|
If you trust no one then the entire trust system is irrelevant to you, since you won't be participating in any trades since that requires a degree of trust and most certainly no one will send first lest you use an escrow that you don't trust. There are plenty of people that continue to participate in the forum regardless of their trust. See Spoenik for example.
Certainly the system requires rectification but how are you going to do that?
|
|
|
|
|
ACR if you need to use Bitcoins and don't care about anonymity. Bovada/Ignition work well too.
Otherwise you're kind of fucked when it comes to crypto poker. Wait until some of the bigger names release their poker rooms, I guess.
|
|
|
|
I like the site but I think something should be done about its popularity. For some reasons people don't play on it although it was proved that the site is legit, several people in this thread confirmed that they withdrew their winnings successfully. Positive reinforcement cycle based on the fact that there are few players on the site. Small player-base -> Fewer players are inclined to come, which perpetuates the small player-base. This is exactly why it's difficult for new poker sites to start up and why promotions - even if they come - have to be massive in order to attract the 2-5% of people who will stick around instead of simply coming and going. |
|
|
|
I am talking about how "actmyname" is trying to claim that yahoo's negative trust is fair due to FJ claiming that yahoo stole funds. Indeed, this is serious as yahoo clearly gave the feedback about spreading FUD long before any claim about stealing funds was made. Something deeper must be going on here as no one can be that stupid, as you say. Stop! Wait a minute. Check the date on some of the quotes I showed during my libel post.
Of my opinion, yahoo is the worst campaign manger, who always late with payment
This quote is literally false. maybe he is always getting druņk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member? Taken from FJ's thread, this is pretty much libel.
Both these comments happened before the negative trust. Here's some more examples. I do some research and saw yahoo he is always getting druņk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member? Unfounded. 'always' implies every time. This is one time. He love alcohol too much (he is alcoholic) and do not care about company he manages. Again unfounded. Then this one from his original thread:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2184366.msg21913155#msg21913155 I do some research and saw yahoo opening lots of scam thread against some company in some alternate account. He used the fake profiles, he have over 40 i thinking, and he used those fake profile to trick everyone of the forum.
It is very sad. He try to ruin the reputation of some company here if they did not acept him to be the campaign manager! If you don't consider any of it libel then you should reevaluate your sense of the law. |
|
|
|
1 BTC last week is $4,600... Nice trying, but now you look eveņ shadier to lying.
Was over 24 hour lates paying stap to lie. Good thing you brought up the bitcoin price because it most certainly was not 4600 at the time of payment. Coinmarketcap shows that the Bitcoin prices were at a peak of $4245 on Sep 10 so I will use that price. $4245 * 0.943 BTC = $4003. Still not in your lower bound. You should stop fucking lying.
You is wrong, sir , sir yahoo earn much monies from NOTARY who paying him.
I am on contact of NOTARY now. Sir , , yahoo should just said sorry!
yahoo get paid a lot of money of NOTARY compaņy to live his life and NOTARY pay ~$5,000 per week. Where is the source for this information? Show clear-cut evidence of this. I sincerely doubt that NOTARY would pay yahoo before he calculates the total based on the participants. |
|
|
|
Not taking sides here... and I like my drinks too (see my username  ), but giving false negative feedback as a DT member can get you removed. I would tread carefully if I were you, Yahoo. Where's the falseness in stating that the user is spreading FUD? It's true. There are unfounded numbers in their claims -- stating that yahoo missed a $6000 payment when in reality the signature campaign in the first week would have paid out a maximum of just under $4k in total to all participants.
Of my opinion, yahoo is the worst campaign manger, who always late with payment
This quote is literally false. maybe he is always getting druņk, how dare he steal money for 24 hour of some people to get drunk insstead to pay the campaign member? Taken from FJ's thread, this is pretty much libel. |
|
|
|
I was 2 hours late
You admit you late? Why you gived me nagative feedback if you is druņk late?It was 24 hour you miss $6,000 payment.Payments have been sent to those who qualified Literally an hour and 43 minutes over the payday deadline. Is it really that big of a deal? You stole $5,000-10,000 of payment. Source? I do not understand how you're getting these numbers. Here's what I have so far. Assuming that all participants receive max payout: 25 Jr. Members * .002 = .05 17 Members * .004 = .068 23 Full Members * .0075 = .1725 18 Sr. Members * .015 = .27 16 Hero + 1 Legendary * .0225 = .3825 Total: .943 BTC which is equivalent to about $3.3k Not even in your lower bound. The fuck are you saying? |
|
|
|
Oh. I honestly didn't see that. CTRL (or CMD) + F on first page.
| | | Accounts involved | | | Proof | | | Submitted by | | | Other information | | | Date added | | | | | | bL4nkcode, bL4nkcode01 | | | here | | | Timelord2067 | | | None. | | | 12-02-2017 | | |
|
|
|
|
Of my opinion, yahoo is the worst campaign manger, who always late with payment. Your opinion is literally wrong. In order to contradict it, all I have to do is provide one single example of when yahoo paid on time... which you can find in [nearly?] every campaign he's managed.
This was literally one incident that created a single-day delay. Why so butthurt? |
|
|
|
|
Sign a message with an address that you've posted on the forum and reply here. You want to suspend any and all trading activity on the account by getting a DT member to tag it.
Then PM theymos or Cyrus to reclaim the account.
|
|
|
|
Are there already plans to introduce additional currencies? Or will it be BTC, ETH and
LTC for the time being? There are plans to introduce altcoins in the future however unless there is a large demand for one. Right now, as BetKing is doing fine with just these three there isn't much of a point to implement coin support for less popular options. |
|
|
|
I really have a doubt how they will address if a user lost his internet connection during playing the game. and how they would settle the game reward  ? If you disconnect completely then that's too bad: you'll lose the tournament most likely. If during a single independent game, IIRC, the timer goes down until you reconnect. Obviously, with bullet games, this also likely leads to a loss but that's how it is. Get a better connection if you want to play for a prolonged period of time. |
|
|
|
I can't do anything i am totally cut off from the site i can only play on stake.com and i have reproduced this bug and it's a visual bug which i was trying to explain to their site but by the time i type it i was banned from live support i can't get in contact with their staff.Trying to contact their staff with new account now let's see how it goes. You don't need to chat or talk to live support to switch your preferences for privacy to public. AFAIK you should be able to do that and let everyone see that there was no foul play involved during the time of the video. If we can check that you legitimately bet those times (and solely on that one screen) then most would be more inclined to believe in your statements. Otherwise, it simply seems really shady. |
|
|
|
I would love to participate and I guess I will because of the low entry fee Oh, okay. That makes sense. but I am not a good chess player Well, you're being honest about it. bevery time I have played online against other people 90% of the time I have lost, so it would be worthless for me to join. Wait, what? I am sure the people who will join this tournament will be mainly chess masters so I am staying away. What are you saying? Did you not just say you would enter because of the fee in your very first sentence? These contradictions are asinine.
It's not that easy! I can run the soft at background and still chat with you.
This is the problem of playing skill games online - bots. Especially when there are prizes involved.
Yahoo was a very good place to play recreational chess from time to time but bots screw it! Many times already OP and I have posted about anti-bot conduct. There should be no problem. |
|
|
|
Who cares if It is male or female. Fact is Lauda and Luptin are the same Person, hence he or she is a blackmailer and luckily he or she was removed from staff. Thanks to Shorena for giving this scammer negative trust. Edit: Read through old threads, when ever Lauda is attack Luptin defends Lauda. Either they are gay or lesbian or the same Person. They even have enrolled in same signature campaign.  I defend political candidate A whenever they are attacked by negative claims. Hence, I am political candidate A. Q.E.D.
That's not how logic works and especially doesn't make sense because Lutpin has yet to appear in various threads revolving around Lauda. |
|
|
|
Someone hacked my other account "3x2" , please someone help me to recover it, someone else is posting from my account. I can provide the information if needed, anyone knows whom to contact?
lol. |
|
|
|
1 minute is indeed too short especially for amateurs. Maybe this is good for pros but amateurs will likely be hit by the time limit and just instantly lose. It would be like a tournament where the winner is the guy who moves the fastest.
Still an interesting gambling game though. Good luck to all participants. The point is that (typically) average players are more or less on the same level as players that are +-150 elo [approximately] and can still pull a victory out of their ass if they're against higher-rated players. If you're just randomly plopping down moves then sure, you'll lose via the base game. However, the key part of this is mainly just opening theory and you honestly don't need skill for that: just a repertoire and knowledge of which premoves are risk-free.
I would consider 'pros' at 2k+ |
|
|
|
Many thanks for your answer. Was just wondering, why instead of numbers three red questionmarks are shown. Question marks are shown after a negative feedback rating has been added despite a user's past history of having positive feedback. Hence, it's questionable and thus the user is not fully red yet but is likely to have dubious activity revolving around them. |
|
|
|
I opted out of the site after seeing how the site continue to lag until my account is busted. It happened to me severally. Seems its a deliberate attempt to bust accounts. I'm unsure as to what your logic is. They would make it lag and in turn, have you bet slower in order for you to bust out? Why wouldn't the bets be faster in order to play off hot-headedness? Adding time for gamblers to think about what they're doing would be unprofitable. Even objectively it seems completely illogical. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
