i received the payment of one week only, still missing the second week and we are heading toward the third(monday)
|
|
|
I've decided to give you some insight to what perf looks like on stock 1060 ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSEKkfih.jpg&t=664&c=XDtD7sX9mdbisw) and what about power consumption? 1060 vs 1070 TPD is 120W vs 150W so it seems 1070 may looks better in efficiency... 92w at 20mhs eth and up to 120w on other algos 20MH on lyra2v2 with only that speed seems not good, a 970 do the same with 20w more, so i think you need to oc it to squeeze more serious hash without increase too much the wattage
|
|
|
the problem with sia is that it has no pool, so unless you have 10 rig, it's pointless to mine, diff is too high at the moment, for a little farm
|
|
|
Just to come back on my thought. By re-reading the OP, I saw that the TDP was 120W, just as the RX 470. If that's not 80W as I thought, there's not a big deal here...
that's the tdp, you can tweak your power limit to have 80 at 20, hell i can do 140w at 20 with a 970, there is no reason to believe that a 1060 do only 20mh at 120w, would be very bad
|
|
|
Not available in my region, waiting for 4Gb stock ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) 4.69w/MHs, good ! Actually, 12.32w/MHs with my poor 280x rig ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) a gtx 1070 is 3.7w/MH and 1060 will be the same or a bit worse, like 4 ratio 1070 is more expensive yes but who care you can sell it 3 months later and losing nothing Lets say both rigs hashes 143 mhs total. If gtx 1070 gets 3.7w/MHs according to you, then that power at the wall would be 529 watts. The rx 480 at 4.69w/MHs will be about 670 watts at the wall. That is only 141 watts difference. I don't think the start up cost of a (6) rig of gtx 1070 would justify the 141 watts difference when compared to a start up cost of a (6) rig rx 480. For me, a faster ROI is better when less capital is spent to start off with. i agree but you need to account the resale value, and almost no one mentions it when talking about roi, but it's a part of the roi itself in fact the real investment on which you need to roi is the difference between the price at which you bought the card and the one at witch you sell them later, not the initial investment also you didn't take into account the scale factor, having 3.7 at 24MH is different than having 3.7 ratio at 27MH the 1070 does 3.7 ratio at 27MH at the very least
|
|
|
no neos and lyra obviously, i was curious about the hashrate for those two algo with a rx480
|
|
|
Not available in my region, waiting for 4Gb stock ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) 4.69w/MHs, good ! Actually, 12.32w/MHs with my poor 280x rig ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) a gtx 1070 is 3.7w/MH and 1060 will be the same or a bit worse, like 4 ratio 1070 is more expensive yes but who care you can sell it 3 months later and losing nothing
|
|
|
there is a reason why is not activate yet, not everyone is still convinced at 100% that segwit is that good, it may hide some bug or exploit in some way that may put the new fork at risk
there is always a % of risk when you implent a new stuff like this one
|
|
|
tpruvot's 1.8 is out, thread still report 1.7.6? so i can get rid of that "theft" from cryptominingblog for 11evo
|
|
|
There is no optimization to do on pascal yet, its almost the same hardware, reduced in size ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that it looks like you are right since benchmark shows 50-70% improvement over a 970, which is what we are getting already on all algo Excellent job on your commit today for Neoscrypt, its working great! 725 kh/s on 1080 from around 197 prior from who sp? you should get that with the djm34 version No, from tpruvot's 1.8. Isn't the latest version from djm34 from January? you can get that hash with djm34, he imported the work on his fork?
|
|
|
There is no optimization to do on pascal yet, its almost the same hardware, reduced in size ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Maybe the next cuda versions will show some hidden functions, but im not confident about that it looks like you are right since benchmark shows 50-70% improvement over a 970, which is what we are getting already on all algo Excellent job on your commit today for Neoscrypt, its working great! 725 kh/s on 1080 from around 197 prior from who sp? you should get that with the djm34 version
|
|
|
lyra2v2 is better with 1xxx than maxwell, a single 1070 can do 41MH versus private mod of sp which is only 37MH for a 980ti
on neoscrypt also, a 980ti can do only 1MH, a 1070 can do 1150khs with +200 core and 1250khs with +400 on the core
and this without any optimization for pascal
|
|
|
if you plugged directly in the pcie and it did not work then it's the motherboard, return it
Its an Asrock BTC 81 that worked just fine with 3 Radeon r9 290s for years. Are their certain mining software that won't work with RX480's? try with genoil fork 1.1.7 if you are not already using it
|
|
|
skein is not on par with lyra2v2 and neos, it's around 0.013 btc with 1300MH with the same speed i can do 0.018 on neos
on skein one 970 is doing 220MH not sure about your private, how much it is, but even at 300MH, it would be at best on par with neos, and i doubt your private is doing 300MH on a single 970
|
|
|
actually it's not true, siacoin is more profitable if you have a proper big farm that will let you find block more easy
|
|
|
there is only one window there is possibility for a bad airflow, you need to redirect everything from that window
but it is a nice room for mining indeed, you can stack there, a little farm
|
|
|
so sp you have embraced the private pattern also? are you going to support pascal at least for some algo?
|
|
|
i think none at the moment, everything is dumped to the ground, better wait until the next hype wave will begin you will surely see it
if you really want to invest i would look at old altcoin that were not pumped for a long time, somethign like feathercoin may happoen to those alt
|
|
|
it look like nothing will happen, the market is not just driven by one person that will pump or dump at the halving and pump or dump later
the increase was already there with the recent rally for another one we need to wait more than the halving, later this year, also summer is never good for pumping, i recall that the majority of huge pump were in autumn and spring....
|
|
|
you don't stop the tool that bad people use for their bad activity you stop the bad people directly, stopping the tool is never an answer
it's easy to blame bitcoin like government want to do anyway, that is just being lazy from them
|
|
|
|