That's the problem, strictly speaking it's not abuse but it borders on it in my opinion.

Wouldn't it be noticed in that case that we are using Tor? I don't use it.

I also agree with Charles-Tim. The best thing would be to forget this whole thing that started because of a toddler's tantrum.

But don't worry, a neutral tag is not abuse of the trust system. He made it that way so he could accuse without accusing properly. In other words: he hasn't had enough balls.

In other words, a thread has been open for more than a month and a half and when I finally lock it, now it turns out that I am denying the right to reply.

Pass me the phone number of your dealer, that shit you're smoking is sure to be very good.

LMAO. I was thinking of creating a similar thread.

He is leaving the tags in neutral because he knows that if he were to leave those feedbacks in negative, totally invented and without evidence, it would be an abuse of the trust system.

It also left me a "neutral" tag but in a negative spirit saying: "Cyberbully insulting and harassing other members.
Part of my ignore list".

The first part is obviously false, as I just said "go fuck yourself" to him after previous insults and the concept of harassing implies a continuity. In other words, totally made up because he didn't like that I dismantled his garbage arguments with my weighty arguments.

Do you really want me to answer that nonsense? Well, I'm going to.

It is obvious that I did not deny anyone the right to reply. If you are going to maintain that I expect you to cite it with evidence just as I expect evidence that naim027 and I are the same person.

Without that evidence what you say is bullshit.

And the abusive language comes from previous insults.

Edit: dkbit98 has posted false feedback without any proof (because there isn't) saying that naim027 is connected to me.

I'm waiting for the proof dkbit98, and I think this deserves another thread.

Let's see if this works:

Can a moderator confirm that naim027 and I post from different IP addresses?

For those who don't know it yet, dkbit98, in a toddler tantrum has opened this reputation thread against me:

Do you think Poker Player behavior is acceptable?

He says naim027 is my alt and accuses me of alt abuse, sending merit to my alt and creating fake conversations.

I think without much research, anyone will figure out that we are not alts. He writes in a Bangladeshi thread, and it is clear that we have completely different posting style.

But I think there is a much easier way to dismantle it. Just as I can see my IPs for the last 30 days, can't the moderators see them too?

If so, I request that some moderator go to the thread and confirm that we write from different IPs, and most likely from countries thousands of miles away. No need to say the countries for privacy reasons, just to confirm that we aren't the same person.

LMAO. He obviously wan't going to do that because he already decided he was going to create this thread before I locked and unlocked it:


But since he can't prove that any of my behavior is unacceptable, he has seized on the fact that I locked and unlocked the thread. And I've done it again now to quote him.

I always find that whoever says things like that is because they have run out of arguments and he does not want to admit his mistake.

If you had evidence or believed that you would be able to find it, you would not say that.

I have thought of something to see if you do not have to waste time in these investigations and we dismantle OP's argument once and for all.

I'm probably biased on this topic, but it's just that I'm re-reading the OP and I find it, quite simply, ridiculous.

Let's review:


It is clear that if it is a bug, it is not a reputation issue. The reputation issue is if there is alt abuse like creating fake conversations or sending merits between your alts.

But then he says this:


Which completely contradicts the OP, the main point of this thread.

Again, dkbit98 can't just accuse me of that without further evidence. It doesn't seem to me like an acceptable behavior for a DT member.

Later on if I'm in the mood I'll do a point by point review of dkbit98's behavior in this case with quotes.



Today 100% of my posts are in this thread, and it looks like I'm going to write a few more here.  

I don't quite understand why you post this here instead of in your known alts thread.

This thread, is supposedly about whether my behavior is acceptable. Which the cyberbully who created this thread already threatened me with before I locked LL reputation thread, and now all he has been able to come up with is that I unlocked and locked a thread.

If you have any proof that me and naim027 are connected, I'd appreciate it if you'd post it, but I'm telling you, you don't have it, just like the angry 7 year old who opens the thread doesn't have it either because we are not related at all. I didn't know anything about him until yesterday he sent me a PM for me to unlock the thread.

The thing is so simple even for a childishly angry person like the OP to understand.

A few hours after locking the thread, I went back to log in the forum and saw that I had a message from naim027 saying that he was about to reply in the thread and that just as he was about to post I locked the thread. He asked if I could unlock it so he could post the reply. At that moment I unlocked it and I was in the forum for a while but I saw that he didn't post it and I thought that maybe he was offline. After a while I received a PM from him again, saying that he had been again about to post without being able to because I had locked it again. Anyway, I unlocked it again, he posted and I locked it again.

Nice shitpost the OP has pulled out of his sleeve. Total because some time ago he came with demands for Lightlord's thread and as I didn't pay attention to him, and on top of that I gave him weighty arguments, he ended up leaving me a false feedback, which he has left in neutral instead of negative because he knows that if he leaves it in negative it would be an abuse of the trust system.


That's exactly what happens. I've got the PMs to prove it.


You are wrong about this. I have said several times in the thread that I would like things to change and change Lightlord's feedback from negative to neutral. I neither seek confrontation with him or anything and in the last few posts I have said that I am afraid that he does have some serious health or personal problem because he is letting his businesses die. Nor do I have an alt involved in his casinos or anything.


Not only you started by insulting me, but now you are making serious accusations against me. Prove it.

Yeah, I think I will lock it soon, but I'm going to reply first.


You don't know the definition of harrassment:


Essential Meaning of harass
1 : to annoy or bother (someone) in a constant or repeated way She was constantly harassed by the other students. He claims that he is being unfairly harassed by the police. He was accused of sexually harassing his secretary. [=of making unwanted sexual comments to her]
2 : to make repeated attacks against (an enemy) The troops harassed the defeated army throughout its retreat.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/harass

So, no that's not harassment.


So, according to you, he expressed his personal opinion and didn't insult me.

He called me a cyberbully, which is obviously false:


Then he said this


Which is obviously false and kind of insulting as well.

And finally he said this


Which he has not had the balls to do because he knows he has no compelling arguments to do so. And that veiled threat is also an insult because several red tags to Lighlord came out of this thread and what is implicit in what he says is that I could end up the same way.

To say that bullshit you better not say anything at all.  If you didn't write anything after that, I would have reported the post for low value.


False. Anyone can see.


So, what?


The bias from which you speak has more to do with my ignoring your demand to lock the thread than an objective analysis of the issue.


If you think what I do is so wrong, you're overdue.

Have you already reported the thread to be locked?


Go fuck yourself.

Edit:



He just left me this feedback, obviously fake, and he didn't have the balls to put it negative because he knew it could backfire on him.

Do you think this is a good use of the trust system? Sounds like a little kid throwing a tantrum to me.

I like your rhetorical question but that's not the point. The point is that even if I lock the thread, people are still going to talk about the problems that Lightlord hasn't solved, no matter how much you insist on portraying him as a little angel, an innocent victim that we're shooting at while he's helpless on the ground.


You need glasses. You already needed big glasses when you said that:


To which I already answered you:


You saying you have re-checked the OP makes me think that instead of glasses you need a telescope and re-check the OP one more time.

I have said it several times already in the thread, but I repeat it: if you are so clear about it, report the thread to be locked.

I don't rule out locking it myself but I'm certainly not going to do it based on those arguments.

As I said in a previous comment, I'm thinking of locking the thread, but that's not going to stop people from continuing to talk about the topic, "shooting him on the floor", as you say.

People keep talking about the problems in the bitvest threads and the other threads that keep popping up.

Have you seen the gambling thread? People hardly talk about gambling any more there. They talk about Lightlord and the problems.


That's simply not true. He didn't solve the hot wallet issue and I quoted a new thread "shooting lightlord" as you say just 4 posts above on this same page.


No, it's not.

I'll tell you what I think.

I don't know why you still advertise that you rent the signature, when you are in the CM campaign. It is extremely unlikely that someone will pay you more for your signature.

As for the avatar, personal text and putting the website in your profile, OK. I hope you are lucky, because even if you are the 4th most merited, I think you are the 1st in terms of merit earned in relation to the activity, and the extremely worked threads you create, which are constantly bumped because they keep being interesting over time, are ideal for someone who wants to advertise.

I don't know if you've ever talked to Foxpup about this. I'm surprised you're not in the merit cycling club. Maybe the club is full and he can't accept any more people but I think you should be part of it, and he pays very well.

What I can see in your trust page is that you are a scammer and I can also see in your signature that you are also advertising a known scam site. Do you really expect us to believe you?

I currently think it is more likely that Lightlord is still sick or has a problem. He used to bid for advertising space on the forum. Just like he doesn't say anything about campaigns or solving the hot wallet problem, which he said he was going to do, he doesn't bid for ad space either.

The thread I quoted above makes me understand that bitvest.io (and I guess 777coin too) are losing customers.

Edit. His shitcoin project is also paralized: