Я тут подумал, несколько дольше чем в первый раз, и пришел к выводу, что корреляция все же присутствует, но не прямая. Дело в том, что основные продавцы на рынке биткоинов - майнеры. Они вынуждены продавать свои биткоины, чтобы покрыть текущие расходы и вложения в оборудования. Пока не видно, чтобы "старые" BTC стали массово продаваться, или это делается очень аккуратно.
|
|
|
Looks like we need more "violent" moderation in all of the forum sections. I am do not know. Maybe some more volunteer moderators ?
|
|
|
I am think that is start of the process that Gavin mentioned as first on the list of early treats to bitcoin - virus makers, early soft, - vulnerable to hacks. He did not mentioned fake offenses, but this is quite obvious. Bitcoins, in their nature, means extremely high raise in competition level.
As moderator of Russian local (Izsaver) mentioned above, we, Russian community, will track that case closely, and will conduct our own investigation.
If somebody wants some more explanations "why Russians are so tend to be evil" i am can give some, - if that will questioned again. You will not like that explanation, but that will not bather me.
|
|
|
I am think that was mentioned above, but still:
Indeed, there is a relationship between complexity and cost, but it is not straight. Miners, forced to sell their bitkoins relatively quickly, to recoup their costs and investments in equipment. In fact, right now, - they are the main sellers. "Old BTC" are not on sale now, or putted on market very carefully.
|
|
|
Wiki is fully operational now.
|
|
|
Web based mining - as solution for subsidize site owner, is not so good idea, really. 1) Lots of people using mobile devices, and they will be afraid by extra battery drain, even more than by adds. 2) Webmining, by itself, can not be source of income that we can call, anyhow significant. (thats most important part) 3) If (somehow), that idea will spread, users will start to block immediately, any suspected script. 4) That will not add to your users some warm and fuzzy filling towards you, just the opposite.
If you want to experiment with that - allow user to choose, in clear and easy form, did he wish to distribute in that way.
|
|
|
Consensus - That situation should be handed manually. Some preparations should be made - (patched version of client).
|
|
|
Be sure, that you put anough attention to network code. Miner shouldnt loss data sended to pool. Miner shouldnt overload pooll with requests, if it did not get answer immediatly.
|
|
|
US goverment can change one fiat currency to other. Than they can sit down and smile to outrage on deflation - "You did not like inflation, so we decide to try another way".
|
|
|
Argh ! 2016 blocks exactly.
|
|
|
Well, first you should check connections of your bitcoin clients. Second, you should check number of blocks in your client and compare that number with bitcoincharts.com Then post again.
|
|
|
I did not read the article, but, at some extent, yes, inflation does intensify economic inequalities. It's not difficult to see it actually. Don't you think the variables "level of income" and "percentage of owned assets in the form of government currency or an equivalent" have any sort of relation? In general the most poor are those who lose the most with inflation.
The new money is not distributed equally. Banks, for instance, receive it before most others.
Did it mean, that without them, there will be no inequality ? No. Not in any way. PS: Well, i am agree that they intensify that process. I am desagree (and author dont mean that too), that there will be no inequaliti without them at all.
|
|
|
I am choose options - "No, it should be where it is, becose, well, it is where it should be - on open market.
|
|
|
That is so strange statemnt, that i must to check - did he realy mean that. EDIT: Nope he did not mean that exactly.
|
|
|
Да? Но курс отнюдь не подскочил (лихорадочно проверяя MT Gox - лишь подрос в связи с окончанием праздников в USA). И такая ситуация (фактически снижение цены) была на протяжении как минимум 3-х дней (те самые праздники) А вот сложность выросла хм, вдвое ? Какая она там была, лень смотреть.
|
|
|
No dubt, that was attack of artifical intellect, that arise in Dvawe.
|
|
|
It s to early to speek about it. Lots of current users prefer to stay anonimous. With except of special situations (they are running some service, or some developers) Bitcoin have anough "pseudoanonimity" , to stay anonimous. You not mentioned Google login by the way.
|
|
|
Maybe we should name them in more casual way ? Gold BTC silver BTC copper BTC and so on.
|
|
|
|