There's little need to doubt OP.
999dice is a known scam. Their provably fair system was already debunked. Not much anyone can do here since the site's already gone rogue and it's unlikely they'll return such a [relatively] low amount. Their reputation is still stained. The owner already failed to prove solvency & there's this little tidbit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=948965.0 |
|
|
|
Just wondering how much time will be needed for admin to realize that nobody on btckings is interested in poker, everybody is interested only in free money by crushing bots and abusing freerolls bigfish and joyjoy seem pretty interested in playing against one another and the former spars with Gennady quite often. There's soft play on the site. |
|
|
|
OK, we're considering a 5000+400 MTT tomorrow, 12 players minimum, 20K chips ADDED. Would you guys be interested? We are not going to create it unless at least 8 of you here say you're interested. I'm sure that there aren't going to be 12 players willing to enter into an MTT. here4trades, spool, bigfish, Zenzolina, joyjoy, gr1bul, Gennady, eking657, Betwrong, crazymad are the only 'active' players that I have seen. That's a total of 10 players but I don't know the stakes that they play at. It's likely that half of these players are willing to spend 5.4K chips on an entry to a tournament but I know that at least half of the active players on BTCKings right now are only there for the freerolls. I'm down for it, though. |
|
|
|
Thanks for your answer. Can you tell me how it works that spreadsheet Red = previous periods, white = current period, green = future periods Itīs weird because the last time I received the activity points all together, but now I didnīt receive it. I think it past more than 14 days. Thatīs why I want to know if I am wrong or maybe I should wait this week to see my new points. As I have stated, activity is calculated with the function min(posts, 14*periods). Thus if you post once in a new period while posts > 14*periods then you'll receive the respective activity immediately. The next activity period starts in a little under an hour so once you make a post then, your activity will be updated to be 112. |
|
|
|
Activity is distributed within activity periods. It also updates every 30 minutes. We're still in the previous fortnight's activity period. Activity is calculated with the function min(posts, 14*periods) where periods is the number of unique activity periods you have posted in.
This should answer all possible questions so that the thread can be locked. For the activity update times, here's a google spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dDySMB2lsOIIkUXuax2rXL30gv656E4xTsFcC2zQHkg/pubhtml
All other replies henceforth to this thread should be useless. |
|
|
|
Did anyone force you to pay the fee $100K?
No, you're making more that much profit so to keep players continue to play on your site doing this small benefit. If you wish you can remove that and we will pay our fee and no need of your charity work. Let me explain something to you called inputs and outputs. In a transaction, you will use the inputs to pay the outputs. Simple. The more inputs there are, the larger the transaction size. The more outputs there are, the larger the transaction size. Typically there will be two outputs because there needs to be a change address. Now, what happens if you have a hot wallet that uses 4+ inputs? That's a BIG transaction. The point I'm getting at here is that even if you are able to declare the fee, you run into the problem of your declared fee being useless because of the size of the transaction. You could post a 0.005 BTC fee yet still have it confirmed slower than a transaction with a 0.0008 BTC fee simply because the fee:size ratio is smaller. This will still lead to complaints. And if you declare a system where users pay in sat/byte then you have wholly new problems when they are paying huge fees because the transaction takes 10+ inputs. As I have written previously, one of my withdrawals from another site [2f1459fcc40cb6af51a5382a1f4847a1bbf7d8390dd4ffd3ef82b0ab1379ec2d] used a 2.8 mBTC fee which would still take a long time because the effective rate was 150 sat/byte. |
|
|
|
This is the worst experience I encounter and never go to Bitselr site now on because admin never bothers to help me out with this issue. What's he supposed to do? Pay a pool to accelerate your transaction? 
What is the highest fee that you're willing to pay for a 'quick' transaction, by the way? For a recent withdrawal of mine, Stake used 150 sat/byte for a total of 0.0022 and it still took about 3 hours. It could just be the blockchain that was slow given this detail. |
|
|
|
Those are just a guide lines what is happening in blockchain and while choosing fee you also should look at how many unconfirmed transactions in the blockchain. If you see a lot of unconfirmed transaction means you shouldn't follow what they suggested instead pay a slightly higher fee than what they suggested to get your transaction confirmation faster.
I do agree that there will be some delays but 24 to 48 hours is too much that shows the fee paid for those transactions was way below than the expected fee. I'm sure that you didn't actually take a look at the 21.co site because its recommended fee is always the lowest one marked in green (the 0-1 estimated block fees).
Let's also note that for casinos to deal with multiple inputs, it jacks up the size of the transaction to ridiculously high levels if a user is withdrawing.
Here's an example of a withdrawal that I requested from Stake: 2f1459fcc40cb6af51a5382a1f4847a1bbf7d8390dd4ffd3ef82b0ab1379ec2d
This transaction has a size of 1847 bytes which is ridiculously high. Even with the 2.781 mBTC fee that they used it's still 150 sat/byte which is a low fee. If you wanted to get the transaction as quickly as possible (according to bitcoinfees) it would require a fee of 0.00777587 which I don't think anyone is comfortable with unless the withdrawal is >8 BTC. |
|
|
|
so how we can make our transaction confirm quickly? Withdraw via altcoins and save the hassle of the large fee + wait time. |
|
|
|
|
Username: actmyname
Bet ID: Hilo:402,926
|
|
|
|
|
Stake username: actmyname
Bet ID: Plinko:1,845,773
|
|
|
|
No, you didnt understood correctly.
Bitsler offers free bonus funds like all the other casinos and they require to wager at least 100x the bonus you received in order to be able to withdrae the funds. Completely untrue. Provide a source for this statement because there have never been any bonuses apart from giveaways [that could be withdrawn immediately]. |
|
|
|
i am not gonna continue an argument with you. you are obviously one of those ass lickers. Because I'm a skeptic. idiots like you make these bastards steal people money. Of course! I'm the perpetrator of casino scams! now tell me what happens if they steal less than 0.1 btc from 100 naive players None of them come back, a portion of them make scam accusations and tell their friends in crypto about how Rollin is a scam. OP was smart enough to notice this When you withdraw, the server shuts down and the bet conditions change? How is that stealing? and they first banned him from chat i am sure some other fools have been scammed but just kept shut because they know an asslicker like you will come trying to shut them up or bully them. That's completely ridiculous.
Keep in mind OP thinks there's some conspiracy that can affect the numerical outcome of their bets. This is literally not possible because of the fact that the hashed server seed is given to the player. The fuck? |
|
|
|
ok so how do i do it? i can proof that it happened and theres no way i played any other games at the point of it happening. If you can prove it then prove it. Jesus, why does everyone say that they can prove something then don't do it until asked? Bring up the proof first so that you don't waste any time. After all, your intention IS to legitimately warn other players, right? |
|
|
|
Such a long time i cannot wait for that much everybody need in hurry time as well. So i would love to recommend them to decrease the pending time. Then i would like to go this website. Would you be fine with paying a $6 fee to receive your transaction within an hour? If not, then either accept the lower transaction fees on Bitcoin or withdraw a different cryptocurrency on Bitsler's site that lower fees and quicker confirmation times. They have the exchange option, after all (although it will deduct a significant % of winnings, for lower-end players even that can be better than taking a hit with a fee) |
|
|
|
and for charbet this is the history to check at stake.com
Chartbet:608,328 Chartbet history doesn't show the cashout number. I've already checked before so there's no way to prove that the number wasn't tainted after the loss. If you want a video i can do that Do it. Both of your pieces of evidence lack real definitive proof of foul play. |
|
|
|
That's an fantastic ICO. I would love to invest in that ico is there any subscribe button that i would put my email to subscribe to register my name. The site. https://betking.io/. If you want to invest, you better do it soon. The ICO is literally ending on the 4th of September so you have a week to get your money in. |
|
|
|
yeah you can edit the screenshot but it wouldn't match up when you talk to the support and they checked right? In the conversation log, all they have done is forward it up the ladder. I am unsure if they record the automatic cashout value or not so it is not my position to state whether they are able to verify that you sent a bona fide screenshot.
Usually, support will just shoot the technical issues to those that have the assets to do so and thus any inclination of them agreeing with you should not be considered valid. |
|
|
|
Could be real. Could also be fake. Here's one I faked:  All I did was edit the cashout number after the game had ended.
PROOF = https://prnt.sc/gdl76w Balance after dropping 7 times is 22. So 1-2 games didn't pay out in that session. (Imagine players who have deposit and drop hundreds/thousands of balls) Even if you assume i have the minimum to play all that 7 games it would be 334 - 77 - 77 - 52 = 128 + 51 = 179 - 52 - 77 - 34 = 16 not 22 but that is not the case. So my warning to all players please don't play these 2 games until it is fixed and if you have deposited and lost on these 2 games i hope they can give a refund or something. Let's talk about math. Stake automatically rounds to the nearest unit however the payouts are not rounded. They are exact. Meaning if you lost 76.8 satoshi it would show as a loss of 77. Let's do the calculations, now. Starting value: 334. Bet Results- (3) 128 sat * 0.40x
- (2) 128 sat * 0.60x
- (1) 128 sat * 1.40x
- (1) 56 sat * 0.40x
Thus the remaining value after these bets would be... 334 - 230.4 - 102.4 + 51.2 - 33.6 = 18.8
Although this does not match the exact value it should be noted that the math on the payout follows this manner. Bear in mind, I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just adding some degree of skepticism here. |
|
|
|
fag , you are annoying as fuk. why even bother to comment after i comment. You intended to post a reply just so you could see it? No one else is allowed to type after you do. What a snowflake you are. op posted this long ago If 10 days is long ago to you then I'm not sure how you handle everyday life with such withered patience. you rollin ass lickers saw it and ignored First time seeing this thread. immediatly i confirmed what he said you come trash talking. Obviously. You bumped the thread back up. the <100nbtc wasnt stolen. yes rollin should close if they scam as little as 1 satoshi I'm not sure what this point is referring to. I had stated that for Rollin.io to shut down the site to steal such a meagre amount, it would be unprofitable from a financial perspective. And I'm not sure how OP would have any problem with the "suddle" changes if they occur after he withdraws. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
