Also relevant (note the telegram name used by the scammer): Hello, so I've been trading from a person on telegram named @visesento (he is the scammer). We both agreed on the deal, 1000$ movocash for 350$ btc. As we both were unsure about trustness, he offered to hire Monbux. We both wrote an email to him, asking if he can help us to trade safely. Provided details, offer and our telegram ID's. He (@MonbuxBitcointalk) created telegram group within like 10 minutes. Then, where my lack of knowledge occured - he sent me a PGP signed message, which I checked on keybase.io/verify : Monbux Bitcointalk, [04.07.20 20:00] -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v1.0.5 Comment: https://keybase.io/cryptoyMHCAnicO8LLzMDFyG5X18N6VJ+H8fSBY6UMIfIcedVKSfkplUpW1UrJRZUFJfnJ pUVFqXnJYJHElJSi1OJiJSslw0Aj59KCzFBTl7Tw0oIgd6dAM7PAyKDCsop8vwr3 KOfkPCUdpZLKglSg2qTMkuT8zDylWh2l7FSwOWmZeempRQVFmXklQHmTRMvERENT AxOTRDMLC0tDAwvT5KRES9O0VCOLRIskS/OkxGQLS1NToIkZ+cUgHUBjkhKLU/Uy 85XAZsZnpgBFsagvBUuYpCYBTTY0NTYzMjY2NDA2MDA1MEpLNjVNTDIxB/JACotT i/ISc0HOzc3PSyqtALkW6n60cNBRKkstKs7Mz1OyMgQqSi7JBGkzNDE0NDa0tDS0 0FFKrSjILEqNzwSpMDU3szAAAh2lgqLUMiWrvNKcHB2l4tTCvHygLNCOxHSgFcWZ 6XmJJaVFqUq1hw7EsDAwcjGwsTKBooOBi1MAFklLUtj/10VPyec+nrp+V64+Y4Je 39ob3cIS7DuqLFnf9RlIuoYkSW9h/nVzcsXaxWuLJl0KXXbLWv5r8HGLFr2tVSoH eLQcLLbKZuucLNiZ0Np04xyb+9VDU86+Ed44c53lru+Zqv//P4rxfHR0qe23bZfs ywunSn/VVj6V+c6sRsAruy95cVrB41+btstoR+vFntO+KNHheKXb2Et12tzV1+K3 H/jxNulAwzYz3wla8+v5srW/hBakPqi/xi6rEsr9YDLDmccPVu0+VvC+Qtq22K33 TYRJ4dOfc23erMy/M+1jKddnyZ8TsmqEX8/intJi4Gx8tpNPfE3W7B8Ou6LO/byk +UL1+94J5qv2cfFfvlD7HQDC5Qcd =+hQf -----END PGP MESSAGE----- Putting this message in it shows, that the message is signed by monbus (  ?) . So this is where I fucked up, not sure how this works. After this, I've sent BTC to his address ( transaction ID :https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/be618f8c287069dc2cec573070498e90455e3a66d78bcdac5a983a3ad2057882 ) Then, ofc, even after confirmations I didn't get my movocash from the seller. Started asking questions, no response. No response from guy, acting as escrow and no response from the seller. Today he magicly replied, but only when other guy contacted him ( here is SS, how I managed to reach 'monbux' : https://prnt.sc/tdc7z9 , https://prnt.sc/tdc8mm , https://prnt.sc/tdc926 ) . And later all our conversation ( https://prnt.sc/tdcaw3 , https://prnt.sc/tdcbbr , https://prnt.sc/tdcbmq , https://prnt.sc/tdcbwr , https://prnt.sc/tdcc68 , https://prnt.sc/tdccfp , https://prnt.sc/tdccl7 , https://prnt.sc/tdccvc , https://prnt.sc/tdcd21 , https://prnt.sc/tdcda4 , https://prnt.sc/tdcdl4 , https://prnt.sc/tdcdu0 , https://prnt.sc/tdce0j , https://prnt.sc/tdcehk ), coins weren't sent yet to other address, but I am already sure, that I've been scammed. so guys, watch out and don't make same mistake as I've did.  P.S. Monbux, can you explain how this PGP works? Reading through boombl4's posts, I got the feeling that he was advertising an escrow service, and I wondered which one it was. Now I know, it was his own.  Definite scammer. Tagged. |
|
|
|
I think what we'd do is just sign up for a league via ESPN or Yahoo Sports (use a new email address to register) and then have someone collect and hold the BTC (I'd nominate DireWolf for that). Maybe just small stakes... somewhere between 0.001 and 0.003 BTC per player, or something.
I dunno. I kinda talked myself out of it while writing this. Seems like it might be more trouble than its worth.
I was planning to respond to your suggestion of a fantasy league sooner, I think it's a great idea. I'd rather participate than hold the coin, if you'll have me. I nominate DarkStar_, for that. It's been a lot of year since I've participated in a league, so lets keep it cheap please, lol. How many participants would we need to make it fun? I'd feel comfortable with you playing and holding the funds. It's not unusual in the real world for someone to do both. We'd need at least 8 players; 10 is ideal. Also ideally they should be people who have commented in this thread or the old one from time-to-time, or else have an established history of commenting in the Gambling section of the forum (ie, no newbs or Jr members). The hardest part would be arranging a draft... It would take a lot of coordination to do a live draft, and since we all live in different time zones, it might be hard to pin down a time. I think of ESPN and Yahoo Sports have autodraft features (where you rank the players you want, down to 100 players or so) so we could just do that. |
|
|
|
Maybe this year we should try to do a thread Fantasy Football league. After last year's debacle, I don't really want to play in the same league as last time. Bastards still owe me about $250. I'm down for whatever website peeps want to use.
Just a question, what kind sites do you have on mind? If it is a website which accepts bitcoin then you can count me in even if I am quite sure I will be last place, but if something like PP is needed then I will have to think about it since I have been avoiding getting a PP account. I think what we'd do is just sign up for a league via ESPN or Yahoo Sports (use a new email address to register) and then have someone collect and hold the BTC (I'd nominate DireWolf for that). Maybe just small stakes... somewhere between 0.001 and 0.003 BTC per player, or something. I dunno. I kinda talked myself out of it while writing this. Seems like it might be more trouble than its worth. |
|
|
|
You enjoy yourself with your projections as if you can magically divine my emotional state via the internet.
There's no magic behind it, really. It's pretty apparent you were having a particularly bad day. I wasn't even talking to you and you unloaded a bunch of seething spittle in my direction. Something else bothering you that you want to talk about, hun? Biden is finished. He is a joke. OK, we'll remember your opinion on the matter. Oh, and if Trump loses, then "fraud", of course. |
|
|
|
Trump is going to win, barring some kind of fraud, as was my opinion from day 1.
Wow, such convenience: Trump wins = no fraud. Trump loses = definite fraud. I think you forgot to come back up for air after munching down on that cheeto stick for so long, there doesn't seem to be enough oxygen getting to your brain. It wasn't just your opinion though: you claimed as a certainty that Biden's political career was finished back in September. Remember? Oh plenty will come of this, don't worry cupcake. Biden's legacy is over, and many other high level officials are going to face prosecution. You argue about meaningless peripheral issues all you like. The truth is coming out, and your butt is going to be so hurt you are going to suffer a prolapse from the sheer force of your head being yanked out of your ass when the news breaks.
Still waiting for that big truth to come out... Any day now must likely... I don't bet first of all because betting is illegal in the US, second because I have seen what the government does when they find some one illegally gambling with Bitcoin and smell a free lunch, and third because you vindictive gaping cunts are exactly the type of people that wouldn't think twice about making a bet with me then reporting me for doing so. Also finally, I won't because you want me to so bad. I find your continual insistence I do so quite entertaining.
No, its not illegal -- especially online gambling. At best its a state-by-state issue, but you're still mostly incorrect. As suchmoon was saying, you don't even have to bet with anybody here. You shouldn't let your all-consuming paranoia get in the way of an easy profit. Funny how sad little beta gimps such as yourselves always have to imagine everyone as useless as they are in order to sooth their own complex over inadequacy. You all feel free to be as irrelevant as you want to be.
Because having the emotional composition of a hungry toddler is surely the #1 sign of an alpha male.  I have to say, TwitchySeal was pretty prescient here, having said this back in October: Does Trump inspire you to never concede even a single point in a discussion, without any consideration for the truth, and attack anyone that questions you?
I think that's going to be a serious issue long term for the country. The people that admire his disregard for the truth.
|
|
|
|
Those aren't posts in Chinese -- the OP just moved the thread into the Chinese section for whatever reason. Though the gosha@e-coin account most like changed hands, the writing style doesn't complete strike me as 100% being game-protect. He could be trying to word things differently. In any case, we'll know for sure pretty soon as GP can't help but let himself be known (if it is him). |
|
|
|
You are nothing but a little bitch spectator who left the game but still wants a say in how its played. That way if it goes bad you don't pay any price, if it goes well you can suddenly be reinvigorated with patriotism and return home. Fuck you. Stay there, we don't want you. The only way Democrats will win in November is fraud, which is why they are so desperate to open up as many avenues for fraud as possible.
Again, I have to remind you: this is a forum about Bitcoin, and absolutely nobody's opinions about anything political actually matter, nor do they have the slightest bearing on real-world outcomes. We are all just passing time here. Except for you -- you seem to use the forum to vent a lot of anger and frustration. But if you want to stick to your make-believe and put money on Trump you'd do quite well:
TS doesn't actually place bets, remember? He just says he would bet as a metaphor for... for something. |
|
|
|
A couple people described it pretty well earlier: the only way to "win" against franky is either to tell him he is correct or else let him have the last word. In other words, there is no winning. His head is like a perfectly reflective ball bearing in which no light can permeate. Surprisingly, NO DEFAULT SANCTIONS for Craig Wright in the Kleiman v Wright case. Trial by jury it is.
Wonder if they will again attempt to settle before the trial. They tried once in September of last year but that fell through. The trial was originally scheduled for March 30th, then again for this month, so I hope they don't push it back too much further. But you know, covid is also a pretty good excuse not to have to do anything. |
|
|
|
he asked for default judgement in his favour that CSW/DAVE were bitcoins creator
Again, they can ask for anything, doesn't mean they're going to get it. Ira could ask for half the coins in the genesis block, which is impossible, so why aren't you having a shit-fit about that too? Maybe, instead of just blindly asking " what if" and letting your imagination run wild without a hint of limitation or reason, just try considering what's actually practical for once. And, since you seem adamant that any utterance of common sense in opposition to your total lack thereof isn't permitted or justified unless there's some quoting of a legal document from the cases, I give you the following. The courts have expressed zero interest in validating any claims that either party were responsible for Bitcoin's creation, as has already been confirmed to you by the documents you claim to have read: First, the Court is not required to decide, and does not decide, whether Defendant Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of the Bitcoin cybercurrency. For someone to interpret that as a likelihood that a judge is going to validate faketoshi's claims would suggest they aren't fond of critical thinking and have a flair for the dramatic. I tried explaining to franky earlier that a "default judgment" does not mean that the judge ruled Craig and/or Dave is Satoshi, but he glossed right over it. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/default_judgmentDefault judgments arise in circumstances whereby one party to a suit has failed to perform a court-ordered action, and subsequently that failure has not only prevented the issue from being presented before the court but also results in the court settling the legal dispute in favor of the compliant party. For example, when a defendant is summoned to appear before the court in a case brought by a plaintiff, but fails to respond to the court's legal order, the judge can rule for default judgment and thereby decide the case in the plaintiff's favor. I think he needs to go back and do some more Research™. |
|
|
|
What you are doing is borderline harassment, and it isn't the first time.
"Timelord2067's Investigation" "non-sense" "what's wrong with your brain" "crazy lazy".... isn't "borderline harassment" for you? Till now all the posts of this thread are personal attacks against him and I don't see any so-called "investigation"  Re-read the OP and try again. He obviously read this thread because now he is sticking to TYM-related stuff, although the only thing he's "uncovered" so far is that Coins.ph uses multisig wallets. |
|
|
|
Jesus Christ. Over 1,100 COVID19 infections today in Dallas County alone, crushing previous records.
This is getting real bad, folks.
Not infections, cases. Cases are someone with any kind of flu symptoms at all, and 15 other people that might have been around him. And no evidence of asymptomatic carriers. It's a huge hoax, people! There's 3 different categories of cases: possible, probable, and confirmed. A confirmed case is the same thing as an infection as it means SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid has been detected in a laboratory. And its what the number written by Bob represents. Check for yourself: https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/coronavirus/what-we-know-about-coronavirus-cases-in-north-texas-around-the-state/2335449/You're about 2 months too late for the covid conspiracy train. We've already heard it all. |
|
|
|
OFF TOPIC FUD
... you would have posted it from your main account. ...
OFF TOPIC FUD
Perhaps you should leave the alt investigation to the rest of us, after all, why would you *just now* distrust a user who has been banned since the 13 th of February 2020: Its because that user was DT2 strength 0 until I distrusted him. Much like everything you've contributed to this thread thus far, it has nothing to do with it. I have nothing further to add here, and I'm pretty sure you don't either. |
|
|
|
For a DT1 you're very naive if you don't believe in a Filipino mafia.
This has nothing to do with anything. Besides, we both know that if you had something the slightest bit intelligent or reasonable to say, you would have posted it from your main account. Rest assured, your own distrust of me isn't going to stop me from investigating theyoungmillionaire and this DT abuse cluster.
By all means, detective, the guy who still thinks cryptohunter is "Probably Bruno..." Don't let me interfere. |
|
|
|
... and this is what's known as Default Trust abuse:  using their position on DT1 to attempt to silence those who would expose their Default Trust abuse. You're looking more and more guilty as the hours go by. 1. No, its not, and I don't see anything that remotely indicates that this user is engaging in trust abuse. He's not the one including a banned user who has never used the trust system -- you are. 2. As wrong as you are, you aren't being "silenced" in any way as you just moved from -7 to -8 DT strength. 3. This is the wrong thread for this subject. |
|
|
|
Given how "tight knit" the Philippines section is purportedly, with "everyone knowing everyone else" it's surprising none of you can say who TYM is or where they are. Not so tight knit after all.
Everybody who has been paying attention to this thread already knows who TYM is. That's no secret. Really what people should be on the lookout for is what his new account is, if he has one. He will probably be smart and fast-rising in rank, but only the Filipinos will have a chance of guessing who it is based on the contents of his posts. All traces of activity by the old TYM have come to an end, on Facebook and even his Coins.ph account. Perhaps he is using a new account there -- likely that of a friend or a family member. |
|
|
|
all the manipulations are just a defensive reaction due to the massive manipulations by the Elk, Suchkamun, Lauda, Lafu, Tman and other gandons who excluded me
in my case, you need to look for causal relationships
exclusions and the all trust system does not affect my relations with partners and in the trade, no one of them interested feedback, they trusted and continue to trust me.
In theory, this may affect potential partners of newbies, but the specifics of my activity are such that me don't need newbies
so the trust system is very corrupted game system
In your opinion, do you think you use the trust system properly? |
|
|
|
Now I don't think the fans can influence the refs into some decisions in the NFL like they can do in soccer, but the absence of fan support should result in the home teams having less home advantage.
...
With reduced preparation/pratice time, this will definitely be advantageous for teams like the Chiefs, who were able keep everyone. If you have a lot of young and new players and maybe a new QB on top of that, you are doomed imo, since it takes a lot of time to get everyone in sync (and NFL ready for the young players).
This makes perfect sense and I hadn't considered these little details. It will be interesting to see how/if the bookmakers factor these types of variables into their spreads. Edit: Ok, got it. I don't know all satirical outlets in the world unfortunately^^
There's really only a few. The Hard Times being the 3rd. Here's a sample Hard Times NFL article: 5 Ways to Enjoy the Super Bowl Vicariously Through Your Friend’s Gambling Problem
Maybe this year we should try to do a thread Fantasy Football league. After last year's debacle, I don't really want to play in the same league as last time. Bastards still owe me about $250. I'm down for whatever website peeps want to use. |
|
|
|
You have good company in there with Techshare. Guess I shouldn't be surprised given how much you two jerk each other off.
TECHSHARE and Nutildah jerking each other off?? Are you new here? He's been too busy living on the edge.  |
|
|
|
(Series 2 GPK will be released sometime in August.)
I'm curious... do you know why Topps decided to delay series 2? They just wanted to get in on the whole Tiger King phenomenon while it was still relatively recent? There's so many other series they could be releasing from their back catalog. I'm thinking 1952 MLB would be pretty dope. A lot of people would want to get their hands on a digital version of the Mickey Mantle rookie card. |
|
|
|
Why does someone have to be behind everybody?
Because Craig Wright/Calvin Ayre firmly stays with their narrative, despite the evidence against them, and clearly they themselves know they aren't fooling anyone? YES there's someone, and with a hidden motive.
Who's behind the Illuminati? Who's behind the Lizard People?
I don't know. Why did Gavin Andresen vouch for Craig Wright? Why did Satoshi leave? OK well technically you are right as Craig has financiers that backed him under the pretense that he is Satoshi -- I forgot about that. They were referred to in Gavin's testimony as "The Money Men." Andrew O'Hagan even referred to them in his Satoshi Affair book back in 2016. https://www.shortlist.com/news/julian-assange-andrew-o-hagan-books-satoshi-bitcoin-interviewThe money men behind Craig Wright had absolved him off of his dues, writing off nearly $15 million in debt that Wright’s companies had racked up. $1.5 million had gone to Wright’s lawyers alone. The reason for backing him? To them, he was Satoshi Nakamoto. The intellectual property belonging Satoshi Nakamoto, they believed, would fetch them upwards of a billion dollars.
...
Wright’s financial backers planned to move Wright to London (which they did) to “set up a research and development centre for him, with around thirty staff working under him,” O’Hagan wrote.
They would complete the work on his inventions and patent applications – he appeared to have hundreds of them – and the whole lot would be sold as the work of Satoshi Nakamoto, who would be unmasked as part of the project.
He added:
MacGregor [Wright’s Canadian backer] later told me he was speaking to Google and Uber, as well as to a number of Swiss banks. ‘The plan was to package it all up and sell it,’ Matthews told me. ‘The plan was never to operate it.’
Here's a good jumping off point for those inclined to do further research: Australian Stefan Matthews, who began working for Ayre in 2011, was a director of EITC Holdings until at least late 2016. It isn’t clear if he’s still associated with the company. Canadian Robert MacGregor, another long-term Ayre associate, was a director of EITC Holdings until mid-April 2016. The documents do not disclose the shareholders of the company.
Matthews and MacGregor appear with Wright in a June 2015 photograph seen by Reuters. Neither man responded to requests for comment. Sources familiar with the company said they had gone to some lengths to avoid their roles in EITC being discovered. Here's an interesting reveal: EITC Holdings became nChain. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bitcoin-wright-fund-exclusive/exclusive-company-behind-bitcoin-creator-sold-to-private-investors-idUSKBN17F26VReuters previously identified nChain, formerly known as EITC Holdings, as Wright’s vehicle for filing hundreds of bitcoin and blockchain-related patents.
UK records confirm that the target company - under both its EITC and nChain names - already filed more than 80 bitcoin and blockchain-related patents.
A person close to the deal said $300 million had been invested in nChain, but it was not clear over what period of time. So the money men who backed Craig already got what they wanted out of him and now the problem of Faketoshi has been passed down to the private investors of nChain. As far as Gavin is concerned, he (most likely) just played an unwitting role in helping Craig sell the idea that he was Satoshi to the money men. Even though he remains a bit stubborn about the whole signing incident (at which the money men were present), he's more willing now than ever to admit that he was probably "bamboozled." From Gavin's testimony ( part 1, part 2) : page 131 So the blog post that Craig released was not at all what I expected him to release. I expected him to release a very simple, you know, I am Satoshi, here is some -- here is a simple message signed with an early key from an early block.
Instead, he released a very wacky supposed proof that actually wasn't a proof of anything but was incredibly technical and hard to follow, and I was as surprised as anybody to see that. And it -- it took, I don't know, a few hours, a day, for somebody to -- to figure out what all that technical gobbledygook actually meant and to show that it wasn't actually a proof of anything.
Q So he didn't even almost prove he was Satoshi?
A Correct. Anybody could have produced that gobbledygook proof.
Q Why didn't he release a simple signed message?
A I don't know. page 157 Q You said that he -- he led you to believe he wanted one thing from you, and really you thought he really wanted something else.
A I suspect -- yeah, I mean, I guess, you know, I -- I thought that my piece would be part of a larger whole of him proving beyond a reasonable doubt to the world that he was Satoshi Nakamoto. And I thought that that's what he wanted from me. And then he did not complete the rest of the puzzle, and so that makes me wonder, is that really what he wanted from me, or did he have some other ulterior motive for flying me to London and -- and doing this -- the proof session? And I don't know what that other motive would be. As far as Satoshi... who knows? All we have to go on is his word that he's moved on to other things. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
