Your site is a little slow in my end.
ah damn neverending perfectionism without mistakes we wont get any development at all mistakes make things spicy, like this dragon egg out of wood, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQLaZb6zSsg&t=270sand it is a sign that someone is doing/building something there, and that its not standardised central bank funded highly wasteful agenda without tolarance for inperfectionism we will get less and less decentral enterpreneurship regards |
|
|
|
Liebe Community, im Rahmen meiner Master-Arbeit führe ich eine Umfrage über "Die Eignung von Kryptowährungen als Investment" durch. Und du hast jetzt die Möglichkeit einem Gleichgesinnten bei der Erforschung seines Lieblingsthemas zu unterstützen. Schenke mir lediglich 2 Minuten deiner kostbaren Zeit, um den angefügten Fragebogen zu beantworten: https://www.umfrageonline.com/s/4af9698Die Umfrage ist selbstverständlich anonym und es werden keinerlei personenbezogene Daten erhoben. Gerne könnt ihr den Umfrage-Link auch an Bekannte und Verwandte, die schonmal in Kontakt mit Kryptowährungen gekommen sind, weiterleiten. Für eure Teilnahme danke ich schon im Voraus ganz herzlich. Viele Grüße Krypto_Forscher währungen waren eine lange zeit ein entscheidendes investment gut, aber auch nicht gerade in guten umgebungen, kriege hatten entscheidende einflüsse auf den wert von währungen ein beispiel als napoleon in der schlacht von waterloo verlor, haben spekulanten welche die informationen als erstes durch posttauben erhielten die anderen spekulanten hereingelegt, und ihnen gesagt napoleon hatte die schlacht gewonnen, zahlreiche französische wertpapiere/geld (obligationen) wurden dann complett überteuert gehandelt und britische/russische verkauft massiv unterbewertet. als dann sich die wahrheit herausstellte kamm es eben zum gegenteil russische und britische papiere wurden extrem wertvoll (da neue herrscher) und französische wurden wertlos da krieg verloren. aber in die zeiten must du dich selbt hineinlesen. gruß |
|
|
|
|
americans will be diverse in their oppinnions a two party system then will deliver a cointhrowing election with 50.000001% winner....
entire world will then like vultures circeling around social media decisions in the united states. to manipulate the elections to their advantage.
i am afraid the americans will learng to hate their democracy in painful way, and wish to have some security oriented communist dictatorship.
lol
|
|
|
|
~
He's saying that for him, "Available Supply" means the amount that is remaining to be mined/created (actual circulating supply - maximum supply), while on the website, this indicates the actual circulating supply (the amount of BTC that already exists). It's just a matter of wording. Exactly, this is how I understand "Available Supply" so for me there is a big difference. Circulating Supply is 17 M while available Supply is ~ 4 M, just saying. if you define something called circulating supply you exclude some asset holders, like for example the institution that opperates that currency and regulates its release into the economy, for millenia we humans have relied on such insititutions, in order to have beneficial effects of money on our society, if an institution runs a bigg cryptocurrency bigger than others, then its not something bad, it simply opperates on a different economic scale. in different dimensions. not every currency has to be designed to fund the construction of a hotel in a vilage in southern whatever land regards |
|
|
|
Hi, I encounterd this project and also invested in it before they are starting the STO. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3844192.0 ) They have already a very fast integrated wallet as I saw in this video https://youtu.be/NlYrrsuLJ04 and also tried it. Are the STOs much safer ? Being a token that is backed by the company shares I think it has a great chance of success. What do you think of this project and website? Geez, do you not understand we can see your post history? This is not a legit question - this is spam.  Yeah, thanks, might as well close this topic, I will never read relevant opinions. no one knows the future of all icos as well of bitcoin as well, we are all jumping in the dark, answers you get are worthless. |
|
|
|
Hi, I encounterd this project and also invested in it before they are starting the STO. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3844192.0 ) They have already a very fast integrated wallet as I saw in this video https://youtu.be/NlYrrsuLJ04 and also tried it. Are the STOs much safer ? Being a token that is backed by the company shares I think it has a great chance of success. What do you think of this project and website? Geez, do you not understand we can see your post history? This is not a legit question - this is spam. spam/chilling/pumping, no one can say precise. regards |
|
|
|
|
i cant stress the importance of having a healthy attitute towards the SEC
|
|
|
|
it seems like that, the cryptocurrency boom seems to have only happened once, namely in 2017 yesterday, where BTC prices could touch 18k USD
and after that the price was stable at 6k USD
I am very aware of that
I would like to see the cryptocurrencies become more stable in order to see more people become more interested in the technology rather than the trading part and the profits that it brings. problem is that you are all still thinking dolar centristic you dont want to support cryptoprojects, collecting tron makes potentially something real that people might want. regards |
|
|
|
Hallo.
Vielen Dank für deinen Kommentar. Du hast absolut Recht mit den ersten 50 Kryptomonen mit dieser Methodik fürt es schnell zu einem Hofjournalismus !
Mein größtes Problem ist die Wahl der Artikel.
Der gesamte Teil des crowlens ist kein Problem. Ich habe Bots erstellt, die jeweils eine einfache Aufgabe erfüllen. Ein Bot überprüft die Rss-Feeds von Websites, ein anderer sucht nach Keywords in Artikeln, ein anderer erstellt einen Rss-Feed, der Artikel nach Themen klassifiziert.
Das Problem sind die Artikel. Ich kann Artikel filtern und klassifizieren, aber die meisten Artikel sind nicht sehr interessant und sind eher versteckte Werbung für ein ICO oder eine Kryptowährung.
Also habe ich mich auf den legislativen der Länder konzentriert. Aber am Ende wurde mir klar, dass es das Gleiche ist. Die Artikel sind mehr Ankündigungen, dass diese Bank oder diese Persönlichkeit ein Kommentar über Bitcoin gemacht hat.
Ich schaffe es nicht relevante Filter zu erstellen, um Qualitätsartikel nach einem bestimmten Thema auszuwählen.
Hat jemand eine Idee?
ich habe gute ideen ich kann dir gute artikel themen vorschlagen, ich habe vor über einem jahr bitcoin echo vorgeschlagen einen artikel über das langfristige problem mit den ether spekulanten zu schreiben, die haben das nicht gewollt (weil es sehr kritisch war (zu recht!!!)), das was for einem jahr und guck mal was ich heute lese https://medium.com/futuresin/ethereums-demise-as-a-cryptocurrency-is-foreseeable-d9240dcc061ejetzt merken die das problem das ich vor über einem jahr wahrnahm, ich hab sogar die ein jahr alte stoff sammlung in meiner datenbank für bitcoin echo irgendwo rumliegen. am besten du kontaktierts mich per telegramm dann können wir direkt reden gruß |
|
|
|
nope its true according to https://www.similarweb.com/website/bitcointalk.orgbitcoin talk is losing around 2 million users per month since march, i think users will migrate to other forums, doing a linear prognosis then we can expect this forum to be dead in around 9 months regards The site didn't say if it's unique visits or not. I don't think this forum would be dead in 9 months those are just stats that can be easily manipulated. That's good if they're moving to a different forum then it means there would be less spam and posts for me to report. Also you can't confirm if most of those visitors are holding or trading crypto. if the loss of 2 million per month continues it will be 0 in 9 month i expect however a softening up a hard core will remain but this forum might ended lose its crowdiness in max 18 months |
|
|
|
I don't think that websites, especially bitcointalk and CMC dictate the actual sentiment of the market towards any given coin. People might lose interest browsing over these sites knowing that viable and truthful information isn't found within the constraints of the said forum but that wouldn't stop them from trading bitcoin just because they aren't visiting both. Most pros in the trading scene don't visit these sites, they flock somewhere else wherein noise-to-signal ratio is low and trolls aren't around.
I understand that you're trying hard, but please, try harder when it comes to trolling.
ohm no the decentralisation of the cryptoindexes will lead to a leasing, glenn never allowed the listening of cryptos with bigger marketcapitalisation than bitcoin, with 100s of indexes around they sooner or later will have different cryptos on them list different coins and then look very different from each other. cmc losing influence means also that this forums founding members are losing influence over the market regards |
|
|
|
If I may add another comment, Should it be Circulating Supply and not Available Supply?
If you look at Bitcoin: Available Supply: 17.27 M BTC, which is wrong in my opinion. Available supply is less than 4 M BTC as far as I know. Can someone clarify that?
available supply and circulating supply is in theory the same, you mean a different indication like distribution index, or asset distribution asymetry factor |
|
|
|
This doesn't mean it relates to the site, this could be as simple as cloudflare blocking spam attacks or Indians who come to farm sig campaigns and spam like crazy stopping due to the issue of India's ban and they can't exchange for rupees.
no one knows but its still a 2 million loss per month over last 5 months, i think people will migrate into various cryptoforums, and the market will decentralise away from bitcoin. i have found in redit a good alternative so far. we will se more communities comming up What the heck does "decentralise away from bitcoin" even mean? I don't get how you see decentralization as a bad thing, as it's definitely a very good thing. Also, you still haven't explained how you think these things affect the price in a negative manner. less attention, less demand, less liquidity, bitcoin cash and bitcoin gold suffered much more than bitcoin with an amplifier faktor more. regards |
|
|
|
Wait a second!
Are you saying that during the massive bullrun there were more views than during the month long bear market!? Well I never! (/s)
well thats logical because the bullrun and the price hike attracted peoples attention the constant losing what you call "bear market" distracted peoples attention towards other investments |
|
|
|
How is bitcoin not going to reach 50k and bitcointalk/CMC losing influence connected? I don't get the connection. Or is there something I missed? Bitcointalk and CMC losing influence is actually a good thing, whether you like it or not. The biggest names losing influence means that there's good competition going on. Which is good overall to decrease centralization in the space.
That and we have actual business news organizations starting to cover Bitcoin and it's movements, Bitcointalk will continue on but with a lot more altcoin discussion. Which is fine especially if the main developer area stays untouched we don't need or want the spam in there anyways. bitcoiners evovle to a lonely pow cult, problem is in a millenia old human systematic. money printers are only servants not the long term rulers. royal minting in uk doesnt rule uk and is its richest entity, why should the technitions around crypto be different? industry will evolve away from them. You have shown yourself to be a fool, we are in the middle of Bitcoin taking massive amounts of market share back from failing altcoins and ICOs aren't launching nearly as often. Keep spewing your false bullshit. nope its true according to https://www.similarweb.com/website/bitcointalk.orgbitcoin talk is losing around 2 million users per month since march, i think users will migrate to other forums, doing a linear prognosis then we can expect this forum to be dead in around 9 months coinmarketcap loses 14.22 million users per month due to decentralisation of the market. coinmarket cap has also max 10 months left but i doubt linear prognosis works well so double the time would be more realistic as it will be a recessive loss. regards This doesn't mean it relates to the site, this could be as simple as cloudflare blocking spam attacks or Indians who come to farm sig campaigns and spam like crazy stopping due to the issue of India's ban and they can't exchange for rupees. no one knows but its still a 2 million loss per month over last 5 months, i think people will migrate into various cryptoforums, and the market will decentralise away from bitcoin. i have found in redit a good alternative so far. we will se more communities comming up |
|
|
|
It isn't just bitcointalk and CMC, but the entire industry is losing attention.
If you just Google bitcoin and head over to the news section, you would see that tons of people out there are spreading negative news for bitcoin and reiterating their facts that such decentralized currencies were meant to fail, and that's exactly what has happened.
I'm waiting for a miracle to happen in the month of December, just like last year.
the industry will continue to thrive as the alternative would be old fashioned central banking and communism, look at this cryptoindex for example "coinpaprika" it rappidly grows https://www.similarweb.com/website/coinpaprika.com#overview |
|
|
|
How is bitcoin not going to reach 50k and bitcointalk/CMC losing influence connected? I don't get the connection. Or is there something I missed? Bitcointalk and CMC losing influence is actually a good thing, whether you like it or not. The biggest names losing influence means that there's good competition going on. Which is good overall to decrease centralization in the space.
That and we have actual business news organizations starting to cover Bitcoin and it's movements, Bitcointalk will continue on but with a lot more altcoin discussion. Which is fine especially if the main developer area stays untouched we don't need or want the spam in there anyways. bitcoiners evovle to a lonely pow cult, problem is in a millenia old human systematic. money printers are only servants not the long term rulers. royal minting in uk doesnt rule uk and is its richest entity, why should the technitions around crypto be different? industry will evolve away from them. You have shown yourself to be a fool, we are in the middle of Bitcoin taking massive amounts of market share back from failing altcoins and ICOs aren't launching nearly as often. Keep spewing your false bullshit. nope its true according to https://www.similarweb.com/website/bitcointalk.orgbitcoin talk is losing around 2 million users per month since march, i think users will migrate to other forums, doing a linear prognosis then we can expect this forum to be dead in around 9 months coinmarketcap loses 14.22 million users per month due to decentralisation of the market. coinmarket cap has also max 10 months left but i doubt linear prognosis works well so double the time would be more realistic as it will be a recessive loss. regards |
|
|
|
How is bitcoin not going to reach 50k and bitcointalk/CMC losing influence connected? I don't get the connection. Or is there something I missed? Bitcointalk and CMC losing influence is actually a good thing, whether you like it or not. The biggest names losing influence means that there's good competition going on. Which is good overall to decrease centralization in the space.
if bitcoin cant attract as much attention as before its losing awareness and purchasing power. |
|
|
|
How is bitcoin not going to reach 50k and bitcointalk/CMC losing influence connected? I don't get the connection. Or is there something I missed? Bitcointalk and CMC losing influence is actually a good thing, whether you like it or not. The biggest names losing influence means that there's good competition going on. Which is good overall to decrease centralization in the space.
That and we have actual business news organizations starting to cover Bitcoin and it's movements, Bitcointalk will continue on but with a lot more altcoin discussion. Which is fine especially if the main developer area stays untouched we don't need or want the spam in there anyways. bitcoiners evovle to a lonely pow cult, problem is in a millenia old human systematic. money printers are only servants not the long term rulers. royal minting in uk doesnt rule uk and is its richest entity, why should the technitions around crypto be different? industry will evolve away from them. |
|
|
|
So your logic is that Bitcointalk must be in control for a price to increase? What if we are now getting more traditional investors who watch cnbc or fox business for their crypto news or read the wall Street journal. Is this bad for the price in your mind?
jes bitcointalk and coinmarketcap are cornersstones of the bitcoin founders, with more and more encription services, more indexes and more decentral forums comming up the attention of the market will drift away from bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
