Doesn't seem to have an effect yet. The difficulty is rising.  |
|
|
|
Zpool is broken, we all know that.
Yiimp is weird. Auto-exchange is disabled, it mines multiple coins, how does the pool know which coin you're mining, and how does it decide which of the coins to mine for who? The stats shown there are almost completely irrelevant.
If you mine with 1GHASH on all of the 3 coins @ yimp with a even distribution, I guess you will get the same amount that the 24/hours payout is displaying. |
|
|
|
sp, when skein mod will be released?
P.S Tested digibyte at yiimp - get 0.0112 btc at 24 hours from digibyte.
From your tests i see what auroracoin best profit at the skein algo... strange
Soon. The profit is switching from coin to coin. Zpool is always mining the most profitable |
|
|
|
Neither of those coins are worth mining. Myriad and Aurora have had long standing communities for both coins which have kept the difficulty up.
zpool.ca: 24 hours profit of 0.00462 btc/GHASH (currenlty 21GHASH is mining) coins: Aurora (skein) 2.5 AUR 1.162 k 582 599 4 mins 17.2 Gh/s 0.00602 Myriad (skein) 500 MYR 595.439 1 902 738 2 mins 0.00387 Digibyte (skein) 942.611 DGB 2.184 k 3 643 265 9 mins 0.00244 Xedos (skein) 10 XDC 2.461 913 027 0 sec 0.00084 Unitus (skein) 45.204 UIS 3.742 k 806 062 15 mins 17.2 Gh/s 0.00006 yiimp.ccminer.org: 24 hours profit of 0.00366 btc/GHASH (currently 9.3GHASH is mining) coins: AuroraCoin (skein) 2.5 AUR 671.149 582 613 4 mins 1.6 Gh/s 0.01032 MyriadCoin (skein) 500 MYR 550.517 1 902 743 3 mins 0.00412 Digibyte (skein) 960.611 DGB 1.596 k 3 643 278 11 mins 8.7 Gh/s 0.00332 gtx 1070 mining @ 600MHASH profit per day: $2.2/day @ zpool $1,74/day @ yiimp zec@340sol/s will give you less than $1,50 a day. |
|
|
|
Hi sp, thanks for you hard works, but can you tell me what is the improvement vs Klaus_T Skein here https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releasesSpeed on Gtx 1060 look like same as i get on klaus_T Can you tell me the speed on gtx 1080/1070 ? Thanks My first test was without oc and compiled with cuda 8.0. sp-mod #80 (1.5.80) does 520MHASH on the gtx 1070 with oc. I think skeinmod #1 will be around 17% faster @ 608MHASH. I will tune it for the 1060 3gb first. takes time. slow compilation. |
|
|
|
The pascal kernels are 0.05BTC each.
I got some results.
Skein sp-mod #1
gtx 1060 3gb 330MHASH@60watt. (66% tdp) (cuda 8.0 build)
sp-mod release #80 opensource (cuda 7.5) is doing 280MHASH on the same card at the same clocks.
Which skein coin do you mine? DGB-skein has a very low network hashrate, even with 3 rigs profit will be ruined. Auroracoin/skein is good. Myriad/skein is good I tested 100GHASH some weeks ago @ zpool.ca with my private farm. And the payouts where lower than the estimates. Other users have also reported that zpool have too high estimates. you should expect 20% lower payouts. |
|
|
|
1. Pallas, Cryptonite Windows build bugfixed and sp-modded.
2. Skein pascal sp-mod
3. Lyra2v2 pascal sp-mod
4. Monero pascal sp-mod
5. Boolberry pascal sp-mod
6. RIEcoin pascal sp-mod
7. zcoin pascal sp-mod
There might be some more optimized pascal miners to purchase in the next coming weeks. I will probobly charge 0.05BTC per kernel with updates. |
|
|
|
|
The pascal kernels are 0.05BTC each.
I got some results.
Skein sp-mod #1
gtx 1060 3gb 330MHASH@60watt. (66% tdp) (cuda 8.0 build)
sp-mod release #80 opensource (cuda 7.5) is doing 280MHASH on the same card at the same clocks.
|
|
|
|
|
Working more on skein Sp-mod #1
(Both skein and skein2 is being optimized)
|
|
|
|
|
Ethereum Dagger size is soon bigger than 2GB. Alot of cards will fail to work.
Let's hope that the difficulty will decrease a bit in the next month.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the problem is that the wallet is Temporarily disabled on poloniex. The only way to get your funds out is to dump for BTC or wait for the exchange to delist the coin.
|
|
|
|
I am planning on building a mining rig with more than 8 gpus. I've bought 1 to 4 pci express splitters but I had no luck getting the motherboards to boot with more gpus than the number of its actual physical pcie ports. (tried z87, h97, h81, b150). The person who sold these to me said he heard ASROCK X99 EXTREME supports up to 32 GPUS.
Now I've seen somewhere on the ethereum dual miner thread that somebody managed to use around 18?, i think, amd cards on linux, but I cannot find that post anymore.
Anyone have any info on this? Will a motherboard with X79 chipset be just as good, as they have the same number of lanes? Or it depends more on the bios ?They are rather expensive and I want to hear some opinions before I throw my money.
Most miner software doesn't support more than 8 cards. (hardcoded in the client). I ccminer sp-mod I support 32 cards, but NVIDIA only. |
|
|
|
The EWFB kernel is slow. No profit for you.. much profit for me
Profit for you in which way? Did you finished your miner with better performance? I am dumping my profit. |
|
|
|
sp is waiting the open source to mod it it make sense, with nicehash and the ewbf he can't do anything
EWBF JUST RELEASED v0.0.5b-- And Optiminer plans a new release in a day or so. NiceHash has the smoothest running miner with EQM. I run EQM on nVidia and Optiminer on AMD. Optiminer has stability issues. --scryptr I'm an assembly programmer. Zcash is being harwested... |
|
|
|
|
The EWFB kernel is slow. No profit for you.. much profit for me
|
|
|
|
You know it's a shame some of the bigger old coins are unprofitable to mine now. While they have a pretty healthy trade volume, their blockreward reached a point where it's not longer profitable to mine. Feathercoin for instance has healthy trade volume every day, but easily gets saturated by a handful of miners. Cryptonite is also in this boat.
Conversely, if emission is too high in smaller coins that don't have healthy volume they're easily crapped on by miners dumping minted coins.
I've thought about this over the years I've been mining. Someone really needs to release a adaptive block reward that relies on healthy trade volume. So if the coin is starting to die, the blockreward goes down and reduces emission of coins and keeps supply steady and of course if the coins is flourishing, it increases the emission to a certain extent. Volume is just an example, obviously more factors would have to play into this then just daily volume.
That is a immensely complex problem, but definitely could be done. No one has tackled it yet though.
Literally a idea for a big coin in a nutshell right there. Quote this post when it happens.
elacoin it's dead though ...died with asic scrypt miners .... I mined the shit out of this coin back in the scrypt gpu days was worth mining over ltc, ftc so yes smart way to issue coins but NOT new  sp should think about such a distribution system .... Looked at Elacoin, distribution has nothing to do with market health. It has something similar to a difficulty retargeting system that's more advanced based on difficulty, but still has nothing to do with the market. This doesn't seperate itself from other coins, just assumes there is more 'demand' if the difficulty is higher... That's not what I was proposing. What they were doing is a good way to get the coin pummeled into the ground. Any name for the coin?  And how about difficulty goes up 10% per so many blocks high hash but goes down 50% per same amount of blocks when low hash. As the coin dies if it does it gives the little guys something to mine. How about Reverse payout scheme. Difficulty up ----> more coins for the miners. So you get the same amount of coins always.  100MHASH = 1 coin per day. If the networkhash is 1GHASH, 10 000 coins are given to the miners every day. If the networkhash is 100GHASH, 1 000 000 coins are given to the miners every day. .... Expensive, but secure Good for the miners, and not so good for the investors. That's Elacoin and also not what I was talking about. It's amazing how fast you guys try to make ideas your own though. ^^ Its amazing how you think I'm making it my own..... just copy difficulty adjustment of dime coin that's what I was hinting at. I don't copy a low difciculty coin with dickhead support. |
|
|
|
SA v6 (zavasava) 170MHASH@gtx 1070
Eqminer 1.03b 340MHASH@gtx 1070 (+100%)
Same clocks
zavasava's running with 2 threads.
Eqminer 1.03b running with -ca (2 threads)
Just to make it very clear, my fork is NOT SA v6. And I made it very clear that NVIDIA was not my focus. (I don't even own a current-gen NVIDIA card.) And you intentionally misspelled my name. You have been so rude to me that I just decided to optimize the hell out of my miner for NVIDIA cards. My new GTX 1060 is arriving tonight, and I will catch up with Eqminer very soon. The pascal chip is superscalar and able to do 2 instructions per clock cycle. The zcash algorithm is not limited by memory. Shared mem/cache. I am your competition. Your code is slow. I am harvesting zcash. |
|
|
|
Any name for the coin? And how about difficulty goes up 10% per so many blocks high hash but goes down 50% per same amount of blocks when low hash. As the coin dies if it does it gives the little guys something to mine. How about Reverse payout scheme. Difficulty up ----> more coins for the miners. So you get the same amount of coins always. 100MHASH = 1 coin per day. If the networkhash is 1GHASH, 10 000 coins are given to the miners every day. If the networkhash is 100GHASH, 1 000 000 coins are given to the miners every day. .... Expensive, but secure Good for the miners, and not so good for the investors. Good idea but it means emission is unpredictable which means less speculative investors will bother. It would need some real world use or some incentive for people to hold it. But if the emisssion have a roof value and the graph is not linear, could be bether than the slow start of zcash. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
