Although it is true that each token's value increases as the personal token count goes down, there is something most people seem to be missing. The less tokens you have means the less impact your supply will have when the POS starts. This dwindling personal token count is bad news for those who actually want to hold this token and earn a small income through the POS leasing. As a small investor in Waves, I'm beginning to feel overwhelmed. Small waves investor. |
|
|
|
I don't know why my yobit account is saying me : banned by btctalk moderator in the signature section ??
anyone ?? please help ? :\
You may have been banned for low post quality. Many in BCT feel there is a problem with the great deal of spamming going on due to account farming, the account market, and signature campaigns. I looked at your post history, and although you were not the most prolific poster, the two posts that went like this "bump  " probably didn't help your case in the newest purge. |
|
|
|
i find it difficult to trust any of these new ones   With the relative ease of copy pasting code to create a smart contract on the Ethereum blockchain, we're probably going to see a whole lot more of these crop up than altcoins. Shoot, even if someone creates the necessary code from scratch, it might be 300 lines of code or less. I should go buy some more ETH and HODL. With these smart contracts reproducing like bunnies, it may create a constant buy pressure. |
|
|
|
Anyone else want nothing to do with this 'project'? "Wow, largest crowdfund in history! Better get in!" ....seems to be the reasoning behind 90% of people giving their money to these guys. Not shady at all, that every 'curator' is part of the ETH team (but they're only curators, and I'm only taking their word for it!), or that you could only buy in with ETH...or that even with >$100m raised, only two random startups are being used as examples of why this will 'revolutionize' the VC industry...much like the over-hyped 'eth dapps' scheme which ultimately produced nothing worth noting.....seriously, how the hell is this web 2.0 site worth the millions poured into eth? The first link you click on inside the official eth dapps site: http://ethereumgames.net/ truly revolutionary....  What I really want to know is where all this money is going, besides the ETH team's pockets. 100 million is serious business, yet I have a feeling it'll somehow become laundered into obscurity fast, with nothing to show for. No offense intended, just highly skeptical considering what information is currenly available... Well said and not a sheep. I too own some and hope we not be screwed. But like Fartbags said....people have to see how things could work out nicely but also not very well with the way DAO works. Given the top few who own most of the DAO (thus the voting power/rights) they will prob get away with whatever they want (as usual in crypto) while the other 99% of us are screwed. But I hope this no happen as such being. Those in the minority can always split, either on their own or as a group. Us little guys will need to pay attention to what the proposals are and learn how to split if it comes to that. One could also bail by dumping on the exchanges too. I fear that the DAO will end up being drained by a bunch of projects that appear really promising, but are just vaporware scams. |
|
|
|
1PHSDYvVp6HpqtuUPocK41DrdeHbbezaeP
Good idea to protect accounts.
Quoted. You may want to sign a message with this address. |
|
|
|
Can we trade forex on WAVE Platform ?
I would imagine they will have USD tokens and EUR tokens at the minimum. Not exactly forex, but similar. |
|
|
|
Look's like I have egg on my face now. Happy trading. |
|
|
|
Please quote my signed message: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- 05/15/2016 staking my Bitcoin address for future account reference on Bitcointalk.org -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: MultiBit HD (0.3.0) Comment: https://multibit.orgAddress: 12pxey73JEN9uZmbFSqr8GMYHwEzrGGA11 IM6M1m1Qb3v2OuMeUeIvglvNIIUzEYXuG51PcNSuVgRnEgtlPHVJcOtxCFfmhCHZrc6OdEgXa8Aks04 CuvoY+BQ= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- quoted and verified using coinig. |
|
|
|
Couple questions here.
Will the tokens be available to trade on an independent crypto exchange?
If so, what will be the independent crypto's changes?
Finally, If so when will that be?
The other exchanges are the competition for Waves. The people with full nodes and those "lending" to them would much prefer people trade using the Waves platform, since the only way to earn more Waves with POS is by transaction fees. (There is no new waves generated by a block reward.) However, I'm sure some independent exchanges will be interested in letting people trade Wave tokens there. |
|
|
|
if I grok this DAO correctly, it seems to be a bundle of people saying we will dev/curate dapps and proposals, governed by voting rights entrenched to DOA's owned.
Sort of like saying we will have the best bundle of smart "wdigets" under he DOA ubrella and the combined funding to back it.
Sort of like an aggregation/funds management service based in the Etherium.
If this is right then it seems the headless chicken of Eth did not have sufficient emergent properties to see this spontaneously arise, and DAO is there to try and rectify that. I am not saying this is bad, just the ETH is too knew for most models to adapt.
However given that around 10% of eth or more is in DAO, this looks open to another interpretation.
It sort of a like a mastercoin to made safe jump on a massive scale.
It seems Eth was widely more successful the the creators thought and they wanted to get some ETH back. So they invented dao.
If much more that 10% of Eth are collected, I wonder how well eth can function given the block or Eth in relatively small hands....if it get to 20%+ % then what?
its looking like DAO can dictate ETH terms, and this is a sort of reverse take over of ETH by DAO.
Maybe it will all work out for the better and I can see the logic of DOA to finally Make IOT more than a sticker name buzz word....
however I have been around too long to not have developed some health cynicism.
That said you may be forced to jump on the DAO boat at this point if you have ETH.
Yes, the DAO could exert a great deal of power over ETH. However, the chances are pretty good that the DAO will not be having constant kumbaya moments. The chances are pretty good that eventually there will be one or more schisms, so there will be more than one DAO, or many will just split on their own and retrieve their share of the ETH. Also, there is a chance that the proposals end up causing more losses than gains, so the DAOs influence would lessen. |
|
|
|
1EbH3LwLFy77JwkDBEWsNWd4nMoZutaiue
Hello Z00 from bitcointalk.org
HyMohf2NNvaqvs9EUjjWpKZn/LrG1MoQYcVeomRG6v+MSDALUXwUpUPR/BNcgYY4HfflHmVpfLolD9OwOcRcq2k=
quoted and verified with coinig. |
|
|
|
I have a noob question guys, June 1 is the launch of waves and we can exchange this to bitcoins right?
the Ico ends on may 31 and after ico is over you can be witdrawn you tokens from ico plaftform and waiting to put on exchange and you can trade this waves. Mxxxx said there will be their own exchange site first before trading to bigger exchange site. Is that true that there will be a huge buy wall bigger that the current price? People will be able to create tokens of Bitcoin and other major altcoins and exchange them, using the Waves platform. That is the whole idea of Waves. One of it's major functions will be to run a decentralized exchange. If someone gives them the proper KYC info, that person will also be able to create fiat tokens to exchange. |
|
|
|
Dead coin.  Far from dead, but your free to have your opinion. That's right man. Better to say it going to dead unless you do something as Developer. Price is very low and i can't understand why it happened. Development takes time - especially what we're working on. I'm not here to pump the price up. Once some of our new features are released I expect the price to go up. Could you say what are the new features? It can be a good motivation for price moving at least. He said he's not here to pump the price up. Just accumulate at these low prices and wait for news. Exactly, buy on rumor; sell on news (unless the news is really fantastic! Then buy more.) |
|
|
|
Why price so drastic down?
The problem right now is that you have some miners who are dumping and some POS people who are dumping their stakes. It's hard to get new investors when the fully functional CLI is not very appeasing. This is the face that Decred puts forward to a new investor who wants to try and learn to stake.  Decred needs a GUI, or at least get their web wallet fully functional so people can stake with it. The GUI may also help get this coin onto Poloniex, with exposure to new investors. |
|
|
|
I have been banned for 1 month and it says "banned by Btalk moderator" in Bitcointalk UID field. Now my ban is over. What can i do for rejoin to the campaign?
You cannot rejoin with this member name. Your only options are to create another account and get it up to member status, or buy an account. I'm not sure if you will have to create a new Yobit account as well, (and I think this is frowned upon by Yobit.) |
|
|
|
Anyone who didn't obtain their ETH through the ETH ICO is looking at monumental losses.
This is the price of hype. DAO is overbought to hell and back, and the board room is full of random internet douchebags.
This will be a bloodletting for the history books
Only if DAO management dumps eth in one go. If they are smart they will liquidate it in a faucet fashion and let the market absorb it over time. So can the main curator just split without consulting the DAO? I'm thinking this can't happen without a public proposal. I'm still somewhat confused on how this all works. That's why I only have 600 DAO. If the management of the ICO funds are subject to a vote like other "company" decisions, then there should not be a big dump of eth. Unless of course DAO management holds majority of the votes by owning the majority of tokens and just push through their votes, or if management of ICO funds is exempt from voting. I don't think the DAO is going to create any tokens for free for the management,(who will be slock.it if the 1st proposal is approved.) I doubt the creators had the 5 million ETH necessary to have the majority of tokens, at this point. I could be wrong. A proposal is required for any distribution of the ETH. A private proposal if someone wants to split and create their own DAO that only holds their share of the ETH. I think distribution of the ETH in our shared DAO has to be a public proposal, and needs approval. I hope my understanding is correct and I am not just a blathering idiot.  |
|
|
|
Anyone who didn't obtain their ETH through the ETH ICO is looking at monumental losses.
This is the price of hype. DAO is overbought to hell and back, and the board room is full of random internet douchebags.
This will be a bloodletting for the history books
Only if DAO management dumps eth in one go. If they are smart they will liquidate it in a faucet fashion and let the market absorb it over time. So can the main curator just split without consulting the DAO? I'm thinking this can't happen without a public proposal. I'm still somewhat confused on how this all works. That's why I only have 600 DAO. |
|
|
|
My wallet address: 14dPpPPwUfybyJk6f5rtunsRvxR7aBxPyY
Quoted. You may want to do a signature from this address too. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
