Investing in dice sites has actually been a no gain game for anyone who cares about the final fiat value . Dice sites do offer good returns over the long term, but the risks are high and are usually not worth investing into .
Dadice is a failrly new site, not that I doubt it , but would be best to actually invest in something which has been running for a much longer time.

I was testing it again today , I also get a few delays while playing it.
Also I got the same problem of going out of the walls , that I reported in the starting of the month .
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1010288.msg10964912#msg10964912

Wow, that is really sad to hear . Did Micon also get the news just today about it ? Would like to hear how he feels. Kind of disappointing news, Looks like it will somehow cause more developers and site owners to stay anonymous, which could mean more scams happening under bitcoin.


I doubt it, as he wasn't running or started the site on US soil. But if he happens to go back with the site still active and gets involved in the operation, I think he will have to go to court for it.

True, however I am not really sure if that would be a big problem for Chiliphone. Since its already established, a buyer for that can easily make it coexist with any new service thats comes up in the bitcoin ecosystem .
The original Ann thread doesn't have a lot of posts either, so maybe there isn't a big market for it then. However I would expect a big market for anonymous calling, so not sure why it is so.

Sounds nice , looking forward to it. Also like Chiliphone, calls made through Bitphone will be untraceable correct ?
Also , let us know if there is an ANN thread for it.

I know its not against the forum rules, what I meant was that bitcoin ecosystem is prone to a lot of scams and one way someone can be extra careful while trading or buying something is through the use of an escrow. Allowing them to lock or delete posts will make people prone to falling for a scam , so I was just wondering if some kind of rule can be enforced to not have all these business or selling related threads be locked. There is actually no reason to have the thread to be locked except for the fact to refuse an escrow when someone posts about it. And since the thread is not self-moderated, I really don't see the use of locking the thread except for it being a potential scam.

I was checking out the service announcements sub-forum and came across this thread  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=995695.0
which is currently locked by the owner. He usually bumps the thread every 24 hours, and locks it. I feel he is avoiding an escrow for any kind of trading while doing so and has locked it to avoid any posts by consumers or people who want to use an escrow to go ahead for a trade. Should threads like these be allowed to be locked to avoid any posts on the thread ? I feel a self-moderated thread would be better suited than locking the thread.

Is there a chargeback after a particular time has passed ? Since that guy is sending the amazon gift codes at bitstamp, he might just be legit. I don't think he will chargeback, as he probably would have bought a lot of gift cards before, and can't really complain stolen card about an year later, saying that all the amazon cards bought within the last 1 year were not under his notice.

But if you want to just buy an amazon card, just go for Purse.io .

Perhaps you should know that these will be carded, and there might be a possibility of having to face embarrasement, when the card is rejected at the store saying that it was carded.

I don't really think many Miners do pay taxes. The current income mining generates is anyway very low, and many people simply avoid the taxes, apart from a few people.
The big mining companies, must be paying it due to obvious reasons , but at a personal level I very much doubt it. Even the daily bitcoin user, has only a small percentage who report taxes on money earned .

So much hate for America everywhere.

Last I read, they didn't and requested other nations like India and Russia to help with the evacuations, and also requested their own citizens to contact the embassies of these countries. I am surprised they have the money to get warships in the area but not money to get their own people out of the country.


Very much a possibility, I heard that Saudi wanted control, so that their import/export shipments do not get blocked as they come through that area.

This is what I meant. The Bet seems to have lost as the game ended at 3-7 with Marlins losing. You will now go on to the 4th bet, after which you will only be able to bet 1 more match. I know that you are claiming to be successful using martingale, but it isn't something you should be doing without posting any slips, as probably you will have some one following you, and them losing their bankroll on it.

Yeah ,I just meant that it was the 3rd bet in the martingale streak and only won by 1 point luckily, and required one or 2 more martingale losses more to bust the bank roll. So Martingale isn't really going to get you anywhere in the long run, be it dice or Sports betting.

I don't think martingale is going to work out in the long term. You have already had 2 or losses. Getting to 5 can happen anytime soon.

Also it seems this tip ended up being a tie as before the overtime as both teams scored 79-79 in the 4 quarters, and luckily Lietkabelis managed to win it in the over time with 1 point lead.

There are already existing alternatives. Just saw the big wide ad on bitcointalk itself for Bitquick, with the caption " Number one alternative to localbitcoins" . Not really sure what kind of response are they receiving. But its always hard to get people go for another exchange, than something they are used to.

I don't think people who have asked for investments before showing up anything have had much success. A better thing might be get an html designer on board, and design the site together, or hire and risk your own amount just to have the site setup. After that you can approach investors or rather go for crowd funding, and have the site developed and bankrolled.

Not the best thing to do , considering people would send through other sites rather than their own wallets as the anonymity is a big factor. However, I checked the addresses in the sending side, and none of them got the amount back.

Thats sad to hear. Also, Always best to clear the deposits and refund people who deposited after they disabled services without any announcements on the site. I had a 1 chip deposit too . Not that I care for 1 chip, but if a lot of people deposited during those days, it might sum up to a big volume.

As for advertising, I really didn't see any, except for this and one another forum post. I still think its like Skype/Google voice and is perfect as an anonymous option for making calls. Maybe the owner can try again with proper advertising.

I don't think not having chargebacks that a stares away a lot of people from bitcoin. Digital goods will also have some kind of a problem on bitcoin chargebacks, just like Paypal limits it. For people who wish to trade can always be extra careful , or only trade using an escrow. Chargeback is usually initiated in cases mostly involving a scam. With bitcoin that can always be limited using an escrow as currently Paypal escrows are not possible.

I don't remember the game, as I made a few bets on other games after it. But it has happened once in the past as well. So next time I see it, I will let you know the game.