Yes. /thread

Two weeks?

(New forum software)

---

This topic has also been discussed before. By myself, actually. That's why you'll find that the search feature in the forum is a very useful one indeed: so useful that it'll show all the posts in which your name has been mentioned or your post has been quoted.

This is actually really great for people who don't like account sales since now it makes the whole trading part of it take a 14-day period (since any account-sale escrow would have to wait until the link for email change expires). And if the buyer doesn't trust an escrow, then it's perfect! No trade will go through.

---

Over the coming weeks I assume that aspiring buyers will get scammed over and over, and we'll see a steady decline in the interest of account sales.

Funnily enough, the simple security change by theymos curbs both hacking attempts and account sale attempts. Two birds with one stone.

Was it hacked or was it bought?

---

I'm willing to say both, and that you were not the original owner of the account. You don't even deserve the account, then. If the trust feedback on the account is legitimate then you are literally purchasing an account within a week after it was stolen.

---

[edit] Or... you're lying because you have something against the new rausvi account accusing you of being a scammer.

Would you carry over posts from a previous week if there were <25 constructive posts? Because I occasionally take time off, I don't have many opportunities to write quality posts and can hit sub-10 levels for certain weeks. I understand in the previous rules, you needed a minimum of 1 post and a lack of posting for 2 weeks would result in a removal. Thus, will the latter portion remain with the new rule implementation?

That's an A->B connection, not a B->A connection. B can receive all of the past history and reputation from A, but A will not receive the reputation of B.

You're stuck in a rut: there's no way to prove that you aren't Xcoint, even if you get someone to supposedly show their face and the fact that they are a different person.

Speaking of which, why have they not posted but instead you're the only one that wants to speak out about this issue? Don't they want a chance to refute this claim?

---

Sure, but we didn't post your profile link as our own when we registered for a bounty.

Technicalities. You don't have to be so anal about it: even I thought it was perfectly acceptable to state that a moderator deleted the post. (By deleting the threads, they delete the posts)

---

Shitposting is not a good way of ranking up your account. If you've been around before then you know this, and you know that reading OP's post is also a very good idea when you're replying to it. When you start talking about a completely different issue, everybody knows that you're just posting garbage.

The site price is the buyback price, which is calculated via the following:

Token Price = (Initial Funds Raised) / 70,000,000 + (Site Profit) / 100,000,000

---

The difference between the site and hitBTC is that one can dump all their coins on hitBTC, whereas the site has buyback periods in which you resell up to 10% of your on-site BKB tokens.

The first buyback period begins Dec 4, so if you want to sell your tokens, you want to have them deposited into the site before then.

You're replying to the shitty threads. You have yourself to blame. If the thread is filled with nonsensical posts and is littered with zero-value posts, do you really think a reply will contribute to the lack of a discussion?

---

Posting to a zero-value thread is essentially the same as making a zero-value post. You should be happy that spam megathreads are closing.

---

And why are you so anal about your post count? If it's activity you're concerned about, you should have obviously posted quality content within the 14-day period that wouldn't be likely to be trashed, right?

Okay.

Of course you wouldn't. Still doesn't change the fact that it was bought, though. If it was found out, then the same tag would have been applied.

Ah, so you're new to the forum and you bought this account to participate in bounty and signature campaigns. You artificially increased your reputation [essentially buying trust] and thought that this wasn't a shady thing to do?

No. You would purposely expose user information to more people, who could hack into more accounts? That's ridiculous. Hackers wouldn't even have to brute force anything: the passwords would be plaintext.

So your fault.

That's the fault of the user, is it not? It's up to you whether you want to have the lack of security of maintaining the same password over multiple platforms. Truly, laziness is the folly of man.

I'm not sure what the relevance of having a forum run by a politician is. Is being a politician inherently bad? That doesn't exactly make any sense.

Not all alts deserve negatives. The ones that are benign and aren't doing anything wrong, like abusing a bounty/signature campaign do get negative trust. Note that even hilariousandco has an alt, hilariousetc and they aren't tagged.

First of all, this doesn't belong in Meta. Moreso reputation.

Do you have proof that the address you sent BTC to was for a trade? Any PM, screenshot, invoices, etc. to prove that the transaction was actually between two people?

You claim that it was a trade but it could easily just be yourself. (And walletexplorer can find bittrex, poloniex addresses)

It's clear. If your password is changed, you receive an email notification. Thus, you can reset your password via email. If however the email is changed, then you have a link to lock your account and retrieve the account.

---

What was unclear?

This covers all (2) scenarios when someone's account is hacked.

CTRL+F5 or CMD+F5 refreshes the cache. The avatar may not update on the browser but it definitely has changed. You just preserved the old avatar in the cache and that's what it shows.

(iirc, correct me if i'm wrong)

It's not against the forum rules, but many people like Lauda find account sale activity shady and thus will send out a trust feedback indicative of that opinion.

"Account sales lead to scams, spam et al."

What the fuck are you doing? You're not even trying at all with your shitposts. This is incomprehensible garbage that has nothing to do with anything.

---

Are you so excited to hop into a signature campaign that you'll just crappily increase your activity? Clearly, you have some knowledge of the forum as you immediately hop into the Reputation threads; given the English skills, I'd assume that your main/old account had been banned and now you're trying to work your way back up. Badly.

If I had a bitcoin for every time you posted something incoherent, I'd have 15 bitcoins.

If $30 is a high amount for these people you speak of then certainly paying a $2 fee is also particularly high for them. After all, even at the current deposit that's a 6.6% fee that they have to put up with. When you start lowering the deposit (like to 0.001 for example) then you'll have that fee skyrocket to up to 33.3%. With the price as it is right now, txfees are pretty high. I just don't see the point of lowering the deposit if nobody's [or at least very, very few are] going to do it.

This is low-stake. You have the two 1/2 active tables (which are one-cent big blinds) and the 100/200 table which "could" be considered medium-stake at ~100NL in terms of FIAT poker. The tournaments don't have a buy-in higher than $1.2 unless they're scheduled, to which few people actually play.

Looks pretty attractive to low-stake players for me. And $30 is low-stake, let's not kid ourselves. It's 25 buy-ins at the lowest stakes possible, which is a decent number if you want proper BRM

It's just $30. I think that's around the ballpark of FIAT poker rooms so the minimum of 0.005 seems pretty reasonable to me. It doesn't seem very logical to want to spend a $2 fee on small deposits from a player's standpoint (we're talking fastest transaction speed @ avg. size according to bitcoinfees.21.co) and additionally small deposits would force withdrawals to be pretty big in tx size (eventually).

---

If you have, say 5 deposits of 0.001 and 1 deposit of 0.0015, to withdraw 0.005 to someone, you would have to spend 6 inputs (the combined .005 deposits + txfee) and have two outputs: one to the withdrawal address and one as a change address. That's a fee of .001. Which is 20% of the withdrawal. [calculated via estimatefee.com]

{the reason it's not 5 inputs of 0.004 + 0.0015 is because the txfee is .0008 which makes the total transaction require > .0055 BTC for it to pass}