No you are wrong, newbie users can put link on their signature place but it will convert it in a tex and not in an URL clickable ( like Cash BTC, check his signature).
Sorry if I am and thanks for correcting. But his activity is 28. I think it only happens to Newbies with very low activity or only to Brand New? I am sure I have seen *link removed*. Maybe I don't remember correctly! -MZ So are we allowed to put ''REF LINKS'' in signature? or will that be considered as spam? No, the newbie users cannot put their ref. link in their signature space. It is not allowed (I suppose). So ranks > Newbie can use ref links? Thanks. I get it  Yes all the ranks can put the ref. link in their signature space, only the newbie users can't (maybe for prevent the spam). |
|
|
|
No you are wrong, newbie users can put link on their signature place but it will convert it in a tex and not in an URL clickable ( like Cash BTC, check his signature).
Sorry if I am and thanks for correcting. But his activity is 28. I think it only happens to Newbies with very low activity or only to Brand New? I am sure I have seen *link removed*. Maybe I don't remember correctly! -MZ So are we allowed to put ''REF LINKS'' in signature? or will that be considered as spam? No, the newbie users cannot put their ref. link in their signature space. It is not allowed (I suppose). |
|
|
|
Thanks for the information I've added the thread in the initial post, it seems they want reopen their exchange, but maybe they have only change their "office"  // level of sarcasm : 100 . |
|
|
|
I still think Eal should address the allegations. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now however this benefit should not extend forever. Particularly concerning is giving himself trust if these are in fact his alts.
If Marco paid too much then he should bite the bullet from the overpayment as he paid too much. If he kicked someone out of his campaign mid month then he should pay them for the posts made up to the date they were kicked out.
There is no reason why all the mods should not be regularly checking the scam accusacations section so there is no reason why eal has not yet read this.
Have you checked the latest posts of that account, he should be banned for 14 days ( insubstantial posts +sig ad). Everyone of us know he will never be banned because he (Eal F. Skillz) is a staff member. Do you think the proofs aren't valid, I doubt the bitcoin blockchain can be falsifiable. As I told him through pm "Everyone make mistake, but everyone should "correct" their mistakes". I am not in charge of handing out bans so I cannot speak to why (or if) any of the accused have or have not been banned. I do think the blockchain evidence does show they are the same person however I want to hear what eal says before making my own conclusion. The overpayment is Marcos mistake not eal's mistake (or whoever owns the account in question's mistake) Yes you are right, but if I will send you 1 btc and after check and I just had to sent you only 0.50 BTC , will you send me back the 0.5 btc or not ? This is only a question about "honesty" (nothing else). I agree with you, the first mistake is from marcotheminer, but (I think) the alt account should send back the btc. This is just my personal opinion, and I will be glad to remove the negative trust if I was wrong. I would personally send the excess amount back because I would want to maintain my relationship with my trading partners. However if you send Bitcoin to someone then it is that persons property barring some prior agreement to repay amounts. There is also a claim that the funds were confiscated from the bit-x account and if this is the case then it would be 100% Marcos problem. This is also another example as to why payments should not be sent to a website account. Thanks for your opinion, you will do this because you are honest. I personally don't trust staff members with alt accounts that aren't known to the public.
Thanks also to you for your opinion, I trust only the honest users and it seems that him is not honest (not only about the question of the funds |0.055 btc| but also for the postive trusts given between his "alt accounts"). |
|
|
|
|
Now I think it is better to close this thread for prevent any type of spam, OP search (ctrl+f) "lock topic" and lock it. Thanks for the attention.
|
|
|
|
I still think Eal should address the allegations. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now however this benefit should not extend forever. Particularly concerning is giving himself trust if these are in fact his alts.
If Marco paid too much then he should bite the bullet from the overpayment as he paid too much. If he kicked someone out of his campaign mid month then he should pay them for the posts made up to the date they were kicked out.
There is no reason why all the mods should not be regularly checking the scam accusacations section so there is no reason why eal has not yet read this.
Have you checked the latest posts of that account, he should be banned for 14 days ( insubstantial posts +sig ad). Everyone of us know he will never be banned because he (Eal F. Skillz) is a staff member. Do you think the proofs aren't valid, I doubt the bitcoin blockchain can be falsifiable. As I told him through pm "Everyone make mistake, but everyone should "correct" their mistakes". I am not in charge of handing out bans so I cannot speak to why (or if) any of the accused have or have not been banned. I do think the blockchain evidence does show they are the same person however I want to hear what eal says before making my own conclusion. The overpayment is Marcos mistake not eal's mistake (or whoever owns the account in question's mistake) Yes you are right, but if I will send you 1 btc and after check and I just had to sent you only 0.50 BTC , will you send me back the 0.5 btc or not ? This is only a question about "honesty" (nothing else). I agree with you, the first mistake is from marcotheminer, but (I think) the alt account should send back the btc. This is just my personal opinion, and I will be glad to remove the negative trust if I was wrong. |
|
|
|
I still think Eal should address the allegations. I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now however this benefit should not extend forever. Particularly concerning is giving himself trust if these are in fact his alts.
If Marco paid too much then he should bite the bullet from the overpayment as he paid too much. If he kicked someone out of his campaign mid month then he should pay them for the posts made up to the date they were kicked out.
There is no reason why all the mods should not be regularly checking the scam accusacations section so there is no reason why eal has not yet read this.
Have you checked the latest posts of that account, he should be banned for 14 days ( insubstantial posts +sig ad). Everyone of us know he will never be banned because he (Eal F. Skillz) is a staff member. Do you think the proofs aren't valid, I doubt the bitcoin blockchain can be falsifiable. As I told him through pm "Everyone make mistake, but everyone should "correct" their mistakes". |
|
|
|
|
I've left him a negative trust , the proofs "are valid" and this is a dishonest comportment from him (a staff member). I will glad to remove the negative trust once he will resolve all the situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Io direi che è giunto il momento di staccare i miner dal sito, ormai è un ponzi puro ed è possibile ritirare solo tramite la loro carta. Quindi non vedo il motivo di continuare ad usare quel sito li. Non regalategli hash gratis.
|
|
|
|
Have any of you read my reply here?
I don't owe marco or bit-x. It's your fault to overpay people who are in signature campaign. That means if anybody owes anything, you owe Bit-x and you have to pay in your own pocket. You didn't do your job. You didn't count people's posts properly. Now you are blaming me? That's too sad for you.
You kicked me without a valid reason and try to hijack my february payment at the end of the month. I didn't even want money for my overcounted posts in january which is totally your fault.
I offered you 3 reasonable solutions but you never replied them. I showed my good intention since day 1 but you were so stubborn. Because you are a pathetic loser who can't even do an easy job. By opening this thread all you think is trying to retaliate Turkish members because you want to SELL A HACKED ACCOUNT of yussuf89. Now everybody knows your real face. You are not trustworthy. You farm trusts with fake loans. You are a trust farmer untrustworthy member with tens of confirmed multiple accounts.
You have received a negative trust from a trusted member, You should reply from your "main" account (Eal F. Skillz) and try to resolve all this situation. Good luck with your battle. |
|
|
|
Just received a 1 BTC private offer by PM. Waiting for his answer to see if he wants to go first or to use an escrow.
If you have received a private offer of 1 btc I suggest you to accept that offer , maybe it will be the last/unique "good" offer for that account. |
|
|
|
It's March now, is there anything update about the new Forum? I'm eager to see it.
One of the slickage member told this : Since you are here taesup , can you please give a hint when the Beta release or the Final release are going to be available for us please  Just estimated like May-December or whatever . ~ Madnes so I think we "have" reached the end , maybe only a few months and the new forum will be released. |
|
|
|
We are discussing here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=964171.0 one of the member of Slickage told : "So the plan is to use emoji at some point but that has it's own problems. Github, Slack, Reddit, and a bunch of other companies all use the same implementation of emoji so we'll probably end up following that." |
|
|
|
Thank you again for the help , I have updated the Original post with that tweet; but as I told in the beginnin I suggest to avoid bter if they will re-open. However the final choice is yours (of all the customers)... One word: Decentralized Exchange.  I've seen the new project Mercury ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946174.0) but it allow only the exchange between the cryptocurrency. The real problem is the implementation for the "FIAT" side. |
|
|
|
Thank you again for the help , I have updated the Original post with that tweet; but as I told in the beginnin I suggest to avoid bter if they will re-open. However the final choice is yours (of all the customers)... |
|
|
|
newbies can put links but it will be not clickable Links will be changed to *link removed* but I think it happens only for Newbies with low activity. -MZ No you are wrong, newbie users can put link on their signature place but it will convert it in a tex and not in an URL clickable ( like Cash BTC, check his signature). |
|
|
|
|
Come hanno già detto gli altri, non me vale proprio la pena. Partecipare ad uno schema ponzi è da matti, proprio perché l'idea alla base non regge. Se stai cercando un modo di guadagnare, stai lontano sai ponzi (questo e l'unico consiglio che posso darti ora).
|
|
|
|
grazie tante, questo vale anche per altre prepagate che sono in giro?
un ultima domanda, visto che vorrei aprire un conto online keytrade in belgio, chiedevo se fosse possibile con questo metodo di trasferimento perche non vorrei avere un vero conto in italia per vari motivi.
grazie
Anche la superflash della banca "intesa San Paolo" fornisce un Ivan assieme alla carta, quindi è possibile fare bonifici SEPA ad un costo di 0.50 per bonifico (non nelle eh?). Altre carte non me conosco. |
|
|
|
I have given the rights to the account to neotox and he took the account and hasn't paid yet.
So who won the auction ? I've seen also TotalShift wrote this post : I have already sent the payment to your address. Can you explain better? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
