|
So do we know what are the best settings to use?
|
|
|
|
I use this settings --avalon-options 115200:16:10:d:274 --bitburner-voltage 1270
Hello, Just installed my BB Bitfury I adapted your settings and have also ~48 GHash/s per board. THX for that. Is there any collection of good settings out there? and what about the "10" in the avalon-options? there are 2 rows with "8" chips, so I tested "115200:16:8:d:274" with no difference. Greetings The second 10 is always fix. It means one row of chips. A bitburner x has 1 row and a bitburner xx has 2 rows. But bitburner x and bitburner xx both are counted as 2 x 10 rows. So if you have 6 bitburner x or xx then you use 12:10 which means 12 times 10 chip rows. Its only for delivering the work or so. The Bitfury boards have only 16 chips but nobody knows what settings to use. Oh, sorry... overread that. Thats something kano should answer most probably. Its best to ask in his cgminer-thread i think. I don't expect kano to comment without having the actual hardware in hands. Our only hope is burnin or maybe cryptx. |
|
|
|
I use this settings --avalon-options 115200:16:10:d:274 --bitburner-voltage 1270
Hello, Just installed my BB Bitfury I adapted your settings and have also ~48 GHash/s per board. THX for that. Is there any collection of good settings out there? and what about the "10" in the avalon-options? there are 2 rows with "8" chips, so I tested "115200:16:8:d:274" with no difference. Greetings The second 10 is always fix. It means one row of chips. A bitburner x has 1 row and a bitburner xx has 2 rows. But bitburner x and bitburner xx both are counted as 2 x 10 rows. So if you have 6 bitburner x or xx then you use 12:10 which means 12 times 10 chip rows. Its only for delivering the work or so. The Bitfury boards have only 16 chips but nobody knows what settings to use. |
|
|
|
Already at 800th page, expect firmware 0.96 to do black magic and take hash rate to 800+ haha
Will donate 1BTC to charity if that happens! |
|
|
|
You are lapping up slick marketing, not analyzing actual facts. Last I checked, a fancy pedigree hashed at zero GH/sec.
If they really "have the best team of elite engineers out of all the asic mining companies" why
- did they make claims about the physical performance of their chip (GH/W/sec) before logical design was even complete?
- have they fallen behind schedule on their supposed "first week of October" tape-out?
Did they even raise the $5 million needed for 28nm NRE? Or did ScamGarden, LABscam, ACTIVEscamming, and IceDrill IPOs exhaust investors before Cointerra (and CryptX) had a chance to get started?
i guess we're hoping we'll hear more news this week (and if theyre behind by a few days, well thats annoying but also no different than anyone else)... and yes, its my understanding that they have higher performance and lower power consumption than their peers, and that it was validated and simulated during the physical design process Simulated. Wake me up when we see a real chip... KnC still hasnt delivered on their w/ghash, so why would anyone believe a non-taped out simulation? Hasn't is the right word. They over delivered! |
|
|
|
hi Rampion
thanks for your help ! but this doesn't worked, i've already tried it and it says:
-bash: sceen -r: command not found
it's scReen, not sceen and i would recommend you sticking it to 0.95 |
|
|
|
Claiming "I want to handle everything in increments of 3 [or some such]" is inconsistent with trying to sell more than one, and suddenly willing to make space for a whole server room (original 9 + the truckload of miner protection gear) You don't have room for a bit moar?  the problem with your brain is that it's static. like mud. you fail to consider that ppl can change or figure out solutions to a problems as they go along. i decided to go with being Order #1, maximize the mining while the going is good and deal with the truckload later. you're right in that i'll probably have to find a solution to that later. but it's a good problem to have. how about that bet, Mr. Never Mined a BTC in My Life? Lordy, you've talked about my yeller button, you offered to prove that you have 9 pre-orders, you accused me of not being a miner. You've talked about so many ugly things. The only thing you didn't address is the lie you've been caught in. Though i like where you're going with this. Level up, practice makes perfect still confused. what lie are you talking about? Can i get you to commit to a single story? Why did you go through all the mutually-contradictory rationalizations before ending up with "people can change their minds"? Tell me one last time why you wanted to unload a bunch of pre-orders from a company you were shilling for representing at the time? ? how many times do i need to say it? b/c of space and electrical capacity considerations. when i first ordered BJ's, 4 TH/s was supposed to come in 4 machines. b/c they changed their plans, it went to 10 machines. then, thru their own generosity, the MPP is going to take it to 50 machines. i have a small room for these. 50 machines seemed untenable and b/c i ordered first, i could sell my pre-orders for an immediate profit; still can. but the intent was never to sell them, it was to mine. the repackaging of these into Sierra's solves the entire issue for now. period. still want to bet 1000 BTC? After you admitting that HashFast screwed you and also their numerous customers by an activated MPP i just realized why are you so angry and why did you went full retard like Inaba. If you have that problem i imagine a lot of their customers didn't think through very well of that MPP and blindly ordered. Let's see how this works our for everyone. |
|
|
|
500GH/s of avalons ok. Anything else? I m under the impression that we had this discussion yesterday This thread was very entertaining to read! Thank you all. Where do we move now?
Witch-hunt begins on the 15th - LC final deadline. Shenzhen, Guangdong, China (CST) Timer removed. End time: 2013-10-15+12:00:00CST Nothing has changed - on the 15th we are waiting for 3TH/s... or see above Thank you for a shorter way to that thread. This is the second time when i manage to revive the "labcoin" user. This makes me warm and fuzzy. |
|
|
|
please point out where i've trolled this thread.
It seems that retard Inaba has a fan. Well done! |
|
|
|
500GH/s of avalons ok. Anything else? |
|
|
|
I live in HK. If anyone wants me to give them a call I can! Is there a number? Actually i could do a search and see if they are even a registered company...
This is a scam... |
|
|
|
|
This thread was very entertaining to read! Thank you all. Where do we move now?
|
|
|
|
|
Why are you people still using anything other than 0.95? It's the best firmware today!
|
|
|
|
BitSyncomm took 8 mil $ in chips pre-orders and failed very very bad. Having 1.4 mil in sales means jack shit! |
|
|
|
Firmware 0.95 solves the VRM problem and boards seem to work fine with only 4. Thank you Orama and KnC! Welcome to working with customers Orama and enjoy your ride Of course people are whining, but some are just not realizing that you are trying to push things out of the door as fast as you can and this hiccups are totally understandable. At least for me. The good thing is that you are pushing firmwares and fixes as fast as you can too. Even if KnC isn't perfect it seems that it's the best and the most reasonable "pre-order" ASIC company yet. Great job and keep doing your stuff even if people are complaining as hell. |
|
|
|
|
cryptx you promissed me shipping in the second week of October. Now that week has finished. No word on shipping, no word on refunds, nothing. So sad!
|
|
|
|
Yes he is a shill.
So what's he gonna do about this mess?
LOL? Revive this topic for this? Wow... |
|
|
|
Too late!
It's never too late! Just too expensive  |
|
|
|
Bitcoinorama, First of all: THANK YOU, for your great reporting!
But now to the bare facts:
I have received my Jupiter today and tested it thoroughly (0.91, 0.93 and 0.94) and this on all 4 ASIC-boards as one Jupiter-system, as well as each ASIC-board separately (only connecting one board at one time). And found huge differences in the boards.
Actually only one of my Jupiter-boards is working very well, one is running more or less OK (has some Core disables), but 2 are just bad. Together they make only 390 Gh/s (the good one is 135 Gh).
Be aware that this Jupiter is cooled very well (in a Server-room with 18 C, without the case-top, and even an extra Fan blowing 18 C cool air into the Jupiter-box). So hardware-errors due to heat problems are impossible. Still the bad boards have about 30% of bad cores…. Reducing the optimum hashrate from 140 G/s per ASIC-board to 100 or less.
Sure the FW versions 0.91 to 0.94 are trying to “stabilize” the system, but actually it’s only disabling the faulty cores per ASIC. This disabling results in less reporting of HW-errors indeed, and so reduces the Hashrate performance as well (by disabling 30% of the cores). This disabling is also noticeable if you look at the Temperatures of the ASICS (and their Watt use). See this list (sorry, I don't know how to insert a screenshot into this post):
ASIC slot #1: 57 C
ASIC slot #2: 36 C
ASIC slot #3: 38 C
ASIC slot #4: 41 C
the one with 57 C runs very well (on its own about 135 Gh).
So looking to all other posts and reports about Jupiters running 550 Gh and others like me running only 391 or lower: You simply are lucky if you received a Jupiter with 4 good ASIC-boards (then 4 times 135 is about 540). If you have one or more not so well manufactured ASIC-boards you end up (much) lower. I’m afraid (please ask Sam for me) that software updates will NOT solve this thing. We need to replace the hardware: more boards per Jupiter (tested at KnC before shipping) that are capable of running 140 G without Hardware-errors.
Let's see how do they address this Again thank you Bitcoinorama for your reports. Too bad you only got 2 BTC as donations. You will get more! |
|
|
|
How do I get this view in the SSH?
SSH to your Jupiter and type screen -dr |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
