Youre right with the fragmentation but often i see open swap offers that are offered at the exact same rate. Since they are added at the same moment they will most probably will taken in the same moment. But they will still show up as two even though they are the same rate and time. And they will end at the same time too.

Only thought it might be a bit easier to read though its not as important.

Regarding not swapped out USD. You might count them like Dollar-Minutes. Each amount of USD not lend out for some minutes will add to that account. Then one might be able to adjust the settings and lower that amount by checking the performance at the same time.

I think it would be a great tool to maximize profits.

Ist echt Stoff für einen Film. Aber besonders helle war er nicht. Ok, Kriminelle sind das oft nicht. Aber wenigstens hätte er sich richtig informieren müssen wie sicher er ist. Da hat er sicher Leute gehabt die ihm das erklären könnten.

Didnt explain someone in here before that this has to do with bitfinex running a cron-job only each hour? This job then checks if a swap ended and closes it.

If its handled that way then i think its not good. I cant even see how they will calculate it in a fair way if your swap is hold longer than both parties thought.

Okcoin is better imho. I tested bitfinex before but their fees make it practically impossible to make profits on short term.

796 is better there but there are too few trades happening. And the missing support is a risk i dont want to take.

Now im at okcoin and if they wouldnt be down now, i wouldnt have to say any bad things about them. They have support, quite responsive. I like that.

Thanks for the payment and bonus. I think the new bonus system is a good thing to dadice because more people have a chance for it and they can rise if they want. Top 3 might have users give up because the chance to get one practically isnt there.

I wonder if an effect can be observed out of it.

Maybe i understand you wrong but in most european countries you cant be fired because of such things.

Its 0.0001 BTC. I withdrew something now and thats the amount it couldnt claim.

Um... why is that? At the end it would be the most secure way to do it.

An escrow could simply let buyer and seller make their rules and point out risks. If the seller is fine with showing the account to the buyer then its up to them. The escrow only gives additional security if wished.

If the buyer wants to be more sure then the seller could give the link to the profile and put some text in it so the escrow knows he controls it. That would prevent giving some fake profile link.

Though the most secure way would to give the login details and change it to temporary ones. Of course the escrow then needs to check if there are ways to gain access again. For example through email. This has to be changed too of course.

If the seller fears he can find out if the pass is changed then the escrow only changes the password after the coins came in. Though those things have to be cleared beforehand. Trade starts only after buyer, seller and escrow agree on terms. Which means terms have to be on the table first.

At the end the escrow holds both items and he KNOWS that the trade will be secure.


Um... is that your reason you stopped? Because you suddenly feared that your coins might be stuck too long? If true then this sounds very weak for an explaination.

And as long as you dont speak with escrow and seller that you need everything be done fast, you will have waiting times with practically every escrow. Thats part of the deal for getting security or you speak about that point beforehand. But not when everything is already running. That doesnt sound like a valid reason to be honest.


Um... im happy you are no judge as profession. I mean the defendant doesnt want to speak... he must be guilty. I really dont think it makes sense to leave the trust system for people that decide someone might scam. Who are they to judge before anything happened? If i would have done so i would have marked many persons red and i dont know of anyone who actually scammed later.

Trust system protects against scammers who clearly offer things everyone can see are scam attempts. But going out of a deal is not enough to justify knowing he is a scammer. Quickseller not even claimed that. But the red color says he is now. I think only a handful would check where the red actually came from.


I disagree. Seeing a red trust lets me leave fast since im very sure that established members checked things and found he is not trustworthy. Thats something i cant see for worhipper.

And you negrepped ponzi persons and they found more persons to be scammed because of that? I cant believe that and everyone who invested then deserves being scammed.

Where can i change the currency shown? So far the website looks interesting because i need something like a stat showing the incoming money.


Blockchain.info, like i wrote, shows all other addresses in transactions too. It becomes confusing. I liked blockchain.info more before they starting plastering the whole site with addresses i dont care about. At least it would be good if they could be switched away.

The error message from C++ Runtime Library still exists in electrum 2.0.4.

R6034 An application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly.

This happened with 2.0.3 too. The error message shows up every time i start an electrum wallet.

Is there a Bitcoin Block Explorer that can show the income to an address in €-Value of the time of receiving? Blockchain.info does provide this though they show many useless informations too, like all the other addresses that received coins too. And you cant filter by time.

Ideally it would show the time and date of receiving, the value in Euro, and no other informations like other addresses receiving in the same transaction. And only a certain timeframe.

Anything like that?

America is really far away of being a democracy. As a citizen having the right to decide one thing in a long time and the rest of the time you delegate your power. And the one choice you have is one between A and B practically. Which at the end is something like a choice between pest and cholera.

At the end you have really something different than a demo-cracy which means ruling of the citizens in fact. And that, lets be honest, cant be further from the truth.

Does this have to do anything with Bitcoin?

I would like to see a okcoin USD market chart. okcoin isnt only okcoin.cn, its okcoin.com too and they have USD-prices.

It would be good to see the real USD price since the biggest exchanges otherwise are in CNY and it would help to see another big exchange priced in USD.

In defence of Quickseller, its sometimes needed to change the rules in order to not get in risks as the escrow. Because you never know if buyer and seller are actually the same person and this person tries to scam you. Though those all are things cleared before the trade actually starts.

At the end i will explain risks to the party at risk and if its fine for him/her then i proceed with the way they want.

Saying that... i would not give a negative trust if buyer and seller had an agreement and not all rules were on the table. I would neg rep when a deal is broken between buyer and seller. Not if they want to use another escrow only for example. (I would take out the part in your template about neg repping everyone who steps out a bit. This sounds like a threat and a risk one cant overview.)

Hot Wallet is empty since some hours. Website claims admin is informed but it doesnt change.

Shouldnt at least some people deposit in the meanwhile?

You are in this thread... so i think you care at least a little bit.

I dont want to go into detail about why im sure because i wouldnt like to risk anything but if you get a collected dividend then you might want to have this div being safe. So thinking about a safe exchange is worth it in my opinion.

When i write this... im very sure but knowing is a big word. So just in case im wrong i now will claim that i dont KNOW. I dont have influence in this and i know what happened to those who were fans of projects that went bad. I dont want to be one of those. So just in case, dont take my word for an advice. I dont KNOW it. But i have reasons to be sure.

You dont want to play on this topic. If the amount it big enough that you can be concerned then you really should contact a tax lawyer or similar. There are one for bitcoin in every developed country nowadays.

Ask in specialized forums too. Its always better to have different opinions because it happens that you get the wrong advice too unfortunately.

Ich vermute das sind keine IT Spezialisten. Oder welcher IT-Spezialist fällt dir ein der sich trauen würde sich in irgendeine Verbrecherorganisation einzuschleusen oder verdeckt zu ermitteln? :O

Ich denke der ist einfach der praktische Typ. Und hatte keine Ahnung was er macht.

Question is in title. I search a way to contact him because it seems he doesnt react to both email and pm.

Whats up with him? Anyone knows him or can reach out to him?

Thanks!