|
Well, then as the price keeps dropping from idiot corporations, rather than trading in dark pools, incurring massive slippage doing market sells (and eliminating the profit of their not having to deal with chargebacks), then more and more bitcoiners (who aren't idiot panic sellers) will choke off their supply output if they can't sell at their minimum target price. As demand increases and supply decreases, price will increase.
My BTC is effectively destroyed as far as the supply side is concerned, until I can start spending it at $1250/BTC.
|
|
|
|
shared and liked.
Can you include some proof to get paid. shared and liked. facebook page: facebook.com/nay.kopo its where i shared too. BTC: 1MuBphPCdM4nakoYUYt5fyjYV4o1aJFqQi PMed you in reddit too. can't see any list of jobs available there. what kind of skills are usually needed? If you right-click the timestamp and copy the link location you get https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=289091167937266&id=100005091550362 for Lanzer. You needed to share one of their memes on your page, enhu. |
|
|
|
|
Stand your ground= do not turn your back to a rampaging violent felon so he can shoot, stab, beat, etc. you in it, then take your self-defense tool off your incapacitated or lifeless body and use it to injure and kill others.
|
|
|
|
Well this certainly sets a precedent. A central bank issuing it's very own digital currency and simultaneously denying it's citizen's from using alternative blockchains. lmao.
That's going to be absolutely funny to watch, they won't be able to enforce it, Bitcoin was made open source precisely because of stuff like this, this thing is going to get completely destroyed by hackers  Hopefully they "steal" the insecure centralized currency, but also hack the identities of those who own it, then pay them back. Of course it still might trigger a bank run, so they'll need to convert it all into physical USD and BTC before that happens. |
|
|
|
|
How do you force armed people to marry?
|
|
|
|
"We all know that no matter if 100% of law-abiding, non-crony public commentors sent in opposition to your tyranny, you would still engage in it. The End."
The regulators will take what you say i to consideration provided you make a good argument and are coherent Like they take the US Constitution "into consideration" before they violate the fuck out of the rights it codifies, with impunity? Anything that violates the constitution will get overturned by the Supreme Court. You need to make a valid argument in order for what you say to carry any weight. Bullshit. I track petitions for certiorari for constitutional violation cases and not only do they almost never get overturned (where the lower court rubber-stamped the tyrants and the victims are appealing), SCOTUS refuses to even touch almost all of them (when they could simply GVR - grant, vacate, remand - or other methods short of requiring full written and oral arguments). |
|
|
|
|
No. None. Who knows if you can't audit the code? Never heard of it before.
If you're the only person who controls and can access the private keys, then it's safe.
|
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, every time I turn around, some douchefuck does a market sell of thousands of BTC on Bitstamp with massive slippage, which triggers bots to sell, and BTC is never able to deflate, only tank. Who in their right mind would spend BTC when it's worth less than when they acquired it?
|
|
|
|
I love the music in that promo video. One feature that we bitcoiners may like to use is GliphMe- https://gliph.me/The way I would explain it is that for the person contacting you, it's like those live sales/support chats that Amazon and other sites use - use any non-text-only browser and it'll work without installing any add-ons. You'll get notifications of new messages and open your Gliph app to chat back to them. |
|
|
|
|
LOL, as if an angry mob of government's future victims has ever been included as a factor in a pro-liberty written legal ruling (an exception, in and of itself).
Judicial rubber-stamping is the rule, and any ethical attorney will tell you a legal challenge would make him a lot of money, for you to lose on summary judgement.
|
|
|
|
"We all know that no matter if 100% of law-abiding, non-crony public commentors sent in opposition to your tyranny, you would still engage in it. The End."
The regulators will take what you say i to consideration provided you make a good argument and are coherent Like they take the US Constitution "into consideration" before they violate the fuck out of the rights it codifies, with impunity? |
|
|
|
|
You could be monitoring an address that one of the major BTC "hackers" emptied a hot wallet into. Doesn't mean you control the private key, only proves you're interested in it.
|
|
|
|
|
"We all know that no matter if 100% of law-abiding, non-crony public commentors sent in opposition to your tyranny, you would still engage in it. The End."
|
|
|
|
|
If the FBI went undercover after sane, law-abiding Muslims, the Muslims would have been fully justified in shooting the undercovers in self-defense. As an agent, you don't give a gun to those who will turn it on you. Though, I'm sure if they made a mistake, their summarily executing the sane, law-abiding Muslims for self-defense would have been rubber stamped as "justified".
|
|
|
|
So there's the receiving the blockchain side, what about just sending transactions and not bothering to wait for an ack? It seems like there would need to be a worldwide net of receiving nodes with internet access listening for TXes on whatever frequencies we/the ITU decides are standard, then if 2 or more are able to clearly receive decodable TXes from the same sender, the better. Byte sizes of my last 5 received TX: 440 225 257 374 439. Since I don't have any higher tech, let me run the 440 byte hex through a morse code generator at 80 WPM (assuming digital decode) and see how long it takes. 3 mins 20 secs. Or on Q15X25 http://www.calctool.org/CALC/prof/computing/transfer_time says 1.37500 seconds. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
