|
Use an encrypted VPN and then do an online call.
If you want to be extra paranoid go with TOR and PGP text messages.
|
|
|
|
I've just looked at my stats, and it frightened me. I've spent nearly 19 days on Bitcoin Talk.
18 days, 22 hours and 36 minutes.
How time flies when you are having fun.
Get on my level (25/17/1).  Keep in mind that a lot of that time is probably idle, who knows what the actual numbers are. |
|
|
|
|
Is there an actual source for this? That sounds completely ridiculous... It's hard to imagine that this is true... but then again we're talking about the Philippines here...
|
|
|
|
Like how stupid do you have to be to post in your 3rd world language in english sub forums? Even 50 iq sub sahara africans arent doing that. Do you guys dont have enough counsins to marry so that you have to marry your sisters and mothers now? This shit is not good for a populations iq you know...  This happens with just about every language in this forum. I've reported like 4 Russian spam posts in the English forums just yesterday alone. There's also a ton of English spam here. Just people farming activity, report them and move on. |
|
|
|
I sold 1/4th of my bitcoins today as price was too good to me and I thought that in coming days price may drop so sold some coins and gain best profits on my investments and now hoping for the price to go lower in coming days so that I could buy some bitcoins at lower price as price will surely go below $6k in coming days.
The price should go below 6k easily since it was the first time it went over that recently. But given the kind of rise we are seeing, may want to hold off till $20,000 or even $1,00,000 before selling. Bitcoin is just starting to gain popularity in the investment world. Lots more price increase to follow given the limited supply. There are alts that will climb faster than Bitcoin. It just isn't easy to identify them. But blindly holding Bitcoin until a given target isn't really worth it unless it's only a part of your portfolio (which should be the case). Did you really just say that holding bitcoin isn't worth it??! If someone buys bitcoin, doesn't get into alts at all, and just holds bitcoin they will make a TON of money! Sure investing in altcoins could potentially increase profits even a lot more, but it is also highly risky. Altcoins can be very profitable but there are so many, and even plenty of ones that have really good concepts and devs don't skyrocket, even with proper research it is still involves a lot of luck. If you're successful then that's fantastic and it is much better than just holding bitcoin, but it is easy to not be successful, or to hold something as it pumps and keep holding thinking this is only the start and then it dumps - that happens all the time with altcoins. Not saying one is better than the other, but if someone just wants to safely make huge profits then "blindly" holding bitcoin long term is the best bet in the world right now. So how is that "not worth it"? Yes, I did say that blindly holding just Bitcoin is not worth it. It's always a bad move to move into an asset class without diversifying that part of your portfolio, unless you literally don't care about potential losses or missing out on profits elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Investing in real estate means buying property through a notary, and then paying property tax.
If you can't walk in and say "this is mine", you've got nothin'.
Gold's like that, too. If you don't have it in your hand, you've got nothin'.
Listen to this guy. Until there's a way to invest in real estate in a way that legally entitles you to a property you're just buying hot air. |
|
|
|
This question may have been asked elsewhere but I haven't been unable to find it and hopefully this is the correct place to ask. If not forgive me.
I know you can have multiple ERC20 tokens in one ethereum wallet, but is this wise to do? Should I be transferring each token to its own ethereum address? I've been trading the older cryptocurrenies (bitcoin, ether, litcoin, etc.) but I am now looking at a few tokens to purchase and have successfully participate in a couple of airdrops and I am trying to figure out the most prudent thing to do. It's obviously easier to track them holding them in one wallet. It may not make a difference either way but any thoughts would be appreciated.
There are pros and cons to both methods. If you send each token to its own wallet, you will lose less money if you lose access to an address through hacking or simply losing the private key. However, the more tokens you have the more difficult it will become to keep track of all your private keys, so it might become easier to lose access to some of your wallets. On the other hand, keeping all tokens on one address would mean that you lose all your funds if you lose access to your private key or fall victim to a hack or phishing attack. But it's also easier to keep track of a single wallet. Depending on how much you're investing (and on how you are planning to deal with taxes), you might want to consider a mixed approach. |
|
|
|
Character building? Educators aren't the only teachers in school. They get to learn from their classmates, friends, and most importantly experience.
They learn how to get up, and become better. If intellect isn't the only factor here.
What are they going to learn from their classmates if their classmates are completely oblivious themselves? |
|
|
|
I'm usually learn from the expert , buy cheap sell high
Sound easy ?
Well it's not because cryptocurrency trading provide more risk than wall street trading
About profit ?
Cryptocurrency trading provide more profit in long term and it's proven by Bitcoin !
Long term "trading" is called investing. And it's still very risky when it comes to crypto, but that's because of the insanely high potential profits. You are right about the fact that trading is incredibly risky though, and most people here are going to lose most of their profits at some point by being too greedy. That's exactly what happened during every "bubble" in the past and it will keep happening in the present and the future because humans never really change. They just start playing with new toys every so often. |
|
|
|
Devs need to be convinced to Add RSK(Smartcontracts) and lightining network(Unsure of Segwit) functionality to the dogecoin blockchain(just like BTC and LTC are doing atm). I believe then DOGE will skyrocket both in Usage and in price.
Question is how many developers are currently involved to make it happen in a reasonable time frame? DOGE needs more active development at the moment, no dev, they have all canceled their participation to DOGE. You can also find a youtube video with the creator of DOGE saying that he will never continue dev DOGE. make a search on youtube That would be ok if someone took over, but nobody seems to want to do it, so Doge is just a meme unfortunately. I quite liked the coin, but it doesn't really offer anything anymore in face of all the competition. And it's perhaps impossible to change what once made it so strong in a trustworthy way. As you said it is just a meme and it is like a stigma and nobody would really believe DOGE could compete with the big ones on a technical level. And ultimately, that is the truth for now (and might remain forever). A meme competing on a technical level would be some next level meme though. Sure it would be difficult to pull that off, but I would really enjoy seeing it done. |
|
|
|
I started when I saw you avoiding people's questions, either due to incompetence or due to not even caring about having solutions to their questions.
And you still keep avoiding and deflecting the main issue here.
Where are the funds that you've raised?
Funds for now are locked in escrow, until ICO is complete. To educate about our project, We are reaching the audience through: Webinars, Digital Marketing and conducting workshops across globe. I will share the details soon here. Escrows generally provide an address for confirmation during escrowed deals. Take NVO for example, there were multiple escrows for each crypto that was accepted and everybody could freely look at the address and check how many of each coin were raised. If you had an escrow you should have no issue with doing the same and proving that you actually raised $11m. Yes i agree you here, but we are currently being audited by top exchanges as I iterated, to the sensitivity of same we need keep it confidential until process is completed. You see we are still in ICO and has already been partnered with HitbTC and Changelly. More to come in row. Just allow us little time i promise to keep all details on table as per your expectation. HitBTC isn't exactly a top exchange. It's more of a questionable "future" trading exchange. Furthermore, the funds in the case of NVO and other ICOs were clearly visible throughout the entire duration of the ICO. An audit doesn't hinder revealing an address on the blockchain either. |
|
|
|
I started when I saw you avoiding people's questions, either due to incompetence or due to not even caring about having solutions to their questions.
And you still keep avoiding and deflecting the main issue here.
Where are the funds that you've raised?
Funds for now are locked in escrow, until ICO is complete. To educate about our project, We are reaching the audience through: Webinars, Digital Marketing and conducting workshops across globe. I will share the details soon here. Escrows generally provide an address for confirmation during escrowed deals. Take NVO for example, there were multiple escrows for each crypto that was accepted and everybody could freely look at the address and check how many of each coin were raised. If you had an escrow you should have no issue with doing the same and proving that you actually raised $11m. |
|
|
|
|
I started when I saw you avoiding people's questions, either due to incompetence or due to not even caring about having solutions to their questions.
And you still keep avoiding and deflecting the main issue here.
Where are the funds that you've raised?
|
|
|
|
I can actually see impatience in your comment, you are going through. Control yourself ! Does not sound good. Behave as potential competitor, currently it is more of looser i can sense. Back to insulting, avoiding, and posting with your alts I see. There's nothing for me to loose by the way. I don't belong to Blocklancer, I'm participating in a bounty campaign and nothing else. But unlike you, they are actually competent enough to respond to any and every question clearly and coherently without avoiding any of it. Which is why I've joined their signature campaign and not yours. Then enjoy Blocklancer campaign, why to spam in other's ANN thread. Be honest and accept it as i do here. Anyways just on curiosity, is Blocklancer running bounty campaign to defame Coinlancer. Nope. If it was I wouldn't be doing the Blocklancer campaign. I hate shady schemes and would never support them. Which is also why I keep asking you more questions the more you avoid them.  |
|
|
|
what is the best to buy right now?
they are both low.
IMO Link. SONM hasn't been performing for a long time now. SONM has been actively working on their platform since the very beginning. There are very few projects that perform as well as SONM does. |
|
|
|
I live in Hong Kong, can I participate in the ICO?
The ICO is long over. |
|
|
|
The funniest thing is that when they say that this project is scamer, then it loads a lot of newbies and translates the conversation into another channel))) Immediately translate the conversation) Here you look. Only the accusation goes to their address and immediately a lot of newcomers fly))) No old resident of this folrum was interested in the project. Sorry for my English. I think you understand me. Of course nobody cares. It becomes very apparent just by skimming their website that they're a charade. And if that wasn't enough, the ANN makes it certain with the constant avoiding of and failure to respond to questions. Hi Mr. Blocklancer or i should say Alexander Thellman, please talk some logic here. I guess you cannot keep such false grievance, personally i am making sure you get answer to all your baseless questions. The sheer fact that you assume that just because someone is participating in a signature campaign and cracking down on your charades would imply that they're the head of a company is just ridiculous and proves your dishonest and scammy nature. You have kept avoiding the same questions over and over, not just mine but also those of quite a few other people asking questions in this thread. Hence the only logical conclusion is that you are indeed a scammer and don't know how to respond to being pointed out. Or why else do you keep flailing and beating around the bush with empty (and false) accusations instead of responding head on? I can actually see impatience in your comment, you are going through. Control yourself ! Does not sound good. Behave as potential competitor, currently it is more of looser i can sense. Back to insulting, avoiding, and posting with your alts I see. There's nothing for me to loose by the way. I don't belong to Blocklancer, I'm participating in a bounty campaign and nothing else. But unlike you, they are actually competent enough to respond to any and every question clearly and coherently without avoiding any of it. Which is why I've joined their signature campaign and not yours. |
|
|
|
But this would then also make me wonder about VISA. Wouldn't they do their due diligence and try everything they can to not partner with a company that might get sued for shady operations?
Visa is not legally liable if MonaCo ends up deliberately manipulating the token price (which I am not saying they will, but they definitely can with the current model). Despite my responses, I actually like the idea of the card. I'm just not going to let shills post bullshit and make it appear as if everything is rainbows and unicorns in here when it clearly isn't. And right now there's a massive problem with the removal of the asset contract, which so far still doesn't have any replacement solution, as well as the issue with the card reservation once the token price gets too high for normal people to care. |
|
|
|
I am going thru every posts of you.
Will gt back to you abt it..
Seems like you r still nt answering my questions.
So, u r here for some kinda of charity if not for profit ?
I am here for profit for sure.
I dont need any clarification frm you to say that I am here for profits.
Of course I am here for profits, but I only invest in projects that are genuine and seek to create real value without fucking people over with lies or very bad excuses. It's very easy to make money without supporting shady schemes. So if you actually support scams just to make profits - even though there are ways to make significant profits without supporting such people - it speaks volumes about your character. "It would become impossible for most people to pick up cards."
What does this mean? Please explain. Otherwise any argument is pointless. Why would most people should be unable to have their cards? Would the company impede the acquisition of the cards because the company is unable to comply with delivering the cards?
Why would there be no reason to hold the tokens after the lock-in period? The statements you made are not trivial. You need to elaborate. How can you know what is going to happen? How can you know about the progress of the company and the services provided by it?
"The only way to work around that is to change the amount of tokens required to reserve cards, which would have a direct influence on the token price and thus be market manipulation which is illegal."
What you are saying is that if the amount of tokens required to reserve cards is modified, then this is market manipulation. Your argument is useless because you are proposing an absurd solution to a problem that you still need to address, which is the worthlessness of the token. Why are you even employing market manipulation and alleged illegality as arguments?
Stay on task, and tell us why the MCO token must be worthless.
People jumped the ship because they didn't like the change made by Monaco regarding the asset contract. Jumping is legitimate. But the elimination of the asset contract cannot possibly mean that the token will have no value. How can you make such deduction? No asset contract means no future token value. Why?
Not sure what your problem is, I've already explained the issue in detail. If the token price goes up it will cost too much to get a card (even if you get it back in 6 months) and most people are not interested in such modalities. The only counteraction to this problem poses a significant risk of market manipulation, which could have very serious legal implications. Because see above. Locking up tokens doesn't create value without creating problems that will inevitably create market manipulation scenarios which are illegal.Hey, I have no problem. You've got one. You can't stay quiet. I have only asked for answers which you may be even able to give, but they are subjective. They don't describe the situation in absolute terms. If you think that the company is going to manipulate the price, whatever it may mean, then just stay away from it, sell the tokens you don't believe in, and embrace other initiatives. If you don't like the rules, then you are not obliged to maintain a position in supporting Monaco. You seem to spend a lot of time in here just to express opinions without considering that the project is evolving and is going to evolve. Things change. Have you ever thought about that, wiseacre millionaire? There is nothing subjective about my assessment. Having to adjust the amount of tokens leading to a direct influence on the price will lead to market manipulation, regardless of whether or not it will be intended, is an objective fact. If you genuinely can't understand this it just goes to show how unimportant the opinions of most posters here are (which are always shallow variants of "scam" or "omgmoon"). And in this ridiculous shitstorm of greedy kids throwing around Bitcoins it's important to bring some sanity into the market by stating facts. If you don't care about them, go ahead and keep running after chump change. But I'll keep pointing out flaws, just like I keep pointing out opportunities. Shortsighted incompetent shills are not healthy to crypto in the long run, and I actually believe in the technology and don't care about just making some profits like most people here. So I will make sure that at least those that care will get an objective perspective on these kinds of issues. And serious investors certainly appreciate this approach. The only ones with a problem are greedy shills who would support anything that makes them some money. |
|
|
|
I think Japan is the first country that will solve the problem of ICO, but no ban, no, competent regulatory process only! Because the ICO is the reason for the growth of the national budget.
The thing with ICOs is, that if regulation is too strict they will simply run their ICOs in another country. So if regulations aren't some sort of guideline that helps protect the interests of investors, they won't be very successful. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
