eleuthria, what is the pool's percentage of invalid blocks (since inception)? (I'm considering donating).
3 blocks out of 189 = 1.58%. However, it's a pretty small sample size to make any calls.
|
|
|
This may have been asked and already answered, but does anyone know when the email alert feature will be enabled?
BTW, I am new to BTCGuild...and I love the account page so far!
It was going to be in last night, but the server became available and I moved the pool over. Since then I've been celebrating mostly as the pool is working, going strong, and growing fast again. The alerts will likely be available late tonight/early tomorrow.
|
|
|
My miners are showing up as being down on the BTC website, but they're all up. Everything is fine, they are hashing away, and I'm not showing any problems in their logs.
Anyone else having this problem?
+1 EDIT: It's ok now. Whoops. I didn't realize that BTCmine was getting DDOSed as well as deepbit, slush, and the guild. At least as of right now, no sign of a DDoS hitting BTC Guild. The host we moved to last night has very beefy DDoS protection in place.
|
|
|
Is anyone else disappointed with BTCMine's payout?
In what way? I'm only getting about 1.2 BTC/24 hr Previously on deepbit (maybe about 3 weeks ago) I got 4 BTC/24 hr, but I have sinced moved away since they dropped their PPS payout from 0.0004 to 0.0001. Every other pool doesn't pay as much anymore. Difficulty has gone up significantly in 3 weeks. Unless your hash rate has increased in line with difficulty, your rewards will always diminish, regardless of which pool you use.
|
|
|
Not a pool feature specifically, but Nicksasa of our IRC chatroom (#btcguild on freenode) has a bot which has been used for pool stats and block announcements. He recently added a betting system where people can bet 0.1 BTC for how many shares our next round will take, winner take all minus 0.01 off the top (transaction fee to send winnings) and a 5% fee from each bet (0.005).
EDIT: Corrected transaction fee taken off the top (0.01, not 0.1!)
|
|
|
By now it should be assumed that if a hardware change (or in this case location & complete server change) occurs, it will die once I think it's safe to go to sleep. Sorry for the inconvenience, but I can't stay awake for 48 hours to monitor the server before getting some rest.
Server is back up, fixed a few things that weren't setup the same as the old server, and fixed some DB settings to account for the dramatic increase in RAM available on the new server.
|
|
|
heh. pretty good.
now all you need is a poll:
1.) i know this song from the TV series. 2.) i know this song from "The Blues Brothers" movie. 3.) i know this song from the Dead Kennedys.
nice to see a proper trailing apostrophe, BTW...
2, definitely 2.
|
|
|
BTC Guild is back online and running strong so far. New server is MUCH faster than the old one based on reports from all our users in the IRC channel. We're now more connected to other bitcoin nodes meaning our blocks will spread across the network faster, and new blocks will be notified faster via long poll updates.
Registrations are back up, and we encourage our users that switched to other pools to come back now that we aren't running on an overloaded server.
|
|
|
New server is being setup for the pool RIGHT NOW. It will be coming online in the next few hours, and registration will be back open.
|
|
|
well, i really don't mind to "..see idle warnings/RPC errors from time to time..", but check this out. and that's only 4hours No idea what the problem is on that one. We've still got about a thousand workers running which aren't experiencing anything close to it.
|
|
|
something's wrong, i get a "warning: job finished, miner is idle", followed by "Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC" every minute or so, which is.....not so good. poclbm that is on ubuntu and a GUIminer on windows, phoenix doesnt tell me those warnings as often, but miners stop working randomly (every few hours) with a "work queue empty, miner is idle" (which is why i switched back to poclbm).
guess i'm currently losing a lot more than i'd pay in fees on other pools.
Please read the giant warning on the front post, or the last few pages of the thread. The server is absolutely overloaded. Even after shutting registration, the people already in the pool have been adding speed/turning workers back on and pushed it 30 GH past what it was when new users were stopped from registering.
|
|
|
For the hundredth time: The websites showing network hash rate are based off the time to solve the last X blocks. The estimate network hash rate is always screwy after a difficulty change. Wait 24 hours before your head explodes.
For 1 Thanks for explaining. For 2 instead of saying for the hundredth time, maybe you should suggest that the admin put a STICKY post on this so people don't go crazy. For what it's worth. That's just my suggestion. Thanks and goodluck mining! Sorry, it's just I've seen the same post within minutes of every difficulty jump for the past 2 months, and I'm getting crabby while waiting for my dedicated server to become available .
|
|
|
Network total 7.022 Thash/s
Wasn't it just 4Th/s?
For the hundredth time: The websites showing network hash rate are based off the time to solve the last X blocks. The estimate network hash rate is always screwy after a difficulty change. Wait 24 hours before your head explodes. Same goes for the next difficulty estimate.
|
|
|
For the hundredth time: The websites showing network hash rate are based off the time to solve the last X blocks. The estimate network hash rate is always screwy after a difficulty change. Wait 24 hours before your head explodes.
|
|
|
I have just started mining with you yesterday. I noticed that after I added 2x more 5850's to my system that the Worker Speed reported on your site is now not consistent (about 50-60%) with what is displayed when running Diablo Miner. Just wondering why this is happening, or if my Miner needs tweaking.
Diablo Displays ~ 866 mH/sec and your site hovers around 410-420 mH/sec the command line is using -v 2 -w 128 as this results in the highest speed. could the -w 128 be causing this? Just wondering if the issue is me or the site?
As has been posted for the last few days, the server needs to be relocated to a dedicated host, which is lined up but not yet ready. The amount on the site is NEVER the same as your miner, it's a 15 minute average. Right now it will likely be less due to occasional miner idles that are being caused by the current volume of workers on the server. This is the reason new registrations were closed, the current server cannot handle the load (we grew over 100 GH/sec in 4 days).
|
|
|
.. but the moment you sell those 100 bitcoins for $800 you have to report that. Having bitcoins is like having 100 jpgs or 100 bookmarks, you don't report jpgs on your taxes even though they may have value, but if you sell them then you report that, same thing.
I respectfully disagree. There is no requirement. We have been greatly deceived. Unfortunately I don't have much in the way of proof. I've personally operated outside the FR system and not paid income tax in years. I conclude that the IRS agrees with me since I have no legal issues. Good luck with that if they ever catch on. Just because you haven't been audited yet means nothing. When you do get audited, enjoy the interest and penalties. There are thousands of people out they operating under the: "I haven't been taken to tax court yet, so I must not be doing anything wrong" theory. Ignorance won't get you off the hook. Make sure you hire a CPA experienced in audits, they'll save you a lot of money when the time comes.
|
|
|
Just registered to ask 1 question eleuthria, is there a reason you don't support JSONP? You made a great API, but I want to use only javascript/ajax to get data, and JSONP would be really handy It's really easy to implement as its just one extra GET to parse. Of course it shouldnt be on top of your ToDo list, as there are more important features waiting. wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSONPBy the way, really like this pool more. The UI is really clean, all the data you need is in the right place... I love it Not sure if you're the person that requested it in the IRC chat, but JSONP is on the list of features to add in the near future.
|
|
|
I just wonder what happens when all these coins go up in value and the IRS sees someone made 50% ROI without showing it on taxes Well, if the IRS audited you, you're in trouble for not reporting the income. They don't care what Bitcoins are, they care about the deposits that hit your bank account for actual $. For Mining (Schedule C): You can expense your electricity usage (not all, only the amount you can prove was used for BTC), depreciate your machines (% based if its also a personal use machine), and then report the full amount you sold the BTC for. For trading (Schedule D): Records of the amounts paid and when for BTC, and records of the amounts you sold them for and when. Short/long-term gains. Use FIFO or LIFO consistently for allocating your sales against the different purchases, since the IRS will not have somebody with the knowledge to understand how the coins could be potentially traced back to their actual purchase.
|
|
|
Does this pool have failsafe for attackers like deepbit?
No spare servers are up yet, trying to push the server to a dedicated host first. After getting moved to a machine that shouldn't have any issues scaling to 1 TH/sec+, I'll be working on modifying the pool software to shard it across multiple servers in different regions, with redirections when one fails.
|
|
|
Maybe you can keep up 2 servers or more. I think deepbit uses multiple servers (at least two). I know webservers like apache start up like 10 instances of the server.
The new server coming up should be able to support a a pool speed over 1 TH//sec before needing more software optimizations or separate servers. My goal is to begin working on linking a separate EU server after the new one is online and I get the features I want implemented. That way we'll have two servers in different regions for people to pick from, but a single linked website for stats/rewards.
|
|
|
|