Escrow coin will be launched soon, users will be able to avail escrow services without any fee
I think 0% of escrow fee are suited for new escrow which is only building a trust for their accounts their services was free but if they already have more trust i think in the future it will impose fee for every successful transaction to be made like what morr trusted escrow do before. There is literally no need for any kind of "new escrows" (unless you want another exit scam like we've seen in the past) let alone 0% fee. Transaction fees alone for decent confirmation times can be as much as 0.0017 BTC currently.
I'd assume that transaction fee costs are assumed to be covered by the buyer/seller even when there is a 0% fee, but: I'd be very cautious of someone trying to get you to use their escrow service with a 0 fee.
I fully concur with this. Someone would have to be out of their mind to take such a huge risk(s) for free or ill intended. |
|
|
|
Well, Everyone has to start somewhere, you guys understand this well too that honestly working to something is always good.
You start by working properly and being honest. However, if you are advertising yourself as "trustworthy" at your start, then you are everything but honest. Now, if you can't be honest about something as simple as that, how can anyone trust that you'd be honest when it comes to something much more important?  |
|
|
|
Does it affect your team that much? i am not even competing with you, but you and your team keep pulling us down. is that how ALU service works?
Just to get all project, you'll do everything? lol.
I usually have no idea if or with which clients aTriz is making arrangements with. Regardless, your insinuation of bad intent does absolutely not, in no way, excuse you from fraudulently advertising yourself. I also like the post gaps between September 2016, July 2016 and September 2017.  |
|
|
|
I'd also add, you should really be banned for copy/pasting:
Nice work. I didn't expect that one, and thus didn't ask 8ball about it. |
|
|
|
Bitter? Dont worry soon will release our new platform.. stay tuned  Give me a break. Your thread almost solely consists of lies: - Trustworthy? No history of past trades or similar.
- Proven records? Almost no history of management as per your own thread (I see 2(?) campaigns.
Were I sure that I was completely, without a doubt, impartial, I would have instantly neg. rated you. Archival of thread: https://archive.fo/zATP4. |
|
|
|
Had to lock this because of illiterate spammers or their bots(?). We are slowing progressing towards 100% SegWit. I have a Trezor coming on Tuesday..but what the heck ...will be good to know such a link for a segwit paper wallet version
* Lauda slaps Searing with a segregated trout. Where is your new address? |
|
|
|
Maybe if these experimental boards work as intended, we'll have some forum-wide changes for cracking down on spammers.
Why is that required though? Aren't we well aware of how enormous the problem has become? Haven't we discussed a numerous amount of suggestions for tackling the problem? It probably should be at the top or under Bitcoin Discussion (though I'm not entirely sure what discussion the sub board is intended to include right now (just bitcoin related topics or any kind of worthwhile/important discussion not necessarily exclusively bitcoin related)).
Looks like the intent is various kind of serious discussion (not limited to Bitcoin), but the board is not placed properly IMO. I really hope he address why he is so against this as I really can't see any other way we're going to put a stop to account farming. As long as sigs are tied to activity/post count then shitposting/farming is always going to be an issue and will in fact only continue to grow worse over time.
A simple way to start the combat against this issue is adding a rule that both account farming and account trading is permanently bannable. Dislocating signatures from activity/post is a more *radical* change IMO, but that I'd agree with too. Removing some boards from activity or disallowing certain ranks from posting in them would be another and not difficult to implement (especially the latter and some boards are already restricted from certain ranks). Punishing signature campaigns in various ways is another and is what should have been done with the Signature Guidelines thread.
Both of these are needed badly.  - The member limitations are moved up one rank. You must be a Jr Member to post in Serious Discussion and a Full Member to post in Ivory Tower
I would suggest an even higher rank requirement for that section. Maybe Senior Member. Although that is no guarantee that the poster is legitimate at all. |
|
|
|
Paying BTC to those who would give him tokens gained from Signature Bounties.
No. That would be purchasing tokens. He created a campaign to enroll other people's (or his own) accounts to farm bounties. If this was against the forum rules, he should have been stopped right there and then,
Forum rules are not relevant to the trust system. How can't I be an untrusted member if I was working under an accused guy which i didn't even know.
I like stories. I am completely innocent in this matter.
If you were innocent, I wouldn't have found your account and wouldn't have tagged you.
I suggest, for next time, that you put priority in some sort of *code* (or morals or ethics or whatever you are in to) before your own greed ("who doesn't like easy money"). |
|
|
|
I can't say I'm surprised that this has not been resolved given that "Edward Miroslav" has been found guilty of several immoral practices (account buying, trust buying) etc. This wasn't a targeted mute, I'll unmute your account shortly, thousands of accounts are muted a day to prevent faucet abuse automatically and this just seems to be a false positive. Unfortunately we don't have an option to disable faucet on a per-account basis other than using mute, we'll be fixing that as well.
What does surprise me is that Stunna, even though he/she unmuted you, never fully tried to resolve this case. Why is that?
Another example of review farming: https://forum.primedice.com/topic/29824-earn-a-quick-50k-satoshis/. |
|
|
|
First of all, I didn't know about this thread,
Irrelevant. The thread is just the place from which the investigation started. Secondly, I am not his alt.
Irrelevant. Was never implied. Thirdly, I am working for Jamal because he was looking for a campaign manager and I am getting paid for doing so.
Relevant and correct.
You are running, i.e. managing the signature campaign used for farming[1] by Jamal. Instead of posting from multiple accounts (as he did own or currently owns multiple accounts) as he did before, he hired people to do this for him. I don't find this much different than the traditional farming via multiple accounts. Therefore, you as an accomplice can't be trusted. Therefore, you received a negative trust rating. Furthermore, you've absolutely failed to make a case to defend yourself and have spammed about it via different channels (2 PMs within an hour, thread in the wrong section (this one) and posted in the other thread as well). Sounds like exactly what someone would do, in panic, after being exposed. What exactly is * false*?
[1] All of these accounts will be SMAS blacklisted, including all the managers. They have also been reported to the Staff and may be neg. rated as well. Who's to say he isn't pretending to *enroll* his own accounts to get away from posting via multiple accounts? |
|
|
|
|
If you can sign a message from a staked address, then I would be willing to tag that account. Screenshots won't do for me in this case.
|
|
|
|
Twitter Rule addition:
Twitter accounts must not have more than 10k total tweets.
This rule change is effective tomorrow, and will apply starting with Week 7.
Is this a rule for new members or for old participants too? For everyone. |
|
|
|
One of the staff suggested excluding the Bounties (Altcoins) board from activity calculation / post count which I'm totally for.
I concur with that idea. Seems a bit too heavy handed. As I mentioned, I'd rather the Bounties section simply not contribute to the post count. Doesn't punish the legit users who are there to apply to bounties but doesn't allow the spammers to pad their post count / activity.
Why? It is strict, but very easy to *implement* and enforce. I am even working on moving signature campaign applications, of the campaigns that I manage, off of the forum. |
|
|
|
|
Yes.
I'd like to expand the idea as follows: Ban/remove any bounty campaign that does not use Google Forms (or similar) for submissions. Using this is: a) More efficient. b) Doesn't spam Bitcointalk with useless enrollment posts. @mprep should take a look at this.
|
|
|
|
Twitter Rule addition:
Twitter accounts must not have more than 10k total tweets.
This rule change is effective tomorrow, and will apply starting with Week 7.
Will be week 7? Announced 6 weeks only. The campaign has been extended. It will run for an undefined extra amount of time. The new forms will be added to the OP soon. |
|
|
|
Readability. I think it was JetCash awhile back complaining that his constructive thread was getting drowned out by the mass of signature spammers and account farmers. Hopefully, this will be a place which can rectify this and allow people to discuss what they want without being exposed to the bullshit responses.
If it were somewhere at the top, I'd understand. However, this section is listed under Off-Topic which itself is listed far down. A step, in sort of a decent direction.
It doesn't solve issues at all, so what direction are you talking about? All this board is supposed to do is create a small environment for legitimate people to *possibly be serious*. It does literally nothing to combat any problem that exists in any board. |
|
|
|
I hereby plead you to kindly remove your negative rating from my profile.
Nothing will be removed. You are a scammer. Stop spamming already. I am sorry i had to post negative rating for Whoeir, Avirunes and Lauda because it is an injustice to leave negative rating on my profile even when all issues were resolved.
Maybe we should look into all team members from Etheriya now. |
|
|
|
Does any know of an existing script or program that could do something like that easily?
There is only Statoshi that I know of. Demo website: https://statoshi.info/. Source: https://github.com/jlopp/statoshi.
For a manual setup, you'd need: Easy to set up: No. However, once set up it will probably work nicely for a long time. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
