CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[vaulter]

it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)

the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity

the neoscrypt game is all about how the memory is accessed.
latest djm34 version is highly optimised in that regard.
the 1070 must have some differences in memory access which is triggering the slower behavior.
a 1070 should come to my door tomorrow or monday, then I will make some tests on linux.

On linux its good ~900 for 1070 - and i think i saw 900khs on windows - but i cant reproduce it

[1715259430]

1715259430

[1715259430]

1715259430

[1715259430]

1715259430

[Amph]

it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)

the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity

the neoscrypt game is all about how the memory is accessed.
latest djm34 version is highly optimised in that regard.
the 1070 must have some differences in memory access which is triggering the slower behavior.
a 1070 should come to my door tomorrow or monday, then I will make some tests on linux.

On linux its good ~900 for 1070 - and i think i saw 900khs on windows - but i cant reproduce it

it's 1150 on linux with +200 core, i remember you said 900khs on win 10 too 1 month ago, when you first posted about the hashrate, it's strange that you can't get it anymore

[bensam1231]

it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)

the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity

You are one hypocritical PoS. You LITERALLY were asking for the same thing in the ethminer thread. Not only that, I don't know why you'd be against bug fixes in the first place. Do you think members in this thread don't read Genoil's Ethminer thread or something?

I explained all the bugs and as bugs they should be fixed. You are the first and probably only person I'm going to put on ignore on here (I don't even have Wolf0 on ignore for how much we disagree), your posts not only have no informational value, they often times are just completely nonsensical, you try to take control of a situation for no real reason, or you just go completely back on what you're saying.

And in case you didn't get this weeks ago... Or maybe today... They're bugs and the miners are broken, which is why they need to be fixed. Hopefully you got it that time. You can't just expect a introduction of a major new GPU architecture to magically work for exactly reasons Pallas was mentioning. Microsoft or Nix won't just magically fix miners for the mining community.

it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)

the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity

the neoscrypt game is all about how the memory is accessed.
latest djm34 version is highly optimised in that regard.
the 1070 must have some differences in memory access which is triggering the slower behavior.
a 1070 should come to my door tomorrow or monday, then I will make some tests on linux.

Interesting, I suppose the same is also correct for 1080. Specifically because it uses GDDR5X, instead of just 5. Considering the amount of memory bandwidth available, it's entirely possible for the 5x to be faster in tasks like NeoS and Dagger... but no one has developed for its 'nuances' yet. Although that being said, HBM didn't end up that much faster on Fury for Dagger regardless of the size of the memory bus, so maybe it's not true at all.

We still need someone to develop a dual miner for Nvidia. It's been about five months since the introduction of Claymores and considering the relative performance of the 1070, there is definitely a lot of performance to be tapped there while mining Dagger.

[Amph]

it can not be done for win 7, win 7 is doomed, new pascal does not work there, on win 10 it work already so dunno why you are complaining there, same for lyra2v2 it work good(41MH with a 1070 is almost 90% more than a 970)

the only problem is neos, which i can not expain since ethereum is working, and neo is still there broken(win 10 also) when it is even less memory intensity

You are one hypocritical PoS. You LITERALLY were asking for the same thing in the ethminer thread. Not only that, I don't know why you'd be against bug fixes in the first place. Do you think members in this thread don't read Genoil's Ethminer thread or something?

I explained all the bugs and as bugs they should be fixed. You are the first and probably only person I'm going to put on ignore on here (I don't even have Wolf0 on ignore for how much we disagree), your posts not only have no informational value, they often times are just completely nonsensical, you try to take control of a situation for no real reason, or you just go completely back on what you're saying.

And in case you didn't get this weeks ago... Or maybe today... They're bugs and the miners are broken, which is why they need to be fixed. Hopefully you got it that time. You can't just expect a introduction of a major new GPU architecture to magically work for exactly reasons Pallas was mentioning. Microsoft or Nix won't just magically fix miners for the mining community.

again with this ignore bullshit, i don't fucking care if a random dude on the web put me on ignore jesus...

there are bugs yes, but there are other guys that have their 1070 hashing fine on win 10, so something is telling me that it can not be only a miner fault, and i think those people have some problems with their os installation

you have this exact shit with game, some have a crash and other not, it does not always mean that the game is bugged, some times the user is just an idiot....

also the simple fact that the miner work fine in linux, is another proof that the problem lie in windows and not just in the miner or potentially not at all in the miner

[airwalker2662]

Your x17 private (mod7) is the only one better than public on any of these and its marginal now.

No. All algos are faster on the 750ti last I checked.

The last time I compared it was faster on the 980ti as well:

Sp-Mod #5 ( All nicehash algos optimized) default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock) faster than ccminer 1.7.5 cuda 7.5 32 build

nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 37.10 (sp-mod #7)
x11:   12.85 (+18%)
x13:   10.27 (+19.97)
x15:    8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)

Sure, those you have listed are faster except for lyra2. That's great for Nicehash, but who uses Nicehash now? You took a screenshot of Miner Control with zpool and it's profitability:


"The only way to make profit now is to use my private kernals. Here is scryptr's config with sp-mod #7 on 3 low profile 750ti's (38w tdp each)"

"Zpool.ca is currenly paying 70% more than the nicehashminer, and 2 of the 4 best paying algos are not minable on nicehash.com"

"sp-mod #7 comes with fresh and optimized skein and x17 kernals.. (3 weeks old)"


Having tested each of your private mods vs the latest public I can tell you I only benefit from x17 and groestl on zpool. Everything else isn't profitable enough to mine, it's kind of a waste. No support for the blake2s,  c11 , sib  , x11evo and underperforming in skein, lyra2, and myr-gr vs public. Also while faster, your neoscrypt produces a ton of rejects. So I have 2 faster algo's with yours in reality... I don't care that the 750ti is faster on x11 - no one mines with it on GPU.  What about optimizing for the 970/980 and 1XXX cards on profitable algos?

 

[scryptr]

Is there a download link for latest MinerControl with Zpool example config?

I POSTED ONE ON THE ZPOOL THREAD--

An example config for Zpool is on the Zpool thread, page 96.  Here is the link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260863.msg15464974#msg15464974 .  There is information about MinerControl in the post.  With a NiceHash and Zpool example config, MinerControl is pretty easy to setup and run.  The config file itself is a beast if you start with a generic example.

MinerControl works fairly well, or you can just run a simple batch file.  A miner named JaredKaragen has also posted such a batch file in the same thread, the link is in his signature.  Further back in this thread, I have posted a very simple switching batch file.

Hope this helps.       --scryptr

[sp_]

Also while faster, your neoscrypt produces a ton of rejects.  

You are using the 750ti miner on the gtx 960 or 970. My blake2s kernal is the fastest in the world. Why should I share it with you for 0.1 BTC? Blake2s is not minable on nicehash. The private exe you mention contains the all "nicehash algos" optimized kernals.
I have 6 other exe/sourcecodes for sale. For 0.6 BTC you can get them all...

[sp_]

MinerControl is pretty easy to setup and run.  The config file itself is a beast if you start with a generic example.

This is nice. A miner that share the secrets of the profits. He is using the sp-mod private for most of the algos. You can check wich algos in the config file..

ccminer is sp-mod private
tpminer is tpruvot opensource.
and the others are from different branches.

[airwalker2662]

Also while faster, your neoscrypt produces a ton of rejects.  

You are using the 750ti miner on the gtx 960 or 970. My blake2s kernal is the fastest in the world. Why should I share it with you for 0.1 BTC? Blake2s is not minable on nicehash. The private exe you mention contains the all "nicehash algos" optimized kernals.
I have 6 other exe/sourcecodes for sale. For 0.6 BTC you can get them all...

Yeah well your private miners are all catered to the 750ti right? I have 970's and 1080's as well. What blake2s miner - specs??

[antonio8]

Also while faster, your neoscrypt produces a ton of rejects.  

You are using the 750ti miner on the gtx 960 or 970. My blake2s kernal is the fastest in the world. Why should I share it with you for 0.1 BTC? Blake2s is not minable on nicehash. The private exe you mention contains the all "nicehash algos" optimized kernals.
I have 6 other exe/sourcecodes for sale. For 0.6 BTC you can get them all...

Screenshot?

[tbearhere]

Here is todays snap



The profit didn't drop. it is +10% from yesterday

zpool with sp-mod #7 is on todays snapshot 30% more profitable than the nichashminer.

Sorry... what meant is by putting on the thread the pool...like saying a coin is doing the best...then everyone runs to that coin and profits die because it is a multipool. 

Now saying  sp-mod #7 is doing good and listing the hashrates is a different story.
sp-mod #7 is doing good.... yes.    thx

[tbearhere]

Here is todays snap



The profit didn't drop. it is +10% from yesterday

zpool with sp-mod #7 is on todays snapshot 30% more profitable than the nichashminer.

SP, Please get back in the game. You show Skein, Lyra2v2, x17, and Groestl as the best paying algos on Zpool. Your x17 private (mod7) is the only one better than public on any of these and its marginal now. Their are many new algo's to choose from that are more profitable that you still do not support, let alone the current ones that have surpassed your donated versions. Please get back to where you were, you used to be amazing...

And thoses profits are not 24 hour  there only 3 minutes .

[tbearhere]

MinerControl is pretty easy to setup and run.  The config file itself is a beast if you start with a generic example.

This is nice. A miner that share the secrets of the profits. He is using the sp-mod private for most of the algos. You can check wich algos in the config file..

ccminer is sp-mod private
tpminer is tpruvot opensource.
and the others are from different branches.

This i what I was talking about...listing A miner that share the secrets.  Like giving your builds out for free.
Ps 2 beers is enough .. btc is triple price.

And on that pool you make the same as mining on suprnova pools.

[Amph]

so sp you have embraced the private pattern also? are you going to support pascal at least for some algo?

[bensam1231]

Here is todays snap



The profit didn't drop. it is +10% from yesterday

zpool with sp-mod #7 is on todays snapshot 30% more profitable than the nichashminer.

Sorry... what meant is by putting on the thread the pool...like saying a coin is doing the best...then everyone runs to that coin and profits die because it is a multipool. 

Now saying  sp-mod #7 is doing good and listing the hashrates is a different story.
sp-mod #7 is doing good.... yes.    thx

There isn't anything secret there dude. Zpool is not unheard of, the top profiting coins are all on Whattomine which tons of people know about. Lyra/Mona is not secret news.

[Amph]

actually it's not true, siacoin is more profitable if you have a proper big farm that will let you find block more easy

[sp_]

Here is todays snap:

Top 3 is:

skein
groestl
x17

None of them can be mined @ nicehash.com and all of them have been optimized for the 750ti in sp-mod #7 (0.1 BTC)

Skein@zpool is 54% more profitable than the best nicehash algo wich is lyra2v2 (nicehashminer)

[sp_]

Zpool.ca is mining 6 skein algo coins and the pool hashrate is 15.3GHASH

Digibyte (skein)   998.016 DGB   754.86   2 685 541   3 mins   13 Gh/s   0.0141
Aurora (skein)   2.5 AUR   1.234 k   327 574   6 mins   472.9 Mh/s   0.0104
Myriad (skein)   500 MYR   787.055   1 718 265   4 mins      0.0055
Skein (skein)   4 SKC   1.08   916 662   0 sec      0.0043
Xedos (skein)   10 XDC   1.038   871 351   0 sec      0.0037
Rich (skein)   4 RICHX   63.04   295 016   20 secs      0.0025

Supported by MCAP:

Digibyte ($ 2,310,867)
Auroracoin ($ 1,359,608)
Myriadcoin ($ 527,532 )

etc

[Amph]

skein is not on par with lyra2v2 and neos, it's around 0.013 btc with 1300MH with the same speed i can do 0.018 on neos

on skein one 970 is doing 220MH not sure about your private, how much it is, but even at 300MH, it would be at best on par with neos, and i doubt your private is doing 300MH on a single 970

[bensam1231]

Zpool.ca is mining 6 skein algo coins and the pool hashrate is 15.3GHASH

Digibyte (skein)   998.016 DGB   754.86   2 685 541   3 mins   13 Gh/s   0.0141
Aurora (skein)   2.5 AUR   1.234 k   327 574   6 mins   472.9 Mh/s   0.0104
Myriad (skein)   500 MYR   787.055   1 718 265   4 mins      0.0055
Skein (skein)   4 SKC   1.08   916 662   0 sec      0.0043
Xedos (skein)   10 XDC   1.038   871 351   0 sec      0.0037
Rich (skein)   4 RICHX   63.04   295 016   20 secs      0.0025

Supported by MCAP:

Digibyte ($ 2,310,867)
Auroracoin ($ 1,359,608)
Myriadcoin ($ 527,532 )

etc

Too bad none of those are optimized for 1XXX series. Time to suck it up and buy Pascal if you're really interested in continuing to sell your work. Skein results on a 970 compared to 1070 are completely off.