I also think that without active promotion the project will not come anywhere. In such a market, if you are not in the top of websites and project reviewers, then investors do not see you. The main question is whether you have a large fund or an investor? Because without him there is almost no chance of success.

The news looks interesting but wonder how you are related to them?
After all, the EU regulators will only accept their blockchain where they can freeze transactions, which means there is no decentralization. That is, it turns out just a state project and all the rest immediately go under the ban.

I think this is probably one of the most promising projects for growth. Certainly not in such a market, but when the market turns around, I think this project will grow faster than the others.
Let's see how it goes, but if you buy something, then that's it.

Where does such information come from? From what I know this fund has lost a lot of money in the fall of the market and while he prefers not to enter into new projects. I think it's just rumors that someone spreads.

I also have the same question. It is logical that if the software cap is not reached, the investors will be given back the money. The company must understand that software cap is the minimum amount for implementation and success. Without these amounts, there is no chance.
And just to spend the money of investors is unethical.

An unusual project in its field, but with such a community manager, the way up will be very long, I think.
To unleash a project and promote it with a mass of similar projects, you must be very careful about marketing and not like this.

A rather unusual interview, they say a lot, and probably at prices of $ 15–18 per token, this is really a great option for those who still have doubts. Think there is a risk of falling but it is still minimal between price.

Верное решение главное чтобы потом не возникла проблема с теми кто купил или выполнил для них работу. Как я понимаю будет своп а всегда когда такое происходит процентов 25% не успевают или не понимают как сделать. Лучше вначале раздать в эфире а потом через кабинет все смогут без проблем свопнуть.

Ребята явно тянут время но этим сейчас многие проекты занимаются так что нет ничего необычного. Пока нельзя сказать что это скам но если еще несколько месяцев не будет никаких явных движений то будет не хорошо.

Это получается что то вроде ракеты союз с дыркой. Как взлетела так и идет вниз обратно. Рынок вошел в долгое затишье перед бурей и решений по etf. Очень многое от этого зависит и пока решение не будет большие деньги в проект не пойдут хоть ты прыгай.

При таком рынке когда все падает цена 250-300 это нормально. Вот когда будет рост и альты начнут отталкиваться от дна можно будет говорит о возврате к 500. 1000 долларов за эфир это только если рынок будет продолжать пузырится как ранее и биткоин будет под 20к.

The development of course continues, but until the market is fully reversed the price will not grow. There are a lot of large investors in neo(look at big holders) who receive gas and vice versa buy more and more prices as prices fall. Usually smart money do it if they understand that over time there will be growth.

The concept of course is good and it is clear that they have done a great job on this moment. But confusing is the white paper is very weak as the composition of the team. I don’t think that with such experience the team will be able to make good code for this concept.

It's clear that advisers as developers are needed, but the biggest question is how much money from the fund goes to such support and what exactly are they paid with project tokens or in bitcoin?
After all and you understand this, if tokens of the project are paid, it may turn out that they will immediately start selling later and the price will fall several times. For investors and who have already bought and for those who are going to buy such data is very important.

I agree there is nothing to hurry. Soon must show the exchange and see how the bidding will go. I think if even the price drops to $0.1(in selling the price 0.4$), it will still make sense to buy some tokens.
Hazza project’s prospects are huge and if you look at what funds were invested and who is behind the development, it is clear that there is a very big chance to get a very good profit in the future.

If it's not a secret, how much is he better than the rest? 10% and higher?
Or is it less? I look through the mine option and for the sake of testing looking closely at the different options to choose the best one and try on max.

In this type of market, only such blockchain projects can collect the necessary amounts. But since there are a lot of competitors, to get success, you need some kind of option that will show that the blockchain is worth investing in.

The potential of this is very large but it is not clear how exactly to do so that investors like it too? On one such idea, projects are not built, it seems to me.

Может и стоит подождать статистика показывает сейчас что те кто спешат просто не набирают или набирают в разы меньше чем нужно команде ля реализации всего что запланировали по дорожной карте.

Обычное дело затягивают как могут в надежде что все получится, просто рынок сейчас не такой как ранее когда все скорее пытались сделать и выйти с большими иксами. Нужно уметь ждать и тянуть время в том числе с запросами которые сейчас кидают.