer, etc. and giveaways while the other sub-board is ponzi section. Well, we might include the constructive posts in Games and Rounds section too soon. We are also going to implements 'varying rates' from this or next week and gambling will of course be the highest paid one. Unfortunately we don't rely on a bot, so other boards (at least most boards) will have the same rate. We still had counted the constructive posts (only) of the Games and Rounds section. But for FanEagle, (they weren't really constructive and especially) off-topic posts are not counted. |
|
|
|
Escrow or no one plays. Simple as that.
I think you still owe me for topping the one before the one before this one.
We didn't reach the minimum amount of bought levels to be able to payout. This time, we lowered the prizes and upped the fee for answers. I hope that even things out so it can run smoothly. This is the first time you mention this. It was stated nowhere in the previous game. You still owe me the prizes. We've returned all bought answers. Over 0.15 was returned to players. If we missed you, your Bitcoin can be credited towards answers for this new game.
You are supposed to pay the prize, not refund the amount. btw, I didn't even get a satoshi. Can you post the transaction id?  |
|
|
|
Any spots left for full member?
Yes. You can check from the document (link is also on my signature) |
|
|
|
Special Announcement!
The minimum post restriction has been waived for very good quality posters.
The bonus has been changed to 0.1BTC for top 3 constructive posters. does this mean that there will be a 0.1 x 3 bonus each week for the constructive poster or 3 of the week constructive poster will share the bonus among them? Yeah, there will be 3 winners of 0.1 BTC each every week.  Oops, I will edit that to make it more proper. In the Signature thread OP, it was done right, I think. |
|
|
|
Special Announcement!
The minimum post restriction has been waived for very good quality posters.
The bonus has been changed to 0.1BTC each for top 3 constructive posters every week.. |
|
|
|
Special Announcement!
The minimum post restriction has been waived for very good quality posters.
The bonus has been changed to 0.1BTC each for top 3 constructive posters every week... |
|
|
|
I forgot that the subsection of gambling were invalid for the payment, I will do better this week Re-enrolled. Posts are counted from 2009. You haven't removed the signature, right? Make the posts very constructive. |
|
|
|
Didn't get anything, did I do something wrong?
at least 20 minimum constructive posts, I just checked the document, you have only 13 constructive posts, which is unqualified. I needed 15, but two missed the cut off it seems. Did they need to be posted pre 12pm GMT or something? Need some better clarification Yep, sorry. Don't wait till the last minute to finish the post number. You are supposed to post for the community, lol Since we are from different time zones from different continents, we can either make it a little early or late. So we just do the counting early, in case of any unforeseen circumstances. Posts you made after the count will only show up in the next week. 30 icey Hero member 0.0015 1BFai99XW5ZxwjNG8dqLKrzwqpSTUxD6Yk 1303 1305 2It is so, because we assume that the participants do not make posts for campaigns and does not fit their posts to the criteria in the last few hours. |
|
|
|
I posted about this topic a few months ago and the responses I got were pretty interesting: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=677129Bitmixer.io automatically excludes posts that are under 75 characters in length although I believe it is the only one out there that has such a restriction. For any particular post, length is a poor-to-average indicator of constructiveness. For example, here is a post I made that was very short but reasonably constructive. The OP complained about the newbie posting limits and believed that their posts were getting discarded by the forum software. I was the first to reply that that this was not in fact true and showed them how to retrieve their posts by accessing the draft feature. Post length becomes a better indicator of constructiveness once it is applied to posting history. Those with entire post histories that consist of short one or two sentence replies are highly likely to have their posts classed as unconstructive while the opposite is true for those who have a history of making lengthier posts. As for some examples of highly constructive posts, here is one and here is another. Note that these posts manage to be constructive without being overly long. For an automated solution, post length is probably the only realistic measure of constructiveness that we have today since machines currently lack the intelligence to classify posts based on their semantics and context within the overall thread. [snip] Of course you're right that this is indeed beyond the scope of most signature ad campaigns but in fact we might have the technology to do this, given the work. Imagine you train a classifier on the posts of a thread and then measure the perplexity of a given post with respect to that thread, I wonder if you could find the right set of features such that this sort of framework could be a proxy for "constructiveness". Yeah, that is why we don't use bots |
|
|
|
Enrolled. Enrolled. Hmmm, well,.. Enrolled. Some of your posts are in the borderline. Could improve. Tip: Make some extremely constructive posts, that no one can say is unconstructive. |
|
|
|
|
A few has been removed for this week.
Enrollment will be stricter from this week. Based on previous post quality. There may be a few denied from this week.
|
|
|
|
All payments for the week of March 10th have been released.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thank you
Confirmed. Thank you for being an awesome escrow |
|
|
|
|
Escrow or no one plays. Simple as that.
I think you still owe me for topping the one before the one before this one.
|
|
|
|
What do I need to improve on?
Nothing much. Just try to make a few very very constructive posts. |
|
|
|
tspacepilot asked this above. It's too bad we can't see which posts were excluded or know something of the rationale behind the exclusion (wrong section, or they simply thought it wasn't helpful, etc). I got an A and I'm telling my mother! I got B grade and my mumma will beat me if she hears this   I got B- my mummy is use to see D so she will be happy! Thanks great campaign! Edit: Anyway ill try to improve but my english stops me.  Tip: You post a lot in lending. . May be explore other boards? Ill do but I dont know nothing about mining or analisy. Anyway ill try at begginers and help or so... Could you tell me a thread that works fine with my english level? Thanks That is just a suggestion. Do the posting for you, not for the campaign. And everything will automatically work out. |
|
|
|
Just lost 0.1+ BTC. Don. Made 0.78 BTC wager though.. |
|
|
|
tspacepilot asked this above. It's too bad we can't see which posts were excluded or know something of the rationale behind the exclusion (wrong section, or they simply thought it wasn't helpful, etc). I got an A and I'm telling my mother! I got B grade and my mumma will beat me if she hears this I got B- my mummy is use to see D so she will be happy! Thanks great campaign! Edit: Anyway ill try to improve but my english stops me. Tip: You post a lot in lending. . May be explore other boards? |
|
|
|
tspacepilot asked this above. It's too bad we can't see which posts were excluded or know something of the rationale behind the exclusion (wrong section, or they simply thought it wasn't helpful, etc). I got an A and I'm telling my mother! I got B grade and my mumma will beat me if she hears this B means Excelent, btw A - Beyond Awesome B- Excellent. C- Okey-dokey D- Needs to improve E- How did you even get here?* *No offence**In this post '-' is hyphen not minus. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
