Oh sad to hear that,you are one of those investors.Im not actually having a track on the development of this ICO of Betking and when it comes to support things,They should really handle on the things that must supposed to do.
For now they are really making a shady move by starting on not answering peoples queries on here. Questions are answered on Discord and Telegram. Dean is far more active on those venues (and the BetKing.io chat) than he is on bitcointalk. Considering the fact that he could have exit scammed for more while he was running BetKing in the past, I don't think a delay in bounty payments should be any indication of a scam. |
|
|
|
as far as i understand there will be a buyback option off 10 % from time to time , and we can keep m later on ethereumwallet but that is not an option for now
Off 10% what? 10% of profit will be used to buyback BKB or what? They meant the 10% buyback per quarter. Dean is offering the opportunity for users to sell up to 10% of their total BKB tokens every quarter. voteformeg was also commenting on how you can't withdraw the BKB tokens just yet - but that's to come later. One can still trade BKB tokens on the site by tipping. |
|
|
|
|
If you want to post images I don't think that a 2-4 week wait is a particularly long time. What reason would one have to embed images in their post immediately after registration?
|
|
|
|
No, it's not a "get rich", i'd just like to understand if the tokens will be tradable or are account-related
It's fine to get a little extra in the tokenvalue every month, but as long as you can't sell them it's pointless... isn't it? Not a sort of revenue stream Well, there is always the option of selling BKB tokens by tipping other players: as of now that's the only way to 'trade' them and you would have to deal with the risk of a scam, unless you find some willing escrow that is going to sign up on BetKing.io and be the intermediate in the transaction.
Apart from that, Dean is willing to buy back 10% of an account's total tokens per quarter for the price listed on the site. |
|
|
|
I read the post, liked it, shared the same thoughts and just made the mistake of copying the exact words... This is the logic Is this how someone publishes content outside of online forums? Do they simply 'share the same thoughts and make the mistake of copying the exact words'? You intentionally broke it apart as well to try and make it seem like it was different from the original post. Age in terms of the forum is completely irrelevant. I'm sure that at a young age most children were taught that stealing was bad. Stealing intellectual property, or copying content is the same. This is reinforced in modern academia so I'm not sure how you managed to think that it was fine to copy & paste. |
|
|
|
as you can understand, i am trying to point out that the copy-paste thing was a true mistake by my side and if you can make an exception it won't happen again, it's not a spamming account for sure
i am totally frustrated about this situation and i would appreciate if your team will reconsider my case
thanks again Should not have happened in the first place. Do you really need a rule set in stone to start considering the fact that you're not allowed to plagiarize content online? Where is the basic logic? If your case is reconsidered then it creates a precedent which will lead to more bs threads. It won't be. |
|
|
|
So in the, if (to make an example) I hold 1000 tokens that are worth 0.1$ the site will buy my tokens?
... and in the end i spent 100$ to buy them. Where is the profit? The profit comes from the site profit as the token price is dictated thusly. If you read back a little you will find that the token price is calculated using [funds raised]/70,000,000 + [site profit]/100,000,000. If you want to sell the tokens for a higher price then you have the option of trading with other users by tipping BKB (though you would likely want an escrow for this task).
I'm not sure why you expected an immediate profit. This is not some get-rich-quick scheme. |
|
|
|
Sheet has been graded and turned into Baryom. No lotto this week Payment received. (For those that are concerned with Baryom's absence of his wont update posts.) |
|
|
|
Color didn't change in my case so I'm still wondering why. The user that sent you the positive feedback is not in your trust list and hence their feedback will not show any change in 'visible trust' on the profile. However, it will remain in the untrusted feedback section. By default, DefaultTrust is trusted in users' trust lists and is typically followed for trustworthiness of an individual. Hence any trust that has an impact would be from DT1 and DT2 users (users trusted by DefaultTrust, and users trusted by DT1 users) |
|
|
|
Anyway I read that it can drop if posts are trashed or deleted ? Just trying to understand how things work.  Activity can drop, yes. If a post that is necessary for potential activity within a given period is deleted (either voluntarily or not) then the user's activity declines respectively. If you consider the following: I have 28 activity, comprised of 1 post in my first activity period and 27 in my second... If the single individual post is deleted then my potential activity is reduced by 14, making the total 14 as well. |
|
|
|
1) I've see that there were multiple Betking thread. Which one should we considered the "main" one and should we use ? Considering how BetKing.io is a casino and hence gambling, I think it is pretty evident that the thread in the Gambling subsection of the forum is the main one to use. (This is the ICO announcement thread).
3) When the bounties will be distributed, will we earn BKB or BTC when reporting critical bugs/vulnerabilities ? That IS, after all, what .5% of the total amount of BKB tokens are used for. |
|
|
|
|
Hero Member, Newbies and Legendary members do not lose their rank if activity dips below the threshold. This has been talked about before and if you decide to investigate, a simple search in Meta will allow you to find the threads of notability.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah... it doesn't make sense for the user to have made 94 total replies within the past 19 hours (as of this post). They seem to be just creating vague replies or agreement statements in the altcoin section, which can't really be monitored well. It's likely that the manager doesn't care about the participants, as is the case with most ICOs.
It seems strange however that the user is posting so frequently. They gain no additional benefit from it as the payment is fixed/week.
|
|
|
|
How many threads about this have come up? Refer to those. Search before you create threads: it's that simple. Posts = # of replies Activity = min(time, posts) where time is the number of 14-day activity periods that you have successfully had at least one post in. The activity number is determined in this way:
time = number of two-week periods in which you've posted since your registration
activity = min(time * 14, posts)
Rough summary of what this means: If you post once per day on average, then you will eventually get the maximum number of activity points that you can get. Posting more than once per day on average is useless for increasing activity. The maximum number of activity points you can get is 1 per day, but your activity score only updates every two weeks. Therefore, it will take about 100 days to get 100 activity if you post once per day on average.
Activity is updated every hour.
|
|
|
|
cool, we get to wait for weeks, while everyone else gets paid. I don't think that's fair. ICO participants (who are investors, by the way, should be the first ones to receive the BKB tokens. Not to mention, investors have been waiting for weeks as well. Get off your high horse. also man, we worked for you promoting ICO and you cut it off after 2nd week. and now your going take weeks to pay.\ 2 weeks of advertising means that if you were an active participant, you probably dodged a mass dilution of stakes:tokens. Plus, you spent less time for the same amount of payment (essentially). why can't you pay it now. takes 15 seconds Are you sure? If you only need 15 seconds to handle all bounties, then maybe you should advertise your service.  |
|
|
|
How can you tell the email wasn't changed? I looked at the security log at https://bitcointalk.org/seclog.php and all it shows is how the password was changed (by email reset or manually after logging in). I suspect the perpetrator had my password, logged in, then changed the password and email. Right: I made a mistake. I was sure that the seclog showed email changes (It may have before, but perhaps not anymore. Or, I've simply thought we were given more information than what reality dictates). It is very much likely what you stated was the series of events revolving around your account.
If the posting quality changes greatly then most likely the account can be tagged without much doubt. Additionally, if you manage to find any other means of verification please do post it here to accelerate the process. |
|
|
|
The only proof I have is the email for this new account is the same as the hacked one. Other than that I'll just have to follow my old account around and post replies to it notifying everyone that "stevegee58" is not legit. The email wasn't changed this month. You should be able to reset the password to your email, right? (Otherwise, it's strange because only the password was changed rather than both email and password.) |
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, a signed message is the best way to verify account ownership. If there is any other way you can think of that can show that you were the original owner of the account then you could post that proof and then a negative trust would be justified. Otherwise, simply anyone could open up an 'alt' account and claim their account was hacked.
(I do understand that specific account had their email and password changed which is very suspicious)
|
|
|
|
I talk about your apparently non-existent feedback on bL's trust page and you deflect to the FP. Interesting indeed. Untrusted feedback is hidden by default. I enabled it [the option to see it by default] pretty early on. The option to show the feedback was there... You just didn't click on it. |
|
|
|
Anyway, is there a consolidated list of scam coins? Like a sticky in alphabet order with the dead ones greyed out so we don't waste our time. Anyone thinking of "investing" can at least check this list quickly as a first step in "due diligence". At least get screwed by a coin that put in some effort. You don't have any idea what the fuck is happening here, do you? Betcoin.ag, a casino site took all of the BCH that was forked from August for themselves. Even if one doesn't believe in BCH, it doesn't necessarily deserve to be called a 'scam coin'. There are far better candidates for that.
The users weren't screwed over by any scam coin but rather by the scam site. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
