Hey CK, I know you prolly missed it, but please check your PM...
Thanks!
If it was a while ago, I may have deleted it without answering as I avoid giving personal support questions since my time is limited and I'd rather give as many answers in public as possible where others can benefit from them and avoid needing to repeat myself. Apologies.
|
|
|
ck did you made some automatic updates on the best share part?
No I haven't. The pool is behaving very nicely as is. Did you notice something?
|
|
|
You mangled the address in your URL. The Aagh component of your address is what you should be saying right about now.
|
|
|
Should I mess with my miner diff? Will it help somehow? Can someone explain the whole diff thing and if it makes sense to adjust? I have 30 sp20's if that matters. Thanks.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=274023.0However since I wrote that guide, and wrote the diff management code ckpool and therefore this pool uses, that means you need to do nothing here (and it makes no difference with solo mining anyway).
|
|
|
I have got cgminer running with a hashfast board, but it constantly scrolls with errors of not finding a avalon and icarus device, how do i get it to stop looking for the miners i dont have and stop cluttering up my window, i want the device not found errors to go away since i dont care about devices i do not have?
Those messages only show up if you have it in verbose or debug mode... so don't do that.
|
|
|
Thanks for the congratulations everyone!
Ck, throwing some hash power at your other wallet to say thanks for setting this pool up.
727miner, and ads2003uk, thanks for showing us that its possible to break all odds and giving us all inspiration to beat the record some day.
Akashamar, I was using nicehash, I haven't tried westhash.
Good luck to everyone!
BTW, any idea what difficulty the last block was?
Congrats and thanks. Here's the block diff: [2015-05-08 12:58:41] Possible block solve diff 56705997608.675743 ! [2015-05-08 12:58:41] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2015-05-08 12:58:41] Solved and confirmed block 355517
|
|
|
There is not much reason for lists like this. It is a old way to deal with signatures. If you really cannot handle signatures look here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1003570.0 They can disappear... poof. But these signatures do in some cases go twords good things. I know mine go twords hardware which I enjoy reviewing. No I do think his point is valid. The campaigns are annoying in their own right, but as DH said, they're also a marker that the poster has an extremely high chance of being a useless poster and only after post count rewards. People who post vague responses that look like answers but in fact have zero information like "check your hardware and software"... well duh. Sure they may make the advice more verbose than this, but that's really all they say without any actual useful advice whatsoever. Furthermore this discussion has long since moved away from the original opening topic which itself has been asked many many times before so I'll be splitting off this discussion and sending it to meta/ and locking this thread shortly.
|
|
|
Not amazing, there are heaps of threads about this already. It's a poor optimisation used by crappy written pool software on block change to send out work without transactions till it can get its act together to create work that includes transactions. The fact that it's KnC's custom mine that does such a shortcut does not surprise me in the slightest.
|
|
|
I hit a block on bitsolo 2 weeks ago, but has anyone noticed that the script over there sux ? I keep having bandwith/TH dissappear for no reason, from 15th down to 2th at times.. weird..right ? Yea.. gonna stick to CK pool.. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Welcome aboard. All pools strive to have stability and performance and while this pool has also had its fair share of problems during development, it's reasonable to assume that since the pool owner here wrote the software that runs on it, he can also fix any issues as they arise. Good luck!
|
|
|
For the love of god, make this thread stop. At the very least, stop calling them nounces. I penned numerous responses to this thread and deleted them every time when I reminded myself of how this thread progresses...
|
|
|
I received my U3's today and CGminer cannot seem to find them. I switched the driver to the WinUSB diver. They show in device manager. Do we need to add anything to the command line to get them to be recognized? Before I switched the driver to the WinUSB driver CGMiner warned me that I needed to do that. Now it simply says it can't find them. I am using version 4.9.1
cgminer -o stratum+tcp://stratum.mining.eligius.st:3334 -u xxx -p xxx
Try cgminer 4.9.0. Apparently I screwed something up and the U3s don't work for some people in the latest version.
|
|
|
5m shouldn't make a huge difference on orphans though. Even some coins with 1m blocks don't suffer from high orphan rates.
Do you have anything to support that conjecture? Sure the random coins with 1m blocks you're talking about dont have high orphan rates but that's almost certainly because the number of actual effective mining nodes is small rather than "1 minute is okay". One only produces orphans when there are other nodes finding blocks within a short time frame. The less nodes there are mining, the lower the probability of orphans. Not to mention the blocks will always be tiny with virtually no transactions on these altchains. They can't be compared.
|
|
|
There's no such thing as a superstitious miner, or pool operator, is there...?
|
|
|
I wonder why I've never had problems looking at the pool stats with my phone, but now it says "this plug in is not supported"
Pool stats page has been changed slightly to autorefresh every 60 seconds and contains an object now instead of plain text. If you cannot access it, you can use the direct text output with this link: http://solo.ckpool.org/pool/pool.statusI'm curious why people care about the pool stats, they don't affect individual performance/ability to solve a block. Is it just curiosity factor? The pool stats are there for me, but it's zero effort to make them available to everyone. Gamblers like to look for patterns and from what I've seen on how people choose when to solo mine, they might see something in those stats that they use too.
|
|
|
The best share figure is raw data straight from the pool code and it is directly parseable as valid json. Formatting it takes a rewrite and restart and adds a (teensy bit of) overhead and makes it no longer parseable as a value but as a string display. That said none of things are huge but the most important ones are that I don't want to do any code at the moment while everything's stable (I'm taking a code break), nor do I want to interrupt the stable running of the pool.
|
|
|
nice auto update feature, will it be implemented for user too ?
auto update every 60 secs ?
Thinking about it but it will take a tiny bit more effort since the pages are all extremely simple static html or even just text at the moment and each user/worker's stats are created on the fly as plain text.
|
|
|
I think we need the pool restarts . LOL Add them to restart 2x a day and we'll get ore solves. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) * kano does a restart just for the sake of it ... D: Why did I bother fixing bugs? I had regular unplanned restarts built into the code by virtue of bugs previously...
|
|
|
I wonder why I've never had problems looking at the pool stats with my phone, but now it says "this plug in is not supported"
Pool stats page has been changed slightly to autorefresh every 60 seconds and contains an object now instead of plain text. If you cannot access it, you can use the direct text output with this link: http://solo.ckpool.org/pool/pool.status
|
|
|
[2015-05-05 00:57:05] Possible block solve diff 152186319981.488434 ! [2015-05-05 00:57:05] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2015-05-05 00:57:05] Solved and confirmed block 354990
"hashrate1m": "520T", "hashrate5m": "1.35P", "hashrate1hr": "460T", "hashrate1d": "25.4T", "hashrate7d": "4.25T", "lastupdate": 1430787761, "workers": 6
|
|
|
If you guys need an escrow when you do this for someone to distribute the reward should you find a block, just holler and I'll give you an address to point your hashes at instead.
|
|
|
|