To say it again, I just want to get rid of my PKC license of Office 2010 Professional. This is not a MSDN license.
picture of COA?
|
|
|
Hello, I knew it wouldn't be easy starting a new pool, but I don't know what's going. What do you expect from my pool? Are there any features that you want to have? I really would appreciate some feedback . regards, talpan stop triple posting. use the edit button
|
|
|
what does "hoppers ok" mean?
|
|
|
8 connections should be 2 bars, and 16+ should be 4
|
|
|
get some proofs, or stop spreading FUD about people, okay? NO RACIAL SLURS IM BLACK DUDE......I JUST TRY TO SELL SHIT ON CRAIGS LIST AND PEOPLE ALWAYS FROM AFRICA TRY TO BUY IT WITH STOLEN MONEY.
lol, you are black, therefore you can talk shit with impunity? way to be a hypocrite.
|
|
|
did anyone notice a XSS vector on one of the pages?
|
|
|
If only it was that easy! It also would be a lot easier if fees were a fixed amount per transaction, as grue believes, instead of per KB, but that's not feasible.
I didn't say it was 0.0005 for all transactions. I meant that most of the time, it was 0.0005 The whole problem is that tx fees are added on top of the withdrawal amount. The user's withdrawal transaction proceeds without warning even if the amount+fee is larger than the user's account balance, which depletes your reserves. They just end up with a negative balance. The fees are unpredictable and can be very large - I'm talking 30% as seen in others' posts - when made up of lots of small inputs, even if the inputs are old. You can't charge them the fee if the withdrawal is of their entire balance. Neither can you only allow them to withdraw a small amount at a time because that just compounds the problem.
this could easily be fixed with a simple patch. somehow integrate the GUI function to determine if a fee is needed to a JSON-RPC method. besides. this is not a very good way to attack a business.
|
|
|
There are only two lines of code changed, and the change is very minor... So i **seriously** doubt anything could go wrong currently.
Those sound like the famous last words of the Debian OpenSSL package maintainer.
|
|
|
So, developers, what's the solution if...
1. You run an exchange where your clients have accounts in your wallet. 2. A malicious client / competing exchange operator makes many small deposits to his account. 3. The malicious client withdrawals all of his money at once and the huge fee gives his account a negative balance, which eats into your reserves. 4. He opens a new account and repeats the process until you're bankrupt and owe your other users their bitcoins back, which you now don't have.
Will any of these solutions work? - Patch to pay no fees and only allow withdrawals of bitcoins with > X confirmations. - Institute some convoluted system that disregards small deposits. - Patch to estimatetxfee and subtract that from withdrawals before sending them.
Or what?
is 0.0005 fee on a transaction is too much? There are better ways of sabotaging the system, like getting a bunch of bitcoins, and deleting the wallet.
|
|
|
Well, whatever are the details of all this, none of the devs seems to care even to talk to me about this. So i find this extremely suspicious. I wonder if some (or all) of them didn't invest heavy money in mining. After all, who would want to intentionally decrease their profits ?
lol, look at all the recent blocks. the transaction fees were super low. take off your tinfoil hat, and admit to yourself that your concern is useless. "derp a dev won't respond to me. MUST BE SOME CONSPIRACY GOING ON INVOLVING THE DEVS, THE ILLUMINATI, AND THE 9001 YEAR OLD MINING CREED" last 3 blocks: Generation: 50 + 0.80834234 total feesGeneration: 50 + 0.30386 total feesGeneration: 50 + 0.1656 total fees
|
|
|
for real? woah.
FFS, search the effing forums before posting.
|
|
|
agreed. when someone comes here, they'll think this is a project run by 10 year olds.
|
|
|
I get 400 MH/s at that setting. it's a bit lower because i ran it at a lower aggression.
|
|
|
Wow, daytrading seems to be a super bad idea. I was just looking for a way to stop my loses during the $30 - $20 crash.
|
|
|
5770 = crap card for mining. also, don't get a motherboard with a shitload of pci-e x16 slots.
|
|
|
With how stupid the CRTC is acting, You need Canada Post. They are that fastest, cheapest way to move large amounts of data across the country.
Since finding out my ISP has said they will start injecting advertising in the browser, I have been using Canada Post for out-of-band communication. Since I have a bad habit of reading fine print, I can't use any electronic transactions except Bitcoin for ordering things over the Internet (so use mail for that too).
what kind of ISP injects ads? If this happened to me, I'll switch to another service, or tunnel all my connections via ssh to a remote shell.
|
|
|
A few years ago I had an AMD processor catch fire.. It can happen, more likely it'll be a problem with the power supply, but as long as you have a smoke alarm and insurance, you'll be fine pics or it didn't happen Not sure how a CPU, even without a heatsink can start a fire. there's nothing flammable near the CPU, and you'll need crazy high temperatures (for a CPU) for a fire to start.
|
|
|
|