DE has done a lot of viscious trolling of other devs and projects over the years, some that borders on harrassment, like posting memes of people's relatives, and offering bounties to DOX devs who haven't scammed people because he doesn't like them. If it ends up that DE has been playing a long con joke on people following here for over a year, and thinks it's OK because he didn't accept any money he might be in for a shock. If he's coming back to necro this 'joke' for another laugh he should expect some trouble. If he's actually mentally ill, then what happens next might upset his family.
Are you threatening the dev and his family now because he didn't make us rich? Big idiot is right @dev, if we are not on top of some 18 years old girls by the end of the next week, we'll find your family and will jump on them instead. you have been warned. I can't use my right or left hand anymore, I need a real girl to have her whole body for myself, I need money for that. if you go home one day to see there is no family there, don't worry because I have quoted the killer. remember to roll on the floor laughing to be safe. No of course I am not threatening this dev, read what i wrote. This guy has a lot of enemies from all the trolling he has done since 2013, if this is a joke project and he just left it where things were a few months ago there would be no problems, he just burnt a user profile on this forum. But, if he tries to milk this joke for another round of 'laughs' his hypocrisy might just provoke some people who he has attacked over many years to get some payback and troll him back, and if he really has a mental illness, then the consequences for his family would be pretty bad. This guy offered bounties to DOX other devs, what if some of those people decided it was justified to do the same back to him? I'm not saying i think they should, but he dumped so much hatred on bitshare devs, and supernet , and NXT, and IOTA, and Rchain ... If this guy is just trying to milk a joke project one more time with his last post, then maybe he gets some karma. Not from me, he never trolled me, but I do find his posting memes of a devs girlfriend disturbing. I think he is mentally unstable, and very likely this project is a brief moment of distraction. I hope I'm wrong, we'll all know soon enough. |
|
|
|
That /10 ratio is being maintained, because they are selling 1 btc and then buying up 10 Bitcoin Cash preparing for the real flippening.
Services accepting Bitcoin Cash are increasing and services accepting segshitcoin are on the decline.
I agree, BCH guys want to keep the ratio low while they accumulate, and if CSW does indeed have the satoshi bitcoins in trust until 2020 then he can't unload his ammo in the flippening war until then. It's obvious bch supporters have dug in for trench warfare, I don't expect them to go over the top until CSW is ready. Obviously lots of people think he's a scammer, but assuming he isn't then it makes sense they like the current ratio just fine. |
|
|
|
It doesn't look good, but then again this project has always avoided hype and attention, maybe they just working in stealth mode still, but without communication people will always speculate and consider the worst. They need to release a working beta, then all will be ok, |
|
|
|
I guess thats why they say: "you give a finger, and they take the whole hand."
Relax people, we have had an update. Lets give it some more time now.
I disagree, this dev has had plenty of time to show something, and there's a good chance he's using this thread as a weird plaything to show how easily he can manipulate people. I say enough is enough, no more meme's and eccentric rants, show some evidence there is substance here or lock the thread and call it quits. I think this guy might have a mental illness, if he does he wouldn't be the first guy in crypto to use this forum as a 'play thing', and it's not healthy for him if he does having people egg him on. Either DE has something to show now, or he doesn't, and if he doesn't by now chances are he never will. The performance art aspect of this is getting old, posting meme's of another devs girlfriend isn't cool IMO, and if this guy is off his meds again and back for some more 'fun', I say fuck off, deliver some work, or expect some blow back. Eventhough I do not fully agree with you, I do understand that you, or the community for that matter, is at a stage with little toleration. What will happen next? Time will tell I guess.. DE has done a lot of viscious trolling of other devs and projects over the years, some that borders on harrassment, like posting memes of people's relatives, and offering bounties to DOX devs who haven't scammed people because he doesn't like them. If it ends up that DE has been playing a long con joke on people following here for over a year, and thinks it's OK because he didn't accept any money he might be in for a shock. If he's coming back to necro this 'joke' for another laugh he should expect some trouble. If he's actually mentally ill, then what happens next might upset his family. |
|
|
|
What happened with the bitcoin cash fork, did that happen, or implode before launch?
So sad that bitcoin core devs messed things up for counterparty ...
There is a talk of them from the Satoshi's Vision conference here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcIvk4StLLsHow did Bitcoin devs mess up things for CP? Tx fees are as low as never before. Thanks for the link! Bitcoin fees are low now because crypto market is bearish, if/when the market picks up we end up back where we were before, high fees, mem pool overflowing, slow transaction times. Counterparty needs reliable platform in a buĺl market, not just bear market. |
|
|
|
|
What happened with the bitcoin cash fork, did that happen, or implode before launch?
So sad that bitcoin core devs messed things up for counterparty ...
|
|
|
|
Does this mean the masternode launch on main net is imminent too, I can't wait to try the mixer feature Is anyone setting up a masternode pol, for minnows under 250k? |
|
|
|
I guess thats why they say: "you give a finger, and they take the whole hand."
Relax people, we have had an update. Lets give it some more time now.
I disagree, this dev has had plenty of time to show something, and there's a good chance he's using this thread as a weird plaything to show how easily he can manipulate people. I say enough is enough, no more meme's and eccentric rants, show some evidence there is substance here or lock the thread and call it quits. I think this guy might have a mental illness, if he does he wouldn't be the first guy in crypto to use this forum as a 'play thing', and it's not healthy for him if he does having people egg him on. Either DE has something to show now, or he doesn't, and if he doesn't by now chances are he never will. The performance art aspect of this is getting old, posting meme's of another devs girlfriend isn't cool IMO, and if this guy is off his meds again and back for some more 'fun', I say fuck off, deliver some work, or expect some blow back. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. That makes more sense, how ever i question the integrity of notary nodes in a longterm situation, Since voting is involved. As you said, I under stand that they can't falsify blocks, but the majority of new kmd will be held by notary nodes, can't that lead to manipulation when it comes to voting (self voting and bribery).
Most new KMD comes from 5% accrued to ALL KMD, the notaries share of new supply by comparison is rather small. The optimum strategy though is for whales to compound their stacks over the next few years to maximise their VOTE power, but that'll just create mega HODL, which is good for price rise for everyone, and whales have an incentive to pick notaries wisely. Centralization is still a bad thing among notaries. Centralized notaries are less compelled to innovation, competitiveness and professionalism. They're basically leaches (at notarization activity). Sad truth. Vote for independents! https://dragonRiders.team ---> the real deal
I agree centralization is a bad thing, and i expect most whales will spread their vote around multiple candidates and favor those running in only one region, and those who didn't run last time. Some of those candidates happen to be offering rev shares too, so it's a win win for the whales - they get a rev share by supporting more independent candidates. Obviously some whales will have private deals we'll never know about, and some whales are also notaries and will vote themselves in. Overall the competition for places is much higher this year than I expected, which is great! |
|
|
|
Maybe we are beginning to understand each other  It's clear that you and your team have a lot of respect and admiration for your dev. I hope you can also see that we have a lot of respect and admiration for ours. There's a good reason we are standing up for our project and our developer. Just like there is a good reason you are standing up for yours. We'll never agree on all the details in-between but that doesn't mean we can't move forward.Hey, I know our dev does not have the track record in crypto yet but he shares so many of those great qualities you just described. I assure you that the first ever fork of Komodo is in very good hands. Give him some time. We've always been thankful to JL777 and the Komodo team for the work they've done. I'm watching Safe coin closely, the first genuine fork of KMD will be on my instant buy list, if the safe devs has 10% of jl777's attributes then maybe you guys have a shot still. Good luck, but expect scrutiny and criticism, it goes with the territory! |
|
|
|
I will never abandon this project. No matter what happens, I will make YOURChain a fully functional, completely decentralized cryptocurrency. This is not some silly ICO or pump and dump scam project. We are the real deal. Unlike the Ethereum and RChain devs, I can actually code and produce a cryptocurrency that has a syncing blockchain and basic full node wallet functionality. I regret distributing the URHOCs on Ethereum. Looking back, I probably should have used the OMNI protocol layer on Bitcoin. At least the Bitcoin blockchain can sync even though it is completely centralized. Ethereum and RChain devs are total jokes. What a mess! PATHETIC! YOURCHAIN is already winning!You'll need more than one post and a recycled meme to excite the masses this time, we need some concrete signs there is a real project with code here, otherwise people just see that your playing with people's emotions, which isn't cool man! I call bullshit until I see some proof, put up or shut up! |
|
|
|
Thanks for the clarification. That makes more sense, how ever i question the integrity of notary nodes in a longterm situation, Since voting is involved. As you said, I under stand that they can't falsify blocks, but the majority of new kmd will be held by notary nodes, can't that lead to manipulation when it comes to voting (self voting and bribery).
Most new KMD comes from 5% accrued to ALL KMD, the notaries share of new supply by comparison is rather small. The optimum strategy though is for whales to compound their stacks over the next few years to maximise their VOTE power, but that'll just create mega HODL, which is good for price rise for everyone, and whales have an incentive to pick notaries wisely. |
|
|
|
We gonna hustle baby!
Even if it means stealing currency from those that rightfully own stole it.  "Komodo Bug Found: How We Defeated An Attack MARCH 13, 2017 Komodo has just gone through a small emergency caused by an attacker trying to exploit a bug he found. The attacker didn’t cause any real damage as our team responded quickly. The attack started during the weekend and lasted about 30 hours before one of our notary nodes detected it. We quickly pushed a fix that was going to go into effect at Komodo block # 236000. At this point, the attacker had only been creating few coins to avoid detection, and the damage caused was minimal. The attacker went into overdrive after he saw that a fix was coming. He started to generate as many coins as he possibly could, and that led us to take further action. We publicly announced that we would roll back few hours, and advised everyone not to do KMD transactions until the rollback was done. Here’s how jl777 described the situation: I announced the block that will be rolled back to, pretty much in real time, so it is more like stopping the chain at 235300 rather than rolling back. Of course, a few hundred blocks were generated during the time to make the fix, so yes, technically it is a rollback of a few hours. Without the rollback, KMD coin supply would have expanded about 10 % as the attacker would have been able to create over 10 million KMD. We managed to avoid all this by just rolling back a few hours. These recent events have a lot of similarities with Bitcoin’s early days. Here’s what happened on 6th of August, 2010: A major vulnerability in the bitcoin protocol was spotted. Transactions weren’t properly verified before they were included in the transaction log or blockchain, which let users bypass bitcoin’s economic restrictions and create an indefinite number of bitcoins. On 15 August, the vulnerability was exploited; over 184 billion bitcoins were generated in a transaction and sent to two addresses on the network. Within hours, the transaction was spotted and erased from the transaction log after the bug was fixed and the network forked to an updated version of the bitcoin protocol. This was the only major security flaw found and exploited in bitcoin’s history. The difference is that bitcoin knew about it for over a week, while we found out about it when the attack was already under way. This attack is not comparable with a typical hack where an exchange loses funds. In our situation, the bug was in Komodo code and considering its implications a rollback was the logical thing to do to avoid damage.Komodo is still a young project and has a lot of new code built on top of it. The quicker these bugs are found, the less effect they will have. The longer Komodo blockchain keeps running, the less likely that further such bugs are found in the future. We continue to closely follow our network and promise to quickly respond in a similar manner to any possible future incident." KMD notaries mining Safe coin wasn't an attack, if it was they would not have stopped and offered to help you fix the problem , and donate the coins they mined back to your community. Trying to compare that to a real attack like KMD experienced is like comparing a parent smacking a naughty toddlers bum with à violent rape. You posting jl777's explanation proves the point exactly, he's describing an attack, not an inadvertent outcome of Safe coin devs leaving hard coded kmd notaries in your coin source code. Big Naturals That's a bit of a stretch I know you chuckled when you typed that I don't believe you can let someone off the hook for unethical behavior based on how much mercy they had for the victim. Now, I acknowledge that you don't see it as an unethical act or attack. I respect your opinion and passion, but as I said before, I strongly disagree. Yes, we disagree, I do admit I know nothing of the safecoin devs background, so I don't know if he will end up producing anything useful from here on. With jl777 however, I have watched and researched his projects for a good while, and to my knowledge he has demonstrated on numerous occaissions that he has all 5 qualities that make a super dev in this space: 1. high skill as a coder 2. high level experience in finance industry 3. superior communication skills, patience, humour, ability to explain & inspire 4. work ethic, the guy Is online working everyday, 7 days a week +12 hours going on 5 years now 5. demonstrably honest, every project he has started migrated to KMD, has done 2 ICO's, one for Supernet which OWNS millions in crypto funds (I.e jl777 did not receive funds personally but used to create a crypto fund), and the second for KMD which pays for notarisation fees. I have not seen one credible case of jl777 ever scamming anyone, but countless cases of his generosity Five years of good reputation in the crypto field should not, and will not be tarnished by Safe coin, so you guys would do well to consider thanking jl777 for using his code, and apologising for the slurs against his character. |
|
|
|
Looks like candidates that shares the most of their mining-rewards MadMax (40%), Dwy (30%), Goldenman (22,3%), Ptyx (20%) are not passing in EU region. Most people vote for their own region and Europeans are such a rich mofos, they don't need more coins, i guess I think overall nearly every candidate offering revenue share is either currently in at least one 'winning' position, or very close. Still a lot of VOTES to come in, but with only a couple of days to go the rev share candidates are all highly competitive, which is what I expected, and makes me regret the lost opportunity for a community pool even more than before. Edit, most rev share candidates are first timers, so it makes sense that they need to offer something to stand out over established guys with reputation |
|
|
|
There will be near to 100 slots for this campaign. We are very close now. Will be adding a few more users tonight.
I wanted to touch on a few issues that i'm reading in this thread. Obviously I am seeing users who are not accepting decisions very easily. The users that are selected are at my discretion. If Tony wants a certain user added, he is free to message me and we can work that is at out. Otherwise it is MY DECISION.
I don't normally give a response to everyone who was passed over for the simple fact that I would be answering those inquiries for weeks on end per campaign. Everyone who is denied is generally in 1 of these categories. 1. Not an active poster 2. Alt account found on the alt list located in the reputation section. 3. Shitposter 4. Spammer or burstposter 5. uses account for giveaway claims and twitter claims only.
I will explain examples of 2 users who have applied in this campaign.
Then User boombooms activity just on the 1st page of his posts goes feb 10th, then a 2 week break and he posts on feb 25th, then another 2 week + break and posts march 12, then a few posts on mar 14th, 2 posts on the 19th, 1 post on 21st and now active a lil whining in byteball thread
I'd like to think i'm doing my job just fine
I have been doing this for awhile
I dont make any damn money hiring users who arent going to qualify weekly
so of course im looking for active accounts in order to make the job worth it for me.
I'm not trying to just be a dick to everyone. I am trying to pick the most active people period. I don't know who has or has not been a faithful byteball supporter the whole way. I only pay attention to projects when I am working on them. If you or your account was active and posting well, you'd have been selected. Don't go shouting out complaints that are your own faults.
A few slots remain. I have updated the sheet with a few more users. Some of those users post counts were edited from what was in the application.
It's good that you followed up the criticism with an explanation of how you operate, and if tonych endorses your methods then people can complain all they want, we know the outcome. BUT, I wonder if Tony does in fact endorse your methods, byteball had/has a different vibe to other crypto, no ICO, no hype, no pump groups, just a novel distribution idea backing up a coin with really great tech. If you don't follow BB then maybe that's why you're surprised at the reaction your decisions got in some cases. I for one appreciate you honestly stating you favor high post people because that's how you get paid, and you don't really know or care who are supporters of this coin, but I actually find that attitude disturbing, and really wish this had been a community run sig campaign. Banning long time supporters of BB from further distribution after moon airdrops were cancelled because a pro sig campaign manager who doesn't follow the coin community history or vibe thinks they won't post enough for him to get paid, well, that's really depressing the shit out of me! |
|
|
|
We gonna hustle baby!
Even if it means stealing currency from those that rightfully own stole it. "Komodo Bug Found: How We Defeated An Attack MARCH 13, 2017 Komodo has just gone through a small emergency caused by an attacker trying to exploit a bug he found. The attacker didn’t cause any real damage as our team responded quickly. The attack started during the weekend and lasted about 30 hours before one of our notary nodes detected it. We quickly pushed a fix that was going to go into effect at Komodo block # 236000. At this point, the attacker had only been creating few coins to avoid detection, and the damage caused was minimal. The attacker went into overdrive after he saw that a fix was coming. He started to generate as many coins as he possibly could, and that led us to take further action. We publicly announced that we would roll back few hours, and advised everyone not to do KMD transactions until the rollback was done. Here’s how jl777 described the situation: I announced the block that will be rolled back to, pretty much in real time, so it is more like stopping the chain at 235300 rather than rolling back. Of course, a few hundred blocks were generated during the time to make the fix, so yes, technically it is a rollback of a few hours. Without the rollback, KMD coin supply would have expanded about 10 % as the attacker would have been able to create over 10 million KMD. We managed to avoid all this by just rolling back a few hours. These recent events have a lot of similarities with Bitcoin’s early days. Here’s what happened on 6th of August, 2010: A major vulnerability in the bitcoin protocol was spotted. Transactions weren’t properly verified before they were included in the transaction log or blockchain, which let users bypass bitcoin’s economic restrictions and create an indefinite number of bitcoins. On 15 August, the vulnerability was exploited; over 184 billion bitcoins were generated in a transaction and sent to two addresses on the network. Within hours, the transaction was spotted and erased from the transaction log after the bug was fixed and the network forked to an updated version of the bitcoin protocol. This was the only major security flaw found and exploited in bitcoin’s history. The difference is that bitcoin knew about it for over a week, while we found out about it when the attack was already under way. This attack is not comparable with a typical hack where an exchange loses funds. In our situation, the bug was in Komodo code and considering its implications a rollback was the logical thing to do to avoid damage.Komodo is still a young project and has a lot of new code built on top of it. The quicker these bugs are found, the less effect they will have. The longer Komodo blockchain keeps running, the less likely that further such bugs are found in the future. We continue to closely follow our network and promise to quickly respond in a similar manner to any possible future incident." KMD notaries mining Safe coin wasn't an attack, if it was they would not have stopped and offered to help you fix the problem , and donate the coins they mined back to your community. Trying to compare that to a real attack like KMD experienced is like comparing a parent smacking a naughty toddlers bum with à violent rape. You posting jl777's explanation proves the point exactly, he's describing an attack, not an inadvertent outcome of Safe coin devs leaving hard coded kmd notaries in your coin source code. |
|
|
|
Please can we just burn the rest ? The distribution phase needs to end. The thread tells the story, 900 pages about airdrops and how to receive bytes, or in the last fews pages disgruntled sig campaigners bitching about not being selected. What are we going to have, another 900 pages about how to receive free bytes? Its the never ending story. When can we move on and maybe even talk about other things.
Burn them, or one huge airdrop of all the rest to byteholders.
Byteball will have achieved a huge milestone when all the coins are circulating. Lets stop finding ingenious ways to make users be pissed off and dragging this on and on.
Not likely to happen, but a good suggestion none the less. I did a quick spot check of sig campaign applications to see if there is any substance to the complaints, and indeed I too found some problems. Is it really worth the hassle now? |
|
|
|
Can't understand why you are so interested in a coin that you think is unsafe... I am rather enjoying these now ...please keep'em coming. There are many crypto people who just hate scammers, and they want to warn newbies to not waste their hard earned money on coins without any technical merit and huge premines. If you add in dubious blockchain rollbacks with wafer thin justification, then Yes, people will continue being 'interested' in Safecoin , so it's good that you're enjoying the attention. You should also avoid ICOs at all cost. The majority of them help the dev drive the crypto purchased lambo to the crypto moon. If there was a way to short Safe coin it would be the easiest money to make in crypto, but you're not on any exchanges are you, and not likely to be now. your attempts at making out that you're having fun now over this aren't believable either, you guys can't scam people now, your lead dev has been exposed as lazy and incompetent, your blockchain is mutable, your ecosystem small and centralised and scam focused, so for guys like you there must be a grief process over what Safe coin scam might have stolen from newbie invested had your plan not been so easily exposed, and you had a chance to dump on unsuspecting victims. 5 stages of grief: Denial Bargaining Anger Depression Acceptance You're in denial bro, when you get to anger I think safecoin dev will get a lot of hate mail for leaving in hard coded KMD notaries. The five signs your dev might have pocketed money from an ICO.. Your dev initiates an ICO Your dev initiates an ICO Your dev initiates an ICO Your dev initiates an ICO Your dev initiates an ICO The Komodo ICO raised funds to pay years of bitcoin tx fees for delayed PoW notarisations, that is crystal clear, and everytime you mention it you just dig a deeper hole for Safe coin ... how does Safe coin intend to pay for notarisation costs? We gonna hustle baby! The information content in your replies is rock bottom bro, but don't worry, you're at the bottom of the 12 steps that *might* just save your soul. Seriously, you appear to be a newbie with a bought account, there's still time to do some research and get attached to quality projects with better returns than even the best pump and dump scams. There are better scams than safecoin, and better comedy coins too. Time to move on bro! |
|
|
|
Ha ha, fongo is a good term, I think many experienced some fongo in January , I still wake up in cold sweats thinking of why I didn't sell at 20k USD. With bittrex and Poloniex exits off limits now and some funds trapped, I don't know if I'll ever get that money back without a kyc cavity search. |
|
|
|
thank you.
holy shit! they make such an effort just to receive a 5$?
or i am completely uninformed and it is an easy task to get a lot of telegram accounts. this "cryptomoney-world" is really crazy. and it really looks that the only thing that matters is making money.
btw: thank you for the quiz. a learned two new things about bb.
There are some people poor enough in this world that they get their children to perform naked in front of web cams for less money, just to provide food and essentials for their families. If you live on a dollar a day, what would you do for 5x average daily wage? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
