it's like dean would say 2 weeks into crowdsale ico, money raised so far is well below then i thought. therefore, i'm only giving investors 35% instead of 70%
it's the exact same thing.
you put business plan out. you stick with the terms. Totally not the same thing. I'm not sure where the logic is in the connection.
not being paid for this post. |
|
|
|
|
Backgammon likely wouldn't work for online play due to cheating. AFAIK Gambit used to have a Bitcoin option but they cancelled it because of that very reason.
I have been interested in Backgammon, though. Perhaps you could open up a thread in Off-topic and talk about some theory. I've been told it's the poker of board games. [Self-modded of course to avoid spam]
Hey... you created a chess thread before! Thought I recognized the style of writing. Good to see you again.
|
|
|
|
Very nice layout. Clean and easy on the eyes. I see there will be a note-taking function. Maybe instead of country flags, use the area to allow players to color code their opponents as part of the note-taking function - if there isn't already a color coding function to mark opponents, that is. Anyways, looking forward to the finished product.
Interesting idea. Were gonna leave the country flag where it is, but maybe we will incorporate your idea as well. Thank you IIRC PokerStars just makes the outline a different color. You could do the same. Subtle but useful for regs. |
|
|
|
|
They've been a known scam for months now.
$2, really?
|
|
|
|
|
Username : actmyname
Bet ID : 18,317,535,880
|
|
|
|
Accounts connected: lolgato1, Dahman El_HarrachiProof: https://archive.is/kFgJj#selection-2647.0-2658.1 | Linking Dahman → lolgato1. Unnecessary to have proof linking lolgato1 → Dahman since lolgato1 has the red trust. Nitrogen ID: 704413 Looking forward to it  count me in
Nitrogen ID: 704413
It was also too late for lolgato1 to edit the post without a the dotted lines, thus Dahman is clearly linked to lolgato1.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. I don't think that JohnUser should be the French Local board mod but I do think that overall, the community should reach a consensus to eliminate the degeneracy that is the Altcoin section. If you create preventative measures to ensure that bounty participants are paid (i.e. forcing the ICO owners to use escrow) then you will improve the standard of the board.
Likewise, to further this it is possible to introduce the creation of a group of selected [or trusted] members to carry out these measures. That way you can democratically resolve issues. Since I doubt many DT users are French, you will have to rely on either trusting the group directly or having the group direct attention to DT members regarding users that are non-constructive to the board.
Considering this, there is the option to create threads that are similar to that of the English-based forum sections about reputation and campaigns: Known alts, Sig-Ad campaign list, a sort of French SMAS, etc.
The alternative would be to focus your attention on the English-based ones to bust users.
Just some thoughts.
|
|
|
|
That's what I meant. If you win both coins it's kind of like you are really only paying for one. Your coin could potentially be a positive EV if one coin ends higher than the other and you pick the winning one
If you're going to pay the .14+ for two coins and are fine with it, then go ahead. Otherwise, you're better off going for the coin of the winning person (if you're willing to pay the difference should they in fact win) Remember that even if you're to bid on the Mayweather coin right now (.16 new bid) you still have to pop down 0.05 BTC on the coin itself - and that's only if you win. |
|
|
|
first your stupid if you dont think so called provable fair can be rigged you are wrong and yes it was because of the last 100 hands i won 7 the dealer has 31 blackjacks and not one bust in the last 100 hands
If you think that provably fair mechanisms can be rigged then you simply do not understand how they work. Provably fair means that the result is predetermined since the server seed hash is given to you. Now, you even have a client seed so that you can truly randomize the process. Perhaps it's the rage blinding you from seeing the fact that you were just unlucky but there really can't be anything rigged with provably fair verification. Let me guess: you haven't verified a single hand, have you? |
|
|
|
Took the liberty of quoting to show all images at once. I've got to say, there's very meticulous care to detail. This really is a quite well-made piece. |
|
|
|
|
I love the:
DDDP #2 - Chicken Biscuit | 0.007 BTC
|
|
|
|
So. They mailed my crossbow to the wrong location in Utah. Now I'm just waiting around in Providence...entertaining myself. I thought about OGnasty again and punched this raccoon to death out of anger. What a wonderful world we live in. Have you considered a hobby? Maybe making wooden sculptures would be up your alley. - Pete. |
|
|
|
yeah this casino is scam dont play here
they rig it
the dealer had 6 24 times they busted 2 times
Maybe so but are you going to cherry pick data and ignore the other countless times that the dealer busts with 6, resulting in an overall trend of the player winning more often than the dealer when the dealer has a 6?
When a site has provably fair mechanisms to verify the data there is no way that they can rig it in order to benefit them [apart from house edge]. I'm assuming you just lost everything and are now lashing out at the casino. Well, don't bet what you can't afford to lose. |
|
|
|
|
Donc, où est le problème?
|
|
|
|
so we could trick the people who sell into signing message that they own the account, and then posting the signed message with the screenshots as well to make it obvious which account are going to be sold. Sadly, i do not think many people on the forum would appreciate that, because that could be unmoral from eyes of someone as well.
I originally had an idea to make a sort of sting op regarding account sale auctions and digital goods threads. The purpose was to get the owner to show the account then tag it directly after. Of course, this leads to the issue of being immoral towards a merchant selling goods... but when you consider the product, is it justified? |
|
|
|
https://archive.is/cmD3j#selection-525.0-533.495BetKing, a popular Bitcoin gambling platform known for making profits worth over 7400 BTC during its previous stint has announced the ICO of its BetKing Bankroll tokens. The four-week long crowdsale is set to go live on August 7, 2017, and end on September 4, 2017. During the period, investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts can purchase BetKing Bankroll token against Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Dash payments.
The platform has set the maximum cap for Bankroll tokens at 100 million, out of which 70 million is being made available to the ICO participants. The rest will be retained by BetKing and used for paying ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development activities.
The funds raised from the crowdsale will be used to build and operate the revamped BetKing casino platform. Out of the total funds raised, the platform will allocate 50% for bankrolling the bets placed against the house by players, and the remaining half will go towards development, marketing, promotions, infrastructure and legal costs. The platform has already raised over $1.2 million through the recently concluded Pre-ICO, during which early investors availed a 25% discount on the tokens.
src: http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/08/05/betking-ico-an-opportunity-for-investors-to-gain-a-share-in-casinos-profits/
https://archive.is/ULSE9#selection-521.0-523.406More than $1.5 billion and counting. Call them token sales or initial coin offerings (ICOs), the funding method has quickly emerged as the de-facto way for blockchain projects to raise capital – one that is dominating headlines, as well as a growing portion of CoinDesk's editorial coverage and quarterly "State of Blockchain" report.
And it's easy to see why: ICOs are now contributing significantly more funding to the blockchain ecosystem than traditional venture capital, not to mention skyrocketing in terms of deal volume and size. The landscape is also quickly evolving in terms of deal structures, platform use, perceived legality, investor interest, and more – all leading to a boom in the amount of new data available for analysis.
src: https://www.coindesk.com/chart-learn-explore-coindesk-launches-ico-tracking-tool/It's just low-effort topic posts. You can check all their topics here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=153644;sa=showPosts
|
|
|
|
Absolutely. I come to a situation with an objective look at things.
One problem with that objective statement , actmyname & vod are the same person. You always support vod & lauda in every post you make, your post history proves it. ╥Aztek Right, and Lauda = Vod = Zepher = theymos, right? I'm not sure I've ever supported Vod publicly in any post. In fact, even though he and Spoetnik have some big history with each other I tolerate both of their opinions and have no comment regarding either one of them.
If you want me to highlight some problems I have with DT members then I would be glad to do so. The problem with your analysis of my post history is that most of the time my opinions coincide with Lauda (and to a lesser extent, Vod). There's also been many a time that Lauda has supported me in my escapades. Is that really a linkage between the two of us?
If you support a politician constantly, are you that politician? Fuck no. I glazed over your post history. Are you kiklo? |
|
|
|
During which period did they collect 7400BTC in profits?
1 month of limbo is my main concern upon investing.
In a little over two years, they collected 7391 BTC in profits. Read the many threads they've created. (Sep. 2014 to Dec. 2016)
Also, isn't this thread a little unnecessary considering they have their own? If this is used for discussion purposes that's also redundant given that there's plenty of it in the aforementioned thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1842538.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
