|
Along with this, Charles regularly receives a bonus in his subscription company, which suggests that he understands a lot. His own posts are very informative. And I think that by the same criteria, Charles will be able to evaluate other users in the future.
Charles, let my little voice be in your support.
|
|
|
|
Maybe ban evasion and multi account, Cheating on some bounty campaign especially Copying other user article work including me.
A loud enough accusation, without clear evidence. You claim that these 2 accounts avoid the ban and use multiple accounts, but for this, you have to provide evidence that I cannot see in any way. Conducting single transactions is not evidence. Do not forget that you are on the forum, as well as on the Internet, and users can communicate with each other. In the future, please be sure of your accusations. |
|
|
|
|
According to my observations, long posts are sometimes very tedious to read. I very often see the indignation of users that it would be nice to shorten a thought in the text, especially since it carries a lot of "water"
But when it comes to merit, great posts are sometimes also rated more for effort than quality. So yes, I agree, all that is needed can be said briefly but clearly. It is the most convenient and not fatiguing in terms of reading.
But I also vote for good large texts that explain some points in the most accessible and understandable way.
|
|
|
|
|
Probably the OP means that the bought bitcoins were considered, as they call it, "dirty"
Today, there is a lot of information about what "dirty bitcoins" are and how not to get caught buying such coins. Probably already from the name, it is clear that they include bitcoins, which were involved in any fraudulent activities, and all those who have anything to do with them are taken into account by the investigation services.
As for the exchanges, if suspected, they have the right to freeze funds. The verification is well done by Chainalysis, which has the Chainalysis KYT product. With its help, the past of cryptocurrencies is revealed. But it is unfair to blame a "bona fide purchaser" who has nothing to do with criminal activity.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin brings me half shock and half hope. After I bought bitcoin, my assets fell by more than half. I had never experienced it before. I panicked and sold it. As a result, I missed the opportunity to accumulate wealth. Up to now, I only have a little bitcoin. I hope it will give me another chance to change my life.
This also happened to me. The first panic, and then mistrust, but later a great chagrin from past sales, as the price rises incredibly. It always stays in the memory. Today, I just don't look at the investments that I have. I have set some deadlines, and I think that I will not go wrong. I don’t make a religion out of Bitcoin, but faith comes from somewhere by itself.
I think every member who enters this forum is usually notified or invited by members who have registered. So how do you know abaut this frorum?
You are thinking wrong. You forget one moment that Bitcoin is becoming very popular, and the global network is becoming more accessible to different parts of the world. I will cite many accounts as an example that came to the forum themselves, because they were interested in Bitcoin, and they should not have been invited, since they were applicants themselves. |
|
|
|
I was told that the money was paid in bitcoin and later it was converted to USD. I thought that they earned bitcoin by watching ads.
I thought this kind of scam didn't exist these days because people know what is Ponzi scheme is. It basically lures naive people with a small percentage they supposedly got per day after staking their Bitcoin and after how many days, they paid you for how many days and later on, they will shut down and you can never hear them again. I had the same opinion, but to my surprise, I typed "earn bitcoins for watching ads" into a Google search to check the relevance of this query. But even today, Google gives a lot of suggestions that beginners can believe in and then be deceived. It also turned out that in addition to Ponzi schemes, people interested in cloud mining are also offered to earn on viewing from their mobile phones and pay for a subscription. But the only thing they do is watch ads, and as a result, they don't earn anything. https://www.trendmicro.com/pl_pl/research/21/h/fake-cryptocurrency-mining-apps-trick-victims-into-watching-ads-.htmlFraudsters will regularly come up with new schemes of deception, as long as people are willing to be deceived because of their ignorance. |
|
|
|
Likewise, in parallel with your question, I would like to ask if the font in the copied post is changed and the post has no source, is that considered plagiarism?
........]
This is plagiarism at best. But according to the reaction of the moderators, this is also not plagiarism.  I don’t think anyone should risk using such methods, but changing the font also hints that the author does not claim authorship. |
|
|
|
Don't think so noble. I am here not only to study, but to make money. I may not participate in the signature plan, but I will pay attention to some altcoin projects. Everyone be honest, I also know that reading is more important, but the choice is greater than the effort. The reason why I came to the Bitcoin forum is not because the information here is timely, but the important thing is that it is not so impetuous. So don't say that you are pure as a prostitute. I just want to make money. This is not wrong.
make money -It is said very loudly.  Funny. Well, everyone has their own plans. Someone is happy with the two cents received from altcoins and bounty programs. Everyone has different values and choices. But as a senior, let me give you a little advice, knowing more will make you gain more. Losing time on all sorts of cheap programs, you lose opportunities. But by setting aside time for understanding and learning, you significantly increase your relevance. But yes, everyone has their own choice. |
|
|
|
In fact, there is nothing wrong with that. The task of any merit source is to evaluate useful posts and ... that's it. We do not guarantee that the user to whom we have sent merit will always adhere to the rules. I believe that it is worth worrying only if you sent merit to posts containing plagiarism. Then you should work on your attentiveness and more carefully check the posting of users before evaluating it.
I watched you want to motivate newbies for a while as you gave them 1 or more merit. Believe me, it was just for fun, nothing more. And I understood your motives very well. But since you yourself said it out loud, then for a quick check you can simply add an extension from prepostseo, or sometimes check the texts from newbies creating themes.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3211920 These people do not want to accept or read the rules, but they quickly learn from whom and how to get merit. By creating new topics, there is a better chance of earning merits. I often complained about plagiarism from newcomers. And you can also understand that not everyone is ready to check any texts, since they do not have time for such checks. But sometimes it makes sense and also teaches others not to abuse trust and start thinking and writing for themselves. |
|
|
|
You raised an interesting question, as I also see several users who think that simply quoting is enough to ensure that the post is not plagiarized. But it seems to me that quoting without specifying the author can be mistaken for plagiarism, since not every user has a desire to look for the author. At the same time, it is also clear that the author himself does not want to claim authorship. Of course, a more convenient option would be to simply add a link, and I don't understand what the problem is with such posters. But I do not consider such posts to be just plagiarism. Likewise, in parallel with your question, I would like to ask if the font in the copied post is changed and the post has no source, is that considered plagiarism? As of late, Live Bitcoin News detailed that stages like PayPal and Venmo were looking to conceivably offer bitcoin and cryptographic money purchasing, exchanging, and offering choices to clients. New proof seems to show that these organizations are basically keen on crypto benefits because of bitcoin's transient ascent during the spread of the coronavirus. I read this news through livebitcoin, its genuine folks
PayPal is allegedly looking to allow customers to purchase BTC and other forms of crypto directly with the PayPal app. The company is potentially looking to compete with companies like Square, which has offered this feature to individuals for some time.
Ethereum is growing popularity has largely been attributed to the rising interest in DeFi projects, what's going on? Will ethereum finally be able to leave it's 3 figure value?
The number of daily addresses interacting with ETH has surge in the past 24 hours to a Two Years single day high of 486,000 addresses! The last time Ethereum's address activity was this high was on May 5th, 2018
There have been many topics about plagiarism created, and I do not want to add another one in order to resolve a similar issue. Thanks.
Imagine you spotted a helpful tip on an image and thought, "Oh, I saw a question on the forum, and this material is the ideal response to the topic," and instead of claiming it, you copied it and put it in a quote since you didn't know the original link? I'm not saying this is what the OP did because I'm not in his head but c'mon the copied content was helpful, now how do we classify such a case?
Just add the link where you got this "useful advice" |
|
|
|
In general, I believe that people posting only the content from a source and having no further opinion of their own, should also be punished, maybe a warning. It's punishment enough to make small adjustments to the rules and give the moderators freedom to delete such posts and threads. When they fail to reach their signature quota, they will first complain about it and then look to change their habits if they want to get paid. Since those low-effort posts are mostly made to up the post count, their goal is to get paid and when they don't, you will get the wanted results. You're right. Recently, I tried to complain to the moderators about topics that were simply copied and had a link to the source but did not have the opinion of the topic author himself. Such topics were removed, but I only complained about topics where there were no answers from other users or there were only two or three answers. From here, we can understand that just copied texts with the source can also be interesting for discussion. But your second statement, where the user can change their habits, is also true. And so it happened. Now he quotes other people's texts, but besides, he writes something from himself. I am glad that he quickly realized his mistakes. I would like to believe that the same will happen to others who simply copy from the Internet with the source without their comments.  |
|
|
|
There are no rules stating that you must contribute to whatever you copy from the Internet; sometimes the topic suffices; however, in this case, the op is a super lazy poster who did not claim the work as his own, and on that note, I do not believe he deserves parmaban for making silly mistakes. As I previously stated, the forum needs to establish a standard on plagiarism.
However, the Pablo James account was banned. Also, yesterday's case with the plagiarism warning of newcomer DanielBroonze about adding a link to his post was also banned. He was warned several times, but he didn't fix anything. Probably not everyone needs it? https://ninjastic.space/topic/5359660As for getting plagiarism out of the archive, and further persecution of the one who committed it, this is madness. And I did not create the topic for this at all. The topic was about human behavior at the time of detection of plagiarism. Trying to deceive anyone, knowing that everything is in the archive, is disgusting. Once again, I respect Mpamaegbu, he didn’t pretend to be innocent, didn’t begin to destroy his mistakes, knowing that everything is already in the know anyway. It is worthy of a man. Accept everything as it is, and then act according to the situation. The act of today's blocked Pablo James is very cowardly. This once again shows who is in front of us. All the more insulting to add a link to the worldwide network, mistaking everyone for idiots. After all, so, everyone understands that all information exists in Google. |
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: DanielBroonzePost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5358856.msg57887591#msg57887591( archive) One of the Journalist Aaron van Wirdum broke the news Tuesday after he visited a McDonald’s restaurant in El Salvador, where he was presented with a printed QR code directing him to an invoice page on Lightning Network.
I think this is the Great Initiative Taken by the McDonald’s in El Salvador
  https://www.thebharatexpressnews.com/mcdonalds-now-accepts-bitcoin-but-only-in-el-salvador/==================================================================================== PlagiarismUser: tnyldzerdm60Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5336297.msg57845077#msg57845077( archive) Here is my analysis and expectation about this coin.
Dogecoin price closed last week with a 17.70% gain. This marks the best weekly return since the beginning of June. At the time of writing, it has boosted monthly gains to 25.50% and nearly hit its price target of $0.291, the previously discussed June 25 high. With the high test on June 25, Dogecoin price is now at an inflection point. If the spike is a technical event due to significant price compression, DOGE should soon retrace below the 50-day SMA and aim for a new correction lower. Alternatively, let's assume this is the start of a sustainable rally. In this case, Dogecoin price could consolidate around the June 25 high of $0.291, forming a branch of the mug with handle pattern that started on June 25.
The measured movement of the bottom of the DOGE mug with handles is 44%, suggesting a price target of $0.417. As long as Dogecoin price stays above the three highs of $0.220 on July 28, $0.222 on July 30, and $0.220 on August 1 on a daily close basis, DOGE should complete its mug pattern and be ready to explore its price target. 0.417 dollars.
 https://latestnews.plus/dogecoin-price-prediction-prepare-for-these-levels/I think,
ETH has a “much higher chance” of reaching this potential for various reasons. For example, the launch of EIP-1559 on August 5 (as of the London hard fork) could turn ETH into a deflationary asset in the future.
Approval of an ETH ETF by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) could be imminent. Because there are currently two ETH ETF proposals before the Commission and they have not been rejected or delayed so far.
Individual investor adoption is on the rise. Ethereum has recently surpassed Bitcoin in daily active wallet addresses.
Public and private institutions are showing interest in Ethereum for both development and investment purposes.
Many institutional investors currently seem to prefer ETH to BTC, in part because Ethereum 2.0 uses PoS consensus.
An Ethereum price prediction of $5,000 to $6,000 can be made by the end of the year.
Another crypto analyst, Lark Davis, who also believes that EIP-1559 helped boost the price of ETH...
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5784/57845185.html https://awsforwp.com/2021/08/15/crypto-analyst-ethereum-eth-price-could-reach-6000-to-7000-by-year-end/========================================================================================= PlagiarismUser: meves99Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5341891.msg57158771#msg57158771( archive) The term 'mining' is closely related to how one gets Bitcoin. Basically, this activity is just a simple description of the computer process to get Bitcoin, which is like mining gold.
For the Bitcoin system to work, people can instruct their computers to process transactions for everyone.
Computers are arranged in such a way, in order to be able to perform very complex calculation processes. From there, the owner of the computer gets a reward in the form of Bitcoin.
Because the calculation process is very complicated, it takes a strong computer to get Bitcoin. This is what is then referred to as 'mining'.
However, the Bitcoin system has been set up in such a way that the calculation process required to acquire Bitcoins becomes more and more difficult as time goes on.
This is done to prevent too many Bitcoins from being generated, and eventually circulating. If someone starts mining now, it may take years before they finally get one Bitcoin
On the other hand, it takes a lot of money to pay for electricity and to assemble a computer powerful enough to be used to mine Bitcoin.
 https://netral.news/en/what-is-bitcoin-and-why-is-it-worth-it-all-pages.html
|
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: sonmezmstf1978Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5336437.msg56977531#msg56977531( archive)
Cryptocurrency can be defined as a digital asset and a virtual element, designed as an alternative means of exchange to cash in terms of the way it works, securing transactions made using encryption (cryptography). Looking around the world, there are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Bitcoin Cash, Ripple, Litecoin, Cardano, Nem, Iota, Stellar, Dash and many more cryptocurrencies. Today, the most famous among cryptocurrencies is Bitcoin, which is the most preferred in the world in terms of transaction volume and constitutes approximately 50% of the crypto money volume. Bitcoin, which was created by a person or community named Satoshi Nakatomo in 2008 and the first transfer was made in 2009, is a digital currency created in the digital environment. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between Bitcoin, a crypto currency, and gold ounce prices and dollar index. In the study, the years between 2012 and 2019 were determined as the period and monthly data were examined. The ARDL Bounds test approach was used as a method to determine the cointegration relationship between the examined variables. As a result of the study, a long-term cointegrated relationship was determined between the gold and foreign exchange price of Bitcoin. With this result, a 1% increase in the gold ounce price in the long term will increase Bitcoin prices by about 15%; He states that a 1-unit increase in the USD index will increase Bitcoin prices by about 0.28%. However, it was concluded that there is no cointegrated relationship between the variables in the short run.
I have such a resource, I hope it was useful for the problem.
 https://www.turkishstudies.net/economy?mod=makale_ing_ozet&makale_id=42650
|
|
|
|
<Snip> I am looking at LoyceV quote from your OP. He seems to suggest that people should follow the links to get to the original source where the content came from. Personally, I don't think that's necessary. If I used this thread of yours as a source for something I am writing, I need to give credit to you by mentioning your thread as the source of some of the info I got. I shouldn't have to research what you used. It's your task to point to your sources if you used some to write a particular thread. I do not agree. In this case, you can add any link that has nothing to do with the text at all. And this once again exposes the user to a ban. It's just that everything is elementary, if someone copies from somewhere, it shouldn't be a problem for him to copy and paste the source into his text, especially since it is nearby Edit: I'll clarify, an example with the addition of Google as a source of information can also be evidence, in the opinion of the person who added the source. But I'm not talking about scouring the internet for the original. Sometimes this is simply not possible. Apparently because the link to the archive is not proof and the moderator needs a post on the forum. If he looks at the current post and everything is fixed there, there is no reason for a ban. I hardly post these posts at all. Why do you need this bewilderment when making a decision by a moderator? If you want the user to be punished by a ban, do not inform him. When you find a report, just click the Report button and wait for the moderator's decision. If the moderator did not react, then you can tell the community about it. And so, in fact, this topic is a good warning for violators to have time to correct their mistakes. Deprive them of this opportunity, and just do not publish material about them before the ban.  This is where I saw the problem. Seeing the time when the plagiarism complaint appeared, and the further editing time, is not a problem for moderators. Therefore, I conclude that it is considered acceptable for the administration to add sources. And also, by sending several reports directly to the moderators, you don't have to wait for the user's ban at all, provided that the text has been well edited and changed. Everything that I send to the moderators in the plagiarism topic is processed in the best possible way. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
