That's just a wishful thinking, even the government is somehow leading the people to believe that crypto is being used for criminal activities and banks are only using the blockchain technology and not the product of that technology which is cryptocurrency. There's still a chance that crypto could go to zero but it's a slim chance or hardly happen unless the blockchain technology is falling apart or can't operate anymore therefore all transactions stuck and there's nothing people can do because it's basically worthless and I guess that's not going to happen anytime soon.

It's like the saying if you can't beat them join them. In the world of business as of now there's no such thing as direct competitor if you can invest to them and get the profit aswell. The only reason paypal leaving is because the regulation backlash and that is really understandable and I do agree as you said Libra is not decentralized by any means it is obvious that Libra is centralized. The whole thing works just like USDT or TrueUSD it's a crypto with blockchain but owned by a company and the company have the authority to do literally everything to the coin because they are the reason why that coin have a value.

They are fast and all until the mass adoptin hits, the blockchain becoming so crowded and they will face scaling issues. Bitcoin back in the days used to be really fast and have a really cheap fees even so many people saying that bitcoin's fees is a lot cheaper than sending from paypal or bank but now that the blockchain is really crowded everything become slow and the fee sometimes rising up so much. Therefore, I won't say that they are the future until they have gone through the mass adoption and see whether there is a problem or not otherwise their blockchain will be left untested and could potentially have a problem when the mass adoption hits.

The government will never accept something that's out of their reach or that has no control to be a global money, just move on with that dream. These issues about criminality that tied up with cryptos is just an issue after all, onle really few cases found when criminality involves the usage of cryptocurrency.
After all, there's just no chance for crypto to be a global money if that's what you expected, even currently there's no such thing as a global money.
However, I do support the government only if they are really trying to fight against terroism funding and Money laundering properly by having regulation to prevent so other than blindly put the blame on cryptocurrencies which is rarely used for such a thing.

Will definitely bring a major impact the the artist under the SM entertainment and that includes the KPOP fans aswell, but not really for the world wide. Maybe it's just their last effort to save their company from bankruptcy. I haven't followed the news about this company but it seems that they have some kind of urgent circumstances and facing a big problem that forces their investors to withdraw from the company and the company itself the capital to keep on mantaining its operation. If this become a success for the company, I'm pretty sure that the other company that works in the same field will follow the strategy and then basically there'll be a crypto specialized for KPOP I guess.

actually bitcoin have nothing to do with the failing of many project, if these projects are failing just because bitcoin is being dumped that means the project is bad and has no independency towards their own price whatsoever and that's not worth investing, it's basically like a natural selection.
If the project is good it will definitely hold on despite bitcoin being dumped, there are plenty of good project that just do that you can see yourself in CMC and those project aren't failing because their price is not too relying on the market situation.

Now every exchange where people used to trade their privacy coin is starting to delist any privacy coin it seems that they are running out of space to trade.
The concept of privacy coin is good but if it's attract more problem and criminality then I guess it's better to be removed more specifically if used as a way to do things you mentioned above. If it's what it take anonymous coin should be removed, just like in korea they are starting to do so.

It's basically just overhyped stablecoin and definitely not a crypto king. Imagine calling a coin that's established by a big company like facebook which they have full control over it a crypto king that just doesn't suit well. There's no such thing as crypto king other than bitcoin itself and Libra will never be a crypto king because that's just an utterly bullshit and Libra can't even get past the regulation and keeps on being delayed.
Libra is selling like a hot cake only in early stage where it got investors from left and right just because it's a big company and not because the coin's revolutionary idea which I find it none there. just overhyped garbage in short.

Bitcoin price lowering doesn't mean the popularity is decreasing, the current price dumping is I assume a price manipulation from a big player while the bitcoin popularity in HK might or might not increasing. However, I actually don't see the Hongkong and China right now could affect bitcoin at all.
They just don't have correlation and I don't think just because of some riots people would transfer or convert their money into Bitcoin even the foreign investor I assume will just take back their money through conventional way and there's no need to risk their money to bitcoin and got side effect like volatility and complicated thing they need to face if they really want to use bitcoin as a means of transferring huge sum of money. At best, some minor people will try to use Bitcoin I'd guess they won't take it into that far making so much people transferring money using bitcoin.

It's just can't happen to imagine digital currency to replace national currency considering it's in africa where it's always difficut to implement something about technology more specifically is a digital currency. Digital currency only suitable for country with no problem when it comes to digital world and no offense but I don't think africa has reached that point yet, it's still need to fix or distribute their internet connection evenly.
It's not that the digitaztion of national currency will bring value to african currencies it's just not the right time for african country to switch into a more digitized form of currency which is digital currency. It's better to fix the foundation first before building even further.

The anonimity has long died, everywhere you want to use your BTC they usually tend to requires you to verify your identity first by doing the KYC procedures and that will goes on accompanying the government's effort of Anti Money Laundering.  However, KYC in my opinion is not that bad only if the government officials provide their service to every company that requires their user to do the KYC verification rather than letting all those third parties did it or even worse the company that you don't even know who is the owner doing it independently.
It's not like that the government is trying to make everything complicated but they have no other choice to prevent money laundering since all the bad rumours about bitcoin being used for evil things which infact is pretty rare is already on the mind of the people inside government.

Even without the effort of eliminating all these called "useless coin" the market is already not forgiving to all these kind of coin by making them lacking the volume because no one wants to own it and forcefully gets listed from an exchange while some stuck in decentralized exchange without any volume left.
Trying to remove these useless altcoins will definitely take up a lot of effort since there's a freedom for people to create as much coin as they can while resulting nothing. All the effort better to be put into prevention of scam project or that short of thing rather than trying to remove something that will naturally remove itself due to being lacky.

Even if the cryptocurrency reaches the lowest point it won't as low as zero. I think that yes crypto has a chance to become zero in valuation but that chance is kinda small.
Believe it or not crypto will still exist maybe for many decades in the future because it helps a lot of people in terms of remittances and that alone won't make the value of cryptocurrency mor specifically bitcoin to become zero.
If there's anything possible to make it zero, it'd be when the blockchain got stuck and the coin couldn't move at all which is quite impossible unless there's no hash power left.

Cryptocurrency is just limitless when it comes to transferring money, the settlement is sometimes faster than sending through a bank or another third parties indeed but doesn't mean it can be used for money laundering or terrorism funding that easily. The fact that blockchain is so transparent making it hard enough to do money laundering even there is Anti Money Laundering (AML) program alongside with KYC. Recent news I heard exchanges are slowly trying to delist any privacy coins.
If the govts are talking about money laundering I'd suggest them to take a look at their hard cash and see whether it's as transparent as crypto or not.

There's no profit for investing into Libra anyway. The fact that libra is pegged to various low volatilty assets, people who are investing into Libra might aswell invest into all those low volatility assets or even real cash.
By that the existence of Libra doesn't necessarily reducing the liquidity of cryptocurrency market quite the opposite Libra could be a bridge to bring a more liquidity from the masses into crypto market as an alternative to an already popular crypto which is BTC or even another stablecoin.

I don't think so. Blockchain is only revolutionary to those people who want to be free from the massive financial centralization of the world bank and I don't think just because it opposes the bankers it will help africa. Blockchain is not a magical thing you know, it is basically just a system that could improve efficiency of certain field if applicated properly.

If the fundamentals of a country is bad, blockchain product like cryptos will make it even worse making the citizen's money goes out the country and from that I could assume there would be a massive monetary crisis.

If there's a way to change africa, maybe blockchain could only help to transfer money internationally without limit.

Actually it is not that it will bring more demands but instead reducing the rewards each miners get from thus making the supply lesser but still the supply remains the same or accumulating anyway it's just the pace is slower.


The halving before as I've seen not really do much to the price, I mean indeed the price is pumped but long before the halving happened and then the price started rising slowly. Halving is not abolute for the price to increase it's more like reducing the supply while demands is basically still the same.

Definitely not the safest, there is hardware wallet that is far more safer tha MEW or metamask. While MEW and metamask is indeed a legit wallet and trustwrothy all the securities still in the hand of users meaning that they only giving you facilities and the rest of the thing will be up to you and that include security.
Most of the time adding 2 factor authentication is enough, and if you want to add more security layer that'll be even better.

To be frank, halving doesn't guaratee the double of the price it may be the opposite, it's just a usual supply and demand rule. When BTC is getting the halving it's only the miners that are affected and not the holders so don't expect much, consider having a price pump as a bonus.
About altcoins dumping, that's not guaranteed either, there are chance that the price in BTC will be the same but the value in USD is rising or the price to BTC is lowering but the value in USD is basically the same.

Bad exchange good exchange what does it matter if the project is an utter garbage anyway. Even if the volume helped by the immense amount of 24h volume that the good exchange has if the project is still a garbage it will eventually dies out.
You can see so many coins back then deemed to be a good coin get listed in the popular exchange only to be delisted again when the volume is too low. If the project is good, even if they are being listed in a bad exchange some good exchanges will definitely put an eyes and will consider to list them on their own.