Wow. Now that builds confidence I'm sure.

You know, there are way of inviting caution, and there are ways of instilling panic.

I'm beginning to wonder . . .

So glad that our collective loss of millions of coins is amusing you.

Hopefully in 4-5 days, you will get a clue.

see you theeere!!! I am full of EMC2 right now, burn + conferences...10k sat is not the limit!!

I've bought my original allocation back at some tidy profit - happy to speculate on a later rise

What made this coin go up so much? Did I miss something.

New week, new highs! 🚂

China itself is dead. Korea has always been the BCH leader. I still have almost all of mine. I won't be sad if it dwindles to nowt.

I'm curious what are some of the things people here are most excited about with regards to Decred? Lightning Network, cross chain atomic swaps, or some of the amazing features that are coming soon, like the proposal system and enhanced privacy features? Chime in, they can even be things that you would like to see done once the current roadmap is complete.

I give it to you but i don't think that it will be standing as big as it is now. Future will show but now thats my thought.

For you  

Check your reward from the pool you are mining (I presume democats). You will get paid when you have a balance of 100 bcn. Enjoy mining.

don't let the screen door hit you on the ass

*OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT*

JUXTAPOZ MAGAZINE AND GALLERY APPLICATIONS!

Scarab can now be seen in the 200th Issue (September) of Juxtapoz Magazine. We hope this will bring more artists to the platform and help spread the word about what we're trying to achieve with Scarab. Juxtapoz will be mentioning Scarab in their upcoming social media posts and articles.

Also, an updated website is live with applications. now open for gallery owner/curators to apply to host Scarab's upcoming exhibits! 

Is it possible to mine BCN directly from the client? I'm using mining button but not getting any rewards.

You are not correcting anyone, you only just ridiculed yourself so much and on so many levels that I don't even know where to begin.

You not only didn't understand what I said but not even what I was responding to, and not even what they were talking about.

The first person was talking about bitcoin cash saying that most blocks are under 0.1MB and that there was only one 8MB block and it's not a proof of 8MB blocks working. The correct response to that is that if there ever was even one single 8MB block mined/stored/transported then that exactly is the proof of 8MB blocks working and the fact that there weren't/aren't more has nothing to do with the software, network or miners, because the blocks logically cannot be bigger than how many transactions exist in the mempool at the moment the block is mined. This is such a simple logic that even a 10-year-old would understand that and the fact that he seems to not get it was the DUH moment.

The second person didn't use any of the above valid arguments in his response and instead said that the miners only use bigger blocks when it's needed otherwise they use smaller blocksizes, to which I said that this line of reasoning is nonsense because he is basically saying that the miners could make 8MB blocks but they don't "use" them because it's not needed, implying they have a choice. That is simply not true. The miners don't have such a choice. The only thing miners can decide is to exclude some transactions, so in effect, indirectly, they can make the block smaller than it could be given the number of available mempool transactions. But they absolutely cannot make the block bigger. The miners don't "use" big blocks, the miners don't "use" smaller blocksizes, they don't "use" anything. The only thing that's happening is that the software automatically writes the mempool transactions into the newly discovered block and the only thing that miners can possibly do in this matter is to exclude some of them, that's all that they can do, nothing else. They don't choose any blocksize, they don't use any blocksize, they don't get to decide anything except excluding transactions. Again, I think this, too, is an elementary school logic but maybe I am wrong here, maybe the nuances and semantics are too subtle for young people brains, or maybe it's a language issue.

Now you pompously come here, apparently having no clue what any of us was talking about, irrelevantly showing some line of code that doesn't even exist in any of all 4 bitcoin implementations (it did exist in the bitcoin-core source code but was removed almost 2 years ago - "read the code bro") and has absolutely nothing to do with the matter anyway, and thinking that you are actually correcting anyone? Well, your arrogant and disrespectful behavior just won you a place on my ignore list, kiddo, and I won't even comment on the fact that I am most probably older than your parents.