Honestly, I think the best way to be "happy" with regards to money is to learn to live within your means, whatever those means are. If you make $20,000 a year, spend less than $20,000 a year. If you make $200,000 a year, spend less than $200,000 a year. Work towards paying off any debt you have, and living debt-free the rest of your life.
Most "wealthy" people only get stressed by money because they mismanage it. They see a higher paycheck, and instead of working on paying down their current mortgage, they take out a bigger mortgage on a better house, start spending more on their credit cards because they can just pay it off later, etc. Then, when they lose their job, or they have to take a decrease in pay, they realize they've screwed themselves, and that's when the real stress begins.
Believe me, I've been there, done that.
So, learn to always spend less than your income, to save up for your big purchases instead of taking out loans for them, and to live debt-free. Then, when and if you do make $200k, you can have a hearty laugh at all your neighbors making the same amount, but somehow struggling to make ends meet, while you have a surplus of $15k+ a month. And if you only make $20k the rest of your life, you can still live happily being focused on other things besides how you'll pay this month's credit card bill.
|
|
|
I can't remember... is it possible to use the BitMinter client with another pool?
|
|
|
Money makes trading more efficient. Trying to operate in a modern world without money is complete lunacy.
|
|
|
Watching
Seriously ? This is the 5th thread I have seen you post this in. Why don't you go back to 'counting to 74 bazillion with pictures'.....and 'Watch' that instead. subed double-subed witnessed Certified Stamped with approval parking validated Posting is how you get a thread to appear on your "new replies" page. It's not ideal, we all agree, and we all look forward to new forum software eventually. +1 Watching...... I meant, Understood. Confirmed. AND Denied! Denial confirmed. Please watch your step as you exit. Your parents had sex. More than once. And they liked doing it. Now knock it off. All your base are belong to us Formalized I don't know what the big deal is with Egypt, pyramid building isn't that hard. *click* pyramids ≠ invites My pyramids are more compact. But seriously WTF guys STFU. Pyramid restoration project >.> okay i'm done now... How about this very nice run of leased work? Yup Acknowledged.
|
|
|
The market will set a price, but if I want to hold some savings long-term, I want to know if someone can suddenly resurrect a large number of very old coins and devalue my holdings. It's not a problem now with most coins in active circulation, but what happens if we end up with a large majority of stale coins? It's not good for confidence.
But the market price already takes that into account. When I am investing, I know that there are 2-3M coins that are still sitting dormant in their generation blocks. I know that someone could take those out, and drop the price. And maybe that's part of why BTC's are only worth $5 instead of $10 right now. So yes, it decreases confidence, but confidence would be even lower if people knew they could lose all their money if they didn't touch it for long enough.
|
|
|
If I'm understanding this experiment correctly, they want people to pay to play chess on their site?
Why would I choose to do that, when I can play for free at any number of well-established sites that already have decent-sized playerbases?
I can't tell you why people would pay for games like this when they can get them for free elsewhere, only that they do, and that they do at very steady and predictable rates (see above). This experiment is testing to see if Bitcoin has any chance at competing against the current premium game model. Unfortunately, for a large variety of reasons, it probably can't. Perhaps the search will continue for any compelling reason why a business should accept Bitcoin instead of, or in additional to, more traditional payment options. On the totally separate topic of a chess wagering game, which seems to be of more immediate interest than a boring statistical analysis of revenue models, can anyone provide any suggestions for how to prevent cheating? Cheating at online chess is quite easy. Just copy your opponent's moves into a computerized chess program and mimic the computer's moves. If wagering is involved, it seems like there would be an awfully high incentive to cheat. I agree with you there - the incentive to cheat is very high, and it is very likely that it would be done. I think the only potential to combat against it is to do 5 minute or less games. Even 5 minute, it might be possible to use a chess program on the side, but it would be difficult. Certainly a shorter time period would make it impossible.
|
|
|
I had around 300 Bitcoins stolen from my MT Gox account on Sep 8th/9th 2011. I found out after receiving an email to say that my account was up for review and eventually getting a working password from them that got me into my account.
Oops. Sounds like you fell for a phish. Sorry, that definitely sucks.
|
|
|
Watching
Seriously ? This is the 5th thread I have seen you post this in. Why don't you go back to 'counting to 74 bazillion with pictures'.....and 'Watch' that instead. subed double-subed witnessed Certified Stamped with approval parking validated Posting is how you get a thread to appear on your "new replies" page. It's not ideal, we all agree, and we all look forward to new forum software eventually. +1 Watching...... I meant, Understood. Confirmed. AND Denied! Denial confirmed.
|
|
|
Actually I was curious about the cable length. So you had less than 2% voltage drop on it but it couldn't handle what around 6.5 Amps. Was it poor quality wire? 18AWG should be good for twice than length or more. Interesting indeed... maybe it wasn't really 20 gauge? This wire chart seems to indicate that 5 amps on 20 gauge should be able to run 9.5 feet without any trouble. http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o159/ocdropzone/electrical/WireChart.jpg?t=1242308611
|
|
|
Hi, friends! I can see that several competitors of Anonymous Ads appeared within last few days. They all are quite decent and promising services and I wish them good luck. But I don't want to loose the competition, so I need to accelerate development of Anonymous Ads. Many things need to be done: create unique design, develop many new features, improve usability, scalability and reliability. I hope to do it during a month or two. I believe that when it is "ready", it should magically become very popular (if not - then some marketing needs to be done too). So now I am trying to raise 1000 btc via selling 10% share of future profits at GLBSE. It is only ~5000 USD (that is an average monthly salary of american software developer) for 10% of future profits (that could be.. well.. i don't really want to compare it with AdSense... ). There are 100000 AA shares issued at GLBSE. I currently own ~99930 shares, and ~70 has been sold to random people at random prices. I just created a sell order for 10000 shares (that is 10% of all the issued shares) at 0.1 btc/share. So you if you want to help AA - buy some shares. It could be a nice investment opportunity. I promise to be very careful & responsible with your investments You're valuing your startup advertising service at $50,000? What is your current monthly profit? How much growth do you see in the future? What is the total market for Bitcoin advertising?
|
|
|
I agree with you on all points evoorhees, well written! I am completely against the welfare system we have in the states, as it only discourages responsibility and hard work.
I know someone who is on welfare... a single mom with 3 kids. She was able to buy, on the taxpayer's dollars, a flatscreen TV, a laptop, a blu-ray player, etc, etc. It upsets me when someone who does nothing but stay home with their kids all day can afford things more easily than my family can, when I'm working 50 hours a week and struggling to put food on the table for us all.
|
|
|
Someone posted this on their facebook wall... thought it was interesting, but haven't visited any of the links to verify the numbers. But it wouldn't surprise me... I really dislike the fact that my tax dollars go towards helping people who break the law, regardless of the actual dollar amount. It's easy to dismiss individual programs that benefit non-citizens until they're put together and this picture emerges. Someone did a lot of research to put together all of this data. Often these programs are buried within other programs making them difficult to find. A Real M Eye Opener WHY is the USA BANKRUPT? You think the war in Iraq was costing us too much? Read this: We have been hammered with the propaganda that it was the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us. I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. Also included are the URL's for verification of all the following facts. 1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments. Verify at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8 2. $22 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML 3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML 4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt....0.HTML 5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML 6.. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN..com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt...01.HTML 8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. Verify at: http://premium.cnn..com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01..HTML 9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRI 13. In 2006, illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin. Verify at:. <http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm> 14. The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One million sex crimes committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States ... Verify at: http: // www.drdsk.com/articleshtmlM The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME, HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.
|
|
|
Watching
Seriously ? This is the 5th thread I have seen you post this in. Why don't you go back to 'counting to 74 bazillion with pictures'.....and 'Watch' that instead. subed double-subed witnessed Certified Stamped with approval
|
|
|
I really do dislike your banter with somebody else on this thread, and your constant attacks on my service, if we want to swtich to 1% fees to keep you quiet we may just do that.
agreed. sorry andrew, your marketing strategy leaves a bit of a bad taste in my mouth, so i've decided against your service for now. Whatever makes you feel comfortable. I think the 107 other publishers appreciate your decision. I was in full support of your advertising service until I saw your blatant threadjacking/rudeness/unprofessionalism in this thread. Sorry Andrew, but you've really got to stop now. It just makes you look bad - it doesn't make anyone want to use your service more than the one listed in this thread. Advertising your own business in a competing business's thread even once is pretty low. Arguing with the OP about whose service is better over and over again is even worse. Stop shooting yourself in the foot. Apologize, delete your posts in this thread, and don't post in competitor's threads in the future. It's for your own good...
|
|
|
Yet another experiment has shot down the idea of using bitcoins in games. Not ONE, not a single ONE player advocating bitcoins turned up. Even Ixcoin has ONE player promoting their use, but for bitcoins, NONE. It was thought unfair to switch the currency to bitcoins rather than to some other currency that at least one player actually advocated. Point taken, so until we do some kind of formal battle of the coins wherein the players advocatign each coin can fight out among them to establish dominance of a particular blockchain we will just use normal default game-currencies as the actual main in-game currency.
-MarkM-
I suppose there was a lack of advocacy to get Bitcoiners there in the first place. You've been mentioning potential solutions all throughout the thread, but you never had a call to action. You never said, "Hey, now is the time for everyone to join this game (URL)!" Nothing about promoting Bitcoin's use in a particular game at a particular time/date. So, try it again, but be more clear with what you want to accomplish. What game are we supposed to advocate for Bitcoin in? How do we go about accessing said game? What's the best way to advocate for Bitcoin within the game? What date and time should we do this? Again, your posts have all come off as being "potential" ideas. I don't think anyone understood that you were actually trying to gather Bitcoin players into a particular game. And if that was the case, your posts are unclear enough that I still don't know which game you wanted to promote Bitcoins in.
|
|
|
If I'm understanding this experiment correctly, they want people to pay to play chess on their site?
Why would I choose to do that, when I can play for free at any number of well-established sites that already have decent-sized playerbases?
|
|
|
1) A 5 year interval DOES hurt long term savings. What if I put 100 BTC on a piece of paper, forget about it for 6 years because it's stored in my attic, and then they're all gone? A lifetime interval MIGHT be acceptable, but.... 2) What's the point? The coins are infinitely divisible, so even if there's only 1 satoshi left, Bitcoin can still be used.
Now, if you're worried more about deflation and less about actual coins lost, then a much better solution is to just let the 50 BTC block rewards continue on indefinitely. Eventually, the coins generated would equal the coins lost, and the amount of currency in circulation would be completely stable - no inflation or deflation.
If the concern is keeping exactly 21M coins in circulation, then use a combination of both: Generate new coins for coins that haven't been transferred in 5 years. The old coins are still available to the original owner, but if they were truly lost, then they won't detract from the 21M coins in circulation for longer than 5 years. If they are eventually used again, then slightly more than 21M coins would be in circulation, but that could be made up for by not creating new coins for the next batch of 5-year-old coins that would have otherwise been regenerated.
|
|
|
Q1: I wonder, are the majority of people trading bitcoins represented on this board?
Q2: Have you ever been influenced on a trading decision by posts on this forum? I have, numerous times.
Q3: Do you trust your fellow speculators? Q4: How much do you think is deception where people suggest a different action and take another?
A1: Beats me. Why would it matter? A2: Never. The very idea is ludicrous. A3: Trust should never enter into a trading decision. If you need it, you are too weak to play. A4: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance. You're missing out then. I read the stuff posted here. Please tell me in detail what I'm missing. Show your work. It's the power of the crowd. If 75% of investors believe the price is going up, and buy accordingly, then it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
|
|
|
|