i see that that event is in new zeland. If i remenber well, i've read more or less 2 months ago, that in new zeland will be open a new exchange particularly for trading xem. Are there any news about that? I think its a Australian based exchange and the beta should begin any time now. hopefully end of this month |
|
|
|
does the stacking work again?
have not had a stake for a long time .. what will happen and what is going on there?
Based on the amount you stake, you are paid out in blocks of 20 ODN. Your total stake should average up to about 10% per year. does someone know more about the upcoming masternodes? I am following discord but am I right to assume that the split which is happening is going to delay the MN start? |
|
|
|
I see the price started to rise an hour ago, is there any news? Or does it buy whales before growth?
Don't know anything about big news coming, aside from RPX (Jonathan Ha) being extremely active on conferences. It this moment though, the RPX-price comes very close to the ICO-price and I wonder why I have been doing so much effort before on getting into the ICO. It seems that RPX maybe was overhyped as it was the first NEO-based token at that moment? Hopefully I am wrong off course and whales are seeing the potential of RPX. On another note, I got banned from the RPX-telegramgroup because I posted my submissions for the telegram-sticker-contest. I was doing this because we haven't heart anything anymore and I put a lot of effort in my submissions... So I ask to unban me & second where I can find the results of the RPX-contest & third, I know 50 RPX isn't much but all small bits combined are much, what about the distribution of the 50 RPX? https://blog.red-pulse.com/the-red-pulse-telegram-sticker-contest-b4f5b5b0761 it ran until the 12th of March. Now we are almost one month later. Telegram-handle = @CryptoGorilla007 By my calcualtions the current price is 140% above the ICO price. How did you calculate your profit? In Euros, the ICO price was about 0.02403846, and the current price is 0.05769026. Or am I doing sth wrong here? even if you calculate neo wise you should have made profit from the ico |
|
|
|
If BTC goes up again I'm sure XEL will pump at least 4500 satoshi.
Today there is a fast pump that the whales do.
It proves that XEL the next few days there will be a good signal.
XeL doesn't need any P&D. No doubt it will reach new heights in the future. that's why the price isn't really interesting. The ongoing GitHub activity therefore really is !  |
|
|
|
Dear, user, we are sending this e-mail to report that the following cryptocurrencies will be delisted on April 25th, 2018:
BTA, BTCD, BSTY, CLAM, DGC, DP, DPC, EFL, EXP, MOON, NEOS, NVC, PPC, SLG, SLR, START, WDC, XVP, ZET
From that day on, these coins will not be able to be traded at Bleutrade platform. In case of positive balance, the withdraw may be done within 15 (fifteen) days (until May 10 th, 2018). After this term there is no commitment from Bleutrade to stock remaining balance. So Bleutrade Exchange will be able to definitely exclude the wallets.
I am very surprised by this notice, I am very sorry that this happens right now.
Waiting to know the motivation...
I don't think they are following the thread or newest updates about the coins. Maybe someone should reach out to them |
|
|
|
it was dead? [/quote Seems that it is Dead...  work has never stopped behind the scenes  |
|
|
|
There's been some movement on their MAIN ICO sale, So far they already sold 439389 Penta tokens and there are still 6 days ++ remaining before their ICO ends.
I am really curious how this works out. The final number of participants will be interesting |
|
|
|
|
Joined the bounty campaign! Really looking forward to the project
|
|
|
|
lon is very active in telegram, will be interesting to see how much the ico will raise Unfortunately, Telegram will soon be blocked in Russia, as Durov refused to provide information to special services. They suspect that terrorists are operating in the Telegram. do you have any source? never heard about that |
|
|
|
|
since there are a lot of coding sites out there, (Khan, Codecadamy etc) I am really curious how Bitdegree will perform
|
|
|
|
The community reached out to us, that Miners should receive less in order to stabilize the Price and Network which is lead by Dumping Miners right now. After this we decided to double the Masternode Rewards and take the Developers Fee from the Mining stake. Update this week.
could you expand on this more? also there is no vote? is the mining reward going to be halved + dev fee from mining in order to double the masternode rewards? what reasoning is there for masternode operators to not dump their rewarded coins? I think that if staking was introduced now it would give miners incentive to hold their coins and accumulate for masternodes instead of dumping because they would be rewarded along the way. full disclosure i am a miner, however i havent dumped any coins and im not sure what miners would at this point (coin value is too low) so i dont think its that driving the price down. if i were to mine coins just to dump for max profit and not speculate for long term gains, i wouldnt be mining alqo. The reason for mn owners not to dump their coins is the reward they get for providing their mn - simple as that. As a miner you normally have the profit/loss ration in mind when mining (meaning: investment vs. output). So if you would be interested in SHORT TERM profits it would make no sense to run a mn. The miner on the other hand can sell anytime he's in the green. On another topic: what's up with the three stage update? There will be another ANN, when it is rolled out, right? thats kind of what i was getting at with the masternode profits, theyre still profits that can be sold off (not talking about the 10,000 xlq required to hold the node). in this case theyre just moving reward from one userbase to the other, miners to masternode holders. profits are profits whether theyre earned from mining or a masternode and could be dumped just the same. This is why i suggested that if staking was implemented sooner it would give miners an incentive to hold onto the coins they have mined. not to mention at the current price i dont think miners alone can be blamed for the continuing decline, i cant imagine anyone would mine XLQ to sell at these prices (im hodling what ive mined over the past few months). im not saying their decision to increase MN rewards and reduce miner reward is right or wrong. just opening discussion on why this change might not have the outcome they intended and trying to figure out how this will affect things long term. also why wasnt this decision put to a vote? that makes absolutely no sense. if an individual has enough to run a masternode, he or she has no incentive to hold on to his rewards unless he is trying to save up for another masternode and even in that situation, if someone wants another masternode, they more than likely to buy the bulk of their coin of the market cos waiting to save up for another masternode strictly of MN rewards will take a really long time. So if anything a Mn owner is more inclined to sell cos they not taking any loss if they already have their MN. It's all gain, while a miner has to take account of the current spending to make sure they earning a profit and if BTC prices keep falling and the market continues on the downtrend with time their profit will be heavily affected to where they not so inclined to sell while a MN owner has little to no cost. Just the cost of maintainin the VPN if they are using one. agreed. maybe alqo team has no mining rigs and wants more reward from the masternodes they hold... I really don't think that's the reason. I don't know wether the team is mining or not, but they deserve some credit for their work done. Sure there is the dev-fee now, but running an exchange and listing on other exchanges + paying devs and community members is expensive. to be honest, i think if there would have been a vote, the change sure would be accepted. (MN are by far the largest holder) |
|
|
|
lon is very active in telegram, will be interesting to see how much the ico will raise |
|
|
|
Hi,
While compiling on Linux, get this:
using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make
mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.
I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.
@Taranis67, is it ok for you?
I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon. Why are you doing this alone? Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not?  Moon can't be spent...On anything. Any issues with code is a symptom, not the problem.. But that's the same with most cryptos, only the biggest ones can be spend. |
|
|
|
so MVT still not receiving 10k USD daily trades that is why not being listed in coinmarketcap? it seems dropper has less and less activity about the project.
hard to reach that without proper exchanges. And actually i think he might be a bit disappointed because of the lack of community initiative I thought MVT already been on coinmarketcap, is right or only my feeling?? If yes, because didn't reach the minimum daily trades then coinmarketcap deleting MVT from the list, oh damn i am bit confused now lol  Its never been listed on coinmarketcap. the volume never surpass even 5k daily volume. When MVT get listed on nxt.exchange we have more chances to get listed on coinmarketcap. I think being listed on some decentralized exchanges would be a good shot too. IDEX, CB, even HEAT |
|
|
|
Does anybody know when dim.token would get listed on an exchange? Shouldn't that have already been hapened?
Dim Tokens will be traded on Hybse once it's functional in June this year. Thanks, haven't known Tokens will only be traded on Hybse. Anyway, it doesn't matter for me, I'm invested for the long run and I think Hybse will be huge. If it really goes live in June this would be really huge. No doubt about that. Any official statement about that ? or just on the roadmap? |
|
|
|
 I´m waiting now 3 months for my account activation. I´v contacted the support 4 weeks ago and they didn`t respond. What can I do? I would contact them again. maybe your message got missing |
|
|
|
STOP BUYING XEM!!!
NEM foundation supports Cryptopia for scam. NEM foundation disclaims responsibility, but they have a contract with Cryptopia!!!!
Cryptopia wrote me that my coins was credited to my account. But NO!
This is bad joke!!!!! This deposit was not credited to my account!!!!!!
---------
Sender: TheQueenIsDead (Cryptopia)
4/3/2018 10:07:21 PM
Hi ducho Your deposit of 1016.63227000 XEM (TxID: 7f3480092e3c130a31e3e6b74d832893bd156686006a8f4fde4f91b38521d45c) has been credited to your account.
Kind regards, Cryptopia Wallets Team
---------
The foundation has nothing to do with the exchanges. You sure will be fine. Just stay in touch with the support |
|
|
|
Wow... Login on Depotwallet with Trezor is online and it`s working.... Very nice ... Good job DIM Team. Hope soon will be good news more.
Hm I think about to buy a Trezor just for NEM and DIM, all my other coins are supported on my Ledger Nano S. But ... Trezor One or Trezor T with the new OS, I can‘t decide. I still hope NEM/DIM will be supported by the Ledger too someday. I don´t think that will happen soon. Someone has to code the Ledger app by themselves. If enough people really want it, it might be a good idea to setup a bounty |
|
|
|
How can I earn money with ELIX?
as a lending platform you will be able to earn by lending your coins to others |
|
|
|
Sometimes it really needs a community take over, taking over a community to make it productive and profitable, to make it active and attracts new members that will put together their efforts and ideas to make a sleeping project back into life again to be a prolific way of investing and engaging in a cryptocurrency.
True, some projects would just die without a community takeover. But the best course is if it does not need to happen. And isnt it so that the original dev sits with some keys that can be used in harmfull ways? Think i saw that in another community take over. Please dont take that last part as "proof" or reason to sell, i just want an answer from someone who knows more about it  sure it would be better without a takeover, but many projects did something like a takeover or rebranding. just think about DASH/darkcoin |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
