but I am wondering it is fair for ALL MEMBERS in here???
Yes, stop whining. I'm tired of these *pretend I really care about the system, but I'm actually only concerned about my own ranking up* threads.
An extra bonus: You're breaking the forum rules due to the way that you're responding to this thread. |
|
|
|
That's partially why I sped up work on merit. I don't agree with using the trust system for pure spam; that's not what it was designed for.
Finally. Love this very needed post to clarify your stance on what's been happening. +50 Merit points.....Wanted to give all 500 That doesn't make theymos any less wrong with his stance, and that doesn't make it any less likely that those other people aren't doing something else worth neg. rating. Time for the Pharmacist and AMN to turn into detectives. Ive been contacting these DTs but they ignored my request to remove it,and most of the people who got redtrust from them aren't native english speakers.
Just because we shouldn't do it, that doesn't mean that those users haven't really deserved it. |
|
|
|
Personal grudges should be left out of public lists like these.
They shouldn't if the user mentioned fits the profile. Just because someone has a grudge against someone else, that doesn't mean that either party doesn't fit the profile of a list. |
|
|
|
El problema de fees y tiempo es obvio, esta me parece una muy buena solución para que bitcoin pueda ser realmente usado en la vida diaria.
Ayudará con fees, sí. ...debemos tener unos bitcoin cash guardados por si acaso, ya que es el bitcoin original de satoshi.
Bcash es no *bitcoin original de satoshi*. Tienes que ser *brainwashed* para pensar eso. |
|
|
|
Tagged. You should watch this user, i.e. where exactly he is going to send his sMerit to. |
|
|
|
Haha, Im at 910 activity and got knocked back to hero for eternity now. Cant say it will bother me too much.
You are literally bothered by it, as shown here: They should have just reset everyone back to 0 though, that way we wouldnt have any artificial merit.
Legendaries and hero members are at the safe zone now, why would they care about us ?
We don't care about shitposters, that's correct. The only thing they are willing to care about is their position.
Wrong. The fact is 99% Hero members and Legendaries feel happy about this merit system even some of them are under-quality posts  . Obviously. The rank has nothing to do with posting quality (before this new system). |
|
|
|
Example: if you was in bitcointalk forum a few years ago, you posted a lot of under-quality posts and you earned Legendary Rank, so it is unfair with new people joining this forum now.
Equivalent example: If something was legal 10 years ago, and now it is not, it is unfair to all the new people that *might want to do it* now.  And a lot of projects need bitcointalk rank level such as bitsend airdrop (need Legendary rank), so it is much harder if this new system running.
That's the whole point. And I lose my faith in this forum. I will still read and post in this forum but not in supporting anymore.
No argument. If a new forum created and quality much better than you, I will go a new place.
You won't be missed. |
|
|
|
Would the merit system make it easier for campaign managers and mods to spot people who are multi-accounting and abusing signature and ICO campaigns?
Maybe, maybe not. I think that it won't take long before we'll see people giving out merit point to their own various Bitcointalk accounts, thus leaving a digital trail that ties the accounts together.
Where exactly would they get their initial merit from? You do not get sMerit unless you are a source (past the initial phase) or someone gives you merit. Who would give random merit points for useless posts?
Stop opening so many threads. Close this one and keep your discussion within existing ones. |
|
|
|
but im not sure it guarantees people who post properly will progress through the merit system.
It's not supposed to. It's supposed to make ranking up significantly harder, which is a good thing in every single way.
The people who are voting 'very bad' in this poll are mostly 3rd world shitposters. |
|
|
|
What do i do?
Nothing other than being a good member of the community. The more you persist on bothering someone, the more they are going to resent you. This is why I keep filling up my PM ignore list nicely. |
|
|
|
Well I like the new system for obvious reasons but I think lot of people are just going to be using different platforms to talk about Bitcoin and alts.
Your opinion is pure bullshit. We do not need greedy shitposting monkeys. They can go to some other rabbit hole. So on one hand it's good but on the other it will take away the dominant position of BitcoinTalk.
No. This makes sense, but to avoid wasting sMerits - which should be used to support helpful community members to raise in rank - it would still be good to either reject the reward to legendaries, or maybe don't subtract the given sMerits in that case.
I disagree. Not all legendaries are equal, and Merit points may finally be that which was needed to make the difference more clear. |
|
|
|
I think His existing camp with jamal is Utrust which is shady and still not paying their participants eventhough their coins and sale end up for long months ago.
While, admittedly, I do not know the situation with that bounty campaign, that is still past work. Especially if it is unfinished, Avirunes can't leave. If there is really something wrong with that campaign, then that would warrant a separate thread with proof (naturally). |
|
|
|
That's not a link to Avirunes. this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
No. It's an example of the exact opposite, i.e. the trust system working as intended. Avirunes does no longer work with that shady user, and I *trust* them enough not to warrant a negative. If he/she does continue working with him (or them), then they'd be a liar and that would warrant a negative from me as well. |
|
|
|
I'm not Prettymie.
the user asked where to find the bounty manager. I gave the link and quoted his message.
You are correct. The connection is invalid. |
|
|
|
it's a very bad idea ....very difficult for other language users!
It's a very bad idea for shitposters, yes. |
|
|
|
Tagged both of them.
I'm not entirely convinced of this / don't see sufficient proof. |
|
|
|
Strongly inclined to tag this one. Tagged. Working hard to break rules I guess, cause that's pretty much what you are doing
Looks like the account went dormant (or temporarily dormant until it sees this message), meaning that there is even stronger reason to tag the other guy.
Thoughts? |
|
|
|
Funny since I'm a very trustworthy person.
You are not, you are a random. Negative trust is there for scammers and theives.
It is not. My hero account I've worked on very hard is now worthless and pointless and I have a nasty red mark next to my name.
By posting in generic and useless threads? Very hard work indeed. People steal from others. Campaign managers sometimes steal and they receive nothing so what I learn is that being a thief is ok but spamming or not reading is not.
Relative privation fallacy. No problems about me just one post one random person didn't like and now years if working getting this account ranked up is gone.
Nothing wrong with that. There are not very nice people here and I really needed that money.
This is exactly why you should not be allowed to enroll in campaigns. Find a real job. Good luck to you all and stay away from d2 members they will nail you for whatever reason they feel because someone decided giving them that power was appropriate. One person can mess your career up here.
Whining won't score you any plus points. This person gave out so much negative trust to people in one day he actually spammed negative trust.
He never gave out negative trust, in a single day, in the amount that I did. He's fine. I'm sorry but calling someone a "fuckbag" is abusive.
No, and if you truly believe that then you're an idiot. Go back to school and then find a real job. |
|
|
|
You use bad language and swear. Is that right?
It is. You seem to be someone who can't admit they ever wrong or apologize.
He is not. It's abuse. Your behavior is abusive.
No. These are people here behind these accounts. You can't just call someone a horrible name even if they are spammers. It makes you look bad.
Of course anyone can call anyone else whatever they want; idiota. Use common sense. I've seem campaign managers given green trust when they are skimming money off the bounty distribution or just downright not paying.
Stories. I am in one of the strictest campaigns there are and have been so for almost a year.
No. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
