Sometimes it's more than that. A hacker might use your webcam to record your face and use it to trick some KYC platform, or record your room/house or whatever it is and sell it to somebody else (for intelligence purpose). Who knows. Which is why blacking out your webcam when not needed is a good practice, regardless what kind of things you're doing on your computer.

There are some rumours floating around and the insider job thing is one of them. Keep in mind this is just some rumours and not facts. And if this is true, then it is for personal benefits obviously, not to drag Kucoin's image or something like that. Other possibilities are some hackers managed to send their malware to one of Kucoin employees, install a keylogger, or something like that and he got the seed/key of the hot wallet.

I think a third-party investigation or police investigation is necessary.

Agan ini hobi sekali ya ngeresponds post yang umurnya udah lama.

---

Tentunya risiko berbanding dengan tingkat profit. Tezos dan Neo emang udah berumur tapi kalau koin baru yang masuk ke pasar berasal dari inflasi ya bisa jadi ga lebih menguntungkan dari koin baru yang supplynya terbatas dan hasil stake diambil dari fee network plus ga ada inflasi. Jadi ya seperti yang udah disebutin di atas, tergantung strategi dan hal-hal prinsip untuk menentukan profit dan risikonya.

I think there are some choices for you:
1. Unlock the bootloader when it's available, replace the recovery, install a custom rom focused on privacy or something similar.
2. Buy a portable hardware wallet like Keycard or Satochip that supports NFC. This will allows you to manage your wallet without directly touching your private key/seeds since it will be stored on the NFC card.
3. Use your old phone for managing your cryptos, use your new one for other stuff or for a hot wallet that you are prepared to lose.

Obviously it doesn't matter since the hacker got the seed/private key that allows them to access the wallets directly. 2FA and stuff like that only protect individual users and not the whole wallet.

Tentunya ga ada yang tahu bakal bisa break apa engga. Yang jelas cuma bisa prediksi aja kalau bisa break kemungkinan harganya bisa naik lebih tinggi lagi ke level fibo berikutnya, kalau gagal ada kemungkinan masuk ke bearish trend lagi dan balik ke $9k. Ane sih lebih memilih mengamati market saja akhir" ini, daripada trade terus gagal ambil posisi yang menguntungkan karena perubahan tren yang mendadak.

I'm quite confused by this. How did you arrive at this conclusion? Which books do you read? Pretty sure if what you need to do is just send some satoshis then you'll find it very similar. Open your wallet, click send or something, input the address, set the amount, set the fee, and then broadcast (overly simplified but just for illustration).

Not sure what does ASIC and license has to do with arbitrage trade to be honest. The rule is simple, it's price difference, which happens due to difference in depth and volume. Those are not related in any way to ASIC and license. If anything, it might influence the transfer between each exchange since some coins has higher block time, but you can easily solve it with using a fast chain to send out your funds, or simple keep funds on different exchanges and then transfer when you've made a clear profit. Even if the video does not exist you can still do it here and there.

It is not depending on the price but the mempool. Should be lower by now since not everyone is claiming and fees are coming down slowly. You can probably get away with 200 Gwei or so (check the ethgasstation) instead of 800 Gwei like the first day when the claim is opened.

I suggest you to learn from credible sources instead of reading from random comments on the internet. If someone said you need 20 confirmations would you also believe it then? Those 'required confirmations' are not hard-coded and most of the time it's the merchant, business, receiver choice to consider which number they consider good enough for their business.

Mastering Bitcoin is a good place to learn, so you'll know why and how things happens. If you don't want to do it and just want to whine about fees, maybe use altcoins instead. Oh, and stop double posting please.

IMO tidak mungkin ada yang bakal nerima tanpa KYC om, karena pasti mereka harus laporin buat menjamin agar lisensi mereka ga dicabut dari negara tempat mereka mendaftarkan bisnsnya. Kecuali emang dari awal mereka main di black market, yang kemungkinan besar jual ulang kartu" hasil colongan atau hasil registrasi dengan nama orang lain. Kalau ada yang nawarin tanpa KYC, risikonya malah lebih besar karena bisa jadi yang tahu data kartu itu termasuk CCVnya bukan cuma om aja.

Sepertinya untuk market leader masih pada ragu buat masuk ke Indo karena regulasinya belum jelas, sementara yang lain mau ambil risiko nerbitin kartu dan dikirim ke user di Indonesia. Walau dari segi fee juga gede banget sih, malah kalau dihitung lebih murah pake debit bank Indo aja setelah cairin Bitcoin yang dimiliki ke rupiah.

I think you don't have to hit the panic button just yet. Cyber attacks are not some magic where the attacker can just wave a wand and your phone will brick in the next minute. The majority of those web wallet hacks or hot wallet hacks are coming from the users bad security practice, such as typing seed/private key when they log in, visited the wrong website, etc. I'm not sure which organizations you're referring to but most crypto based website/wallet developers/forum etc will always tell you to be careful and practice a good security awareness.

But anyway, it's crypto where you're fully in control of your money. Users should take some part in protecting their money and not expect others people to do it for them.

If they don't support DAI natively, maybe they can send USDT for, let's say, 10% fee or so. Not sure how easy it is for them but it will probably decrease the risk a little bit.
Only for some big transactions maybe. Pretty sure they won't bother with something less than $1k since it is not going to worth their time. And users should be careful in the first place, so it's not exactly their problem too.

Their portfolio explanation should be enough to warrant a red flag. PR in International Companies, Creator of Mobile apps, etc, all are so ambiguous. Not to mention the defi thing that's being thrown out of nowhere.

Iya om. IMO sebenarnya pertanyaan yang lebih tepat (setelah diskusi thread ini dari tiga tahun yang lalu) mungkin bagaimana biar mining tetap bisa untung saat ini, yang pembahasannya bakal ke arah milih koin apa, jual kapan, pake energi apa, gimana biar bisa listrik lebih irit, dkk, bukan "untung apa tidak".

Kenapa ga jalanin node sendiri aja gan? Atau memang ga ada resource buat jalanin wallet sendiri dan harus make third-party buat manage dananya?

Belum juga om, ga worth juga kalau main asal coba aja karena yang dipake data KYC. Plus sepertinya ga begitu jadi market leader, jadi ane masih ragu aja.

Memang begitu om. Mau ga mau sekalian untuk semua aset, karena kalau cuma ETH saja nanti protes besar"an seperti sebelumnya juga bisa terjadi, kayaknya buat antisipasi daripada ribut (plus memperbesar margin profit ketika network ga terlalu sibuk, maybe) lagi.

My goodness, you need to hold 500 tokens worth of some thousands USD just to enjoy a 5% cashback? Man, I can get the same offer without holding any tokens here.

Dunno if they're being so confident that people will start using their cards or they're simply clueless about what their competitors do.

Well, many said the same thing years ago. Find it on your own, search for something called "bitcoin has died xxx times". If you still can't believe that crypto is here to stay then feel free to leave.

Even before 2017, we got a bull run too, and a bear market, and a wipe out of weak hands.