Unfortunately i dont have a clue about this topic. I couldnt tell whats going on or if its the bot trading at all. And im not in the position to buy too. If i would have the money then i would ask you what profit it can make on the sites where its still working. If true i could offer you to pay you from the profits. Like first month of running it. Though when it would be so easy then you would do it yourself.

Where do you build your bots? Tradewave, cryptotrader or tradingview?

I doubt you will find an insurance company that will make an insurance for bitcoin miner. If you start to explain them that they are extremely valuable devices that will be valuable for 3 months only though then they will send you out of office fast. Its simply a real nice risk. So i think it was unavoidable that no insurance was there. Or was there an insurance for the big mining farm that burned down some weeks ago?

If the bot really is able to play so good wouldnt it make sense then to let the bot play outside of the pokerroom, check the decisions he makes and play manually on the pokersite then? I mean this wouldnt trigger the bot recognition tools. And when the bot isnt winning on mass but on higher amount games then this should be doable. On top you have to use human like playtimes because you play manually in fact. Only get support by a bot.

38 signups sound huge. I wonder if a normal user would be able to reach similar stats when posting normal.

Is the signature link unique so that you know its because of that? If so how many posts did you made to get one referral? Though the refs might have happened because you are to tightly connected to the website. Only wondering. Might really be luck. Probably someone posting in gambling sections might turn that better.

Did anyone got a referral through the signature? If so how often does this happen only from forum signatures?

Is your code public so that one can see the indicitors you use?

So far most of the persons who asked didnt see that they posted most in threads that dont count and so on. The oneliner seems to be not a general rule too, it depends on the usefulness of oneliners written. So far i dont see that unfair payments were done. The manager explained to everyone too, which is quite some work. I think that way is better than a bot, since a bot can be gamed because of his fixed rules.

Ah ok... didnt see that it was an off topic forum. Sounded like an ontopic topic.

Anyway... i guess you hope you dont have to explain so much every week. :

Additional rule... oneliner-posts dont count. I cant say that i think that makes much sense in general because oneliners can actually be very helpful but most of your posts are simply not helpful. But i think thats nothing only dadice is handling that way. As far as i read most signature campaigns handle it so.


40 were paid. And after only checking the first 20 posts i think it might match the oneline-posts that are taken out.

Im not against it. I only say that oneliners arent automatically bad posts. In fact my post was very good since after i first thought i know the answer already, i had to search and calculate later, to check things out. It took me some time and it was the perfekt answer. In fact i think short answers often can be the better answers. But even when you would say that short answers automatically are spam... thats no solution at all. In my case... i only would need to add a sentence or two. Wouldnt be a problem. The same goes for spammers. Simply write more and youre done. So treating oneliners as spam might be a fast solution but i think its a rule that can be gamed. Which kills the purpose. And helpful oneliners (i got a thank you for it:)) are treated as spam.

Saying that... if its checked manually anyway then it might be better to not got the oneliner-are-spam-route. It would be pretty easy anyway to identify spammer.

Are the posts counted with a bot? Looks like he automatically not counts posts with too few lines then. Actually i had to think quite some time to write that post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=984397.msg10724569#msg10724569 and i think it cant get more constructive than it is. No, i dont complain because of one posts payment. Only wondering. When its really done with a bot then that means helpful posts might not be counted and not good ones can be cheated when the bot only counts words or signs of a post. Though it looked like at least a short look at the last posts page of each member was done manually.

Edit: By the way... on first tab in google sheet i still have a wrong id in the first link.

Stimmt. Ist das neu? Vielleicht habe ich das vor einigen Monaten, als ich das so gemacht habe, auch nur nicht gefunden? Dann sehe ich jetzt auch nur noch die Notwendigkeit der Zeichenfolge für die Browserversion.

Most probably because you have so many posts with only some words. Not really useful. And im not sure what the foreign language says. So its probably hard to determine if the posts are worth something as advertisement.

Kannst du auch machen. Ist auf jeden Fall einfacher da man den Code einfach mit dem neuen Smartphone einscannen kann. Ich bevorzuge aber die Zeichenfolge weil man dann selbst eingeben kann wie der Name des Profils im Authenticator steht. Ich denke falls jemand mein Handy hat könnte das noch mal ein wenig sicherer sein wenn er nicht weiß zu welcher Seite das gehört. Aber ist vermutlich nicht wirklich nötig. *g*

The user id is one number smaller than my own. Its the same on the other tab. The profile id is correct but the stats link shows another member. So on each tab there is one time the correct id in a link and one time the id one below me. Dont know how this happened.

You can watch it live happening here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_RyLrCa3saxwHPz8mgPuNlV8ewuX7RlC15ZUQRVp99w/edit#gid=743481789 on sheet 3
I saw it a hour ago or so. Unfortunately 2 of the 4 links of my user details are wrong so the user working on that claimed i have zero posts. 

Too bad. I think price might drop again in the next hours but i think it will go upwards for the next days. Leverage would be nice. I trust kraken more than bitfinex at the moment. But i will think about bitfinex then.

Sounds like some really important infos you should mention when you sell it. It doesn't work on the site you used it on anymore, so the promised profits are very unsure, and it seems you can't run it yourself anymore because of missing coding skills. Which means the new owner needs to be able to code.

In my opionion you really only will have a chance of selling if it works and you can prove it. Maybe with a video. Otherwise buyer would buy the "pig in a poke".

Sounds legit... not. So you could earn the selling price in one month by yourself. Or even 10 times more. That means the price you sell this script for would be brought in by playing 3 days only with it. You need to bring up a very good explaination for this to expect someone will bid. At the moment i suspect that you cant really use that bot in casinos since it gets detected. You guys couldnt find a way to code around it so the theoretical profits are only theoretical.

Only my theory. But you need a very good explaination regarding that price.